Current Events > Watch dogs 2 is a good game.

Topic List	Page List: 1
pres_madagascar 09/06/17 9:44:29 AM #1:	Good fun --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886119772] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>Good fun</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 09/06/17 9:46:39 AM #2:	I only recently got around to playing the first one, and was surprised at how much I enjoyed it. I loved being able to snoop on NPCs, it really made the world feel like it was populated by actual people. --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg http://i.imgur.com/8kjZU.jpg <cite>eston posted [p:886119853] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>I only recently got around to playing the first one, and was surprised at how much I enjoyed it. I loved being able to snoop on NPCs, it really made the world feel like it was populated by actual people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Back_Stabbath 09/06/17 9:46:46 AM #3:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDN9miAspw8 --- please help <cite>Back_Stabbath posted [p:886119856] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDN9miAspw8</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/06/17 10:37:27 AM #4:	Honestly, the sequel is better in every way so far. This is what the first game should have been. Basically high tech modern day assassins creed. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886121784] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>Honestly, the sequel is better in every way so far. This is what the first game should have been. Basically high tech modern day assassins creed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/06/17 10:08:05 PM #5:	The game is solid as fuck gameplay wise, but the way every9ne dresses is just ridiculous, no one dresses like this.i made my guy as normal looking as possible. Also the story is ass. The gameplay more than makes up for it. So many different ways to hack the city now compared to the first. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886158732] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>The game is solid as fuck gameplay wise, but the way every9ne dresses is just ridiculous, no one dresses like this.i made my guy as normal looking as possible. Also the story is ass. The gameplay more than makes up for it. So many different ways to hack the city now compared to the first.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Behaviorism 09/06/17 10:11:58 PM #6:	pres_madagascar posted... The game is solid as fuck gameplay wise, but the way every9ne dresses is just ridiculous, no one dresses like this.i made my guy as normal looking as possible. Also the story is ass. The gameplay more than makes up for it. So many different ways to hack the city now compared to the first. EH, I'd bang the chick with the sideways ponytail(forgot her name). She looked like she could take a pounding --- Taryn Terrell has returned to GFW!!!!!!!!! <cite>Behaviorism posted [p:886158956] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote>The game is solid as fuck gameplay wise, but the way every9ne dresses is just ridiculous, no one dresses like this.i made my guy as normal looking as possible. Also the story is ass. The gameplay more than makes up for it. So many different ways to hack the city now compared to the first.</quote> EH, I'd bang the chick with the sideways ponytail(forgot her name). She looked like she could take a pounding</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/06/17 10:18:18 PM #7:	Behaviorism posted... pres_madagascar posted... The game is solid as fuck gameplay wise, but the way every9ne dresses is just ridiculous, no one dresses like this.i made my guy as normal looking as possible. Also the story is ass. The gameplay more than makes up for it. So many different ways to hack the city now compared to the first. EH, I'd bang the chick with the sideways ponytail(forgot her name). She looked like she could take a pounding The one in your hacker crew with the septum nose piercing? The "graphical artist"? --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886159286] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>Behaviorism posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote>The game is solid as fuck gameplay wise, but the way every9ne dresses is just ridiculous, no one dresses like this.i made my guy as normal looking as possible. Also the story is ass. The gameplay more than makes up for it. So many different ways to hack the city now compared to the first.</quote> EH, I'd bang the chick with the sideways ponytail(forgot her name). She looked like she could take a pounding</quote> The one in your hacker crew with the septum nose piercing? The "graphical artist"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Behaviorism 09/06/17 10:21:19 PM #8:	Yes, pretty much the only woman in the game lol --- Taryn Terrell has returned to GFW!!!!!!!!! <cite>Behaviorism posted [p:886159444] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>Yes, pretty much the only woman in the game lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CarlGrimes 09/06/17 10:22:03 PM #9:	Behaviorism posted... pres_madagascar posted... The game is solid as fuck gameplay wise, but the way every9ne dresses is just ridiculous, no one dresses like this.i made my guy as normal looking as possible. Also the story is ass. The gameplay more than makes up for it. So many different ways to hack the city now compared to the first. EH, I'd bang the chick with the sideways ponytail(forgot her name). She looked like she could take a pounding The Indian chick? Yeah she was pretty hot. --- You'll get a funeral if you don't wise up and call me....Carl Poppa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9aM9Ch97U8 <cite>CarlGrimes posted [p:886159482] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>Behaviorism posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote>The game is solid as fuck gameplay wise, but the way every9ne dresses is just ridiculous, no one dresses like this.i made my guy as normal looking as possible. Also the story is ass. The gameplay more than makes up for it. So many different ways to hack the city now compared to the first.