Board 8 > This is how political correctness dies

(+) Yeah! (+)

Google stocks down.

http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/goog
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/googl
---

Google stock has been trending down since a slight drop 3 weeks ago that I don't know the reason for. There seems to have been no effect on it from these events as anyone who pulled the timeline back and wasn't trying to paint a narrative could tell, and it's mostly stabalized.

But, uh.....good hustle.
---

This is how Vlado's argument dies
---

If you look a few days back, they seem to have recovered a bit after a massive drop yesterday.

Unless, of course, you don't consider this a drop:

---

I wonder if the guy will regret all this when his entire life starts becoming scrutinized by redpills online. Or maybe he will enjoy that? It's true that males are more genetically predisposed towards political internet messiahship than programming.
---

There was an extremely minor drop yestersay that is in line with typical constant market fluctuation. If you pull back a month you will see what an actual drop looks like, and even that one isn't radical.
---

Yes, down to levels not seen since one month ago.
---

foolm0r0n posted...

I wonder if the guy will regret all this when his entire life starts becoming scrutinized by redpills online. Or maybe he will enjoy that? It's true that males are more genetically predisposed towards political internet messiahship than programming.

He already got plenty of job offers, but you already knew that. Sorry to ruin your attempt at being edgy. Not really sorry.
---

LapisLazuli posted...

There was an extremely minor drop yestersay that is in line with typical constant market fluctuation. If you pull back a month you will see what an actual drop looks like, and even that one isn't radical.

lmfao, imagine actually believing this. "It's just a coincidence, guys! Nothing to see here!"
---

Vlado you at looking way to hard at the graph and not at all at the numbers. $10 on a nearly $1000 stock is not a notable drop, no.

The $80 from 3 weeks ago, though, something must have caused that.
---

Vlado, spoiler tags are meant to be used to hide details that might ruin something for someone else. No one cares enough about your posts to warrant you using spoiler tags unless it's related to your Civil War fanfic.
---

Vlado posted...

He already got plenty of job offers, but you already knew that. Sorry to ruin your attempt at being edgy. Not really sorry.

He won't take the jobs now that he knows he can do political interviews for money. That's how biology works.
---

Vlado posted...

LapisLazuli posted...

There was an extremely minor drop yestersay that is in line with typical constant market fluctuation. If you pull back a month you will see what an actual drop looks like, and even that one isn't radical.

lmfao, imagine actually believing this. "It's just a coincidence, guys! Nothing to see here!"

That's what the people who actually know a little about stocks are thinking, yeah. I can understand why YOU might have difficulty imagining it.
---

foolm0r0n posted...

I wonder if the guy will regret all this when his entire life starts becoming scrutinized by redpills online. Or maybe he will enjoy that? It's true that males are more genetically predisposed towards political internet messiahship than programming.

I'm hoping he won't be so ready to go all in with anyone who treats him as a messiah. I saw the Assange job offer, and I hope he doesn't take it (whatever it is). This guy currently has his own schtick, which I respect, and I hope he can stick to it without compromising and joining some larger right movement.
---

Google hires a bunch of women: stock rises 300%
Google fires this guy: stock drops 0.05%

No wonder redpills fucking hate the free market. Only a strong national force can keep the males on top.
---

Like, Vlado, I know you must have pulled it back out to 1 month and 3 month out of curiosity. Very disengenuous of you to feign ignorance here.
---

LapisLazuli posted...

Like, Vlado, I know you must have pulled it back out to 1 month and 3 month out of curiosity.

Tbf, it's not immediately apparent how to do that on Market Watch, so I'll buy that he might not have realized that's a thing. Especially when the graph he's seeing supports what he wants, so why actually question that?
---

kevwaffles posted...

LapisLazuli posted...

Like, Vlado, I know you must have pulled it back out to 1 month and 3 month out of curiosity.

