Poll of the Day > Conservative Mom is OUTRAGED after a Pro-Abortion Group used her DAUGHTERS PIC!

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
LinkPizza 01/27/18 2:58:56 AM #51:	Personally, I'm pro-choice. But what this group did is wrong. I understand what they were trying to do. But the way they did it was honestly, very shitty. And they should have used a different disability. One that actually shows during pregnancy. I feel bad for the family, and hope that the people of the group who did this gets whatever they deserve. --- 3DS Friend Code: 4742 6214 5315 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. 0001 3388 9537, also. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:894890348] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote>Personally, I'm pro-choice. But what this group did is wrong. I understand what they were trying to do. But the way they did it was honestly, very shitty. And they should have used a different disability. One that actually shows during pregnancy. I feel bad for the family, and hope that the people of the group who did this gets whatever they deserve.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 01/27/18 3:58:12 AM #52:	BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road) Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder. Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit? The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:894891767] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote>There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road)</quote> Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder.</quote> Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit?</quote> The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BeerOnTap 01/27/18 12:12:58 PM #53:	Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road) Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder. Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit? The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments. http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/seeing-a-baby-on-ultrasound-made-abortionist-quit-become-pro-life/ The lady's name is Abby Johnson, and she was an employee at Planned Parenthood for several years. This is a real phenomenon, regardless of how much you want to bury your head in the sand and/or defend it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gON-8PP6zgQ Here's more about it if you care to watch, but I doubt you will. <cite>BeerOnTap posted [p:894905300] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote>There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road)</quote> Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder.</quote> Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit?</quote> The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments.</quote> http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/seeing-a-baby-on-ultrasound-made-abortionist-quit-become-pro-life/ The lady's name is Abby Johnson, and she was an employee at Planned Parenthood for several years. This is a real phenomenon, regardless of how much you want to bury your head in the sand and/or defend it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gON-8PP6zgQ Here's more about it if you care to watch, but I doubt you will.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/27/18 12:17:18 PM #54:	I think I'll have to wait to watch this. Can't watch a vid this log at work. And have to pack when I get home. It might be a while. I'll still be pro-choice, though... --- 3DS Friend Code: 4742 6214 5315 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. 0001 3388 9537, also. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:894905509] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote>I think I'll have to wait to watch this. Can't watch a vid this log at work. And have to pack when I get home. It might be a while. I'll still be pro-choice, though...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 01/27/18 12:40:15 PM #55:	BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road) Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder. Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit? The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments. http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/seeing-a-baby-on-ultrasound-made-abortionist-quit-become-pro-life/ The lady's name is Abby Johnson, and she was an employee at Planned Parenthood for several years. This is a real phenomenon, regardless of how much you want to bury your head in the sand and/or defend it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gON-8PP6zgQ Here's more about it if you care to watch, but I doubt you will. So you're using third trimester as an argument. Either way it isn't murder and that's still an appeal to emotion argument. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:894906682] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote>There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road)</quote> Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder.</quote> Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit?</quote> The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments.</quote> http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/seeing-a-baby-on-ultrasound-made-abortionist-quit-become-pro-life/ The lady's name is Abby Johnson, and she was an employee at Planned Parenthood for several years. This is a real phenomenon, regardless of how much you want to bury your head in the sand and/or defend it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gON-8PP6zgQ Here's more about it if you care to watch, but I doubt you will.</quote> So you're using third trimester as an argument. Either way it isn't murder and that's still an appeal to emotion argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BeerOnTap 01/27/18 8:22:50 PM #56:	Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road) Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder. Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit? The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments. http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/seeing-a-baby-on-ultrasound-made-abortionist-quit-become-pro-life/ The lady's name is Abby Johnson, and she was an employee at Planned Parenthood for several years. This is a real phenomenon, regardless of how much you want to bury your head in the sand and/or defend it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gON-8PP6zgQ Here's more about it if you care to watch, but I doubt you will. So you're using third trimester as an argument. Either way it isn't murder and that's still an appeal to emotion argument. From the article: "the former Planned Parenthood administrator who became pro-life after watching a 13-week-old baby fight for his life during an abortion" 13 weeks is the very beginning of the 2nd trimester. You're really reaching. Also, it's not emotion-based, but rather right to life vs murder. <cite>BeerOnTap posted [p:894930853] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote>There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road)</quote> Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder.</quote> Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit?</quote> The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments.</quote> http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/seeing-a-baby-on-ultrasound-made-abortionist-quit-become-pro-life/ The lady's name is Abby Johnson, and she was an employee at Planned Parenthood for several years. This is a real phenomenon, regardless of how much you want to bury your head in the sand and/or defend it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gON-8PP6zgQ Here's more about it if you care to watch, but I doubt you will.