</quote> EH, I'd bang the chick with the sideways ponytail(forgot her name). She looked like she could take a pounding</quote> The Indian chick? Yeah she was pretty hot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/06/17 10:22:28 PM #10:	The clothing is what's weird lol --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886159506] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>The clothing is what's weird lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 09/06/17 10:31:55 PM #11:	Much lighter in tone than the first game. --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:886159993] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>Much lighter in tone than the first game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/06/17 10:32:53 PM #12:	Lol ubitrash <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886160033] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/06/17 11:57:29 PM #13:	jumi posted... Much lighter in tone than the first game. Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser OEIO999 posted... Lol ubitrash Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886164224] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>Much lighter in tone than the first game.</quote> Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser <cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate 09/06/17 11:58:30 PM #14:	I enjoyed the game also, I never played the first. I liked taking control of cars on the road and slamming them into traffic and causing big wrecks. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:886164273] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>I enjoyed the game also, I never played the first. I liked taking control of cars on the road and slamming them into traffic and causing big wrecks.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MabusIncarnate 09/06/17 11:59:25 PM #15:	OEIO999 posted... Lol ubitrash Is your sole purpose on these boards to be a bag of shit to everyone in every thread you open? Just wondering. --- Ten million dollars on a losing campaign Twenty million starving and writhing in pain <cite>MabusIncarnate posted [p:886164334] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> Is your sole purpose on these boards to be a bag of shit to everyone in every thread you open? Just wondering.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 12:00:19 AM #16:	MabusIncarnate posted... I enjoyed the game also, I never played the first. I liked taking control of cars on the road and slamming them into traffic and causing big wrecks. As someone who played the first, the amount of new ways to hack the city is great, the first was rather limited. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886164375] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote>I enjoyed the game also, I never played the first. I liked taking control of cars on the road and slamming them into traffic and causing big wrecks.</quote> As someone who played the first, the amount of new ways to hack the city is great, the first was rather limited.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GOATSLAYER 09/07/17 12:02:09 AM #17:	I played the time trial/ demo and I didn't like it as much as I expected to --- Hide your kids, hide your goats <cite>GOATSLAYER posted [p:886164447] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>I played the time trial/ demo and I didn't like it as much as I expected to</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 12:13:09 AM #18:	GOATSLAYER posted... I played the time trial/ demo and I didn't like it as much as I expected to To be entirely fair, the game doesn't really hit it's stride until you have some more abilities unlocked and all the gadgets. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886164954] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>GOATSLAYER posted...</cite> <quote>I played the time trial/ demo and I didn't like it as much as I expected to</quote> To be entirely fair, the game doesn't really hit it's stride until you have some more abilities unlocked and all the gadgets.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/07/17 1:32:52 AM #19:	MabusIncarnate posted... OEIO999 posted... Lol ubitrash Is your sole purpose on these boards to be a bag of shit to everyone in every thread you open? Just wondering. Since you're following me around like a good little pet, you should answer that yourself. Not like someone of your upbringing has the mental capacity to comprehend what intellectually superiors say. Now go back to where you belong. <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886167977] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>MabusIncarnate posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> Is your sole purpose on these boards to be a bag of shit to everyone in every thread you open? Just wondering.</quote> Since you're following me around like a good little pet, you should answer that yourself. Not like someone of your upbringing has the mental capacity to comprehend what intellectually superiors say. Now go back to where you belong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/07/17 1:35:55 AM #20:	pres_madagascar posted... jumi posted... Much lighter in tone than the first game. Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser OEIO999 posted... Lol ubitrash Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times. The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype. <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886168079] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>Much lighter in tone than the first game.</quote> Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser <cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times.</quote> The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 5:04:11 AM #21:	OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... jumi posted... Much lighter in tone than the first game. Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser OEIO999 posted... Lol ubitrash Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times. The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype. Ac syndicate was solid, far cry 4 was solid, woodlands is solid. Their aaa games are usually just solid at best, never amazing, but their ubi art games are good --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886172872] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>Much lighter in tone than the first game.</quote> Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser <cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times.