Current Events > 12,000 people or all cats. You must sacrifice one.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Turtlebread 12/13/18 9:14:38 AM #151:	this topic really brought in the crazies i guess this confirms the correlation --- https://imgur.com/yCW15Zn <cite>Turtlebread posted [p:914050364] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>this topic really brought in the crazies i guess this confirms the correlation</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Caution999 12/13/18 9:17:34 AM #152:	Crazy or not, the only choice is to pick the cats. Would hurt humans less. If you don't learn from history, you're doomed to repeat it. Stupid humans that thought cats were "evil" decided to start killing them. Didn't work out well for them. Helped spread the Plague. --- The best posts, believe me. <cite>Caution999 posted [p:914050446] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Crazy or not, the only choice is to pick the cats. Would hurt humans less. If you don't learn from history, you're doomed to repeat it. Stupid humans that thought cats were "evil" decided to start killing them. Didn't work out well for them. Helped spread the Plague.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sevens1997 12/13/18 9:17:59 AM #153:	The only people choosing cats just hate them because they're not as obedient as dogs. Change cats to dogs in this scenario, and I guarantee their answers change. Not that they'll admit it. Narcissists seldom admit to being such. --- http://sevens1997.filmaf.com/owned Reading Royals - 2013 Kelly Cup Champions <cite>sevens1997 posted [p:914050467] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>The only people choosing cats just hate them because they're not as obedient as dogs. Change cats to dogs in this scenario, and I guarantee their answers change. Not that they'll admit it. Narcissists seldom admit to being such.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aressar 12/13/18 9:19:58 AM #154:	Caution999 posted... gp1829 posted... Are people in this topic actually debating the merits of "a really big fire to kill all the rats" damn this is stupid. They weren't paying attention during the "circle of life" scene in Lion King. Every creature exists for a reason. Everything is kept in harmony. Disturb that balance, and you'll have issues. And this is how I know there's a God. The way this world was designed is too precise for all of this to have been random. Actually the way evolution works is that creatures either adapt to the local flora and fauna, develop a random mutation which helps them survive (and pass that quality on to their offspring), or die out. And throughout the history of life, a lot of species did die out because they didn't/couldn't adapt. So the world wasn't designed 'precise'. It was actually quite messy. In the end, all living beings today are the survivors, and we can continue to survive through adaptation. But if you would like a god to believe in, I suppose you could view nature as such, considering that's quite intricate and all-encompassing. --- One time, CE triggered me so hard with their objectively wrong opinions that I accidentally punched myself in the balls. <cite>Aressar posted [p:914050536] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>Caution999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gp1829 posted...</cite> <quote>Are people in this topic actually debating the merits of "a really big fire to kill all the rats" damn this is stupid.</quote> They weren't paying attention during the "circle of life" scene in Lion King. Every creature exists for a reason. Everything is kept in harmony. Disturb that balance, and you'll have issues. And this is how I know there's a God. The way this world was designed is too precise for all of this to have been random.</quote> Actually the way evolution works is that creatures either adapt to the local flora and fauna, develop a random mutation which helps them survive (and pass that quality on to their offspring), or die out. And throughout the history of life, a lot of species did die out because they didn't/couldn't adapt. So the world wasn't designed 'precise'. It was actually quite messy. In the end, all living beings today are the survivors, and we can continue to survive through adaptation. But if you would like a god to believe in, I suppose you could view nature as such, considering that's quite intricate and all-encompassing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/13/18 9:21:09 AM #155:	sevens1997 posted... The only people choosing cats just hate them because they're not as obedient as dogs. Change cats to dogs in this scenario, and I guarantee their answers change. Not that they'll admit it. Narcissists seldom admit to being such. Why not make your own topic and test it? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:914050576] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>sevens1997 posted...</cite> <quote>The only people choosing cats just hate them because they're not as obedient as dogs. Change cats to dogs in this scenario, and I guarantee their answers change. Not that they'll admit it. Narcissists seldom admit to being such.</quote> Why not make your own topic and test it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Caution999 12/13/18 9:27:41 AM #156:	Cats are so intelligent that even after being domesticated, they never forget their instincts. You can take a healthy house cat, after several years of knowing nothing but being pampered by its owner, and it could go outside and survive...and survive, easily. Modern dogs that have been specifically bred to appear 'cute' would not last long outside by themselves. Only REAL dogs would survive out in the wild; the ones that were around naturally. Not these little pieces of crap that serve no purpose except to be 'cute.' Only hunting dogs would do well. Hunting dogs that can run fast. If humans were to suddenly disappear, the only dogs that would be around would eventually be some kind of wolf hybrid sort of dog imo. --- The best posts, believe me. <cite>Caution999 posted [p:914050800] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Cats are so intelligent that even after being domesticated, they never forget their instincts. You can take a healthy house cat, after several years of knowing nothing but being pampered by its owner, and it could go outside and survive...and survive, easily. Modern dogs that have been specifically bred to appear 'cute' would not last long outside by themselves. Only REAL dogs would survive out in the wild; the ones that were around naturally. Not these little pieces of crap that serve no purpose except to be 'cute.' Only hunting dogs would do well. Hunting dogs that can run fast. If humans were to suddenly disappear, the only dogs that would be around would eventually be some kind of wolf hybrid sort of dog imo.