Board 8 > nypd rapes girl

(+) Yeah! (+)

I somehow read this and it's like my brain rejected the fact that she was ARRESTED when they did this

what the fuck

I didn't even realize that part of it

Corrik posted...

They did not admit to kidnapping a girl. They admitted to having consensual sex with a girl. (Blowjob received by one of the men and not sex).

Important to read what is actually said.

Important to use your brain for 1 second which I realize is hard for you.

They admitted to the sex, which requires admitting to the kidnapping. Unless they are saying they raped her in the jail cell?
---

foolm0r0n posted...

Corrik posted...

They did not admit to kidnapping a girl. They admitted to having consensual sex with a girl. (Blowjob received by one of the men and not sex).

Important to read what is actually said.

Important to use your brain for 1 second which I realize is hard for you.

They admitted to the sex, which requires admitting to the kidnapping. Unless they are saying they raped her in the jail cell?

Their story for all I know could be they asked if she wanted to get into the van and have sex and she said yes.

I do not know what their story is. However, I am not gonna make the story up as I go along like you are.

I have already read two stories that conflict on it. 1 says she was arrested, her friends were sent away, she was placed in the van and then raped.

The second I have seen says that the friends were let go. The cops asked her to get in the van. Told her to take her top off. Afterwards they cuffed her and drove to a Chipotle where they told her if she wanted to get off her charge she had to have sex with them.

I do not know the cops story. I am going to use a little bit of my brain here and assume their story is going to have them doing nothing illegal in it.
---

Corrik posted...

I am going to use a little bit of my brain here and assume their story is going to have them doing nothing illegal in it.

Literally already beyond this so we'll leave it at that I guess

Remember to teach your daughters to obey whatever the nice cop man says so they don't get dailymail articles written about them in the future!
---

WhoopsyDaisy posted...

what a dumb thing to say, it's not specifically minorities you disingenuous idiot

Disingenuous is 'raising questions' then being mia when they're answered because you didn't like them. But that's a separate matter, sir.
---

Do any of these articles mention who offered the sex?
---

Corrik posted...

foolm0r0n posted...

Corrik posted...

They did not admit to kidnapping a girl. They admitted to having consensual sex with a girl. (Blowjob received by one of the men and not sex).

Important to read what is actually said.

Important to use your brain for 1 second which I realize is hard for you.

They admitted to the sex, which requires admitting to the kidnapping. Unless they are saying they raped her in the jail cell?

Their story for all I know could be they asked if she wanted to get into the van and have sex and she said yes.

I do not know what their story is. However, I am not gonna make the story up as I go along like you are.

I have already read two stories that conflict on it. 1 says she was arrested, her friends were sent away, she was placed in the van and then raped.

The second I have seen says that the friends were let go. The cops asked her to get in the van. Told her to take her top off. Afterwards they cuffed her and drove to a Chipotle where they told her if she wanted to get off her charge she had to have sex with them.

I do not know the cops story. I am going to use a little bit of my brain here and assume their story is going to have them doing nothing illegal in it.

Corrik wyding dude
---

SgtSphynx posted...

This is such a great sentence...

Two detectives and their supervisor have been stripped of their badges and guns

It's almost like cops get in trouble when they actually do something wrong
---

Terastodon posted...

Corrik posted...

Cops are f***ed regardless.

See this is the issue. People aren't sure about this. Because they have a crazy good union and because people believe they have a reputation for literally getting away with murder.

Cops need better PR guys.

Where is this crazy good union and how can I join it? Because our union can't even get us street parking
---

BTW whoever tagged me is apparently on ignore so if they asked me a direct question I can't see it
---

sweet topic title btw i didn't know i participated in the rape.

let's make a topic called "black people rape woman"
---

Foolmo just wanted to know if you knew the rapists
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Foolmo just wanted to know if you knew the rapists

oh

can't say that i do

were they convicted of rape already?
---

They admitted to the sex, which legal B8ers determined is institutional rape at the very least
---

JetJaguar posted...

sweet topic title btw i didn't know i participated in the rape.

let's make a topic called "black people rape woman"

employees represent employers, which is why people get fired for negatively representing their employers

an occupation is not a fucking race, you can always take off your badge
---

It definitely works that way with positive press

"NYPD captures criminal"
---

Jakyl25 posted...

They admitted to the sex, which legal B8ers determined is institutional rape at the very least

false confessions occur all the time
---

CelesMyUserName posted...

JetJaguar posted...

sweet topic title btw i didn't know i participated in the rape.

let's make a topic called "black people rape woman"

employees represent employers, which is why people get fired for negatively representing their employers

an occupation is not a fucking race, you can always take off your badge

ooooh you're angry

that's still a double standard though
---

JetJaguar posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

They admitted to the sex, which legal B8ers determined is institutional rape at the very least

false confessions occur all the time

Under what circumstances, typically?
---

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Corrik posted...

foolm0r0n posted...

Corrik posted...

They did not admit to kidnapping a girl. They admitted to having consensual sex with a girl. (Blowjob received by one of the men and not sex).

