LogFAQs > #979863663

bfslick50 posted...

It should be obvious and yet here we are spelling it out for you. You said the "death toll would be higher if it was a genocide" implying you've concluded it's definitively not a genocide and that "international courts refuse to call it a genocide" implying the courts agreed with your decision when in fact very much have not reached that conclusion or any conclusion.

Yes, and then someone posted reasons why it was a genocide, and I told them why they were wrong, did you miss the past like, 30-40 posts?

Also I never concluded it wasn't a genocide, I simply said that no courts have called it a genocide as of yet.

IceCreamOnStero posted...

Why is Israel striking targets they know have human shields placed at them?

Because Hamas is shooting rockets/munitions from those places? Kind of obvious that those become legitimate targets, also why the assumption that Israel would expect there to still be civilians there after the warnings to leave?