Yeah, let's talk about the racist CVS manager instead of deflecting to an separate and unrelated incident.
Deflecting? I don't have to deflect from him being a racist because there is no indication at all he is a racist. Yet this story is making its social media rounds and stirring outrage. Pointing out that the same isn't really happening for a through and through violent hate crime isn't deflecting and it definitely points to a specific narrative the media wants pushed. And you are so easily manipulated that you guzzle it right up, say thank you, and open wide for more. And these happened within the same time frame. Why is one getting all the outrage when the other got oddly quiet as soon as it came out the hate crime was perpetrated by a black lady? Definitely makes you wonder what the agenda might be...
So a black hat hacker turned white hat after being caught and convicted is forever untrustworthy as well? So much for the idea of rehabilitating criminals. Hmm...
So the store even said this guy was wrong, but yet you try to paint him as an hero, stopping lady's from getting leakage pads .
imagine the business siding with the guy with people like you crying rabble rabble ---
Yeah, let's talk about the racist CVS manager instead of deflecting to an separate and unrelated incident.
Deflecting? I don't have to deflect from him being a racist because there is no indication at all he is a racist. Yet this story is making its social media rounds and stirring outrage. Pointing out that the same isn't really happening for a through and through violent hate crime isn't deflecting and it definitely points to a specific narrative the media wants pushed. And you are so easily manipulated that you guzzle it right up, say thank you, and open wide for more. And these happened within the same time frame. Why is one getting all the outrage when the other got oddly quiet as soon as it came out the hate crime was perpetrated by a black lady? Definitely makes you wonder what the agenda might be...
yeah i completely agree the attack on the hispanic man was far far worse than this woman being denied a coupon even if maybe her race had something to do with it.
Yeah, let's talk about the racist CVS manager instead of deflecting to an separate and unrelated incident.
Deflecting? I don't have to deflect from him being a racist because there is no indication at all he is a racist. Yet this story is making its social media rounds and stirring outrage. Pointing out that the same isn't really happening for a through and through violent hate crime isn't deflecting and it definitely points to a specific narrative the media wants pushed. And you are so easily manipulated that you guzzle it right up, say thank you, and open wide for more. And these happened within the same time frame. Why is one getting all the outrage when the other got oddly quiet as soon as it came out the hate crime was perpetrated by a black lady? Definitely makes you wonder what the agenda might be...
yeah i completely agree the attack on the hispanic man was far far worse than this woman being denied a coupon even if maybe her race had something to do with it.
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Is it because TC and Co dont care about racism if the racist person is a black person? They only want to paint all white people, and specifically all white males, as racist despite their actual beliefs? ---
>claims that changing the subject is not deflecting >continues to deflect by talking about other subject
Also, I don't watch the news. I hadn't heard of this story until someone posted it here. I saw the story about the 91 y/o before seeing it posted here. ---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
>claims that changing the subject is not deflecting >continues to deflect by talking about other subject
Also, I don't watch the news. I hadn't heard of this story until someone posted it here. I saw the story about the 91 y/o before seeing it posted here.
Do you understand what words mean? I have been talking about this subject the entire time. Me using another incident as basis of comparison to media/social reaction as it pertains to this case is not changing the subject.
Is there some kind of stupid test race-baiters have to take before getting their virtue badge or something?
>claims that changing the subject is not deflecting >continues to deflect by talking about other subject
Also, I don't watch the news. I hadn't heard of this story until someone posted it here. I saw the story about the 91 y/o before seeing it posted here.
Do you understand what words mean? I have been talking about this subject the entire time. Me using another incident as basis of comparison to media/social reaction as it pertains to this case is not changing the subject.
Is there some kind of stupid test race-baiters have to take before getting their virtue badge or something?
No I don't understand words. I speak in grunts and type by mashing buttons. If this actually forms words, it is completely coincidental and I have no idea how it happened. Again, I just click on random things, in this case the quote icon, and then I just press randomly around the lower part of my phone screen.
You're deflecting from one incident to another, just like whenever trump does something wrong, his supporters deflect to obama or hillary. I don't want to talk about that though, because I'm not deflecting. I'm remaining on the subject at hand, which you don't seem to want to do.
See, you're saying "I'm not deflecting. I'm talking about another incident that's the same." Oh? So you're deflecting from an incident that "isn't racist" according to you to an incident that is racist according to you. Basically, you're trying to argue that it's not deflecting because racism and non-racism are the same.
