Current Events > Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle trailer

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Leanaunfurled 06/29/17 6:50:04 PM #51:	Senta posted... I'm going to see it, and not think of it as Jumanji. Has a stellar cast, so I think it'll be a fun watch; just not a good Jumanji movie. Basically this is how I see it. Just using the Jumanji name for its name, which is bleh, but looks like a fun popcorn flick otherwise. --- Currently Playing: Trails in the Sky the 3rd http://i.imgur.com/mfuN9AI.png http://i.imgur.com/nyP8pdG.jpg <cite>Leanaunfurled posted [p:882052016] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>Senta posted...</cite> <quote>I'm going to see it, and not think of it as Jumanji. Has a stellar cast, so I think it'll be a fun watch; just not a good Jumanji movie.</quote> Basically this is how I see it. Just using the Jumanji name for its name, which is bleh, but looks like a fun popcorn flick otherwise.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 06/29/17 6:56:38 PM #52:	The concept of people being sucked into a 80's/90's esque video game and forced to be characters they're nothing like does seem like it could be a humorous concept. But Jumanji is such an odd choice for it. The Jumanji board game felt like this ancient, magic and mysterious thing that has likely sucked in and ruined people throughout the generations. A mysterious video game system dates it to only be a few decades old and yet it still somehow ended up being forgotten in a school basement. It's just an odd choice. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:882052384] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>The concept of people being sucked into a 80's/90's esque video game and forced to be characters they're nothing like does seem like it could be a humorous concept. But Jumanji is such an odd choice for it. The Jumanji board game felt like this ancient, magic and mysterious thing that has likely sucked in and ruined people throughout the generations. A mysterious video game system dates it to only be a few decades old and yet it still somehow ended up being forgotten in a school basement. It's just an odd choice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MonkeyBones23 06/29/17 7:03:34 PM #53:	Looks worse than Baywatch --- We're a forest of lives, but we grow tall and wide. We'll never be cut down. <cite>MonkeyBones23 posted [p:882052747] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>Looks worse than Baywatch</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 06/29/17 7:36:32 PM #54:	MonkeyBones23 posted... Looks worse than Baywatch --- woof <cite>Howl posted [p:882054591] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>MonkeyBones23 posted...</cite> <quote>Looks worse than Baywatch</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zero_Destroyer 06/29/17 7:42:05 PM #55:	Leanaunfurled posted... Senta posted... I'm going to see it, and not think of it as Jumanji. Has a stellar cast, so I think it'll be a fun watch; just not a good Jumanji movie. Basically this is how I see it. Just using the Jumanji name for its name, which is bleh, but looks like a fun popcorn flick otherwise. --- Enjoy movies and television? Check out my blog! I do reviews and analyses. http://fictionrantreview.wordpress.com/ (The Force Awakens spoiler review up!) <cite>Zero_Destroyer posted [p:882054927] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>Leanaunfurled posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Senta posted...</cite> <quote>I'm going to see it, and not think of it as Jumanji. Has a stellar cast, so I think it'll be a fun watch; just not a good Jumanji movie.</quote> Basically this is how I see it. Just using the Jumanji name for its name, which is bleh, but looks like a fun popcorn flick otherwise.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XxKrazyChaosxX 06/29/17 10:40:27 PM #56:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozfGeGYe-lY --- "I woke up at four am by accident in time for the paper to be delivered. Guess what? It's not a kid on a bike, it's a man in a car." - Kevin Malone <cite>XxKrazyChaosxX posted [p:882063943] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozfGeGYe-lY</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ninjarobot_22 06/29/17 11:16:22 PM #57:	The new movie looks horrible to be called the sequel to Jumanji. If it was named something else, maybe I could have given it a chance. The original had more heart. It was action, adventure, drama, and comedy all in one. The new movie looks like a goofy, slapstick comedy film. <cite>ninjarobot_22 posted [p:882065703] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>The new movie looks horrible to be called the sequel to Jumanji. If it was named something else, maybe I could have given it a chance. The original had more heart. It was action, adventure, drama, and comedy all in one. The new movie looks like a goofy, slapstick comedy film.