Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
---|---|
refureeman 02/27/18 9:53:29 PM #1: |
Wow. To say that I am disappointed is an understatement. I've played most console castlevania games from the nes to ps2 eras and I will say this ranks as among my least favorite.
Super Castlevania IV was a really solid game. I do feel it's overrated, but I grew up with it and have played through it recently and it is still quite a fun game. I thought this would be the same (if not better) and honestly it felt like it took ten steps backwards. The controls were unbelievably clunky. Among the worst/slowest jumping animations I've experienced in a 2d platformer. I am also a firm believer that in a game with a life bar, instant deaths should be a rare occurrence (if not completely nonexistent). I can safely say that I died far more often to getting knocked off a ledge than by health loss. The final boss was just two forms of utter stupidity where I died almost exclusively from being knocked off the edge. The few times I died to health depletion was because of another glaring flaw: no hit recovery. Both you and the bosses can take hit after hit in succession and it makes some bosses super easy and some lesser enemies suddenly super dangerous. I honestly feel there are a lot of good ways to make a challenge (higher health/damaging enemies, more enemies, more varied attacks, etc.). This game went about it entirely the wrong way in my opinion. On a plus side, it still "felt" like a castlevania game and had cool graphics, music, and theme. The few stages that didn't involve pitfalls were actually pretty fun but the game took me a long time to complete because it was so frustrating I could not play it for long. TLDR: I felt the game was decent but a disappointment, particularly coming after Super Castlevania IV, and there were far too many stupid deaths from no hit recovery, bad jumping mechanics, and pitfalls. --- I'll take that as a compliment. As well as this, they, you and every other pronoun. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
papercup 02/27/18 10:00:21 PM #2: |
I've only played through it once, but I remember it being okay. Not terrible, but not great.
--- Nintendo Network ID: papercups 3DS FC: 4124 5916 9925 ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
refureeman 02/27/18 10:06:34 PM #3: |
papercup posted...
I've only played through it once, but I remember it being okay. Not terrible, but not great. I'll concede, I am more disappointed than I am saying the game is actively bad. Another SNES castlevania game that I finally get to play and it just has so many stupid instant deaths it just was a mediocre experience. --- I'll take that as a compliment. As well as this, they, you and every other pronoun. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Sahuagin 02/27/18 10:19:19 PM #4: |
are Super Castlevania IV and Castlevania: Dracula X not the same game?
I played one of them a long time ago, it was ok --- The truth basks in scrutiny. http://i.imgur.com/GMouTGs.jpg http://projecteuler.net/profile/Sahuagin.png ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
VeeVees 02/27/18 10:24:56 PM #5: |
Dracula X is a shit version of Rondo.
--- Rudy sucks ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
refureeman 02/27/18 10:26:11 PM #6: |
Sahuagin posted...
are Super Castlevania IV and Castlevania: Dracula X not the same game? No, Dracula X is the snes port of Rondo of Blood. Super Castlevania IV is much better. --- I'll take that as a compliment. As well as this, they, you and every other pronoun. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Red_Frog 02/27/18 10:57:10 PM #7: |
Best thing about DX for the SNES is the music, a lot of it is pretty good. Unfortunately, yeah, the rest of the game doesn't really hold up compared to the soundtrack.
... Copied to Clipboard!
|
papercup 02/28/18 1:02:22 AM #8: |
Yes if you're going to play a SNES Castlevania play SC4
--- Nintendo Network ID: papercups 3DS FC: 4124 5916 9925 ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Topic List |
Page List:
1 |