I don't race bait and virtue is utterly meaningless to me, so I don't know how you think that last paragraph applied to me. ---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
>claims that changing the subject is not deflecting >continues to deflect by talking about other subject
Also, I don't watch the news. I hadn't heard of this story until someone posted it here. I saw the story about the 91 y/o before seeing it posted here.
Do you understand what words mean? I have been talking about this subject the entire time. Me using another incident as basis of comparison to media/social reaction as it pertains to this case is not changing the subject.
Is there some kind of stupid test race-baiters have to take before getting their virtue badge or something?
No I don't understand words. I speak in grunts and type by mashing buttons. If this actually forms words, it is completely coincidental and I have no idea how it happened. Again, I just click on random things, in this case the quote icon, and then I just press randomly around the lower part of my phone screen.
You're deflecting from one incident to another, just like whenever trump does something wrong, his supporters deflect to obama or hillary. I don't want to talk about that though, because I'm not deflecting. I'm remaining on the subject at hand, which you don't seem to want to do.
See, you're saying "I'm not deflecting. I'm talking about another incident that's the same." Oh? So you're deflecting from an incident that "isn't racist" according to you to an incident that is racist according to you. Basically, you're trying to argue that it's not deflecting because racism and non-racism are the same.
I don't race bait and virtue is utterly meaningless to me, so I don't know how you think that last paragraph applied to me.
I was comparing the reactions to two instances, all the while talking about the CVS incident. How is it deflecting if I continue with the original topic throughout my comparison. Topics don't exist in a vacuum. I can point out hypocrisy of leftist media/leftists while still engaging on the original topic.
Deflecting would be drawing attention to one injustice to divert attention from another actual injustice. In this case, not only was there only one provable injustice, but I kept devoting attention to the original case.
So yes, I ask again if you understand what words mean when you use them or if you've just seen people use them on the internet and thought you'd repeat them because you had no other legitimate points. I'm leaning toward the latter explanation because you've provided more than enough evidence for it.
Monday morning, CVS spokesman Mike DeAngelis issued a statement that we have completed our investigation, and as a result the two store colleagues who were involved in this incident are no longer employed by CVS Health.
Fair next. Don't be an idiot and call the police because a person tries to use a coupon
Monday morning, CVS spokesman Mike DeAngelis issued a statement that we have completed our investigation, and as a result the two store colleagues who were involved in this incident are no longer employed by CVS Health.
Fair next. Don't be an idiot and call the police because a person tries to use a coupon
That isn't why he called the police. He called the police because she wouldn't leave and was following employees around arguing.
You guys keep saying she harassed him when no one has even said such a thing. What did happen is after asking why her coupon wouldn't work a second guy asked her to leave (Which CVS obviously recognized as BS. You don't ask a customer to leave just because they want to speak to someone else or ask questions) at which point she started recording and the video clearly indicates she wasn't aggressive at all
Cops were literally called and nothing happened. Instead 2 people got rightfully fired because they called the cops when a woman questioned why they wouldn't accept her coupon
You guys keep saying she harassed him when no one has even said such a thing. What did happen is after asking why her coupon wouldn't work a second guy asked her to leave (Which CVS obviously recognied as BS. You don't ask a customer to leave just because they want to speak to someone else or ask questions) at which point she started recording and the video clearly indicates she wasn't aggressive at all
Cops were literally called and nothing happened. Instead 2 people got fired because they called the cops when a woman questioned why they wouldn't accept her coupon
Fair next
Yes, surely this is the entire story of why the cops were called. And certainly it is because the guy is a RRRRAAAAACCCCCIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSTTTTTT. And even if the events played out how you said, there is nothing at all to indicate he wouldn't have done the exact thing to a white person in the same situation.
I already outlined a likely scenario. She tries to use the coupon. It is thought to be invalid. She thinks she is being accused of being a thief rather than just being told the coupon is invalid and throws a fit, following around the staff, and refusing to leave. Then the cops were called.
I'm positive this dude has served black customers before. I'm positive he has had issues with white customers before. This is only a story, and he only got fired, because she was black. A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job and not have his face and name plastered all over the internet, and wouldn't have to deal with the wave of likely undeserved harassment sure to flood over him from screeching SJWs.
