Current Events > Collins: I will NOT support an anti Roe v Wade SC nomination

Topic List	Page List: 1
BWLurker 07/01/18 11:45:38 AM #1:	https://reut.rs/2lNAGyF Whether she's actually telling the truth or not, it appears the hanger protest worked superficially at the very least. (Reuters) - A key moderate Republican U.S. senator said on Sunday she will not support a nominee to fill a soon-to-be-vacated seat on the Supreme Court who would overturn a key legal ruling that supports a woman's right to abortion. "I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v Wade," Susan Collins told CNN's "State of the Union" program, referring to the 1973 landmark decision. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904297013] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote>https://reut.rs/2lNAGyF Whether she's actually telling the truth or not, it appears the hanger protest worked superficially at the very least. <quote>(Reuters) - A key moderate Republican U.S. senator said on Sunday she will not support a nominee to fill a soon-to-be-vacated seat on the Supreme Court who would overturn a key legal ruling that supports a woman's right to abortion. "I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v Wade," Susan Collins told CNN's "State of the Union" program, referring to the 1973 landmark decision.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/01/18 11:58:19 AM #2:	So hopefully this means Pryor, Pirro and Newsom are out of the running. Even if Collins doesn't mean to keep to this, it could make Trump want to pick someone more moderate for fear of getting blocked. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904297567] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote>So hopefully this means Pryor, Pirro and Newsom are out of the running. Even if Collins doesn't mean to keep to this, it could make Trump want to pick someone more moderate for fear of getting blocked.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solar_Crimson 07/01/18 12:00:37 PM #3:	inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line" --- Be wary of boarding the hype train, lest you end up on the ruse cruise... - nanobuilder (r/nintendo) http://backloggery.com/SolarCrimson <cite>Solar_Crimson posted [p:904297671] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote>inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 07/01/18 12:01:27 PM #4:	Solar_Crimson posted... inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line" She will They also do in the end --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:904297711] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Solar_Crimson posted...</cite> <quote>inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line"</quote> She will They also do in the end</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/01/18 12:04:06 PM #5:	UnfairRepresent posted... Solar_Crimson posted... inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line" She will They also do in the end That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904297824] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Solar_Crimson posted...</cite> <quote>inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line"</quote> She will They also do in the end</quote> That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FarFromFields 07/01/18 12:05:48 PM #6:	BWLurker posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Solar_Crimson posted... inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line" She will They also do in the end That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one. The only acceptable kind. --- FFD Just because this life ain't easy, doesn't make it bad... <cite>FarFromFields posted [p:904297900] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Solar_Crimson posted...</cite> <quote>inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line"</quote> She will They also do in the end</quote> That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one.</quote> The only acceptable kind.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shuto-uke 07/01/18 12:06:42 PM #7:	BWLurker posted... https://reut.rs/2lNAGyF Whether she's actually telling the truth or not, it appears the hanger protest worked superficially at the very least. (Reuters) - A key moderate Republican U.S. senator said on Sunday she will not support a nominee to fill a soon-to-be-vacated seat on the Supreme Court who would overturn a key legal ruling that supports a woman's right to abortion. "I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v Wade," Susan Collins told CNN's "State of the Union" program, referring to the 1973 landmark decision. she says that now. She will fall in line <cite>Shuto-uke posted [p:904297949] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>https://reut.rs/2lNAGyF Whether she's actually telling the truth or not, it appears the hanger protest worked superficially at the very least. <quote>(Reuters) - A key moderate Republican U.S. senator said on Sunday she will not support a nominee to fill a soon-to-be-vacated seat on the Supreme Court who would overturn a key legal ruling that supports a woman's right to abortion. "I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v Wade," Susan Collins told CNN's "State of the Union" program, referring to the 1973 landmark decision.</quote></quote> she says that now. She will fall in line</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/01/18 12:11:00 PM #8:	Shuto-uke posted... BWLurker posted... https://reut.rs/2lNAGyF Whether she's actually telling the truth or not, it appears the hanger protest worked superficially at the very least. (Reuters) - A key moderate Republican U.S. senator said on Sunday she will not support a nominee to fill a soon-to-be-vacated seat on the Supreme Court who would overturn a key legal ruling that supports a woman's right to abortion. "I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v Wade," Susan Collins told CNN's "State of the Union" program, referring to the 1973 landmark decision. she says that now. She will fall in line Even so, this shows that protesting works. You think she would have even said this had all those coat hangers not been sent to her? <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904298186] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Shuto-uke posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote>https://reut.rs/2lNAGyF Whether she's actually telling the truth or not, it appears the hanger protest worked superficially at the very least. <quote>(Reuters) - A key moderate Republican U.S. senator said on Sunday she will not support a nominee to fill a soon-to-be-vacated seat on the Supreme Court who would overturn a key legal ruling that supports a woman's right to abortion. "I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v Wade," Susan Collins told CNN's "State of the Union" program, referring to the 1973 landmark decision.</quote></quote> she says that now. She will fall in line</quote> Even so, this shows that protesting works. You think she would have even said this had all those coat hangers not been sent to her?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 07/01/18 12:14:44 PM #9:	She did last year. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:904298369] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote>She did last year.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