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WafflehouseJK 06/30/17 4:56:44 AM #58:	Leanaunfurled posted... MrNintendo1213 posted... Error1355 posted... Also after looking this up guys you are aware this is a sequel and not a remake? So, you're saying that at some point after the original ends, someone somehow turns a magical board game into a magic atari game. Despite the fact that the atari was already old when the original Jumanji came out. Either that or there is a completely unrelated magic atari game also called Jumanji set in the jungle. No matter how you look at it, it makes no sense and looks bad. "This magical board game gets turned into a magical video game for the sequel THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE THOUGH" Seriously, bro? There's a difference in filmmaking between dispension of disbelief and not following the rules of your own world you've established. It honestly would be more forgivable if it WAS a remake, but if it is in fact a sequel, then it has to follow what's already been established in the first film. --- "She was like, 'Oh, did you see that firefighter? Hes so cute.' And I was like, Mom, I just got blown up." <cite>WafflehouseJK posted [p:882076561] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>Leanaunfurled posted...</cite> <quote><cite>MrNintendo1213 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Error1355 posted...</cite> <quote>Also after looking this up guys you are aware this is a sequel and not a remake?</quote> So, you're saying that at some point after the original ends, someone somehow turns a magical board game into a magic atari game. Despite the fact that the atari was already old when the original Jumanji came out. Either that or there is a completely unrelated magic atari game also called Jumanji set in the jungle. No matter how you look at it, it makes no sense and looks bad.</quote> "This magical board game gets turned into a magical video game for the sequel THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE THOUGH" Seriously, bro?</quote> There's a difference in filmmaking between dispension of disbelief and not following the rules of your own world you've established. It honestly would be more forgivable if it WAS a remake, but if it is in fact a sequel, then it has to follow what's already been established in the first film.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
l Dudeboy l 06/30/17 5:12:59 AM #59:	This children's film is too unrealistic for me. --- You are now breathing manually. Lets put a little lead in the air, and see what falls over. <cite>l Dudeboy l posted [p:882076842] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>This children's film is too unrealistic for me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 06/30/17 5:13:13 AM #60:	Banjo2553 posted... s0nicfan posted... I'm overly bothered by the fact that it looks like an atari with Genesis controllers and high resolution graphics. If they can't even give enough of a shit to make their game reboot consistent with an era, that tells me they're not likely going to give a shit about anything else. They didn't want to spend any extra money to pay Sony, or Microsoft, or Nintendo to use one of their consoles in the movie. Which does show how much they "care." I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. Darmik posted... The Jumanji board game felt like this ancient, magic and mysterious thing that has likely sucked in and ruined people throughout the generations. A mysterious video game system dates it to only be a few decades old and yet it still somehow ended up being forgotten in a school basement. It's just an odd choice. And this is my issue with the comparison. The original would probably be classified as a comedy, but there was enough serious shit in it that you could almost call it a drama too. This one seems too goofy for my taste. Comparisons aside, it just looks meh to me. Someone above said it looked soulless and that's what it seems to me. Maybe if they'd gone more whole-hog into it being a video game it could work for me. --- http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:882076846] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>Banjo2553 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>I'm overly bothered by the fact that it looks like an atari with Genesis controllers and high resolution graphics. If they can't even give enough of a shit to make their game reboot consistent with an era, that tells me they're not likely going to give a shit about anything else.</quote> They didn't want to spend any extra money to pay Sony, or Microsoft, or Nintendo to use one of their consoles in the movie. Which does show how much they "care."</quote> I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. <cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote>The Jumanji board game felt like this ancient, magic and mysterious thing that has likely sucked in and ruined people throughout the generations. A mysterious video game system dates it to only be a few decades old and yet it still somehow ended up being forgotten in a school basement. It's just an odd choice.</quote> And this is my issue with the comparison. The original would probably be classified as a comedy, but there was enough serious shit in it that you could almost call it a drama too. This one seems too goofy for my taste. Comparisons aside, it just looks meh to me. Someone above said it looked soulless and that's what it seems to me. Maybe if they'd gone more whole-hog into it being a video game it could work for me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sage JJ 06/30/17 7:03:10 AM #61:	Error1355 posted... If you want the original, watch the original. Don't bash the new version simply because it has new ideas. If the movie is shit, bash that, but don't bash it just because it's not a 1 for 1 remake. For the most part I agree but there are just some things you do not change about the original. For instance Jumanji should always be a board game. <cite>Sage JJ posted [p:882079025] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>Error1355 posted...