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken. ---
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Could be mistaken, but there is definitely no SJW pretend outrage machine about the brick bitch like there is with this dude in an instance in which there is no apparent racism. Any reporting on the brick bitch is solely reporting the story with no narrative, and if there is a narrative, it is somehow still a Trump's America narrative.
Look at TYT's coverage of brick bitch. No mention at all that she was black or a group of black dudes joined her in trying to kill the guy. But they sure mentioned Trump and the right wing!
The only reason anyone cares about CVS is because she is black. If the manager was also black you would never hear about this. If the lady's white you would never hear about it. If the manager was black and the lady was white and he said "get out of my store you white devil bitch" you might hear about it if you lived locally.
Starting to think the Mexican story was only known because it wasn't originally reported widely that the lady was black so everyone just assumed it was some racist Trumper
A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job
I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.
Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.
Yes! That's it! Let's circle jerk about wrecking this guy's livelihood because we THINK (though there is more evidence to suggest he is not racist than otherwise) that he is racist and that offends us to the core!
A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job
I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.
Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.
Yes! That's it! Let's circle jerk about wrecking this guy's livelihood because we THINK (though there is more evidence to suggest he is not racist than otherwise) that he is racist and that offends us to the core!
I don't give a fuck if he was a racist. He was a stupid prick who acted extremely unprofessionally and was giving CVS a bad name. Do you think he shouldn't have been fired if racism wasn't a factor? I'm glad I don't work for you. ---
>claims that changing the subject is not deflecting >continues to deflect by talking about other subject
Also, I don't watch the news. I hadn't heard of this story until someone posted it here. I saw the story about the 91 y/o before seeing it posted here.
Do you understand what words mean? I have been talking about this subject the entire time. Me using another incident as basis of comparison to media/social reaction as it pertains to this case is not changing the subject.
Is there some kind of stupid test race-baiters have to take before getting their virtue badge or something?
No I don't understand words. I speak in grunts and type by mashing buttons. If this actually forms words, it is completely coincidental and I have no idea how it happened. Again, I just click on random things, in this case the quote icon, and then I just press randomly around the lower part of my phone screen.
You're deflecting from one incident to another, just like whenever trump does something wrong, his supporters deflect to obama or hillary. I don't want to talk about that though, because I'm not deflecting. I'm remaining on the subject at hand, which you don't seem to want to do.
See, you're saying "I'm not deflecting. I'm talking about another incident that's the same." Oh? So you're deflecting from an incident that "isn't racist" according to you to an incident that is racist according to you. Basically, you're trying to argue that it's not deflecting because racism and non-racism are the same.
I don't race bait and virtue is utterly meaningless to me, so I don't know how you think that last paragraph applied to me.
I was comparing the reactions to two instances, all the while talking about the CVS incident. How is it deflecting if I continue with the original topic throughout my comparison. Topics don't exist in a vacuum. I can point out hypocrisy of leftist media/leftists while still engaging on the original topic.
Deflecting would be drawing attention to one injustice to divert attention from another actual injustice. In this case, not only was there only one provable injustice, but I kept devoting attention to the original case.
So yes, I ask again if you understand what words mean when you use them or if you've just seen people use them on the internet and thought you'd repeat them because you had no other legitimate points. I'm leaning toward the latter explanation because you've provided more than enough evidence for it.
Again, I literally just mash buttons to type because I never learned any words or what they meant. I have never had access to any form of language. I don't know why you asked that question a second time. Did you think you'd get a different answer?
You must not be alt-right. If you were, topics would exist in a vacuum. I've argued with many of them and they will use every tactic in the book to control the conversation and dictate what is or is not allowed to be said. You aren't doing that, which is good. There is some hope for you.
Well according to the perpetrator's employers, there was an injustice done. Those losers would still have their jobs otherwise. Or will you argue "CVS fired them for fake racism because the company didn't want backlash from LEFIST SJW ANTI-WHITE RACIST LIBERALS accusing them of real racism" or some such silliness?
The only word I used "from the internet" was deflection. Both sides use it. It's fair game... oh and the all caps stuff in this post, but that's shit from y'all's side of the aisle. ---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Did you also notice that he's calling racism and hate crime against Mexicans (nationality, not race, but I won't split hairs) but then says she isn't a Mexican-hating trump hillbilly. Okay so she obviously isn't a hillbilly, but she's not a Mexican-hating trump supporter but she committed a hate crime against a Mexican? His logic is like... cannibalizing itself. Makes no sense. ---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job
I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.
Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.
Yes! That's it! Let's circle jerk about wrecking this guy's livelihood because we THINK (though there is more evidence to suggest he is not racist than otherwise) that he is racist and that offends us to the core!
I don't give a fuck if he was a racist. He was a stupid prick who acted extremely unprofessionally and was giving CVS a bad name. Do you think he shouldn't have been fired if racism wasn't a factor? I'm glad I don't work for you.
You don't have a right to suck at your job and keep that job.
The only reason you care is because he is white and she is black. If sucking at your job is calling cops on a customer who refuses to leave, then sure, throw the book at him.
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Did you also notice that he's calling racism and hate crime against Mexicans (nationality, not race, but I won't split hairs) but then says she isn't a Mexican-hating trump hillbilly. Okay so she obviously isn't a hillbilly, but she's not a Mexican-hating trump supporter but she committed a hate crime against a Mexican? His logic is like... cannibalizing itself. Makes no sense.
Nothing you just said makes sense. What the fuck are you talking about?
And yes, I have every right to believe a corporation would throw staff under the bus in the face of racism allegations. It is fire them and save face or have people protesting your stores, harassing your employees, etc.
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Did you also notice that he's calling racism and hate crime against Mexicans (nationality, not race, but I won't split hairs) but then says she isn't a Mexican-hating trump hillbilly. Okay so she obviously isn't a hillbilly, but she's not a Mexican-hating trump supporter but she committed a hate crime against a Mexican? His logic is like... cannibalizing itself. Makes no sense.
Nothing you just said makes sense. What the fuck are you talking about?
And yes, I have every right to believe a corporation would throw staff under the bus in the face of racism allegations. It is fire them and save face or have people protesting your stores, harassing your employees, etc.
Trump-supporting woman commits hate crime against Mexican man.
You: "She wasn't a Mexican-hating trump supporter"
?????
And I'm the one who doesn't understand words?
Also, the dude called the cops on her because she wouldn't leave in a situation where he had no right to tell her to leave. Therefore he does suck at his job. Therefore, the book was rightfully thrown at him. Therefore CVS was not throwing him under the bus to avoid backlash but terminating his employment for misconduct and unprofessionalism, so your point on that is moot. ---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Could be mistaken, but there is definitely no SJW pretend outrage machine about the brick bitch like there is with this dude in an instance in which there is no apparent racism. Any reporting on the brick bitch is solely reporting the story with no narrative, and if there is a narrative, it is somehow still a Trump's America narrative.
Look at TYT's coverage of brick bitch. No mention at all that she was black or a group of black dudes joined her in trying to kill the guy. But they sure mentioned Trump and the right wing!
The only reason anyone cares about CVS is because she is black. If the manager was also black you would never hear about this. If the lady's white you would never hear about it. If the manager was black and the lady was white and he said "get out of my store you white devil bitch" you might hear about it if you lived locally.
Starting to think the Mexican story was only known because it wasn't originally reported widely that the lady was black so everyone just assumed it was some racist Trumper
Well if you're gonna just making stuff up, don't be mad when people alter the details of stories to fit their agenda. ---
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Did you also notice that he's calling racism and hate crime against Mexicans (nationality, not race, but I won't split hairs) but then says she isn't a Mexican-hating trump hillbilly. Okay so she obviously isn't a hillbilly, but she's not a Mexican-hating trump supporter but she committed a hate crime against a Mexican? His logic is like... cannibalizing itself. Makes no sense.
Nothing you just said makes sense. What the fuck are you talking about?
And yes, I have every right to believe a corporation would throw staff under the bus in the face of racism allegations. It is fire them and save face or have people protesting your stores, harassing your employees, etc.
Trump-supporting woman commits hate crime against Mexican man.
You: "She wasn't a Mexican-hating trump supporter"
?????
And I'm the one who doesn't understand words?
Also, the dude called the cops on her because she wouldn't leave in a situation where he had no right to tell her to leave. Therefore he does suck at his job. Therefore, the book was rightfully thrown at him. Therefore CVS was not throwing him under the bus to avoid backlash but terminating his employment for misconduct and unprofessionalism, so your point on that is moot.
