Current Events > Is there a specific name for the logical fallacy of stating two seemingly...

(+) Yeah! (+)

contradictory arguments/beliefs/etc that don't necessarily come from the same person?

Examples:

I. "Those who want to ban abortion also want to defund planned parenthood and programs that support children after they are born."

II. "Those who think guns are too dangerous to be left in the hands of civilians also think our law enforcement is racist."

Is this just a type of strawman?
---

A CE post.
---

Red Herring
---

Doublethink.
George Orwell figured this out quite a while ago.

Not a fallacy, but cognitive dissonance? Because they rationalize conflicting beliefs?
---

I'm not asking what it is called to hold conflicting beliefs, I'm asking if there is a name for using such conflicting beliefs in a attempt to delegitimize an argument, despite the person pushing the argument not holding the second or conflicting part.

i.e. in example I. the people who think abortion should be banned aren't necessarily the same people who think welfare programs need to be reduced, and in example II. the people who think there should be gun control aren't necessarily the same people who think police are corrupt past the point of responsibility.
---