</cite> <quote>If you want the original, watch the original. Don't bash the new version simply because it has new ideas. If the movie is shit, bash that, but don't bash it just because it's not a 1 for 1 remake.</quote> For the most part I agree but there are just some things you do not change about the original. For instance Jumanji should always be a board game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 06/30/17 10:06:54 AM #62:	pegusus123456 posted... I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. The resolution of the color gradient on the character select implies either 32-bit graphics or higher. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:882084615] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. </quote> The resolution of the color gradient on the character select implies either 32-bit graphics or higher.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
littlebro07 06/30/17 2:31:02 PM #63:	Went in to the trailer expecting trash Now I really want to see it. But shit, it opens up with Star Wars 8? What's up with the Rock starring in movies based on older stuff and opening against big popular franchises this year? First Baywatch vs POTC, now this. --- http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb289/volcaitlin/gifs/dancning.gif <cite>littlebro07 posted [p:882098499] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>Went in to the trailer expecting trash Now I really want to see it. But shit, it opens up with Star Wars 8? What's up with the Rock starring in movies based on older stuff and opening against big popular franchises this year? First Baywatch vs POTC, now this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I Like Toast 06/30/17 2:44:32 PM #64:	Looks awful like goosebumps --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:882099247] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>Looks awful like goosebumps</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HylianFox 06/30/17 2:49:59 PM #65:	Okay, you got the skinny nerd who wears a bow-tie to school, the huge jock with no spacial awareness that bumps everyone out of the way, the pretty bitch and the slightly-less-pretty bitch was this made in 1989? --- I like my beer cold, my TV loud, and my homosexuals FUH-LAMING! - Homer Simpson i.imgur.com/a2EzoIs.gif i.imgur.com/rPcGRiP.gif <cite>HylianFox posted [p:882099561] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>Okay, you got the skinny nerd who wears a bow-tie to school, the huge jock with no spacial awareness that bumps everyone out of the way, the pretty bitch and the slightly-less-pretty bitch was this made in 1989?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OctilIery 06/30/17 2:51:28 PM #66:	Vindris_SNH posted... How do you expect to compete with a legend like Robin Williams? just stahp Well they're making a movie that's very clearly going for its own unique take rather than something that can be compared to his. <cite>OctilIery posted [p:882099633] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote>How do you expect to compete with a legend like Robin Williams? just stahp</quote> Well they're making a movie that's very clearly going for its own unique take rather than something that can be compared to his.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 06/30/17 3:18:09 PM #67:	s0nicfan posted... pegusus123456 posted... I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. The resolution of the color gradient on the character select implies either 32-bit graphics or higher. I'mma be honest with you. What you just said is one of the most pedantic things I've ever heard. --- http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:882101194] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. </quote> The resolution of the color gradient on the character select implies either 32-bit graphics or higher.</quote> I'mma be honest with you. What you just said is one of the most pedantic things I've ever heard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 06/30/17 4:00:20 PM #68:	pegusus123456 posted... s0nicfan posted... pegusus123456 posted... I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. The resolution of the color gradient on the character select implies either 32-bit graphics or higher. I'mma be honest with you. What you just said is one of the most pedantic things I've ever heard. I'm aware of that, which is why I began my complaint with "I'm overly bothered by the fact that". My larger point is that the console looks like its from the 70s, the controllers are from the 90s, and the graphics are from early 2000s. A total lack of consistency in set design can show a lack of real care by the team making a good movie, which could imply this is more of a shameless cash grab than a reboot actually worth watching. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:882103564] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. </quote> The resolution of the color gradient on the character select implies either 32-bit graphics or higher.