</quote> The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype.</quote> Ac syndicate was solid, far cry 4 was solid, woodlands is solid. Their aaa games are usually just solid at best, never amazing, but their ubi art games are good</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lonestar2000 09/07/17 5:19:01 AM #22:	I wish Siege had a campaign, I really enjoyed those in the older R6 games. --- Rumble Roses. Someone enters the room. Them: O_O Me: What?! I always play games without my pants on!- Inmate 922335 #ImpeachTrump <cite>Lonestar2000 posted [p:886173124] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>I wish Siege had a campaign, I really enjoyed those in the older R6 games.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/07/17 6:37:54 AM #23:	pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... jumi posted... Much lighter in tone than the first game. Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser OEIO999 posted... Lol ubitrash Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times. The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype. Ac syndicate was solid, far cry 4 was solid, woodlands is solid. Their aaa games are usually just solid at best, never amazing, but their ubi art games are good http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands/critic-reviews http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-the-division http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/tom-clancys-the-division The players have most of these games hovering 6+. These games are HARDLY anything to praise. Far Cry Primal was the latest one. 4 was solid, but a clear drop in quality from 2 and 3. Admittedly Watch Dogs 2 is better than these, but my point was Ubi is trash. AC2, FC3 and some of the previous Tom Clancy games were great. Remember Prince of Persia Sands of time? Those days are gone. <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886174443] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>Much lighter in tone than the first game.</quote> Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser <cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times.</quote> The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype.</quote> Ac syndicate was solid, far cry 4 was solid, woodlands is solid. Their aaa games are usually just solid at best, never amazing, but their ubi art games are good</quote> http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands/critic-reviews http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-the-division http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/tom-clancys-the-division The players have most of these games hovering 6+. These games are HARDLY anything to praise. Far Cry Primal was the latest one. 4 was solid, but a clear drop in quality from 2 and 3. Admittedly Watch Dogs 2 is better than these, but my point was Ubi is trash. AC2, FC3 and some of the previous Tom Clancy games were great. Remember Prince of Persia Sands of time? Those days are gone.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#24	Post #24 was unavailable or deleted.
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 8:30:28 AM #25:	OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... jumi posted... Much lighter in tone than the first game. Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser OEIO999 posted... Lol ubitrash Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times. The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype. Ac syndicate was solid, far cry 4 was solid, woodlands is solid. Their aaa games are usually just solid at best, never amazing, but their ubi art games are good http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands/critic-reviews http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-the-division http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/tom-clancys-the-division The players have most of these games hovering 6+. These games are HARDLY anything to praise. Far Cry Primal was the latest one. 4 was solid, but a clear drop in quality from 2 and 3. Admittedly Watch Dogs 2 is better than these, but my point was Ubi is trash. AC2, FC3 and some of the previous Tom Clancy games were great. Remember Prince of Persia Sands of time? Those days are gone. Lol metacritic determining my personal tastes. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886176974] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>Much lighter in tone than the first game.</quote> Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser <cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times.</quote> The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype.</quote> Ac syndicate was solid, far cry 4 was solid, woodlands is solid. Their aaa games are usually just solid at best, never amazing, but their ubi art games are good</quote> http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands/critic-reviews http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-the-division http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/tom-clancys-the-division The players have most of these games hovering 6+. These games are HARDLY anything to praise. Far Cry Primal was the latest one. 4 was solid, but a clear drop in quality from 2 and 3. Admittedly Watch Dogs 2 is better than these, but my point was Ubi is trash. AC2, FC3 and some of the previous Tom Clancy games were great. Remember Prince of Persia Sands of time? Those days are gone.</quote> Lol metacritic determining my personal tastes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/07/17 8:31:39 AM #26:	pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... jumi posted... Much lighter in tone than the first game. Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser OEIO999 posted... Lol ubitrash Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times. The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype. Ac syndicate was solid, far cry 4 was solid, woodlands is solid. Their aaa games are usually just solid at best, never amazing, but their ubi art games are good http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands/critic-reviews http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-the-division http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/tom-clancys-the-division The players have most of these games hovering 6+. These games are HARDLY anything to praise. Far Cry Primal was the latest one. 4 was solid, but a clear drop in quality from 2 and 3. Admittedly Watch Dogs 2 is better than these, but my point was Ubi is trash. AC2, FC3 and some of the previous Tom Clancy games were great. Remember Prince of Persia Sands of time? Those days are gone. Lol metacritic determining my personal tastes. I could just call those games shit, if you'd like. <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886177004] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>Much lighter in tone than the first game.