LogFAQs > #986144806

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Gavin Newsom Surges in 2028 Presidential Primary Poll
Daremo 08/19/25 7:33:47 PM #352:	WingsOfGood posted... again you still fail to understand partisan blinders you literally don't fucking understand what you even wrote here let ai help you AI Overview so in reference to a man running for a 3rd term what political PARTY affiliation or IDEOLOGY is blinding me? like holy fucking moly spaghettios let me break it down for you what you are doing you want to try so hard to not seem to be partisan that you are an independent thinker that you are willing to let a man win his 3rd term breaking the constitution and democracy itself and becoming a dictator but hey, at least you didn't vote blue no matter who right? More evidence your reading comprehension is in the gutter. Daremo posted... No issue stopped me from supporting Harris. I voted for her and encouraged others to do the same. Daremo posted... A lot of Americans are idiots. They do not see the 'greater good'. You cannot get them to vote for someone who isn't at least pretending to cater to their narrow interests. Daremo posted... This is not an ideological view, it is entirely pragmatic. Daremo posted... Partisan blinders is running the Democrat course without looking around to see if that course leads to victory. I'm looking for the path to victory. If it leads to Newsom(it doesn't), well and good. If it leads away from Newsom, well and good. Right now, 3 years out it's impossible to say who should be the Democratic nominee. From here, Newsom looks very bad if you evaluate him objectively. If, however, you Exhibit motivated reasoning and motivated skepticism and Find it difficult to evaluate performance objectively you might be tempted to latch on to a person prematurely, and attempt to elevate them to an untenable position that will result in the ultimate failure of your goals. I don't want my goal of seeing the end of maga to fail. I want to carefully consider every option. If you want to cherry pick my words, cherry pick those two sentences and tell me where you disagree. Or is the vanity of small differences to big for you to see past? --- Cynic, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. - Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary <cite>Daremo posted [p:986144806] in Gavin News... [t:81029152]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>again you still fail to understand partisan blindersyou literally don't fucking understand what you even wrotehere let ai help youAI Overviewso in reference to a man running for a 3rd termwhat political PARTY affiliation or IDEOLOGY is blinding me?like holy fucking moly spaghettioslet me break it down for you what you are doingyou want to try so hard to not seem to be partisan that you are an independent thinker that you are willing to let a man win his 3rd term breaking the constitution and democracy itself and becoming a dictatorbut hey, at least you didn't vote blue no matter who right?</quote>More evidence your reading comprehension is in the gutter.Daremo posted... </cite><quote>No issue stopped me from supporting Harris. I voted for her and encouraged others to do the same.</quote>Daremo posted... </cite><quote>A lot of Americans are idiots. They do not see the 'greater good'. You cannot get them to vote for someone who isn't at least pretending to cater to their narrow interests.</quote>Daremo posted... </cite><quote>This is not an ideological view, it is entirely pragmatic.</quote>Daremo posted... </cite><quote>Partisan blinders is running the Democrat course without looking around to see if that course leads to victory. I'm looking for the path to victory. If it leads to Newsom(it doesn't), well and good. If it leads away from Newsom, well and good.</quote>Right now, 3 years out it's impossible to say who should be the Democratic nominee. From here, Newsom looks very bad if you evaluate him objectively. If, however, you <quote>Exhibit motivated reasoning and motivated skepticism</quote>and<quote>Find it difficult to evaluate performance objectively</quote>you might be tempted to latch on to a person prematurely, and attempt to elevate them to an untenable position that will result in the ultimate failure of your goals.I don't want my goal of seeing the end of maga to fail.I want to carefully consider every option.If you want to cherry pick my words, cherry pick those two sentences and tell me where you disagree. Or is the vanity of small differences to big for you to see past? --- Cynic, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. - Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1