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Deadpool_18 12/13/18 9:28:31 AM #157:	apolloooo posted... If cats gone, humanity is literally doomed by famine and pestilence Um, no? --- We're whalers on the moon, we carry a harpoon, but there ain't no whales, so we tell tall tales, and sing our whaling tune. <cite>Deadpool_18 posted [p:914050825] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>apolloooo posted...</cite> <quote>If cats gone, humanity is literally doomed by famine and pestilence</quote> Um, no?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sevens1997 12/13/18 9:53:37 AM #158:	UnfairRepresent posted... sevens1997 posted... The only people choosing cats just hate them because they're not as obedient as dogs. Change cats to dogs in this scenario, and I guarantee their answers change. Not that they'll admit it. Narcissists seldom admit to being such. Why not make your own topic and test it? Making a topic would be useless. People will try to save face by claiming to be consistent, but it doesn't take a genius to know they're full of shit. The truth is, those people hate cats because they don't do what they're told. Everyone in this topic knows it, but nobody wants to own up to it. --- http://sevens1997.filmaf.com/owned Reading Royals - 2013 Kelly Cup Champions <cite>sevens1997 posted [p:914051692] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>sevens1997 posted...</cite> <quote>The only people choosing cats just hate them because they're not as obedient as dogs. Change cats to dogs in this scenario, and I guarantee their answers change. Not that they'll admit it. Narcissists seldom admit to being such.</quote> Why not make your own topic and test it?</quote> Making a topic would be useless. People will try to save face by claiming to be consistent, but it doesn't take a genius to know they're full of shit. The truth is, those people hate cats because they don't do what they're told. Everyone in this topic knows it, but nobody wants to own up to it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/13/18 9:56:24 AM #159:	sevens1997 posted... Making a topic would be useless. buckbuckbuckbuckbuck --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:914051796] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>sevens1997 posted...</cite> <quote> Making a topic would be useless.</quote> buckbuckbuckbuckbuck</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kayoticdreamz 12/13/18 3:30:23 PM #160:	gp1829 posted... Are people in this topic actually debating the merits of "a really big fire to kill all the rats" damn this is stupid. Yep this topic was a trip lol Anybody that honestly thinks killing off all cats would have 0 impact on the ecosystem should not be allowed to vote or breed. That level of stupid needs to be contained. <cite>kayoticdreamz posted [p:914068121] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>gp1829 posted...</cite> <quote>Are people in this topic actually debating the merits of "a really big fire to kill all the rats" damn this is stupid.</quote> Yep this topic was a trip lol Anybody that honestly thinks killing off all cats would have 0 impact on the ecosystem should not be allowed to vote or breed. That level of stupid needs to be contained.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MaverickXeo 12/13/18 3:50:59 PM #161:	CoolBro posted... this world has been overpopulated anyway. We need to reduce population size In half a year, the numbers won't be changed. That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating. --- --- MaverickXeo --- <cite>MaverickXeo posted [p:914069255] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>CoolBro posted...</cite> <quote>this world has been overpopulated anyway. We need to reduce population size</quote> In half a year, the numbers won't be changed. That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 12/13/18 3:52:03 PM #162:	Is one of the 12000 a big British black man named Wesley? --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:914069315] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Is one of the 12000 a big British black man named Wesley?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/13/18 4:02:08 PM #163:	MaverickXeo posted... That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating. because? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:914069894] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>MaverickXeo posted...</cite> <quote> That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating.</quote> because?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MaverickXeo 12/13/18 4:03:40 PM #164:	UnfairRepresent posted... MaverickXeo posted... That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating. because? Because it destroys entire eco-systems? --- --- MaverickXeo --- <cite>MaverickXeo posted [p:914069976] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MaverickXeo posted...</cite> <quote> That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating.</quote> because?</quote> Because it destroys entire eco-systems?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/13/18 4:08:08 PM #165:	MaverickXeo posted... UnfairRepresent posted... MaverickXeo posted... That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating. because? Because it destroys entire eco-systems? Entire species die every day dude. You don't care or notice. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:914070230] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>MaverickXeo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MaverickXeo posted...</cite> <quote> That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating.</quote> because?</quote> Because it destroys entire eco-systems?</quote> Entire species die every day dude. You don't care or notice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkChozoGhost 12/13/18 4:18:59 PM #166:	Killing the cats would 100% lead to the death of far more than 12,000 humans --- My sister's dog bit a hole in my Super Mario Land cartridge. It still works though - Skye Reynolds 3DS FC: 3239-5612-0115 <cite>DarkChozoGhost posted [p:914070808] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Killing the cats would 100% lead to the death of far more than 12,000 humans</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