Tbf, it's not immediately apparent how to do that on Market Watch, so I'll buy that he might not have realized that's a thing. Especially when the graph he's seeing supports what he wants, so why actually question that?

He already posted another graph that required him to adjust the timeframe, so no defense there!
---

LapisLazuli posted...

Google stock has been trending down since a slight drop 3 weeks ago that I don't know the reason for. There seems to have been no effect on it from these events as anyone who pulled the timeline back and wasn't trying to paint a narrative could tell, and it's mostly stabalized.

But, uh.....good hustle.

Most stocks see downward movement in the summer months fwiw. Sell in May and go away is a common phrase amongst traders and investors, even though it is overblown
---

foolm0r0n posted...

Google hires a bunch of women: stock rises 300%

Thanks for the SJW fanfiction.

foolm0r0n posted...

Google fires this guy: stock drops 0.7%

Fixed it for you.
---

Vlado posted...

Thanks for the SJW fanfiction.

So this is just a coincidence? ($940 = ~300% higher than $320)

---

You can't expect a commie to be well versed in these kinds of things
---

Vlado posted...

foolm0r0n posted...
Google fires this guy: stock drops 0.7%

Fixed it for you.

Wow.
---

foolm0r0n posted...

Vlado posted...

Thanks for the SJW fanfiction.

So this is just a coincidence? ($940 = ~300% higher than $320)

Every one of those rises corresponds to a man being hired and every drop corresponds to a diversity hire
---

That graph Vlado posted is unbelievably intellectually dishonest. Let's show a graph that only covers a range of twenty dollars to make ANY change look massive in size, just to pretend anyone in the real world gives a shit about some employee that got fired. Additionally, said graph is provided out of context, without considering the overall market's effect on individual stocks, or general fluctuations that occur daily.
---

So a normal Vlado post.
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Every one of those rises corresponds to a man being hired and every drop corresponds to a diversity hire

The more political the programmers at Google get, the higher their stock grows
---

lol, first thing the guy does after the opinion piece controversy is come on stefan fucking molyneux' show. do people still want to defend him?
---

foolm0r0n posted...

I wonder if the guy will regret all this when his entire life starts becoming scrutinized by redpills online. Or maybe he will enjoy that? It's true that males are more genetically predisposed towards political internet messiahship than programming.

Pretty disappointed in this response from you tbh. He's almost certainly already regretting it to a certain degree he got portrayed as a hateful bigot across the media and still is being and lost his job... and the latter point when you look at the upsurge and messianic feminist and left wing youtube channels and blogs and the same for the right and religious, is just stupid. You know there's just as much shit on both sides.

Hell Anita Sarkeesian basically invented this shit.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

lol, first thing the guy does after the opinion piece controversy is come on stefan fucking molyneux' show. do people still want to defend him?

Never heard of him before. Which sounds like something I should be happy about. The Peterson interview I'm currently listening to seems fine.

You've also already been proved wrong about the contents of the memo several times and yet you're still wanting to crucify the guy? What's wrong with you?
---

foolm0r0n posted...

Vlado posted...

Thanks for the SJW fanfiction.

So this is just a coincidence? ($940 = ~300% higher than $320)

How does that prove your statement, again?

Google hired a bunch of straight white men in the same period, too - much more than the women they hired.

Espeon posted...

That graph Vlado posted is unbelievably intellectually dishonest. Let's show a graph that only covers a range of twenty dollars to make ANY change look massive in size, just to pretend anyone in the real world gives a shit about some employee that got fired. Additionally, said graph is provided out of context, without considering the overall market's effect on individual stocks, or general fluctuations that occur daily.

We're talking events happening in the last 2-3 days. Of course I'll post an excerpt from the 5-day chart.
---

Vlado posted...

much more than the women they hired.

Many, not much. Just another sign of the cultural disconnect experienced by a man who lives in the capitol of jellied meats.
---

The issue isn't the time, it's the heavily zoomed in price fluctuation. The drop is nothing in overall google stock, but looks huge because it's warped to seem major.

