LogFAQs > #984849144

It's either about requiring Democrats to actually be supportive of some vulnerable minority groups or actually defending social programs. There's little else it could be.

And his entire schtick is getting mad at people not loudly, reflexively, and eternally supporting the Democratic Party and refusing the criticize them for any reason, regardless of what they do or don't do. Unless of course it's one of his specific pet peeves like not being nice enough to men who can't get dates and vote fascist over it.

If she came out tomorrow and said it was about dropping defense of immigrants, LGBT people, black people in order to win elections, etc, he'd be madder at the people who disagreed with that than he would be at Slotkin. At least if his entire posting history is something to judge by.