industrializeit 12/13/18 4:23:31 PM #167:	UnfairRepresent posted... MaverickXeo posted... UnfairRepresent posted... MaverickXeo posted... That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating. because? Because it destroys entire eco-systems? Entire species die every day dude. You don't care or notice. Wow this is your topic and you didn't bother watching that video orangefire posted. Watch the video or remain in your ignorant opinion. --- I personally like Link as a Rugged Shaman Swashbuckler more than Resourceful Gadget Boy. That's why Zelda II is one of my all time favorites, ...(see quote) <cite>industrializeit posted [p:914071062] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MaverickXeo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MaverickXeo posted...</cite> <quote> That said, I'd choose the people. Getting rid of an entire species would be devastating.</quote> because?</quote> Because it destroys entire eco-systems?</quote> Entire species die every day dude. You don't care or notice.</quote> Wow this is your topic and you didn't bother watching that video orangefire posted. Watch the video or remain in your ignorant opinion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
industrializeit 12/13/18 4:23:56 PM #168:	orangefire25 posted... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqOzTh2pjEw" data-time=" There you go --- I personally like Link as a Rugged Shaman Swashbuckler more than Resourceful Gadget Boy. That's why Zelda II is one of my all time favorites, ...(see quote) <cite>industrializeit posted [p:914071086] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>orangefire25 posted...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqOzTh2pjEw" data-time="</quote> There you go</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#169	Post #169 was unavailable or deleted.
UnfairRepresent 12/13/18 4:24:50 PM #170:	industrializeit posted... Wow this is your topic and you didn't bother watching that video orangefire posted. Watch the video or remain in your ignorant opinion. What makes you think I didn't watch it? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:914071140] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>industrializeit posted...</cite> <quote> Wow this is your topic and you didn't bother watching that video orangefire posted. Watch the video or remain in your ignorant opinion.</quote> What makes you think I didn't watch it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dark_SilverX 12/13/18 4:25:34 PM #171:	As long as the people being sacrificed aren't family then them. xD --- I support Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo. don't compare games to feces -- if you've an opinion worth mentioning, do so civilly <cite>Dark_SilverX posted [p:914071171] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>As long as the people being sacrificed aren't family then them. xD</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Caution999 12/13/18 4:26:40 PM #172:	Certain species are more important than others. Bees and Cats are more important than stink bugs and possums. --- The best posts, believe me. <cite>Caution999 posted [p:914071236] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Certain species are more important than others. Bees and Cats are more important than stink bugs and possums.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkChozoGhost 12/13/18 4:47:27 PM #173:	UnfairRepresent posted... industrializeit posted... Wow this is your topic and you didn't bother watching that video orangefire posted. Watch the video or remain in your ignorant opinion. What makes you think I didn't watch it? That fact that you're heavily implying the loss of all cats wouldn't cause the death of over a hundred million people. --- My sister's dog bit a hole in my Super Mario Land cartridge. It still works though - Skye Reynolds 3DS FC: 3239-5612-0115 <cite>DarkChozoGhost posted [p:914072282] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>industrializeit posted...</cite> <quote> Wow this is your topic and you didn't bother watching that video orangefire posted. Watch the video or remain in your ignorant opinion.</quote> What makes you think I didn't watch it?</quote> That fact that you're heavily implying the loss of all cats wouldn't cause the death of over a hundred million people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/13/18 4:52:50 PM #174:	DarkChozoGhost posted... UnfairRepresent posted... industrializeit posted... Wow this is your topic and you didn't bother watching that video orangefire posted. Watch the video or remain in your ignorant opinion. What makes you think I didn't watch it? That fact that you're heavily implying the loss of all cats wouldn't cause the death of over a hundred million people. I don't recall saying or implying such a thing. Although it wouldn't --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:914072506] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkChozoGhost posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>industrializeit posted...</cite> <quote> Wow this is your topic and you didn't bother watching that video orangefire posted. Watch the video or remain in your ignorant opinion.</quote> What makes you think I didn't watch it?</quote> That fact that you're heavily implying the loss of all cats wouldn't cause the death of over a hundred million people.</quote> I don't recall saying or implying such a thing. Although it wouldn't</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
fred12935 12/13/18 4:55:20 PM #175:	Bye bye people i like cats I hate people easy choice <cite>fred12935 posted [p:914072635] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Bye bye people i like cats I hate people easy choice</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