Important to read what is actually said.

Important to use your brain for 1 second which I realize is hard for you.

They admitted to the sex, which requires admitting to the kidnapping. Unless they are saying they raped her in the jail cell?

Their story for all I know could be they asked if she wanted to get into the van and have sex and she said yes.

I do not know what their story is. However, I am not gonna make the story up as I go along like you are.

I have already read two stories that conflict on it. 1 says she was arrested, her friends were sent away, she was placed in the van and then raped.

The second I have seen says that the friends were let go. The cops asked her to get in the van. Told her to take her top off. Afterwards they cuffed her and drove to a Chipotle where they told her if she wanted to get off her charge she had to have sex with them.

I do not know the cops story. I am going to use a little bit of my brain here and assume their story is going to have them doing nothing illegal in it.

Corrik wyding dude

Discussing a story. You?
---

Jakyl25 posted...

JetJaguar posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

They admitted to the sex, which legal B8ers determined is institutional rape at the very least

false confessions occur all the time

Under what circumstances, typically?

I don't think there is a typical circumstance, there's several different ones. Sometimes it's overeager cops beating a confession out of someone, or a person breaking after days of well-intentioned questioning, or a mentally ill person pretending they're the Zodiac. Investigators even have to leak fake info to the press to filter out those loons. Maybe say the killer always ties a red ribbon to the victim's finger instead of a blue one, which he actually does.

Maybe this "confession" is a guy bragging to his friends that he got laid when he didn't. I dunno. They're probably rapists (I think I read that the rape kit showed signs of sexual assault, though that can be faked after the fact) if you go by the letter of the law, although if it's institutional I would hesitate to call them that just because I think the term is unneccessarily harsh in that scenario. Like I wouldn't call a high school teacher who has consensual sex with a student a rapist, that's just me. In that scenario I would just call them dumbasses. Now if they handcuffed this girl and forcibly raped her in the back of a van, that's a different story.
---

For the record though she's not telling the whole truth either because she said they let her go out of the van after doing it, but I know for a fact that she was booked and fingerprinted and photographed because I saw the arrest report with my own eyes.

If I had to guess: She offered to fuck them, thinking it would get her off. They fucked her, because they're disgusting, and then processed her anyway, which pissed her off. So she said they raped her, probably not even realizing that they technically did. We'll see I guess.
---

JetJaguar posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

JetJaguar posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

They admitted to the sex, which legal B8ers determined is institutional rape at the very least

false confessions occur all the time

Under what circumstances, typically?

I don't think there is a typical circumstance, there's several different ones. Sometimes it's overeager cops beating a confession out of someone, or a person breaking after days of well-intentioned questioning, or a mentally ill person pretending they're the Zodiac. Investigators even have to leak fake info to the press to filter out those loons. Maybe say the killer always ties a red ribbon to the victim's finger instead of a blue one, which he actually does.

Maybe this "confession" is a guy bragging to his friends that he got laid when he didn't. I dunno. They're probably rapists (I think I read that the rape kit showed signs of sexual assault, though that can be faked after the fact) if you go by the letter of the law, although if it's institutional I would hesitate to call them that just because I think the term is unneccessarily harsh in that scenario. Like I wouldn't call a high school teacher who has consensual sex with a student a rapist, that's just me. In that scenario I would just call them dumbasses. Now if they handcuffed this girl and forcibly raped her in the back of a van, that's a different story.

I am interested to see also. Mostly because their is oddities that you do not normally see.

Normally a victim doesn't react by posting articles of it and saying it is her and filing a $50 million lawsuit the day after.

And, normally, a guilty party of rape in a situation as this doesn't try to say it was consensual and not use condoms and such to not leave DNA (by normally I mean a cop would normally be smart enough).

Also it is odd they are working desk jobs right now while being investigated. If a slam dunk, i would assume they should have been arrested already.

That said, it is likely they are guilty and the thing I point to most is what you pointed to also in the consistencies with sexual assault part.

Just because a case is odd doesn't mean a crime wasn't committed. The oddities do peak my curiosity though.
---

CherryCokes posted...

I know someone who was raped by an off-duty cop in a similar manner and it has fucked her up for probably life at this point. She's been in intensive therapy for years and years, and has had numerous psychiatric hospitalizations in part because of it. The guy naturally never had anything happen to him, because he made her afraid to press charges.

Here's hoping this young woman has a less saddening outcome.

What does him being an off-duty cop have to do with it besides nothing?
---

because even when off duty, cops have huge superiority complexes.

Let's make it simple for you to understand.

Let's say you're a girl, who gets raped by a man with a burger king name tag. Are you going to want to eat at bk any time soon?
---

Peace___Frog posted...

because even when off duty, cops have huge superiority complexes.

Let's make it simple for you to understand.

Let's say you're a girl, who gets raped by a man with a burger king name tag. Are you going to want to eat at bk any time soon?

Do off duty burger king employees tend to wear their name tags? Lol
---

Perhaps he just finished his shift. Your imagination and ability to have thought experiments are lacking.
---

Peace___Frog posted...