E32005 07/01/18 12:15:22 PM #10:	any republican woman voting to repeal this is fucking scum --- https://i.imgtc.com/IR4XrBA.gif https://i.imgtc.com/7X1rBRv.gif <cite>E32005 posted [p:904298403] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote>any republican woman voting to repeal this is fucking scum</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/01/18 12:17:15 PM #11:	Antifar posted... She did last year. Unlike Pirro, Newsom, and Pryor, Gorsuch has never actively spoken out against Roe v Wade. Maybe he would overturn it, but if Collins saying this gets those three whackjobs out of the running, I'd call it a victory even if minor. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904298489] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>She did last year.</quote> Unlike Pirro, Newsom, and Pryor, Gorsuch has never actively spoken out against Roe v Wade. Maybe he would overturn it, but if Collins saying this gets those three whackjobs out of the running, I'd call it a victory even if minor.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 07/01/18 12:17:50 PM #12:	She'll fall in line. They all will. Lol --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:904298517] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote>She'll fall in line. They all will. Lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 07/01/18 12:18:12 PM #13:	FarFromFields posted... BWLurker posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Solar_Crimson posted... inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line" She will They also do in the end That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one. The only acceptable kind. Bigot <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:904298543] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Solar_Crimson posted...</cite> <quote>inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line"</quote> She will They also do in the end</quote> That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one.</quote> The only acceptable kind.</quote> Bigot</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fam_Fam 07/01/18 12:18:19 PM #14:	E32005 posted... anyone voting to repeal this is fucking scum <cite>Fam_Fam posted [p:904298549] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>E32005 posted...</cite> <quote>anyone voting to repeal this is fucking scum</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/01/18 12:22:27 PM #15:	KhanJohnny posted... FarFromFields posted... BWLurker posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Solar_Crimson posted... inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line" She will They also do in the end That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one. The only acceptable kind. Bigot "stop being intolerant of my intolerance" <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904298714] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Solar_Crimson posted...</cite> <quote>inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line"</quote> She will They also do in the end</quote> That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one.</quote> The only acceptable kind.</quote> Bigot</quote> "stop being intolerant of my intolerance"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 07/01/18 12:26:59 PM #16:	https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/28/collins-wont-apply-ideological-litmus-tests-to-supreme-court-nominee/ Which will it be, then? --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:904298944] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote>https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/28/collins-wont-apply-ideological-litmus-tests-to-supreme-court-nominee/ Which will it be, then?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/01/18 12:29:51 PM #17:	UnholyMudcrab posted... https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/28/collins-wont-apply-ideological-litmus-tests-to-supreme-court-nominee/ Which will it be, then? She appears to have flipped on that after receiving thousands of hangers from her constituents <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904299065] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnholyMudcrab posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/28/collins-wont-apply-ideological-litmus-tests-to-supreme-court-nominee/ Which will it be, then?</quote> She appears to have flipped on that after receiving thousands of hangers from her constituents</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KarmaMuffin 07/01/18 1:11:42 PM #18:	UnholyMudcrab posted... https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/28/collins-wont-apply-ideological-litmus-tests-to-supreme-court-nominee/ Which will it be, then? ...The one that is more recent. What kind of question is this? <cite>KarmaMuffin posted [p:904301155] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnholyMudcrab posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/28/collins-wont-apply-ideological-litmus-tests-to-supreme-court-nominee/ Which will it be, then?</quote> ...The one that is more recent. What kind of question is this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhanJohnny 07/01/18 6:46:11 PM #19:	BWLurker posted... KhanJohnny posted... FarFromFields posted... BWLurker posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Solar_Crimson posted... inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line" She will They also do in the end That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one. The only acceptable kind. Bigot "stop being intolerant of my intolerance" "I am supertolerant, but only of people who think and act like me" <cite>KhanJohnny posted [p:904318207] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhanJohnny posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FarFromFields posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Solar_Crimson posted...</cite> <quote>inb4 alt-righters berating her for not "falling in line"</quote> She will They also do in the end</quote> That's not 100% guaranteed. This has a small chance of convincing Trump to go with a less controversial pick. I think, and pretty much everyone I've talked to (liberal or conservative) think Hardiman would be a fair pick. He's certainly not moderate, but he'd probably view Roe v Wade and other decisions as established law. He seems more an economic conservative rather than a social one.</quote> The only acceptable kind.</quote> Bigot</quote> "stop being intolerant of my intolerance"</quote> "I am supertolerant, but only of people who think and act like me"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 07/01/18 7:52:17 PM #20:	KarmaMuffin posted... UnholyMudcrab posted... https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/28/collins-wont-apply-ideological-litmus-tests-to-supreme-court-nominee/ Which will it be, then? ...The one that is more recent. What kind of question is this? I mean, why should I put all that much stock in her new opinion, given that she can change it so quickly? --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:904321482] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>KarmaMuffin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnholyMudcrab posted...</cite> <quote> https://www.pressherald.com/2018/06/28/collins-wont-apply-ideological-litmus-tests-to-supreme-court-nominee/ Which will it be, then?</quote> ...The one that is more recent. What kind of question is this?</quote> I mean, why should I put all that much stock in her new opinion, given that she can change it so quickly?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KarmaMuffin 07/01/18 7:59:35 PM #21:	UnholyMudcrab posted... I mean, why should I put all that much stock in her new opinion, given that she can change it so quickly? Would you prefer a peaceful protest/demonstration not be effective? <cite>KarmaMuffin posted [p:904321874] in Collins: I... [t:76767403]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnholyMudcrab posted...</cite> <quote>I mean, why should I put all that much stock in her new opinion, given that she can change it so quickly? </quote> Would you prefer a peaceful protest/demonstration not be effective?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Collins: I will NOT support an anti Roe v Wade SC nomination (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Collins: I will NOT support an anti Roe v Wade SC nomination