visualboy2003 12/13/18 7:12:18 PM #176:	Aressar posted... visualboy2003 posted... jumi posted... visualboy2003 posted... jumi posted... 600 million cats, or 12000 humans? eliminate cats is the wiser choice. No it's not. yes, it is. No, it's not. It's nice that you think 'science will find a way to solve that within a few years' but if it were as simple as that, literally all of society's problems would be solved by now. Scientists might indeed look into it, but a permanent and stable solution will definitely take more than a few years, since there are an enormous amount of factors to take into account when interfering with the ecosystem in this manner. During that time, many, many people would be negatively affected by the consequences (i.e. disease), resulting in a lot more human casualties than 12,000. Either choice has a chance of affecting your loved ones. The sacrifice-all-cats choice simply brings a significantly higher chance of (many more) loved ones dying. You're killing people either way: either 12,000 or many more. That's what it comes down to. not if the government put most of the money or a lot of money into develop machinery or medicine that to kill only rats in the shortest amount of time possible. the world would also help solve that problem by united to spend more money and human power to solve it in the shortest time. the reason other problems that you mentioned didn't qet solved that quickly was because the world didn't get united as one to solve a problem that they see as serve and as important that it needs to be solved immediately as it seemed to be. <cite>visualboy2003 posted [p:914079421] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>Aressar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>600 million cats, or 12000 humans?</quote> eliminate cats is the wiser choice.</quote> No it's not.</quote> yes, it is.</quote> No, it's not. It's nice that you think 'science will find a way to solve that within a few years' but if it were as simple as that, literally all of society's problems would be solved by now. Scientists might indeed look into it, but a permanent and stable solution will definitely take more than a few years, since there are an enormous amount of factors to take into account when interfering with the ecosystem in this manner. During that time, many, many people would be negatively affected by the consequences (i.e. disease), resulting in a lot more human casualties than 12,000. Either choice has a chance of affecting your loved ones. The sacrifice-all-cats choice simply brings a significantly higher chance of (many more) loved ones dying. You're killing people either way: either 12,000 or many more. That's what it comes down to.</quote> not if the government put most of the money or a lot of money into develop machinery or medicine that to kill only rats in the shortest amount of time possible. the world would also help solve that problem by united to spend more money and human power to solve it in the shortest time. the reason other problems that you mentioned didn't qet solved that quickly was because the world didn't get united as one to solve a problem that they see as serve and as important that it needs to be solved immediately as it seemed to be.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathVelvien 12/13/18 7:29:38 PM #177:	I think my IQ is diminished from reading this thread. --- Under Night: Phonon \| BBCTB: Orie/Izayoi \| Arizona Cardinals: 3-9, fire Wilks, cut Gresham and Nelson. https://imgtc.com/i/7OdpfSogwx.gif <cite>DeathVelvien posted [p:914080307] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>I think my IQ is diminished from reading this thread.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giblet_Enjoyer 12/13/18 7:37:16 PM #178:	orangefire25 posted... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqOzTh2pjEw" data-time=" holy fuck, I didn't know that bees were actually doing fine. Guess I fell for the meme. --- He which make friends with scorpion, soon come to find out what a scorpion does - they bite people with its tail --ancient Chinese proverb <cite>Giblet_Enjoyer posted [p:914080682] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>orangefire25 posted...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqOzTh2pjEw" data-time="</quote> holy fuck, I didn't know that bees were actually doing fine. Guess I fell for the meme.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
industrializeit 12/13/18 7:39:48 PM #179:	Yeah the bee's thing in the beginning was interesting. I fell for that, and many did --- I personally like Link as a Rugged Shaman Swashbuckler more than Resourceful Gadget Boy. That's why Zelda II is one of my all time favorites, ...(see quote) <cite>industrializeit posted [p:914080834] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Yeah the bee's thing in the beginning was interesting. I fell for that, and many did</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
industrializeit 12/13/18 7:40:33 PM #180:	Ah sorry TC. I might have confused you with someone else. If so my bad --- I personally like Link as a Rugged Shaman Swashbuckler more than Resourceful Gadget Boy. That's why Zelda II is one of my all time favorites, ...(see quote) <cite>industrializeit posted [p:914080882] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Ah sorry TC. I might have confused you with someone else. If so my bad</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rarity462 12/13/18 7:41:50 PM #181:	12k people, theres too many humans as it is. <cite>Rarity462 posted [p:914080947] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>12k people, theres too many humans as it is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gp1829 12/13/18 8:00:29 PM #182:	visualboy2003 posted... Aressar posted... visualboy2003 posted... jumi posted... visualboy2003 posted... jumi posted... 