</quote> I'mma be honest with you. What you just said is one of the most pedantic things I've ever heard.</quote> I'm aware of that, which is why I began my complaint with "I'm overly bothered by the fact that". My larger point is that the console looks like its from the 70s, the controllers are from the 90s, and the graphics are from early 2000s. A total lack of consistency in set design can show a lack of real care by the team making a good movie, which could imply this is more of a shameless cash grab than a reboot actually worth watching.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 06/30/17 4:05:13 PM #69:	Twinmold posted... Looks fine to me. Switching the board game to a video game is a nice way of modernizing the story. people still play board games and a magic video game is really stupid since no one today proclaims to be a real sorcerer a several hundred year old board game on the other hand would have been made in the age of superstition and alchemy when people did regard the spirits and curses and believe in such so no it isn't modernizing it it is ruining it --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:882103813] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>Twinmold posted...</cite> <quote>Looks fine to me. Switching the board game to a video game is a nice way of modernizing the story.</quote> people still play board games and a magic video game is really stupid since no one today proclaims to be a real sorcerer a several hundred year old board game on the other hand would have been made in the age of superstition and alchemy when people did regard the spirits and curses and believe in such so no it isn't modernizing it it is ruining it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VectorChaos 06/30/17 4:11:22 PM #70:	Dat Karen Gillan --- PSN VectorChaos http://i.imgur.com/ftMERkZ.jpg XBL Vector Chaos http://i.imgur.com/10hWZ95.png http://i.imgur.com/MZMOLx0.jpg http://i.imgur.com/R2jRl8F.jpg <cite>VectorChaos posted [p:882104110] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>Dat Karen Gillan</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 06/30/17 4:16:50 PM #71:	pegusus123456 posted... s0nicfan posted... pegusus123456 posted... I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. The resolution of the color gradient on the character select implies either 32-bit graphics or higher. I'mma be honest with you. What you just said is one of the most pedantic things I've ever heard. it is not pedantic it is details like this that change this from a mindless flick a few people will watch once and then it goes into the bargain bin to be forgotten like "journey to the center of the earth" with the Rock or is regarded as a classic that is beloved by people for generations to come like the original Jumanji movies are about aesthetics, and little care or thought into said aesthetics is what separates great movies from c- movies as such this highlights even more the stupid choice of video game over board game the board game in the original was HIGHLY aesthetic from the orig https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/styles/article_small/public/thumbnails/image/2017/03/28/08/jumanji.jpg highly crafted wood, not just cardboard careful thought out design that suggests maybe some witch doctor made the game look at this replica, yes, aesthetic enough to cause people to want to make replicas! https://cdn.thisiswhyimbroke.com/images/jumanji-640x533.jpg --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:882104434] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm more wondering where you two saw high res graphics in this trailer. All you see of the "game" is a static background image where they choose their characters. After that, they get sucked into the video game at which point I think you can start discounting the limitations of technology. </quote> The resolution of the color gradient on the character select implies either 32-bit graphics or higher.</quote> I'mma be honest with you. What you just said is one of the most pedantic things I've ever heard.</quote> it is not pedantic it is details like this that change this from a mindless flick a few people will watch once and then it goes into the bargain bin to be forgotten like "journey to the center of the earth" with the Rock or is regarded as a classic that is beloved by people for generations to come like the original Jumanji movies are about aesthetics, and little care or thought into said aesthetics is what separates great movies from c- movies as such this highlights even more the stupid choice of video game over board game the board game in the original was HIGHLY aesthetic from the orig https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/styles/article_small/public/thumbnails/image/2017/03/28/08/jumanji.jpg highly crafted wood, not just cardboard careful thought out design that suggests maybe some witch doctor made the game look at this replica, yes, aesthetic enough to cause people to want to make replicas! https://cdn.thisiswhyimbroke.com/images/jumanji-640x533.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Error1355 06/30/17 4:25:57 PM #72:	VectorChaos posted... Dat Karen Gillan indeed --- This life is just a game we play, that we can never win. But don't give up, no don't give up. <cite>Error1355 posted [p:882104946] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>VectorChaos posted...