I never said the brick woman was a Trump supporter. What the fuck are you talking about? I'm saying if she was that's all you would hear about and that story would explode and thay narrative would be plastered all over. You don't seem to be able to comprehend what you read.
And again, the guy isn't being shamed for brig bad at his job. He is getting shit on so hard because he received the scarlet R by screening SJWs. I don't have a problem with him being fired for being a shitty employee. I do have a problem with it being because he was alleged to be a racist with absolutely no evidence. And he does have the right to ask her to leave if it isn't on basis of her race, which you have no evidence is the case.
And the media isn't posting "bad employee gets fired". Nope, they are posting "WHITE man calls cops on BLACK woman."
There is a very blatant narrative being forced and you're sucking it up like a good drone.
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Could be mistaken, but there is definitely no SJW pretend outrage machine about the brick bitch like there is with this dude in an instance in which there is no apparent racism. Any reporting on the brick bitch is solely reporting the story with no narrative, and if there is a narrative, it is somehow still a Trump's America narrative.
Look at TYT's coverage of brick bitch. No mention at all that she was black or a group of black dudes joined her in trying to kill the guy. But they sure mentioned Trump and the right wing!
The only reason anyone cares about CVS is because she is black. If the manager was also black you would never hear about this. If the lady's white you would never hear about it. If the manager was black and the lady was white and he said "get out of my store you white devil bitch" you might hear about it if you lived locally.
Starting to think the Mexican story was only known because it wasn't originally reported widely that the lady was black so everyone just assumed it was some racist Trumper
Well if you're gonna just making stuff up, don't be mad when people alter the details of stories to fit their agenda.
I'm not making anything up. There is a very clear difference in the narrative of these two stories. The reporting of the Mexican one is just reporting. The reporting of this one is about an evil white racist daring to call the cops on a black lady who wouldn't leave.
You guys keep saying she harassed him when no one has even said such a thing. What did happen is after asking why her coupon wouldn't work a second guy asked her to leave (Which CVS obviously recognied as BS. You don't ask a customer to leave just because they want to speak to someone else or ask questions) at which point she started recording and the video clearly indicates she wasn't aggressive at all
Cops were literally called and nothing happened. Instead 2 people got fired because they called the cops when a woman questioned why they wouldn't accept her coupon
Fair next
Yes, surely this is the entire story of why the cops were called. And certainly it is because the guy is a RRRRAAAAACCCCCIIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSTTTTTT. And even if the events played out how you said, there is nothing at all to indicate he wouldn't have done the exact thing to a white person in the same situation.
I already outlined a likely scenario. She tries to use the coupon. It is thought to be invalid. She thinks she is being accused of being a thief rather than just being told the coupon is invalid and throws a fit, following around the staff, and refusing to leave. Then the cops were called.
I'm positive this dude has served black customers before. I'm positive he has had issues with white customers before. This is only a story, and he only got fired, because she was black. A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job and not have his face and name plastered all over the internet, and wouldn't have to deal with the wave of likely undeserved harassment sure to flood over him from screeching SJWs.
So true.
These stories of "something happened to a black person and it's news because the other person was white" is pathetic. ---
"I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Could be mistaken, but there is definitely no SJW pretend outrage machine about the brick bitch like there is with this dude in an instance in which there is no apparent racism. Any reporting on the brick bitch is solely reporting the story with no narrative, and if there is a narrative, it is somehow still a Trump's America narrative.
Look at TYT's coverage of brick bitch. No mention at all that she was black or a group of black dudes joined her in trying to kill the guy. But they sure mentioned Trump and the right wing!
The only reason anyone cares about CVS is because she is black. If the manager was also black you would never hear about this. If the lady's white you would never hear about it. If the manager was black and the lady was white and he said "get out of my store you white devil bitch" you might hear about it if you lived locally.
Starting to think the Mexican story was only known because it wasn't originally reported widely that the lady was black so everyone just assumed it was some racist Trumper
Well if you're gonna just making stuff up, don't be mad when people alter the details of stories to fit their agenda.
I'm not making anything up. There is a very clear difference in the narrative of these two stories. The reporting of the Mexican one is just reporting. The reporting of this one is about an evil white racist daring to call the cops on a black lady who wouldn't leave.
You're clearly making up a narrative to fit your argument. None of your analysis has been accurate. ---
A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job
I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.
Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.