600 million cats, or 12000 humans? eliminate cats is the wiser choice. No it's not. yes, it is. No, it's not. It's nice that you think 'science will find a way to solve that within a few years' but if it were as simple as that, literally all of society's problems would be solved by now. Scientists might indeed look into it, but a permanent and stable solution will definitely take more than a few years, since there are an enormous amount of factors to take into account when interfering with the ecosystem in this manner. During that time, many, many people would be negatively affected by the consequences (i.e. disease), resulting in a lot more human casualties than 12,000. Either choice has a chance of affecting your loved ones. The sacrifice-all-cats choice simply brings a significantly higher chance of (many more) loved ones dying. You're killing people either way: either 12,000 or many more. That's what it comes down to. not if the government put most of the money or a lot of money into develop machinery or medicine that to kill only rats in the shortest amount of time possible. the world would also help solve that problem by united to spend more money and human power to solve it in the shortest time. the reason other problems that you mentioned didn't qet solved that quickly was because the world didn't get united as one to solve a problem that they see as serve and as important that it needs to be solved immediately as it seemed to be. Stop posting. <cite>gp1829 posted [p:914081904] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aressar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>600 million cats, or 12000 humans?</quote> eliminate cats is the wiser choice.</quote> No it's not.</quote> yes, it is.</quote> No, it's not. It's nice that you think 'science will find a way to solve that within a few years' but if it were as simple as that, literally all of society's problems would be solved by now. Scientists might indeed look into it, but a permanent and stable solution will definitely take more than a few years, since there are an enormous amount of factors to take into account when interfering with the ecosystem in this manner. During that time, many, many people would be negatively affected by the consequences (i.e. disease), resulting in a lot more human casualties than 12,000. Either choice has a chance of affecting your loved ones. The sacrifice-all-cats choice simply brings a significantly higher chance of (many more) loved ones dying. You're killing people either way: either 12,000 or many more. That's what it comes down to.</quote> not if the government put most of the money or a lot of money into develop machinery or medicine that to kill only rats in the shortest amount of time possible. the world would also help solve that problem by united to spend more money and human power to solve it in the shortest time. the reason other problems that you mentioned didn't qet solved that quickly was because the world didn't get united as one to solve a problem that they see as serve and as important that it needs to be solved immediately as it seemed to be.</quote> Stop posting.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
visualboy2003 12/13/18 8:44:02 PM #183:	gp1829 posted... visualboy2003 posted... Aressar posted... visualboy2003 posted... jumi posted... visualboy2003 posted... jumi posted... 600 million cats, or 12000 humans? eliminate cats is the wiser choice. No it's not. yes, it is. No, it's not. It's nice that you think 'science will find a way to solve that within a few years' but if it were as simple as that, literally all of society's problems would be solved by now. Scientists might indeed look into it, but a permanent and stable solution will definitely take more than a few years, since there are an enormous amount of factors to take into account when interfering with the ecosystem in this manner. During that time, many, many people would be negatively affected by the consequences (i.e. disease), resulting in a lot more human casualties than 12,000. Either choice has a chance of affecting your loved ones. The sacrifice-all-cats choice simply brings a significantly higher chance of (many more) loved ones dying. You're killing people either way: either 12,000 or many more. That's what it comes down to. not if the government put most of the money or a lot of money into develop machinery or medicine that to kill only rats in the shortest amount of time possible. the world would also help solve that problem by united to spend more money and human power to solve it in the shortest time. the reason other problems that you mentioned didn't qet solved that quickly was because the world didn't get united as one to solve a problem that they see as serve and as important that it needs to be solved immediately as it seemed to be. Stop posting. why, cause you can't arque with me, lol. that's why you can only ask me to stop, lol, cause you cant say anything to prove me wronq. <cite>visualboy2003 posted [p:914084376] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>gp1829 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aressar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>600 million cats, or 12000 humans?</quote> eliminate cats is the wiser choice.</quote> No it's not.</quote> yes, it is.</quote> No, it's not. It's nice that you think 'science will find a way to solve that within a few years' but if it were as simple as that, literally all of society's problems would be solved by now. Scientists might indeed look into it, but a permanent and stable solution will definitely take more than a few years, since there are an enormous amount of factors to take into account when interfering with the ecosystem in this manner. During that time, many, many people would be negatively affected by the consequences (i.e. disease), resulting in a lot more human casualties than 12,000. Either choice has a chance of affecting your loved ones. The sacrifice-all-cats choice simply brings a significantly higher chance of (many more) loved ones dying. You're killing people either way: either 12,000 or many more. That's what it comes down to.</quote> not if the government put most of the money or a lot of money into develop machinery or medicine that to kill only rats in the shortest amount of time possible. the world would also help solve that problem by united to spend more money and human power to solve it in the shortest time. the reason other problems that you mentioned didn't qet solved that quickly was because the world didn't get united as one to solve a problem that they see as serve and as important that it needs to be solved immediately as it seemed to be.</quote> Stop posting.</quote> why, cause you can't arque with me, lol. that's why you can only ask me to stop, lol, cause you cant say anything to prove me wronq.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#184	Post #184 was unavailable or deleted.