</cite> <quote>Dat Karen Gillan</quote> indeed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sylverlolol 06/30/17 4:27:36 PM #73:	Questionmarktarius posted... Twinmold posted... Switching the board game to a video game is a nice way of modernizing the story. Videogames already existed in 1995, some of which looked pretty much like that "TV Games" thing in the 2017 trailer. Board games were still very popular in the 90s...now, not so much (especially compared to video games). --- This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. <cite>sylverlolol posted [p:882105031] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Twinmold posted...</cite> <quote>Switching the board game to a video game is a nice way of modernizing the story.</quote> Videogames already existed in 1995, some of which looked pretty much like that "TV Games" thing in the 2017 trailer.</quote> Board games were still very popular in the 90s...now, not so much (especially compared to video games).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HylianFox 06/30/17 4:32:38 PM #74:	darkphoenix181 posted... highly crafted wood, not just cardboard careful thought out design that suggests maybe some witch doctor made the game so why the hell is the title in English? --- I like my beer cold, my TV loud, and my homosexuals FUH-LAMING! - Homer Simpson i.imgur.com/a2EzoIs.gif i.imgur.com/rPcGRiP.gif <cite>HylianFox posted [p:882105303] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>highly crafted wood, not just cardboard careful thought out design that suggests maybe some witch doctor made the game</quote> so why the hell is the title in English?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 06/30/17 4:33:48 PM #75:	did anyone here ITT saying "lets just give this a chance guys, maybe it will be good!?" watch this movie and actually think it was a very good movie? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1397514/ --- sigless user is me or am I? <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:882105364] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>did anyone here ITT saying "lets just give this a chance guys, maybe it will be good!?" watch this movie and actually think it was a very good movie? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1397514/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Leanaunfurled 06/30/17 4:49:27 PM #76:	VectorChaos posted... Dat Karen Gillan Thank you, someone else has their priorities straight. darkphoenix181 posted... did anyone here ITT saying "lets just give this a chance guys, maybe it will be good!?" watch this movie and actually think it was a very good movie? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1397514/ None of those movies looked good to me. This one does look entertaining, though again I don't see any reason to connect it to the original, which is the problem majority of people have. --- Currently Playing: Trails in the Sky the 3rd http://i.imgur.com/mfuN9AI.png http://i.imgur.com/nyP8pdG.jpg <cite>Leanaunfurled posted [p:882106230] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>VectorChaos posted...</cite> <quote>Dat Karen Gillan</quote> Thank you, someone else has their priorities straight. <cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>did anyone here ITT saying "lets just give this a chance guys, maybe it will be good!?" watch this movie and actually think it was a very good movie? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1397514/</quote> None of those movies looked good to me. This one does look entertaining, though again I don't see any reason to connect it to the original, which is the problem majority of people have.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EmeralDragon23 07/01/17 8:38:44 PM #77:	Did all of you forget people get into sucked the jungle in the original too? --- El Psy Congroo 3DS FC: 3952-7469-6840 <cite>EmeralDragon23 posted [p:882171957] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote>Did all of you forget people get into sucked the jungle in the original too?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 07/01/17 8:44:15 PM #78:	EmeralDragon23 posted... Did all of you forget people get into sucked the jungle in the original too? Find a single person complaining about that aspect of the trailer in this topic. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:882172218] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>EmeralDragon23 posted...</cite> <quote>Did all of you forget people get into sucked the jungle in the original too?</quote> Find a single person complaining about that aspect of the trailer in this topic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Delirious_Beard 07/01/17 8:45:10 PM #79:	snesmaster40 posted... Oh, Sony Pictures. Trash confirmed. --- http://i.imgur.com/5UL2v5u.gif "Does our ruin benefit the earth? Does it help the grass to grow, the sun to shine? Is this darkness in you, too?" <cite>Delirious_Beard posted [p:882172264] in Jumanji: W... [t:75513120]...</cite> <quote><cite>snesmaster40 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh, Sony Pictures. Trash confirmed.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle trailer (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle trailer