LogFAQs > #980176727

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	SC declines to block enforcement of age-verification requirements for porn sites
loafy013 04/30/24 7:06:23 PM #175:	Robot2600 posted... we knew this was a bad fucking idea in 1997 yet somehow, almost 30 years later we've regressed to pre-1960s levels of maturity surrounding sexuality. even if you agree with this law for some unknown reason, the implications are very bad. then books start to be labeled "porn" then even bikini pics are labeled "porn" (sound fucking familiar?) and now M-rated games are "porn" then R-rated movies are porn then pg-13 movies etc I think you're overthinking what will happen. I don't see them labeling random stuff porn. Being Texas, what will be labelled porn is anything regarding LGBTQ+ stuff that implies they are people like anybody else. --- The ball is round, the game lasts 90 minutes. That's fact. Everything else, is theory. <cite>loafy013 posted [p:980176727] in SC decline... [t:80759244]...</cite> <quote>Robot2600 posted... </cite><quote>we knew this was a bad fucking idea in 1997 yet somehow, almost 30 years later we've regressed to pre-1960s levels of maturity surrounding sexuality.even if you agree with this law for some unknown reason, the implications are very bad.then books start to be labeled "porn"then even bikini pics are labeled "porn" (sound fucking familiar?)and now M-rated games are "porn"then R-rated movies are pornthen pg-13 moviesetc</quote>I think you're overthinking what will happen. I don't see them labeling random stuff porn. Being Texas, what will be labelled porn is anything regarding LGBTQ+ stuff that implies they are people like anybody else. --- The ball is round, the game lasts 90 minutes. That's fact.Everything else, is theory.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1