visualboy2003 12/13/18 8:47:46 PM #185:	no, it won't. cause cats didn't solve the rats problem as pointed out by tc before in his post replied to you. you didn't make a come back to him. rats is the on going problem that already have been long time on earth by the way. so, why couldn't the united power of the world couldn't solve, if it already have been affecting us. <cite>visualboy2003 posted [p:914084587] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>no, it won't. cause cats didn't solve the rats problem as pointed out by tc before in his post replied to you. you didn't make a come back to him. rats is the on going problem that already have been long time on earth by the way. so, why couldn't the united power of the world couldn't solve, if it already have been affecting us.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkChozoGhost 12/13/18 11:33:29 PM #186:	UnfairRepresent posted... I don't recall saying or implying such a thing. Stop feigning ignorant. UnfairRepresent posted... Although it wouldn't It would. --- My sister's dog bit a hole in my Super Mario Land cartridge. It still works though - Skye Reynolds 3DS FC: 3239-5612-0115 <cite>DarkChozoGhost posted [p:914093163] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>I don't recall saying or implying such a thing.</quote> Stop feigning ignorant. <cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>Although it wouldn't</quote> It would.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kayoticdreamz 12/14/18 1:14:59 AM #187:	visualboy2003 posted... why, cause you can't arque with me, lol. that's why you can only ask me to stop, lol, cause you cant say anything to prove me wronq. lol....your trolling skills are top notch. you keep ignoring facts like you're stevie wonder <cite>kayoticdreamz posted [p:914097268] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote> why, cause you can't arque with me, lol. that's why you can only ask me to stop, lol, cause you cant say anything to prove me wronq.</quote> lol....your trolling skills are top notch. you keep ignoring facts like you're stevie wonder</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrumpTrain 12/14/18 1:26:31 AM #188:	UnfairRepresent posted... Lord_Shadow posted... Can I hand pick the 12,000? No Then this topic is useless. --- You can rant about all other religions any time, but as soon as you bring up inconvenient real Koran facts, you face jail for blasphemy <cite>TrumpTrain posted [p:914097629] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lord_Shadow posted...</cite> <quote>Can I hand pick the 12,000?</quote> No</quote> Then this topic is useless.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Purple_Cheetah 12/14/18 1:33:56 AM #189:	Easily pick the humans. They can repopulate and there's bound to be ones that are terminal or on death's door anyways. Not to mention all the poor and homeless we tend to turn a blind eye towards. This whole scorched earth approach makes me laugh. Yeah, burn all the woods/forests, then burn all the structures, burn all the food, then burn the bodies. Then when you're done burning it all we'll just flood the earth and create waterworld. Yeah, I'm sure the 12k that were saved would rather not take part in that. my boat... <cite>Purple_Cheetah posted [p:914097868] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Easily pick the humans. They can repopulate and there's bound to be ones that are terminal or on death's door anyways. Not to mention all the poor and homeless we tend to turn a blind eye towards. This whole scorched earth approach makes me laugh. Yeah, burn all the woods/forests, then burn all the structures, burn all the food, then burn the bodies. Then when you're done burning it all we'll just flood the earth and create waterworld. Yeah, I'm sure the 12k that were saved would rather not take part in that. my boat...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kayoticdreamz 12/14/18 1:38:45 AM #190:	Purple_Cheetah posted... Easily pick the humans. They can repopulate and there's bound to be ones that are terminal or on death's door anyways. Not to mention all the poor and homeless we tend to turn a blind eye towards. This whole scorched earth approach makes me laugh. Yeah, burn all the woods/forests, then burn all the structures, burn all the food, then burn the bodies. Then when you're done burning it all we'll just flood the earth and create waterworld. Yeah, I'm sure the 12k that were saved would rather not take part in that. my boat... exactly. people who pick killing the cats should be sterilized and never allowed to vote. they are clearly a menace to society with their insane thinking. Science isn't going to solve what cats do. Even this hypothetical proposed fired has the problem of being a long term solution because lots of things eat rats. They are a "prey animal" aka meant to get eaten and killed. So basically we have to do what cats do on a constant steady basis and not do it too well because other things still have to eat rats. In essence if cats kill on average over 10 years, 500,000,000 rats then we have to devise a way to average that number exactly with no deviation. kill the 12,000 anyone saying otherwise is worse than hitler and stalin combined. <cite>kayoticdreamz posted [p:914098018] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>Purple_Cheetah posted...</cite> <quote>Easily pick the humans. They can repopulate and there's bound to be ones that are terminal or on death's door anyways. Not to mention all the poor and homeless we tend to turn a blind eye towards. This whole scorched earth approach makes me laugh. Yeah, burn all the woods/forests, then burn all the structures, burn all the food, then burn the bodies. Then when you're done burning it all we'll just flood the earth and create waterworld. Yeah, I'm sure the 12k that were saved would rather not take part in that. my boat...