</quote> Which isn't a bad thing. Aiden was an annoying brooding loser <cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote>Lol ubitrash</quote> Their business practices are shit but they do make decent games at times.</quote> The days of Ubisoft making good games are long past, now they are wannabe EA. All they do now days is false advertise, the first Watch dogs is a strong representation of it. Their games now are mostly average. I remember how excited people got for Division, all the while I kept thinking, it's Ubisoft, it's just hype.</quote> Ac syndicate was solid, far cry 4 was solid, woodlands is solid. Their aaa games are usually just solid at best, never amazing, but their ubi art games are good</quote> http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/assassins-creed-syndicate http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/far-cry-primal http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/tom-clancys-ghost-recon-wildlands/critic-reviews http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/tom-clancys-the-division http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/tom-clancys-the-division The players have most of these games hovering 6+. These games are HARDLY anything to praise. Far Cry Primal was the latest one. 4 was solid, but a clear drop in quality from 2 and 3. Admittedly Watch Dogs 2 is better than these, but my point was Ubi is trash. AC2, FC3 and some of the previous Tom Clancy games were great. Remember Prince of Persia Sands of time? Those days are gone.</quote> Lol metacritic determining my personal tastes.</quote> I could just call those games shit, if you'd like.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 8:35:10 AM #27:	OEIO999 posted... I could just call those games shit, if you'd like. Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886177106] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote> I could just call those games shit, if you'd like.</quote> Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/07/17 8:38:23 AM #28:	pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... I could just call those games shit, if you'd like. Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid. No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees. <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886177184] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote> I could just call those games shit, if you'd like.</quote> Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid.</quote> No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 8:41:47 AM #29:	OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... I could just call those games shit, if you'd like. Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid. No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees. Lol you have a stick so far up your ass you can lick it. I love how you assume middl3 of the road is shit. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886177277] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote> I could just call those games shit, if you'd like.</quote> Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid.</quote> No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees.</quote> Lol you have a stick so far up your ass you can lick it. I love how you assume middl3 of the road is shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/07/17 8:45:29 AM #30:	pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... I could just call those games shit, if you'd like. Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid. No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees. Lol you have a stick so far up your ass you can lick it. I love how you assume middl3 of the road is shit. Ubisoft sheel is trying to tell me I am not allowed to call a game shit, even though metacritic has rated it understandably low. You should wack yourself over the head with that stick, it'd do you some good. And you must've scored 50 in school and thought you were the next fucking Steven Hawkins. Well you nailed the psychical part of it. <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886177381] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote> I could just call those games shit, if you'd like.</quote> Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid.</quote> No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees.</quote> Lol you have a stick so far up your ass you can lick it. I love how you assume middl3 of the road is shit.</quote> Ubisoft sheel is trying to tell me I am not allowed to call a game shit, even though metacritic has rated it understandably low. You should wack yourself over the head with that stick, it'd do you some good. And you must've scored 50 in school and thought you were the next fucking Steven Hawkins. Well you nailed the psychical part of it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 9:06:23 AM #31:	OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... I could just call those games shit, if you'd like. Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid. No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees. Lol you have a stick so far up your ass you can lick it. I love how you assume middl3 of the road is shit. Ubisoft sheel is trying to tell me I am not allowed to call a game shit, even though metacritic has rated it understandably low. You should wack yourself over the head with that stick, it'd do you some good. And you must've scored 50 in school and thought you were the next fucking Steven Hawkins. Well you nailed the psychical part of it. insult someone's intelligence misspell whack as wack, shill as sheel, Stephen hawking as Hawkins, and physical as psychical. Lmfao --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886178036] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote> I could just call those games shit, if you'd like.