Poll of the Day > Conservative Mom is OUTRAGED after a Pro-Abortion Group used her DAUGHTERS PIC!

(+) Yeah! (+)

Natalie Weaver, a North Carolina Conservative Pro-Life Mother is Outraged with TWITTER and its regulations after she came across a poster promoting abortion with a picture of her severely disabled daughter splashed on it!!

She reported the hate tweet posted by @OBSIDIANMOAK

But after she reported it, Natalie was furious with the response that said "Hello, thank you for your recent report. We have reviewed your report carefully and found that there was no violation of the Twitter rules aginst abusive behaviour"

She is the founder of Advocates for Medically Fragile Kids North Carolina and took her disapproval over the matter and said @TwitterSupport just received an email that twitter doesn't think a person using my child's image as the poster child to ABORT & to weed out all the "defectives" in utero is a violation. Why? Bc they won't recognize hate toward ppl w/ disabilities in their regulations/reports

Her message went viral with thousands showing support and after the backlash, twitter decided to suspend the account

Her 9 y/o daughter, Sophia suffers a rare brain disorder, Rett syndrome, that affects mostly girls and is found between the age of 1-2. Symptoms include slowed brain growth, decline of social and language skills trouble breathing, problems walking and using hands..

Have you ever found someone using your picture on the internet before as insult or impersonation?

Natalie and her daughter -

http://tinyurl.com/yca5mmp7

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/01/23/14/4880132A00000578-0-image-a-9_1516717604659.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/01/23/14/4880131600000578-0-image-a-5_1516717424757.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/01/23/14/4880132200000578-0-image-a-8_1516717565517.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/01/23/14/4880130A00000578-0-image-a-4_1516717414450.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/01/23/14/4880131200000578-0-image-a-2_1516717225449.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/01/23/14/4880130600000578-0-image-a-6_1516717491582.jpg
---

oh god did she just prop up a corpse..??
---

those pictures are um........

anyway, it's still pretty rude to do that. and I can't believe Twitter told her to fuck off and then even suspended her. she should take this even higher. maybe this will be the movement that brings Twitter down.

I feel terribly for her daughter, but I'd say that it really does make a great argument for pro-choice. Or at that pro-lifers should ease down on their stance a bit.
---

I think that girls face has been doctored up...
---

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!

*clicks link*


---

Yes. Uber disabled suffering children are products of the Pope telling people how science be, and the parents that desperately cling to pregnancies that should have been let go.

It's hilariously offensive, but it's true. Since when has the truth been relevant? Truth doesn't make me happy! Truth is about what I want.
---

Yellow posted...

Yes. Uber disabled suffering children are products of the Pope telling people how science be, and the parents that desperately cling to pregnancies that should have been let go.

It's hilariously offensive, but it's true. Since when has the truth been relevant? Truth doesn't make me happy! Truth is about what I want.

dude. to be quite honest, nobody has the right to tell that mom who to love. if she loves her daughter, then that's the end of the story. we are strangers who don't know this girl and know nothing about her other than her face. it's not our place to say that she should have aborted.

Idgaf about the girl or her mom. Frankly, think she's adorable. I care about the kid that will suffer for nine more years or so until she dies a likely slow painful death because her body wasn't built correctly. All because the mom had a (by definition) phobia of abortion.
---

You know, I watch a lot of horror, but those are some grisly photos.

mrduckbear posted...

But after she reported it, Natalie was furious with the response that said "Hello, thank you for your recent report. We have reviewed your report carefully and found that there was no violation of the Twitter rules aginst abusive behaviour"

That is pretty fucked up.
---

So twitter hates the disabled and condones harassment?

I'm pro choice and if anything, those pics make me want better genetic testing in utero.
---

Jesus fucking christ what the fuck is that thing??
---

I'm pretty sure a liberal pro-choice mother would also be outraged if her daughter were used like that.

Also, Ducky, shame on you, as usual. Why didn't you post the poster? Would be nice to see for ourselves just how bad it is.
---

Zikten posted...