</quote> So you're using third trimester as an argument. Either way it isn't murder and that's still an appeal to emotion argument.</quote> From the article: "the former Planned Parenthood administrator who became pro-life after watching a 13-week-old baby fight for his life during an abortion" 13 weeks is the very beginning of the 2nd trimester. You're really reaching. Also, it's not emotion-based, but rather right to life vs murder.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 01/27/18 11:21:12 PM #57:	BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... Revelation34 posted... BeerOnTap posted... There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road) Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder. Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit? The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments. http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/seeing-a-baby-on-ultrasound-made-abortionist-quit-become-pro-life/ The lady's name is Abby Johnson, and she was an employee at Planned Parenthood for several years. This is a real phenomenon, regardless of how much you want to bury your head in the sand and/or defend it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gON-8PP6zgQ Here's more about it if you care to watch, but I doubt you will. So you're using third trimester as an argument. Either way it isn't murder and that's still an appeal to emotion argument. From the article: "the former Planned Parenthood administrator who became pro-life after watching a 13-week-old baby fight for his life during an abortion" 13 weeks is the very beginning of the 2nd trimester. You're really reaching. Also, it's not emotion-based, but rather right to life vs murder. I already proved it isn't murder. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:894941244] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BeerOnTap posted...</cite> <quote>There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder. And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike. (And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road)</quote> Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder.</quote> Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit?</quote> The prove it was for what I bolded. Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought. Also it wouldn't disturb me since I don't use shitty appeal to emotion fallacy arguments.</quote> http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/seeing-a-baby-on-ultrasound-made-abortionist-quit-become-pro-life/ The lady's name is Abby Johnson, and she was an employee at Planned Parenthood for several years. This is a real phenomenon, regardless of how much you want to bury your head in the sand and/or defend it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gON-8PP6zgQ Here's more about it if you care to watch, but I doubt you will.</quote> So you're using third trimester as an argument. Either way it isn't murder and that's still an appeal to emotion argument.</quote> From the article: "the former Planned Parenthood administrator who became pro-life after watching a 13-week-old baby fight for his life during an abortion" 13 weeks is the very beginning of the 2nd trimester. You're really reaching. Also, it's not emotion-based, but rather right to life vs murder.</quote> I already proved it isn't murder.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amuseum 01/28/18 1:26:57 AM #58:	= murder = unlawful premeditated killing of a human being by a human being = human being = any living or extinct member of the family Hominidae a human fetus or embryo is a human being. it has human genes, human brain, human heart, human form. progressives like to pretend they fight for the rights of the oppressed, the weak, the defenseless. yet they support the killing of the weakest, the most defenseless human beings. --- Ergonomic keyboard layouts for Android https://goo.gl/KR1vK6 5-suited Draw Poker for Android http://goo.gl/KhmXi <cite>Amuseum posted [p:894947189] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote>= murder = unlawful premeditated killing of a human being by a human being = human being = any living or extinct member of the family Hominidae a human fetus or embryo is a human being. it has human genes, human brain, human heart, human form. progressives like to pretend they fight for the rights of the oppressed, the weak, the defenseless. yet they support the killing of the weakest, the most defenseless human beings.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/28/18 1:37:29 AM #59:	Amuseum posted... = murder = unlawful premeditated killing of a human being by a human being = human being = any living or extinct member of the family Hominidae a human fetus or embryo is a human being. it has human genes, human brain, human heart, human form. progressives like to pretend they fight for the rights of the oppressed, the weak, the defenseless. yet they support the killing of the weakest, the most defenseless human beings. But, that also depends on when it's considered living... and in earlier stages, it's usually still developing those things... --- 3DS Friend Code: 4742 6214 5315 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. 0001 3388 9537, also. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:894947664] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote><cite>Amuseum posted...</cite> <quote>= murder = unlawful premeditated killing of a human being by a human being = human being = any living or extinct member of the family Hominidae a human fetus or embryo is a human being. it has human genes, human brain, human heart, human form. progressives like to pretend they fight for the rights of the oppressed, the weak, the defenseless. yet they support the killing of the weakest, the most defenseless human beings.</quote> But, that also depends on when it's considered living... and in earlier stages, it's usually still developing those things...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 01/28/18 4:12:20 AM #60:	Amuseum posted... = murder = unlawful premeditated killing of a human being by a human being = human being = any living or extinct member of the family Hominidae a human fetus or embryo is a human being. it has human genes, human brain, human heart, human form. progressives like to pretend they fight for the rights of the oppressed, the weak, the defenseless. yet they support the killing of the weakest, the most defenseless human beings. "Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought." --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:894952263] in Conservati... [t:76236286]...</cite> <quote><cite>Amuseum posted...</cite> <quote>= murder = unlawful premeditated killing of a human being by a human being = human being = any living or extinct member of the family Hominidae a human fetus or embryo is a human being. it has human genes, human brain, human heart, human form. progressives like to pretend they fight for the rights of the oppressed, the weak, the defenseless. yet they support the killing of the weakest, the most defenseless human beings.</quote> "Also premeditated is part of malice aforethought."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Conservative Mom is OUTRAGED after a Pro-Abortion Group used her DAUGHTERS PIC! (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Conservative Mom is OUTRAGED after a Pro-Abortion Group used her DAUGHTERS PIC!