Current Events > Those FILTHY CLIMATE DENIERS!!!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/09/18/immediacy-threat-climate-change-exaggerated-faulty-models/amp/

How DARE they question the infallible science of climate alarmism!
---

I can't even read your article because I don't have premium...

and yet you couldn't be bothered to post the relevant paragraphs here for us to read
---

I hate the term denier when it comes to climate change. Nothing wrong with being skeptical.
---

darkphoenix181 posted...

I can't even read your article because I don't have premium...

and yet you couldn't be bothered to post the relevant paragraphs here for us to read

---

That article literally says the climate is changing multiple times in the first paragraph.

darkphoenix181 posted...

I can't even read your article because I don't have premium...

and yet you couldn't be bothered to post the relevant paragraphs here for us to read

I had a read through the page source, from what I can gather they're basically saying "We're not at absolutely defcon 17 levels of utter catastrophe tomorrow, but things are still really really bad".
---

Oh, it also has a lot of optimism about the speed at which the shift in energy sources is going.
---

pinky0926 posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

I can't even read your article because I don't have premium...

and yet you couldn't be bothered to post the relevant paragraphs here for us to read

I had a read through the page source, from what I can gather they're basically saying "We're not at absolutely defcon 17 levels of utter catastrophe tomorrow, but things are still really really bad".

Not really. It said what I've been saying for years - climate change is nowhere near as bad as is being predicted because the models are wrong. We're supposed to be 1.3 degrees above pre-industrial, and we're only at 0.9 degrees above. It also says America not joining into the Paris Accord is a non-issue, and that there is a 66% chance of stablizing the temp rise in accordance with it.
---

darkjedilink posted...

pinky0926 posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

I can't even read your article because I don't have premium...

and yet you couldn't be bothered to post the relevant paragraphs here for us to read

I had a read through the page source, from what I can gather they're basically saying "We're not at absolutely defcon 17 levels of utter catastrophe tomorrow, but things are still really really bad".

Not really. It said what I've been saying for years - climate change is nowhere near as bad as is being predicted because the models are wrong. We're supposed to be 1.3 degrees above pre-industrial, and we're only at 0.9 degrees above. It also says America not joining into the Paris Accord is a non-issue, and that there is a 66% chance of stablizing the temp rise in accordance with it.

Ok. I'll wait before there's more studies suggesting this than the opposite.
---

pinky0926 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

pinky0926 posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

I can't even read your article because I don't have premium...

and yet you couldn't be bothered to post the relevant paragraphs here for us to read

I had a read through the page source, from what I can gather they're basically saying "We're not at absolutely defcon 17 levels of utter catastrophe tomorrow, but things are still really really bad".

Not really. It said what I've been saying for years - climate change is nowhere near as bad as is being predicted because the models are wrong. We're supposed to be 1.3 degrees above pre-industrial, and we're only at 0.9 degrees above. It also says America not joining into the Paris Accord is a non-issue, and that there is a 66% chance of stablizing the temp rise in accordance with it.

Ok. I'll wait before there's more studies suggesting this than the opposite.

You realize that you're saying you want to believe computer models proven false by actually data over the actual data, right?
---

darkjedilink posted...

You realize that you're saying you want to believe computer models proven false by actually data over the actual data, right?

No, that's not at all what I'm saying.
---

I don't think I could possibly lose any more respect for people who think that "climate change" (aka weather patterns) is our biggest issue (that's what obama said).
---

I don't think anyone denies that there's a climate.
---