I can't believe Twitter told her to f*** off and then even suspended her.

As often happens, ducky's wording is ambiguous, but I believe it was the offending account that was suspended, not hers.
---

Syntheticon posted...

I'm pro choice and if anything, those pics make me want better genetic testing in utero.

this what pro choice usually stands for: discrimination against the disabled, and support for eugenics.
---

Amuseum posted...

Syntheticon posted...

I'm pro choice and if anything, those pics make me want better genetic testing in utero.

this what pro choice usually stands for: discrimination against the disabled, and support for eugenics.

Oh stfu with your nutjob propaganda. How the hell you fools reach "OMG DISCRIMINATION!" based on people demanding a choice is beyond me.

Regardless, this crap is messed up. Never understand how kids get brought in to things.
---

Oh my god what the fuck was that?

What the fuck was that?

What the fuck?

Is this was republicans want a world full of that?

Sign me up for the Iceland version of the world.

TsC_PoLiTiKz posted...

Amuseum posted...

Syntheticon posted...

I'm pro choice and if anything, those pics make me want better genetic testing in utero.

this what pro choice usually stands for: discrimination against the disabled, and support for eugenics.

Oh stfu with your nutjob propaganda. How the hell you fools reach "OMG DISCRIMINATION!" based on people demanding a choice is beyond me.

Regardless, this crap is messed up. Never understand how kids get brought in to things.

Lmao you're calling others nutjobs, but you're the one over reacting. No one asked if you're pro choice, so you're the first to spout and justify your propaganda.

Choice means it's not discrimination? Then is choosing to ban immigration from chosen countries also not a form of discrimination? Is choosing not to bake cakes for gay couples also not a form of discrimination? Is choosing employees based on skin tone not discrimination?
---

you know, most of what duckbear posts is harmless, but this is straight up fucking disgusting.

this poor kid has a devastating condition, and you're going to use it for your shitty gimmick.

go get fucked, ok?
---

No one has the business to say a life isnt worth it
---

helIy posted...

*clicks link*

click link after seeing helly's post .........*escapes back to poll of the day*
---

helIy posted...

*clicks link*

This was me
---

Well no matter if you're pro-choice/life or whatever else it's just fucking wrong using people in this way.
---

Centrinity posted...

Well no matter if you're pro-choice/life or whatever else it's just fucking wrong using people in this way.

Do you also have a problem with stuff like "The people of walmart"?

Im pro-choice and everything, but I have to side with the mom here. It was shitty of them to use that picture of her daughter as a way to demean the parents of children who want to keep their children regardless of any flaws.
---

Good job torturing your child so you can feel good.
---

VeeVees posted...

Good job torturing your child so you can feel good.

I think its a personal choice. What I dont agree with is these people (upper class folks who clearly dont have to worry about anything, financially) forcing these decisions on poor women, specifically those who are still in high school or college.
---

VeeVees posted...

Good job torturing your child so you can feel good.

How is it torture? Do you know how happy or how sad that little girl feels on a daily basis? She seems to love her daughter so who are you to say that she is torturing her by letting her be born this way?
---

LMFAO, ya, love totally helps her not be a living corpse.
---

JanwayDaahl posted...

VeeVees posted...

Good job torturing your child so you can feel good.

How is it torture? Do you know how happy or how sad that little girl feels on a daily basis? She seems to love her daughter so who are you to say that she is torturing her by letting her be born this way?

A person with eyes.

So was it actually a pro-abortion advocate or was it a pro-choice advocate? Would help if we could actually see the originally tweet.
---

Revelation34 posted...

So was it actually a pro-abortion advocate or was it a pro-choice advocate? Would help if we could actually see the originally tweet.

Pro-abortion and pro-choice are literally the same thing. It was a rebranding effort to make the notion sound more palatable. What you're conflating is more along the lines of a eugenics group.
---

Who are we to judge the value of this girl's life? She does look frightening, yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean she'd be better off dead. It's not our place to decide on this girl's behalf that she doesn't deserve life, and all anyone is doing in this thread is judging by her outward appearance that she should've been aborted, and that's depressing.
---

Zeus posted...