The fault originally lies with the site for displaying it as such and tricking you, but then you doubled down.
---

The likelihood is they have had a stock drop due to this, the whole things been blown majorly out of proportion. But is it actually relevant damage? Lol no... so it's dishonest to portray it as such.
---

LapisLazuli posted...

The issue isn't the time, it's the heavily zoomed in price fluctuation. The drop is nothing in overall google stock, but looks huge because it's warped to seem major.

The fault originally lies with the site for displaying it as such and tricking you, but then you doubled down.

Exactly. Compare your graph (not to be confused with Vladograph (tm)) with foolmo's. Yours shows an out of context segment that makes a 9 dollar drop look like a massive crash in price. His graph, showing Google's overall prices, doesn't even register this change as a thing.
---

Its just the summer months down period.

Since 1950, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has had an average return of only 0.3% during the May-October period, compared with an average gain of 7.5% during the November-April period. While the exact reasons for this seasonal trading pattern are not known, lower trading volumes due to the summer vacation months and increased investment flows during the winter months are cited as contributory reasons for the discrepancy in performance between the May-October and the November-April periods, respectively.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sell-in-may-and-go-away.asp#ixzz4pHjBNdth
---

Stock market is the most feels over reals thing anyway
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Stock market is the most feels over reals thing anyway

Literally the Nintendo stock from Pokemon GO last year.
---

MenuWars posted...

You've also already been proved wrong about the contents of the memo several times and yet you're still wanting to crucify the guy? What's wrong with you?

i wasn't wrong about everything i said about the contents of the memo. and if he literally thinks "the best thing for me to do now is get on molyneux' show" then yeah, fuck him.

thanks for the condescending remark, though.
---

Google hired a bunch of straight white men in the same period, too - much more than the women they hired.

how do you know how many straight white men they hired

maybe they were hiring a bunch of gay Asians?
---

^ What would it matter if they were?
---

I don't know, I just want Vlado to tell me where he's getting his Google hiring numbers.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

MenuWars posted...

You've also already been proved wrong about the contents of the memo several times and yet you're still wanting to crucify the guy? What's wrong with you?

i wasn't wrong about everything i said about the contents of the memo. and if he literally thinks "the best thing for me to do now is get on molyneux' show" then yeah, fuck him.

thanks for the condescending remark, though.

You seemed pretty set on hating this Google guy well before he got on the Molyneux show.

I don't know who Molyneux is either.
---

He made Fable.
---

EndOfDiscOne posted...

You seemed pretty set on hating this Google guy well before he got on the Molyneux show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPxocKgsCdQ
---

Vlado posted...

How does that prove your statement, again?

It is a believable narrative, therefore it can be used as proof
---

MenuWars posted...

Never heard of him before. Which sounds like something I should be happy about. The Peterson interview I'm currently listening to seems fine.

Molyneux Is a right wing guy who's pretty popular on YouTube and social media but also a pro at spinning things. He's fairly smart at times but you can just feel the bias often. He's also does like to troll from time to time, which is where a lot of his hate will come from. Doesn't sound or look the part but it's there.

Peterson's a different story, he's an actual professor who's taught similar subjects at Harvard, though he currently teaches in Canada. The interview difference is pretty enormous and the Google guy totally has watched a bunch of his lectures online. As has the other anon Google guy in that interview.
---

MenuWars posted...

Pretty disappointed in this response from you tbh

Sorry dad

If this guy is doing a Molyneux interview then he wants to enter the political arena. That comes with enemies attacking you, of course. And we know that that means:

lol, they really fired the guy, which only proved everything he said 100% right.

However, he probably didn't consider the intense scrutiny and toxicity among his allies. If he wavers even a tiny bit from their narrative, he is a traitor. And a traitor is treated far worse than an enemy. Maybe he is aware and prepared for all that.
---

scarletspeed7 posted...

He made Fable.

Different Molyneux.
---