Yes! That's it! Let's circle jerk about wrecking this guy's livelihood because we THINK (though there is more evidence to suggest he is not racist than otherwise) that he is racist and that offends us to the core!
I don't give a fuck if he was a racist. He was a stupid prick who acted extremely unprofessionally and was giving CVS a bad name. Do you think he shouldn't have been fired if racism wasn't a factor? I'm glad I don't work for you.
You don't have a right to suck at your job and keep that job.
The only reason you care is because he is white and she is black. If sucking at your job is calling cops on a customer who refuses to leave, then sure, throw the book at him.
No, I care because he gives CVS a bad name by acting like a tool. Regardless of how much nationwide media traction this story would get if we theoretically swapped people around, that is not how you act here or any job.
It isn't just that it was worse. It's that it happened around the same time as this, at least the coverage started, then this CVS shit takes off and stirs everyone into a frenzy while a group of black people beating an elderly Mexican and telling him to go back to his country just kinds simmered down once the leftists learned it wasn't some Mexican-hating Trump hillbilly.
Now why could that be?
You keep saying that that story is getting playe much more than the other, but there's 0 reason to bieve that. I have seen far more news coverage about the man being assaulted than this woman getting the cops called on her, so you're either being dishonest or are mistaken.
Could be mistaken, but there is definitely no SJW pretend outrage machine about the brick bitch like there is with this dude in an instance in which there is no apparent racism. Any reporting on the brick bitch is solely reporting the story with no narrative, and if there is a narrative, it is somehow still a Trump's America narrative.
Look at TYT's coverage of brick bitch. No mention at all that she was black or a group of black dudes joined her in trying to kill the guy. But they sure mentioned Trump and the right wing!
The only reason anyone cares about CVS is because she is black. If the manager was also black you would never hear about this. If the lady's white you would never hear about it. If the manager was black and the lady was white and he said "get out of my store you white devil bitch" you might hear about it if you lived locally.
Starting to think the Mexican story was only known because it wasn't originally reported widely that the lady was black so everyone just assumed it was some racist Trumper
Well if you're gonna just making stuff up, don't be mad when people alter the details of stories to fit their agenda.
I'm not making anything up. There is a very clear difference in the narrative of these two stories. The reporting of the Mexican one is just reporting. The reporting of this one is about an evil white racist daring to call the cops on a black lady who wouldn't leave.
You're clearly making up a narrative to fit your argument. None of your analysis has been accurate.
Making up that this story has a white racist spin when here is no indication of this being racist? The exact people calling this dude a racist would be the first ones screaming "Trumps America" if brick bitch had been a white person. You're lying to yourself if you think other wise.
Making up that this story has a white racist spin when here is no indication of this being racist? The exact people calling this dude a racist would be the first ones screaming "Trumps America" if brick bitch had been a white person. You're lying to yourself if you think other wise.
So you can't call something racist unless you can prove beyond all doubt that it is? That's just stupid. ---
A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job
I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.
Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.
Yes! That's it! Let's circle jerk about wrecking this guy's livelihood because we THINK (though there is more evidence to suggest he is not racist than otherwise) that he is racist and that offends us to the core!
I don't give a fuck if he was a racist. He was a stupid prick who acted extremely unprofessionally and was giving CVS a bad name. Do you think he shouldn't have been fired if racism wasn't a factor? I'm glad I don't work for you.
You don't have a right to suck at your job and keep that job.
The only reason you care is because he is white and she is black. If sucking at your job is calling cops on a customer who refuses to leave, then sure, throw the book at him.
No, I care because he gives CVS a bad name by acting like a tool. Regardless of how much nationwide media traction this story would get if we theoretically swapped people around, that is not how you act here or any job.
Actions have consequences.
It isn't getting attention now because he is a bad employee, it is getting attention because of the evil white racist victimhood narrative. You don't give a fuck about how he represents CVS. You care that he is white, she is black, and you think this reinforces your worldview.
Making up that this story has a white racist spin when here is no indication of this being racist? The exact people calling this dude a racist would be the first ones screaming "Trumps America" if brick bitch had been a white person. You're lying to yourself if you think other wise.
So you can't call something racist unless you can prove beyond all doubt that it is? That's just stupid.
So you call someone racist with no evidence of it being so other than "did thing to black person they didn't like" and ruin is livelihood, smear his name, and plaster his info all over the internet as a racist, especially in modern culture, and that's okay with you?