Revelation34 posted...

So was it actually a pro-abortion advocate or was it a pro-choice advocate? Would help if we could actually see the originally tweet.

Pro-abortion and pro-choice are literally the same thing. It was a rebranding effort to make the notion sound more palatable. What you're conflating is more along the lines of a eugenics group.

Pro-abortion are those people that cry for human extinction.

You're confusing sanity with insanity.

Golden Road posted...

Who are we to judge the value of this girl's life? She does look frightening, yes, but that doesn't necessarily mean she'd be better off dead. It's not our place to decide on this girl's behalf that she doesn't deserve life, and all anyone is doing in this thread is judging by her outward appearance that she should've been aborted, and that's depressing.

Right, it's TOTALLY the outward appearance and not her other crippling disabilities.
---

Amuseum posted...

Syntheticon posted...

I'm pro choice and if anything, those pics make me want better genetic testing in utero.

this what pro choice usually stands for: discrimination against the disabled, and support for eugenics.

Don't conflate my views with yours or deem yourself qualified to speak for me:pro choice means supporting people's choice to make their own decisions about all things reproductive and nothing more.
Both the girl and her mother are suffering because of this so giving her an informed choice about if she wants to carry to term is what I'm talking about-what she does with that information is completely her decision.
---

ZiggiStardust posted...

you know, most of what duckbear posts is harmless, but this is straight up fucking disgusting.

this poor kid has a devastating condition, and you're going to use it for your shitty gimmick.

go get fucked, ok?

Shut up, ok?

Zeus posted...

Pro-abortion and pro-choice are literally the same thing. It was a rebranding effort to make the notion sound more palatable. What you're conflating is more along the lines of a eugenics group.

You were already proved wrong about this in the other thread .
---

there's no such thing as being "pro-abortion", more like "anti anti-choice"
---

HylianFox posted...

there's no such thing as being "pro-abortion", more like "anti anti-choice"

This is false. Pro-abortion people do actually exist. They actually WANT people to get abortions.
---

"Im Pro-Choice, but only when it means the choice is to kill the baby".

Lol what guys? Do you even know what it means to be Pro-Choice?

Pro-Choice is better BECAUSE it gives the woman the choice whether they want to abort their baby or not. But why demonize people who choose to keep their children? So in the end you arent really being pro-choice but rather pro-death, its just as bad as people who think no one should be able to abort their babies.

dioxxys posted...

"Im Pro-Choice, but only when it means the choice is to kill the baby".

Lol what guys? Do you even know what it means to be Pro-Choice?

Pro-Choice is better BECAUSE it gives the woman the choice whether they want to abort their baby or not. But why demonize people who choose to keep their children? So in the end you arent really being pro-choice but rather pro-death, its just as bad as people who think no one should be able to abort their babies.

Your example is pro-abortion, not pro-choice.
---

BlackScythe0 posted...

Zeus posted...

Revelation34 posted...

So was it actually a pro-abortion advocate or was it a pro-choice advocate? Would help if we could actually see the originally tweet.

Pro-abortion and pro-choice are literally the same thing. It was a rebranding effort to make the notion sound more palatable. What you're conflating is more along the lines of a eugenics group.

Pro-abortion are those people that cry for human extinction.

You're confusing sanity with insanity.

Hilarpocracy: The hilarious state of saying something crazy while accusing others of confusing sanity and insanity.

And people who advocate human extinction already have their own sets of terms and better ways to go about it.

Revelation34 posted...

Zeus posted...

Pro-abortion and pro-choice are literally the same thing. It was a rebranding effort to make the notion sound more palatable. What you're conflating is more along the lines of a eugenics group.

You were already proved wrong about this in the other thread .

Given your stances regarding GMOs and vaccines, the probably is that you don't know right from wrong.

dioxxys posted...