</quote> exactly. people who pick killing the cats should be sterilized and never allowed to vote. they are clearly a menace to society with their insane thinking. Science isn't going to solve what cats do. Even this hypothetical proposed fired has the problem of being a long term solution because lots of things eat rats. They are a "prey animal" aka meant to get eaten and killed. So basically we have to do what cats do on a constant steady basis and not do it too well because other things still have to eat rats. In essence if cats kill on average over 10 years, 500,000,000 rats then we have to devise a way to average that number exactly with no deviation. kill the 12,000 anyone saying otherwise is worse than hitler and stalin combined.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WafflehouseJK 12/14/18 1:42:29 AM #191:	WTF, why Alice Cooper? --- "She was like, 'Oh, did you see that firefighter? Hes so cute.' And I was like, Mom, I just got blown up." <cite>WafflehouseJK posted [p:914098129] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>WTF, why Alice Cooper?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gguirao 12/14/18 2:03:51 AM #192:	Cats. --- Donald J. Trump--proof against government intelligence. <cite>gguirao posted [p:914098777] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>Cats.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordFarquad1312 12/14/18 2:21:37 AM #193:	12,000 humans isn't even that many in the whole scheme of things. --- The force is my ally "If you are tired of fear from links... Let Kirby's Nightmare protect you." <cite>LordFarquad1312 posted [p:914099269] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>12,000 humans isn't even that many in the whole scheme of things.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
fuzzylittlbunny 12/14/18 2:26:59 AM #194:	Lord_Shadow posted... apolloooo posted... If cats gone, humanity is literally doomed by famine and pestilence Who the fuck eats cats? People in certain places eat cats. I would give you a specific answer, but I've gotten modded for saying it in the past, soooo... :< --- ( ^_^)/\(^_^ ) Maya high five! <cite>fuzzylittlbunny posted [p:914099413] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lord_Shadow posted...</cite> <quote><cite>apolloooo posted...</cite> <quote>If cats gone, humanity is literally doomed by famine and pestilence</quote> Who the fuck eats cats?</quote> People in certain places eat cats. I would give you a specific answer, but I've gotten modded for saying it in the past, soooo... :<</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GasMonkey 12/14/18 2:38:15 AM #195:	visualboy2003 posted... Aressar posted... im not 13 posted... Pretty sure killing all cats will have more of an effect of 12000 people This. Too many people in the world anyway, and the average cat is a lot more nice and self-sufficient than the average human. there is other way to control population better than killing those 12,000. plus, human lives matter more than cats lives. no lives matter --- life at 165mph <cite>GasMonkey posted [p:914099685] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Aressar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>im not 13 posted...</cite> <quote>Pretty sure killing all cats will have more of an effect of 12000 people</quote> This. Too many people in the world anyway, and the average cat is a lot more nice and self-sufficient than the average human.</quote> there is other way to control population better than killing those 12,000. plus, human lives matter more than cats lives.</quote> no lives matter</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/14/18 4:07:11 AM #196:	WafflehouseJK posted... WTF, why Alice Cooper? Sacrifices have to be made. Cooper or cats man DarkChozoGhost posted... UnfairRepresent posted... I don't recall saying or implying such a thing. Stop feigning ignorant. UnfairRepresent posted... Although it wouldn't It would. then how come it hasn't already happened? Rats have been around for 160 million years. Cats have been around for about 10,000 years and were only common globally as pets for under 200. Humans have been around for between 70-250,000 years depending on who you believe. Most conensus is around 200,000 If all it takes is one year of cat free population to get 2100049593948324932 trillion rats eating all food and spreading disease until the human race dies, then how come the human race exists at all? Why didn't the ratapcolasypse happen millions of years ago? And this was back in the days where people really didn't understand concepts like disease or ecosystems. Why did rats only suddenly become a threat to the planet the moment domesticated cats became common? You're literally being fooled by a Youtube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrKG8OOof1o" data-time=" Guess 9/11 was an inside job now because some guy said so right? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:914101747] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>WafflehouseJK posted...</cite> <quote>WTF, why Alice Cooper?</quote> Sacrifices have to be made. Cooper or cats man <cite>DarkChozoGhost posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>I don't recall saying or implying such a thing.</quote> Stop feigning ignorant. <cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>Although it wouldn't</quote> It would.</quote> then how come it hasn't already happened? Rats have been around for 160 million years. Cats have been around for about 10,000 years and were only common globally as pets for under 200. Humans have been around for between 70-250,000 years depending on who you believe. Most conensus is around 200,000 If all it takes is one year of cat free population to get 2100049593948324932 trillion rats eating all food and spreading disease until the human race dies, then how come the human race exists at all? Why didn't the ratapcolasypse happen millions of years ago? And this was back in the days where people really didn't understand concepts like disease or ecosystems. Why did rats only suddenly become a threat to the planet the moment domesticated cats became common? You're literally being fooled by a Youtube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrKG8OOof1o" data-time=" Guess 9/11 was an inside job now because some guy said so right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
