Poll of the Day > So, the Wikipedia page for the Las Vegas terrorist attack sounds Left-Wing

Topic List
Page List: 1
TheWorstPoster
10/02/17 9:43:57 AM
#1:


Blatantly calling the perpetrator "White"?

Check.

Having a section of a lack of gun control in Nevada, despite the fact that no incidents like this happened in that state before?

Check.

"Unknown Motive"?

Check.

Left-Wing talking points to me?

I just want the facts. Not irrelevant details to drive a narrative.
... Copied to Clipboard!
ZiggiStardust
10/02/17 9:55:00 AM
#2:


you're a fucking disgrace, and you should be banned for this post.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
SkynyrdRocker
10/02/17 9:55:32 AM
#3:


ZiggiStardust posted...
you're a fucking disgrace, and you should be banned for this post.
... Copied to Clipboard!
TheWorstPoster
10/02/17 9:55:46 AM
#4:


ZiggiStardust posted...
you're a fucking disgrace, and you should be banned for this post.


For wanting facts rather than a biased narrative?
... Copied to Clipboard!
#5
Post #5 was unavailable or deleted.
Solid Sonic
10/02/17 9:56:47 AM
#6:


Why is there a Wikipedia page for something that happened less than a day ago?
---
DorkLink said I could borrow his signature so I did (see below):
... Copied to Clipboard!
TheWorstPoster
10/02/17 9:57:22 AM
#7:


Zangulus posted...
He's white


Irrelevant

Zangulus posted...
the motive is unknown


Irrelevant. Shooting happened regardless.

Zangulus posted...
he state does have a lack of gun controls.


Irrelevant, seeing how gun-control does not prevent murders (otherwise Chicago would be the safest city in the country).
... Copied to Clipboard!
Nade Duck
10/02/17 10:00:36 AM
#8:


can't wait to see this only get an nkl for whatever pathetic fucking reason.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1