If you're going to make a claim that can ruin someone's life, yeah, I think you should be able to back it up with some evidence. Crazy, Right?
A white person in the exact scenario you wouldn't know about it, he would still have a job
I hope not as he absolutely needs to be fired and have the door hit him on the way out.
Edit: And that is what happened. Good job, CVS.
Yes! That's it! Let's circle jerk about wrecking this guy's livelihood because we THINK (though there is more evidence to suggest he is not racist than otherwise) that he is racist and that offends us to the core!
I don't give a fuck if he was a racist. He was a stupid prick who acted extremely unprofessionally and was giving CVS a bad name. Do you think he shouldn't have been fired if racism wasn't a factor? I'm glad I don't work for you.
You don't have a right to suck at your job and keep that job.
The only reason you care is because he is white and she is black. If sucking at your job is calling cops on a customer who refuses to leave, then sure, throw the book at him.
No, I care because he gives CVS a bad name by acting like a tool. Regardless of how much nationwide media traction this story would get if we theoretically swapped people around, that is not how you act here or any job.
Actions have consequences.
It isn't getting attention now because he is a bad employee, it is getting attention because of the evil white racist victimhood narrative. You don't give a fuck about how he represents CVS. You care that he is white, she is black, and you think this reinforces your worldview.
Whatever you say, bro. I can tell you for a fact this guy would have gotten deservedly fired regardless of the colors of everyone involved. No one has time for this shit.
So the SJWs here aarend the media so adamant that CVS guy is a horrible racist (despite campaigning in favor of the black people in his community) yet display no outrage at all by an incident (a violent one at that) that has actual evidence of being racially aggravated. There is a clear agenda being pushed.
"This white man is RACIST"
"Woman charged with attempted murder" with no racism angle whatsoever. Funny since the story is about a group of black people trying to kill a mexican while yelling slurs at him.
He wouldn't have, because it would have never even been a story. And is it now the point in you making an idiot of yourself where you resort to the "call you what I actually am" rhetoric? I must have missed that on the itinerary.
Making up that this story has a white racist spin when here is no indication of this being racist? The exact people calling this dude a racist would be the first ones screaming "Trumps America" if brick bitch had been a white person. You're lying to yourself if you think other wise.
So you can't call something racist unless you can prove beyond all doubt that it is? That's just stupid.
So you call someone racist with no evidence of it being so other than "did thing to black person they didn't like" and ruin is livelihood, smear his name, and plaster his info all over the internet as a racist, especially in modern culture, and that's okay with you?
If you're going to make a claim that can ruin someone's life, yeah, I think you should be able to back it up with some evidence. Crazy, Right?
You think there's no evidence? A person was treated irrationally, so there's a reason this person was treated differently than normal. You're saying racism isn't a logic conclusion to come to? Lol you're probably one of those people who said racism was over when Obama got elected. ---
*facepalm* I never claimed that you said she was a trump supporter. She just is, you can tell because of what she did.
CVS fired him for sucking at his job, not because he was being shamed for <insert speculation>. Why did he have the right to ask her to leave? Obviously she did nothing wrong as he was fired for failing at his job. Are you going to believe a bunch a "waaaaahhh racism!" torch-wielding SJWs on social media over the literal company the man worked for who said his conduct was wrong?
You want to name-call me (flaming lol) a drone, but if you ask me, the SJWs are in your head, not mine. You're flailing now, friendo.
"THE MEDIA! THE MEDIA! BOOGEYMAN MEDIA!" - you.
What fuels the media? People talking shit about the media.
"No puppet, no puppet, you're the puppet." Puppets, drones, same shit different day.
What do you mean by screening sjws btw? ---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
So the SJWs here aarend the media so adamant that CVS guy is a horrible racist (despite campaigning in favor of the black people in his community) yet display no outrage at all by an incident (a violent one at that) that has actual evidence of being racially aggravated. There is a clear agenda being pushed.
"This white man is RACIST"
"Woman charged with attempted murder" with no racism angle whatsoever. Funny since the story is about a group of black people trying to kill a mexican while yelling slurs at him.