industrializeit 12/14/18 6:36:19 AM #197:	UnfairRepresent posted... WafflehouseJK posted... WTF, why Alice Cooper? Sacrifices have to be made. Cooper or cats man DarkChozoGhost posted... UnfairRepresent posted... I don't recall saying or implying such a thing. Stop feigning ignorant. UnfairRepresent posted... Although it wouldn't It would. then how come it hasn't already happened? Rats have been around for 160 million years. Cats have been around for about 10,000 years and were only common globally as pets for under 200. Humans have been around for between 70-250,000 years depending on who you believe. Most conensus is around 200,000 If all it takes is one year of cat free population to get 2100049593948324932 trillion rats eating all food and spreading disease until the human race dies, then how come the human race exists at all? Why didn't the ratapcolasypse happen millions of years ago? And this was back in the days where people really didn't understand concepts like disease or ecosystems. Why did rats only suddenly become a threat to the planet the moment domesticated cats became common? You're literally being fooled by a Youtube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrKG8OOof1o" data-time=" Guess 9/11 was an inside job now because some guy said so right? The reproduction rates of rats is very real. So is the fact of how many diseases they carry. So there is something very wrong with what we are all taught about fossil records/carbon dating. Disease spreading rats would absolutely explode if all cats disappeared from the earth. Disease and famine would spread around the world. --- I personally like Link as a Rugged Shaman Swashbuckler more than Resourceful Gadget Boy. That's why Zelda II is one of my all time favorites, ...(see quote) <cite>industrializeit posted [p:914104449] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WafflehouseJK posted...</cite> <quote>WTF, why Alice Cooper?</quote> Sacrifices have to be made. Cooper or cats man <cite>DarkChozoGhost posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>I don't recall saying or implying such a thing.</quote> Stop feigning ignorant. <cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>Although it wouldn't</quote> It would.</quote> then how come it hasn't already happened? Rats have been around for 160 million years. Cats have been around for about 10,000 years and were only common globally as pets for under 200. Humans have been around for between 70-250,000 years depending on who you believe. Most conensus is around 200,000 If all it takes is one year of cat free population to get 2100049593948324932 trillion rats eating all food and spreading disease until the human race dies, then how come the human race exists at all? Why didn't the ratapcolasypse happen millions of years ago? And this was back in the days where people really didn't understand concepts like disease or ecosystems. Why did rats only suddenly become a threat to the planet the moment domesticated cats became common? You're literally being fooled by a Youtube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrKG8OOof1o" data-time=" Guess 9/11 was an inside job now because some guy said so right?</quote> The reproduction rates of rats is very real. So is the fact of how many diseases they carry. So there is something very wrong with what we are all taught about fossil records/carbon dating. Disease spreading rats would absolutely explode if all cats disappeared from the earth. Disease and famine would spread around the world.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 12/14/18 6:37:18 AM #198:	"The facts are wrong!" No... The dude on youtube was wrong. And you fell for it. That simple --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:914104470] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>"The facts are wrong!" No... The dude on youtube was wrong. And you fell for it. That simple</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
visualboy2003 12/14/18 7:05:05 AM #199:	kayoticdreamz posted... visualboy2003 posted... why, cause you can't arque with me, lol. that's why you can only ask me to stop, lol, cause you cant say anything to prove me wronq. lol....your trolling skills are top notch. you keep ignoring facts like you're stevie wonder really, but look like tc is on my side, too. <cite>visualboy2003 posted [p:914105048] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote><cite>kayoticdreamz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>visualboy2003 posted...</cite> <quote> why, cause you can't arque with me, lol. that's why you can only ask me to stop, lol, cause you cant say anything to prove me wronq.</quote> lol....your trolling skills are top notch. you keep ignoring facts like you're stevie wonder</quote> really, but look like tc is on my side, too.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
QwelzaarKane 12/14/18 7:10:46 AM #200:	I'd kill 12,000 people over 12 cats. --- http://error1355.com/ce/QwelzaarKane.html Ain't no love shown but to those who down til we die <cite>QwelzaarKane posted [p:914105175] in 12,000 peo... [t:77294675]...</cite> <quote>I'd kill 12,000 people over 12 cats.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > 12,000 people or all cats. You must sacrifice one. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > 12,000 people or all cats. You must sacrifice one.