"Im Pro-Choice, but only when it means the choice is to kill the baby".

Lol what guys? Do you even know what it means to be Pro-Choice?

Pro-Choice is better BECAUSE it gives the woman the choice whether they want to abort their baby or not. But why demonize people who choose to keep their children? So in the end you arent really being pro-choice but rather pro-death, its just as bad as people who think no one should be able to abort their babies.

Because like the joke goes, pro-choice doesn't actually mean pro-choice.
---

Revelation34 posted...

dioxxys posted...

"Im Pro-Choice, but only when it means the choice is to kill the baby".

Lol what guys? Do you even know what it means to be Pro-Choice?

Pro-Choice is better BECAUSE it gives the woman the choice whether they want to abort their baby or not. But why demonize people who choose to keep their children? So in the end you arent really being pro-choice but rather pro-death, its just as bad as people who think no one should be able to abort their babies.

Your example is pro-abortion, not pro-choice.

Oh the first line lol? I was being sarcastic.

Zeus posted...

Given your stances regarding GMOs and vaccines, the probably is that you don't know right from wrong.

You're definitely thinking of something else with this comment.

dioxxys posted...

Revelation34 posted...

dioxxys posted...

"Im Pro-Choice, but only when it means the choice is to kill the baby".

Lol what guys? Do you even know what it means to be Pro-Choice?

Pro-Choice is better BECAUSE it gives the woman the choice whether they want to abort their baby or not. But why demonize people who choose to keep their children? So in the end you arent really being pro-choice but rather pro-death, its just as bad as people who think no one should be able to abort their babies.

Your example is pro-abortion, not pro-choice.

Oh the first line lol? I was being sarcastic.

It doesn't sound like sarcasm considering what comes next.
---

I feel strongly about this topic, so I'd like to weigh in.
The instinctual drive and love that a parent feels for their child, especially a mother, is absolutely beautiful and quite miraculous. A parent's dedication to protecting the life of their offspring is an important evolutionary aspect of humanity and nature alike.

samuricex posted...

I'd say that it really does make a great argument for pro-choice.

How? If you read Duckbear's write-up, it says that Rett Syndrome is typically not found between the age of 1 and 2. And according to https://www.rettsyndrome.org/about-rett-syndrome it says that the child almost always appears to be developing normally for the first couple months of their life.

Also mentioned on the site: "Cognitive assessment in children with Rett syndrome is complicated, but we know that they understand far more than they can communicate to us, evidenced by their bright and attentive eyes, and their ability to express a wide spectrum of moods and emotions."
So for those of you disparaging the mother for her dedication to her child, and making the assumption that she kept the child, and cares for her in vain due to her her own selfishness are just plain despicable.

Jen0125 posted...

helIy posted...

*clicks link*

This was me

Kimbos_Egg posted...

oh god did she just prop up a corpse..??

And for those of you insulting someone with a severe disability, and passing judgement, shows a major lack of perspective and is indicative of just how immature some of you are.
This mother goes through a lot for her child, and abides by the oh so powerful motherly bond, to do the best she can for her daughter's life.
It turns out that life is precious. And this little girl's existence is valuable.
I think there are several pro-death folks here who should take a look at many of the practices involved during the abortion process. There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder.
And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike.
(And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road)

BeerOnTap posted...

There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder.
And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike.
(And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road)

Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder.
---

Revelation34 posted...

BeerOnTap posted...

There have actually been cases where a baby in utero can be plainly seen via ultrasound wincing and attempting to move itself away from the tool inserted to abort it. This is disgusting. This is murder.
And you can ridicule me all you'd like. But I'll sleep just fine knowing I'm on the side that values life, young and old alike.
(And for the record, my stance has nothing to do with religion, before anyone tries to go down that road)

Prove it. Also it isn't murder. It doesn't fall under any definition of murder.

Prove it's not. The literal definition of murder: the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
You mean to say that if you could be in the room, and see that on the screen, you wouldn't be at all disturbed? Not even a bit?