Current Events > attn: conservatives

Topic List	Page List: 1
mario2000 08/20/18 1:56:29 PM #1:	you are entitled to freedom of speech you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform they have every right to decide whether or not they want you on their platform and if you're expressing hatred and stirring up shit, they have every right to kick you out, just as i have every right to kick you out of my house if you're stirring up shit there hope this helps --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907221559] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>you are entitled to freedom of speech you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform they have every right to decide whether or not they want you on their platform and if you're expressing hatred and stirring up shit, they have every right to kick you out, just as i have every right to kick you out of my house if you're stirring up shit there hope this helps</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Turbam 08/20/18 1:57:04 PM #2:	This didn't help at all --- ~snip (V)_(;,;)_(V) snip~ I'm just one man! Whoa! Well, I'm a one man band! https://imgur.com/p9Xvjvs <cite>Turbam posted [p:907221595] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>This didn't help at all</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 08/20/18 1:57:44 PM #3:	mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:907221639] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Romes187 08/20/18 1:58:17 PM #4:	mario2000 posted... you are entitled to freedom of speech you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform they have every right to decide whether or not they want you on their platform and if you're expressing hatred and stirring up shit, they have every right to kick you out, just as i have every right to kick you out of my house if you're stirring up shit there hope this helps I agree except I would change "privately owned platform" to "privately owned business" and I would delete everything after the word "platform" in your second paragraph. There doesn't even need to be a reason...some people are just dicks and if they want to play that game, they can. <cite>Romes187 posted [p:907221669] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are entitled to freedom of speech you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform they have every right to decide whether or not they want you on their platform and if you're expressing hatred and stirring up shit, they have every right to kick you out, just as i have every right to kick you out of my house if you're stirring up shit there hope this helps</quote> I agree except I would change "privately owned platform" to "privately owned business" and I would delete everything after the word "platform" in your second paragraph. There doesn't even need to be a reason...some people are just dicks and if they want to play that game, they can.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vertania 08/20/18 1:58:20 PM #5:	mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Unless you play in the NFL. <cite>Vertania posted [p:907221672] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Unless you play in the NFL.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/20/18 1:58:33 PM #6:	The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. wow i almost forgot you existed, how long was this most recent suspension? --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907221678] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> wow i almost forgot you existed, how long was this most recent suspension?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/20/18 2:04:03 PM #7:	but anyway imma just go ahead and ignore that dumbass apples and oranges comparison you so eagerly rushed in here to make --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907221975] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>but anyway imma just go ahead and ignore that dumbass apples and oranges comparison you so eagerly rushed in here to make</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro 08/20/18 2:10:28 PM #8:	Ok --- 53 LIII 0b110101 p16 0x35 <cite>DevsBro posted [p:907222322] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>Ok</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vertania 08/20/18 2:10:31 PM #9:	mario2000 posted... but anyway imma just go ahead and ignore that dumbass apples and oranges comparison you so eagerly rushed in here to make the NFL is a privately owned platform tho you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform <cite>Vertania posted [p:907222330] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>but anyway imma just go ahead and ignore that dumbass apples and oranges comparison you so eagerly rushed in here to make</quote> the NFL is a privately owned platform tho <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 08/20/18 2:10:42 PM #10:	mario2000 posted... but anyway imma just go ahead and ignore that dumbass apples and oranges comparison you so eagerly rushed in here to make The comparison is spot on. Sorry if that's inconvenient for you, but you clearly didn't think this topic through. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:907222344] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>but anyway imma just go ahead and ignore that dumbass apples and oranges comparison you so eagerly rushed in here to make</quote> The comparison is spot on. Sorry if that's inconvenient for you, but you clearly didn't think this topic through.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/20/18 2:21:58 PM #11:	The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... but anyway imma just go ahead and ignore that dumbass apples and oranges comparison you so eagerly rushed in here to make The comparison is spot on. Sorry if that's inconvenient for you, but you clearly didn't think this topic through. DevsBro posted... Ok --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907223029] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>but anyway imma just go ahead and ignore that dumbass apples and oranges comparison you so eagerly rushed in here to make</quote> The comparison is spot on. Sorry if that's inconvenient for you, but you clearly didn't think this topic through.