</quote> Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid.</quote> No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees.</quote> Lol you have a stick so far up your ass you can lick it. I love how you assume middl3 of the road is shit.</quote> Ubisoft sheel is trying to tell me I am not allowed to call a game shit, even though metacritic has rated it understandably low. You should wack yourself over the head with that stick, it'd do you some good. And you must've scored 50 in school and thought you were the next fucking Steven Hawkins. Well you nailed the psychical part of it.</quote> insult someone's intelligence misspell whack as wack, shill as sheel, Stephen hawking as Hawkins, and physical as psychical. Lmfao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 9:07:48 AM #32:	Also, in what world is a 76% average "shit". --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886178080] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>Also, in what world is a 76% average "shit".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 09/07/17 9:13:47 AM #33:	I've found that I enjoy quite a lot of Ubisoft's games. My only complaint, if you can even call it that, is that there's often too much to do in the way of side quests and general map clean-up. It can make the games feel like they lack focus. I honestly don't get the hate boner people have for this company as a whole --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg http://i.imgur.com/8kjZU.jpg <cite>eston posted [p:886178322] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>I've found that I enjoy quite a lot of Ubisoft's games. My only complaint, if you can even call it that, is that there's often too much to do in the way of side quests and general map clean-up. It can make the games feel like they lack focus. I honestly don't get the hate boner people have for this company as a whole</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 9:16:36 AM #34:	eston posted... I've found that I enjoy quite a lot of Ubisoft's games. My only complaint, if you can even call it that, is that there's often too much to do in the way of side quests and general map clean-up. It can make the games feel like they lack focus. I honestly don't get the hate boner people have for this company as a whole Business practices. Same as square enix and Bethesda. But most of their games do lack focus. I was glad watch dogs 2 did away with the fucking towers --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886178441] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>eston posted...</cite> <quote>I've found that I enjoy quite a lot of Ubisoft's games. My only complaint, if you can even call it that, is that there's often too much to do in the way of side quests and general map clean-up. It can make the games feel like they lack focus. I honestly don't get the hate boner people have for this company as a whole</quote> Business practices. Same as square enix and Bethesda. But most of their games do lack focus. I was glad watch dogs 2 did away with the fucking towers</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 09/07/17 9:20:22 AM #35:	Business practices. Same as square enix and Bethesda This doesn't really tell me much tbqh, because I usually like those companies' games too. Is it a microtransactions thing? --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg http://i.imgur.com/8kjZU.jpg <cite>eston posted [p:886178580] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><quote>Business practices. Same as square enix and Bethesda</quote> This doesn't really tell me much tbqh, because I usually like those companies' games too. Is it a microtransactions thing?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 9:23:43 AM #36:	eston posted... Business practices. Same as square enix and Bethesda This doesn't really tell me much tbqh, because I usually like those companies' games too. Is it a microtransactions thing? Microtransactionz, withholding content, buggy as shit half finished games, etc.. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886178714] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>eston posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Business practices. Same as square enix and Bethesda</quote> This doesn't really tell me much tbqh, because I usually like those companies' games too. Is it a microtransactions thing?</quote> Microtransactionz, withholding content, buggy as shit half finished games, etc..</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 09/07/17 9:23:44 AM #37:	WD2 is good, as someone who never played WD1. The techy stuff makes it more enjoyable as a sandbox than like GTA, being able to toy around with people/police is fun. There are some neat platforming puzzles, too, which is not something I expected. But there's something off about car handling, and I haven't gotten around to actually beating the game. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:886178717] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>WD2 is good, as someone who never played WD1. The techy stuff makes it more enjoyable as a sandbox than like GTA, being able to toy around with people/police is fun. There are some neat platforming puzzles, too, which is not something I expected. But there's something off about car handling, and I haven't gotten around to actually beating the game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 9:24:29 AM #38:	Antifar posted... WD2 is good, as someone who never played WD1. The techy stuff makes it more enjoyable as a sandbox than like GTA, being able to toy around with people/police is fun. There are some neat platforming puzzles, too, which is not something I expected. But there's something off about car handling, and I haven't gotten around to actually beating the game. First game had the same handling. It's very very floaty. Like the cars have no weight. --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886178747] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>WD2 is good, as someone who never played WD1. The techy stuff makes it more enjoyable as a sandbox than like GTA, being able to toy around with people/police is fun. There are some neat platforming puzzles, too, which is not something I expected. But there's something off about car handling, and I haven't gotten around to actually beating the game.