Perhaps he just finished his shift. Your imagination and ability to have thought experiments are lacking.

Yeahhh... lol
---

Literally eighty posts in and nobody posted this yet? For shame, guys.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PScmRiaZhwk
---

Corrik posted...

The oddities do peak my curiosity though.

The oddities do pique my curiosity though.
---

Llarian posted...

Corrik posted...

The oddities do peak my curiosity though.

The oddities do pique my curiosity though.

Picque a boo
---

JetJaguar posted...

CherryCokes posted...

I know someone who was raped by an off-duty cop in a similar manner and it has fucked her up for probably life at this point. She's been in intensive therapy for years and years, and has had numerous psychiatric hospitalizations in part because of it. The guy naturally never had anything happen to him, because he made her afraid to press charges.

Here's hoping this young woman has a less saddening outcome.

What does him being an off-duty cop have to do with it besides nothing?

---

Peace___Frog posted...

because even when off duty, cops have huge superiority complexes.

Let's make it simple for you to understand.

Let's say you're a girl, who gets raped by a man with a burger king name tag. Are you going to want to eat at bk any time soon?

I don't think you made it simple enough.

Because it looks to me like you're categorizing all cops as rapists who think they're entitled to a woman's body.
---

If that's how you take my scenario, that says more about you than anything. It's a matter of association, and you questioning his friend's association of cops being reminders of a traumatic event is pretty shitty.
---

If the second half of your post was all you wrote, that would be the case.

But you specifically felt the need to point out that cops "have superiority complexes" as a reason why the man's profession was relevant to the crime.

Cokes also said nothing about her no longer trusting cops specifically. I do find it funny though that it makes me a shitty person to find it stupid to distrust an entire group of people based on the action of one (and he was off duty so his authority was irrelevant) since that group happens to be cops. If I get robbed by a black person at gunpoint, am I allowed to say that I don't trust any black people because they're all prone to commit crime and will rob me if given the opportunity? Am I allowed to be prejudiced because I was traumatized?
---

Of course you're allowed. It's a free country.
---

was that an intentionally disingenuous post?
---

To be clear, I'm not saying Coke's friend is somehow wrong for distrusting cops as a result of the incident. PTSD isn't rational.

But saying the guy being a cop is relevant to the motive is wrong.
---

HotDogButts posted...

was that an intentionally disingenuous post?

No. He is of course allowed to be prejudiced. There's no law against it.

Of course such speech has consequences, but no one can stop him from saying it
---

HotDogButts posted...

was that an intentionally disingenuous post?

Was what?

I said "Why is the guy being a cop relevant to the rape and how is that story related to this one when the cop was off duty and not in a position of authority?"

Peace Frog said "Because cops have huge egos."

Which despite his attempt to deflect, is pretty much straight up calling cops rapists. If this story was about a girl being raped by two black men, and Cokes said his friend was raped by a black man so this is no surprise, that would be racist. Even moreso if Peace Frog concurred and then assigned a character trait to all black men that make them prone to rape.
---

Jakyl25 posted...

HotDogButts posted...

was that an intentionally disingenuous post?

No. He is of course allowed to be prejudiced. There's no law against it.

Of course such speech has consequences, but no one can stop him from saying it

I wasn't referring to legal consequences. Of course I don't think Cokes and PF should be jailed for being prejudiced.
---

JetJaguar posted...

Peace Frog said "Because cops have huge egos."

Not what i said, but thanks for playing!
---

forgive me for paraphrasing, and assuming that you are capable of adult interaction

enjoy being a bigot!
---

If having a negative view of the majority of the members of a profession makes me a bigot, then that's fine by me. Cops, in general, have far too much power, are far too militarized, and are horrible at self-control. Maybe they need better training. Maybe they need to not be army rejects. Maybe a million things. But they need something and that's for damned sure.
---

JetJaguar posted...

let's make a topic called "black people rape woman"

You do this often

In this case if the NYPD actually convicts these rapists then fine, it wasn't a group effort. But we'll see. That being said, the NYPD definitely built the power structure that let's this stuff happen.
---

I love how TimJab's posts always goes back to wanting to be prejudice to black people.
---

Please someone give me, a cop, permission to hate black people openly

Also cops don't hate black people

Cops can't be racist if b8ers are also racist. It's basic quantum mechanics.
---

CelesMyUserName posted...

I love how TimJab's posts always goes back to wanting to be prejudice to black people.

That is not what his post says. His post clearly says is judging all police by one cop any fairer than judging all black people by one incident? He knows you would say you should not judge all blacks by one incident so he is asking why you would judge all cops by an incident.

Need to really stop making up what people say.
---

https://twitter.com/WalshFreedom/status/914562076210794506

He calls Trump a "cheap cracker." On national TV.

Would a comedian still have a job if he called Obama a "******?" https://t.co/g6d2FZ9h1X

This is how I imagine TimJab. Just looking for any excuse to say derogatory things about black people.
The tweet does actually spell it out, fyi. Even gfax doesn't allow us to use it!
---