</quote> <cite>DevsBro posted...</cite> <quote>Ok</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWing 08/20/18 2:21:59 PM #12:	The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that? <cite>BWing posted [p:907223030] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 08/20/18 2:25:36 PM #13:	BWing posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that? Ask the TC, he's one of the hypocrites who supports the kneelers but thinks it's fair to ban Alex Jones. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:907223248] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that?</quote> Ask the TC, he's one of the hypocrites who supports the kneelers but thinks it's fair to ban Alex Jones.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zodd3224 08/20/18 2:25:49 PM #14:	BWing posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that? This. The President cant go on multiple tirades about how kneelers should be fired and then complain about conservatives being silenced on social media. --- https://imgur.com/qAas5O2 <cite>Zodd3224 posted [p:907223262] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that?</quote> This. The President cant go on multiple tirades about how kneelers should be fired and then complain about conservatives being silenced on social media.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/20/18 2:28:44 PM #15:	"this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality" --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907223433] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>"this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 08/20/18 2:29:50 PM #16:	mario2000 posted... "this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality" Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:907223504] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>"this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality"</quote> Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy 08/20/18 2:31:40 PM #17:	Tc BTFO --- "How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot?" V-E-G-Y https://imgur.com/AqR3aeX https://imgur.com/vvuUXpp https://imgur.com/r9xK2NR <cite>glitteringfairy posted [p:907223607] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>Tc BTFO</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zodd3224 08/20/18 2:31:50 PM #18:	The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... "this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality" Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them. Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations. --- https://imgur.com/qAas5O2 <cite>Zodd3224 posted [p:907223615] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>"this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality"</quote> Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them.</quote> Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 08/20/18 2:32:13 PM #19:	BWing posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that? The NFL isnt a social media network. In todays society Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are the town squares of speech and it operates like a monopoly. This is the same reason public utilities cannot deny service simply because they dont like the political views of someone. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:907223632] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that?</quote> The NFL isnt a social media network. In todays society Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are the town squares of speech and it operates like a monopoly. This is the same reason public utilities cannot deny service simply because they dont like the political views of someone.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 08/20/18 2:33:12 PM #20:	Zodd3224 posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... "this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality" Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them. Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations. I'm fine with them being banned in both cases. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:907223700] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zodd3224 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>"this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality"</quote> Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them.</quote> Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations.</quote> I'm fine with them being banned in both cases.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 08/20/18 2:33:41 PM #21:	The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. Actually, the NFL would need to get the NFLPA to agree to that policy, wouldn't they? --- https://imgur.com/ByKGlJb https://imgur.com/nZdaA8D https://imgur.com/VBLBILg <cite>CableZL posted [p:907223732] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> Actually, the NFL would need to get the NFLPA to agree to that policy, wouldn't they?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 08/20/18 2:35:24 PM #22:	CableZL posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. Actually, the NFL would need to get the NFLPA to agree to that policy, wouldn't they? Probably for a league-wide policy, but individual owners are well within their rights to sit players like Jerry Jones said he would. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:907223825] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>CableZL posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> Actually, the NFL would need to get the NFLPA to agree to that policy, wouldn't they?</quote> Probably for a league-wide policy, but individual owners are well within their rights to sit players like Jerry Jones said he would.