</quote> First game had the same handling. It's very very floaty. Like the cars have no weight.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 09/07/17 9:29:29 AM #39:	pres_madagascar posted... eston posted... Business practices. Same as square enix and Bethesda This doesn't really tell me much tbqh, because I usually like those companies' games too. Is it a microtransactions thing? Microtransactionz, withholding content, buggy as shit half finished games, etc.. Fair enough, although these seem like pretty subjective issues. I haven't played an Ubi game that felt half-finished IMO, and I haven't really noticed anything that felt as though content was being withheld. And I've never spent a dime on microtransactions --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg http://i.imgur.com/8kjZU.jpg <cite>eston posted [p:886178942] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eston posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Business practices. Same as square enix and Bethesda</quote> This doesn't really tell me much tbqh, because I usually like those companies' games too. Is it a microtransactions thing?</quote> Microtransactionz, withholding content, buggy as shit half finished games, etc..</quote> Fair enough, although these seem like pretty subjective issues. I haven't played an Ubi game that felt half-finished IMO, and I haven't really noticed anything that felt as though content was being withheld. And I've never spent a dime on microtransactions</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/07/17 9:38:49 AM #40:	pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... pres_madagascar posted... OEIO999 posted... I could just call those games shit, if you'd like. Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid. No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees. Lol you have a stick so far up your ass you can lick it. I love how you assume middl3 of the road is shit. Ubisoft sheel is trying to tell me I am not allowed to call a game shit, even though metacritic has rated it understandably low. You should wack yourself over the head with that stick, it'd do you some good. And you must've scored 50 in school and thought you were the next fucking Steven Hawkins. Well you nailed the psychical part of it. insult someone's intelligence misspell whack as wack, shill as sheel, Stephen hawking as Hawkins, and physical as psychical. Lmfao You're the one claiming having low rating is somehow solid. Not me. I never claimed to be smarted than you oh god Stephen Hawking. Also, in what world is a 76% average "s**". The user vote was 6.1. That's out of 10, if you were wondering. Shit is an exaggeration to you calling it 'solid', since when is a 6.1/76% solid? <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886179286] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OEIO999 posted...</cite> <quote> I could just call those games shit, if you'd like.</quote> Literally all the games you linked except syndicate are pretty shit. Division was ass. Primal was even more a reskin than fc4. Syndicate however was a solid game. Not amazing. Solid.</quote> No syndicate wasn't solid, It was shit and metacritic agrees.</quote> Lol you have a stick so far up your ass you can lick it. I love how you assume middl3 of the road is shit.</quote> Ubisoft sheel is trying to tell me I am not allowed to call a game shit, even though metacritic has rated it understandably low. You should wack yourself over the head with that stick, it'd do you some good. And you must've scored 50 in school and thought you were the next fucking Steven Hawkins. Well you nailed the psychical part of it.</quote> insult someone's intelligence misspell whack as wack, shill as sheel, Stephen hawking as Hawkins, and physical as psychical. Lmfao</quote> You're the one claiming having low rating is somehow solid. Not me. I never claimed to be smarted than you oh god Stephen Hawking. <quote>Also, in what world is a 76% average "s**". </quote> The user vote was 6.1. That's out of 10, if you were wondering. Shit is an exaggeration to you calling it 'solid', since when is a 6.1/76% solid?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pres_madagascar 09/07/17 9:53:55 AM #41:	5/10 is considered average, bro. This games are only good if they're 8 or above thing is pretty jacked --- http://i.imgur.com/23CCcZB.jpg http://i.imgur.com/32mwCo1.jpg http://i.imgur.com/oqklqKC.jpg <cite>pres_madagascar posted [p:886179888] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>5/10 is considered average, bro. This games are only good if they're 8 or above thing is pretty jacked</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OEIO999 09/07/17 9:56:52 AM #42:	pres_madagascar posted... 5/10 is considered average, bro. This games are only good if they're 8 or above thing is pretty jacked Depends on where you look at I guess, cause the user score was 6.1 and that being nearly average, is a far stretch to call it 'solid'. But hey I will be the nice guy and stop calling Syndicate shit, you happy now? <cite>OEIO999 posted [p:886180007] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote><cite>pres_madagascar posted...</cite> <quote>5/10 is considered average, bro. This games are only good if they're 8 or above thing is pretty jacked</quote> Depends on where you look at I guess, cause the user score was 6.1 and that being nearly average, is a far stretch to call it 'solid'. But hey I will be the nice guy and stop calling Syndicate shit, you happy now?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mystery_Mission 09/07/17 9:58:55 AM #43:	user votes on metacritic don't matter lmao <cite>Mystery_Mission posted [p:886180083] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>user votes on metacritic don't matter lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lonestar2000 09/07/17 10:03:06 AM #44:	Sitara is pretty hot, wish there was SFM porn of her. --- Rumble Roses. Someone enters the room. Them: O_O Me: What?! I always play games without my pants on!- Inmate 922335 #ImpeachTrump <cite>Lonestar2000 posted [p:886180240] in Watch dogs... [t:75746977]...</cite> <quote>Sitara is pretty hot, wish there was SFM porn of her.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#45	Post #45 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Watch dogs 2 is a good game. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Watch dogs 2 is a good game.