Current Events > I just got modded

(+) Yeah! (+)

inb4 Fair. NEXT.
---

Well, can't really say if it was fair, next, without any context at all.
---

Nazanir posted...

Well, can't really say if it was fair, next, without any context at all.

The topic title was called "Would you eat pussy?"
---

ManLink4321 posted...

Nazanir posted...

Well, can't really say if it was fair, next, without any context at all.

The topic title was called "Would you eat pussy?"

.....and?
---

Dustin1280 posted...

ManLink4321 posted...

Nazanir posted...

Well, can't really say if it was fair, next, without any context at all.

The topic title was called "Would you eat pussy?"

.....and?

That's it. The topic post was simply "I would."
---

Assuming that is the whole truth, I don't see why that is moddable

@Error1355
@Alucard188
---

Dustin1280 posted...

Assuming that is the whole truth, I don't see why that is moddable

@Error1355
@Alucard188

That is all I posted.
---

Offensive
---

Offensive Material

You should not post anything that would be considered inappropriate in a business or school environment (in other words, "Not Safe For Work"). Here are some examples:

Links to images or videos containing pornography, nudity of any kind, or sexualized minors (i.e. "jailbait").
Links to real-life blood and gore. Gore in a video game is fine, but real-life graphic material isn't.
Hate speech, such as using race, religion, sexual orientation, culture, ethnicity, disability, nationality, or gender as a means of insult.
Sexually explicit posts. If you must discuss sexual matters, keep it vague. The less detail, the less likely someone will find it offensive.

What part of your question fits the bill of "keep it vague"?
---

That should not have been moddable. It was not "explicit" in any way
---

Alucard188 posted...

What part of your question fits the bill of "keep it vague"?

In what universe is that not vague? Bad moderation
---

Alucard188 posted...

Offensive Material

You should not post anything that would be considered inappropriate in a business or school environment (in other words, "Not Safe For Work"). Here are some examples:

Links to images or videos containing pornography, nudity of any kind, or sexualized minors (i.e. "jailbait").
Links to real-life blood and gore. Gore in a video game is fine, but real-life graphic material isn't.
Hate speech, such as using race, religion, sexual orientation, culture, ethnicity, disability, nationality, or gender as a means of insult.
Sexually explicit posts. If you must discuss sexual matters, keep it vague. The less detail, the less likely someone will find it offensive.

What part of your question fits the bill of "keep it vague"?

It was vague.
---

For the record TC, I have seen far more explicit topics on numerous occasions not get modded.

I am on your side on this one and usually, I am NOT.
---

ManLink4321 posted...

It was vague.

"Do you eat pussy?".

That is not vague. At all. Come on, man.
---

Dustin1280 posted...

For the record TC, I have seen far more explicit topics on numerous occasions not get modded.

Alucard188 posted...

ManLink4321 posted...

It was vague.

"Do you eat pussy?".

That is not vague. At all. Come on, man.

The fourth word can mean multiple different things to many here. Yes, it was vague because no one knew what I was even talking about.
---

Dustin1280 posted...

For the record TC, I have seen far more explicit topics on numerous occasions not get modded.

I am on your side on this one and usually, I am NOT.

It's all a matter of what gets marked, and what we see. If no one marks the explicit posts, then the likelihood of us seeing them diminishes. That doesn't make them OK to post in the first place.

ManLink4321 posted...

The fourth word can mean multiple different things to many here. Yes, it was vague because no one knew what I was even talking about.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/jack-tripper.gif
---

It's incredibly vague, you're full of shit alucard. It simply asked if you perform a certain sex act. No descriptions of sensations or details. It is no less vague than asking "Would you have sex with this girl?"
---

DarkChozoGhost posted...

It's incredibly vague, you're full of shit alucard. It simply asked if you perform a certain sex act. No descriptions of sensations or details. It is no less vague than asking "Would you have sex with this girl?"

It's as vague as running your car into a lamp post.
---

TC the answer to your topic question is NO

I absolutely hate it and find it disgusting personally...
---

DarkChozoGhost posted...

It is no less vague than asking "Would you have sex with this girl?"

---

He could have been talking about a cat. It was pretty vague.
---

DarkChozoGhost posted...

DarkChozoGhost posted...

It is no less vague than asking "Would you have sex with this girl?"

Terminology is key in vagueness. The wording he used isn't vague. It's not a hard concept to grasp. "Would you have sex with this girl?" is a fundamentally different question than asking if you would perform cunnilingus on her.
---

It's really not. Asking if you'd have sex with someone implies vaginal.
---

DarkChozoGhost posted...

It's really not. Asking if you'd have sex with someone implies vaginal.

Implied, AKA vague.
---

I guess it'll be like the "are you stupid?" thing where the users accept that you're wrong, but will mod it anyway.
---

ITT: Mods are never wrong.
---

Don't be mean to the mods. You don't them running to Allen whining that your picking on them.
---

So mods though talking about eating ***** was offensive..... Sounds about right.
---

They are wrong in this case, your question was well within an acceptable degree of vagueness, but they made their decision. Lets be careful for a couple days because of mod stalking.
---