Lmao you're saying no SJWs displayed outrage at the woman who attacked the Mexican man? Now you're just being willfully ignorant or flat out lying. ---
So the SJWs here aarend the media so adamant that CVS guy is a horrible racist (despite campaigning in favor of the black people in his community) yet display no outrage at all by an incident (a violent one at that) that has actual evidence of being racially aggravated. There is a clear agenda being pushed.
"This white man is RACIST"
"Woman charged with attempted murder" with no racism angle whatsoever. Funny since the story is about a group of black people trying to kill a mexican while yelling slurs at him.
Lmao you're saying no SJWs displayed outrage at the woman who attacked the Mexican man? Now you're just being willfully ignorant or flat out lying.
Not from the same racism angle they are displaying here, as evident by how the media is reporting the two stories. You are being willfully ignorant
*facepalm* I never claimed that you said she was a trump supporter. She just is, you can tell because of what she did.
CVS fired him for sucking at his job, not because he was being shamed for <insert speculation>. Why did he have the right to ask her to leave? Obviously she did nothing wrong as he was fired for failing at his job. Are you going to believe a bunch a "waaaaahhh racism!" torch-wielding SJWs on social media over the literal company the man worked for who said his conduct was wrong?
You want to name-call me (flaming lol) a drone, but if you ask me, the SJWs are in your head, not mine. You're flailing now, friendo.
"THE MEDIA! THE MEDIA! BOOGEYMAN MEDIA!" - you.
What fuels the media? People talking shit about the media.
"No puppet, no puppet, you're the puppet." Puppets, drones, same shit different day.
What do you mean by screening sjws btw?
Black people have been violent toward Hispanics and vice versa since before Trump You have no idea her political affiliation.
Making up that this story has a white racist spin when here is no indication of this being racist? The exact people calling this dude a racist would be the first ones screaming "Trumps America" if brick bitch had been a white person. You're lying to yourself if you think other wise.
So you can't call something racist unless you can prove beyond all doubt that it is? That's just stupid.
So you call someone racist with no evidence of it being so other than "did thing to black person they didn't like" and ruin is livelihood, smear his name, and plaster his info all over the internet as a racist, especially in modern culture, and that's okay with you?
If you're going to make a claim that can ruin someone's life, yeah, I think you should be able to back it up with some evidence. Crazy, Right?
You think there's no evidence? A person was treated irrationally, so there's a reason this person was treated differently than normal. You're saying racism isn't a logic conclusion to come to? Lol you're probably one of those people who said racism was over when Obama got elected.
Uh... No? Isn't a logical conclusion to come to because you have no evidence she was treated different than anyone else would have been in the same situation with the same guy. If you are going to nlast the guy all over the news as a racist and try to ruin him, yeah you better have more evidence than "he did something I don't like to someone who happened to be black." Racism isn't over. And in concert with your run of the mill far right racists, people like you are part of the reason why.
*facepalm* I never claimed that you said she was a trump supporter. She just is, you can tell because of what she did.
CVS fired him for sucking at his job, not because he was being shamed for <insert speculation>. Why did he have the right to ask her to leave? Obviously she did nothing wrong as he was fired for failing at his job. Are you going to believe a bunch a "waaaaahhh racism!" torch-wielding SJWs on social media over the literal company the man worked for who said his conduct was wrong?
You want to name-call me (flaming lol) a drone, but if you ask me, the SJWs are in your head, not mine. You're flailing now, friendo.
"THE MEDIA! THE MEDIA! BOOGEYMAN MEDIA!" - you.
What fuels the media? People talking shit about the media.
"No puppet, no puppet, you're the puppet." Puppets, drones, same shit different day.
What do you mean by screening sjws btw?
Black people have been violent toward Hispanics and vice versa since before Trump You have no idea her political affiliation.
Would she have told a Cuban woman to go back to Cuba? A Dominican man to go back to the Dominican Republic? A Puerto Rican teenager to go back to PR? (Which is an official US territory in case you and/or Trump and/or Trump's supporters didn't know) ---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
CVS fired him for sucking at his job, not because he was being shamed for <insert speculation>. Why did he have the right to ask her to leave? Obviously she did nothing wrong as he was fired for failing at his job. Are you going to believe a bunch a "waaaaahhh racism!" torch-wielding SJWs on social media over the literal company the man worked for who said his conduct was wrong?
So can you explain to me why media is mentioning races in the coupon scenario in their headlines but not races in the brick scenario (where one race told another to go back to Mexico)? ---
"I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks
