LogFAQs > #984120548

Dio posted...

Tbf she brought out evidence. That's usually way more then how these usually go. It's really unfortunate it turns out she wasn't being honest.

I was personally convinced as well, honestly. Hell that's why I made this topic. But if I had actual skin in the game, I would have waited it out just to be sure. Like, if I was one of those youtuber friends of his.

But I will say, looking back, the evidence never was as fool proof as everyone made it out to be. Tons of stuff she showed had a lot of redacted things in it. Also, that cease and desist letter, there were two dropbox links that were empty, in addition to that youtube link. She never explained those dropbox links. Why did nobody discuss them? Why did nobody ask what they were? They were clearly a huge missing point of information looking back. They were links to more content that the cease and desist letter were talking about. Unlisted videos directly addressing Daniel and Kayla. But did anyone wait to learn the information about those dropbox links? Nope!

Also, in general, people always say "why would anyone fake a SA case? What do they have to gain?" I have always been against that line of logic. It's such a naive way to look at the world. Why would anyone do anything illegal and immoral? Why would a man murder a person? Because they're crazy! It's looking like this person has some serious mental problems and is a jilted lover. That's all the reason a person needs to spin a wild tale like this.