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 08/20/18 2:36:15 PM #23:	The Admiral posted... Probably for a league-wide policy, but individual owners are well within their rights to sit players like Jerry Jones said he would. Right, but that'd be an individual team policy, not the NFL making the policy. --- https://imgur.com/ByKGlJb https://imgur.com/nZdaA8D https://imgur.com/VBLBILg <cite>CableZL posted [p:907223867] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Probably for a league-wide policy, but individual owners are well within their rights to sit players like Jerry Jones said he would. </quote> Right, but that'd be an individual team policy, not the NFL making the policy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zodd3224 08/20/18 2:37:19 PM #24:	The Admiral posted... Zodd3224 posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... "this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality" Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them. Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations. I'm fine with them being banned in both cases. How do you feel about the hypocricy of Trump's stance on these matters? --- https://imgur.com/qAas5O2 <cite>Zodd3224 posted [p:907223942] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zodd3224 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>"this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality"</quote> Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them.</quote> Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations.</quote> I'm fine with them being banned in both cases.</quote> How do you feel about the hypocricy of Trump's stance on these matters?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/20/18 2:38:02 PM #25:	Nomadic View posted... BWing posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers. But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that? The NFL isnt a social media network. In todays society Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are the town squares of speech and it operates like a monopoly. This is the same reason public utilities cannot deny service simply because they dont like the political views of someone. 1. Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube are privately owned entities. They don't HAVE to let you use them. 2. They have TOSes which clearly state what you can and cannot post. --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907223983] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform</quote> Glad you guys are finally on board about banning the NFL kneelers.</quote> But the people bitching about kneelers are also the same ones bitching that Alex Jones got removed. How do you reconcile that?</quote> The NFL isnt a social media network. In todays society Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are the town squares of speech and it operates like a monopoly. This is the same reason public utilities cannot deny service simply because they dont like the political views of someone.</quote> 1. Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube are privately owned entities. They don't HAVE to let you use them. 2. They have TOSes which clearly state what you can and cannot post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 08/20/18 2:38:30 PM #26:	Zodd3224 posted... The Admiral posted... Zodd3224 posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... "this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality" Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them. Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations. I'm fine with them being banned in both cases. How do you feel about the hypocricy of Trump's stance on these matters? I think Trump's an idiot in general, so him being a hypocrite is not a surprise to me. Not sure how the other folks in this topic and on CE square also being hypocrites given their disdain for Trump on this issue, though. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:907224015] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zodd3224 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zodd3224 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>"this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality"</quote> Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them.</quote> Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations.</quote> I'm fine with them being banned in both cases.</quote> How do you feel about the hypocricy of Trump's stance on these matters?</quote> I think Trump's an idiot in general, so him being a hypocrite is not a surprise to me. Not sure how the other folks in this topic and on CE square also being hypocrites given their disdain for Trump on this issue, though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/20/18 2:40:36 PM #27:	And yes, the NFL is indeed a private platform. The owners can decide whether to punish the kneelers or not. It's their choice and it doesn't affect you at all. They're still gonna play football either way. Even less reason to bitch about it. --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907224143] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>And yes, the NFL is indeed a private platform. The owners can decide whether to punish the kneelers or not. It's their choice and it doesn't affect you at all. They're still gonna play football either way. Even less reason to bitch about it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 08/20/18 2:40:56 PM #28:	Nomadic View posted... The NFL isnt a social media network. In todays society Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are the town squares of speech and it operates like a monopoly. This is the same reason public utilities cannot deny service simply because they dont like the political views of someone. It isn't the same at all. 1) Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube are 3 separate entities. 2) You agree to the terms of service when you make an account on each of those 3 entitites 3) Alex Jones wasn't banned "simply because they don't like his political views." He was banned because of multiple offenses, the last straw being him calling for drag queens to be burned alive. You'd risk getting banned from Youtube, Facebook, Spotify, GameFAQs, and even Infowars' comment section if you said that. --- https://imgur.com/ByKGlJb https://imgur.com/nZdaA8D https://imgur.com/VBLBILg <cite>CableZL posted [p:907224159] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>The NFL isnt a social media network. In todays society Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are the town squares of speech and it operates like a monopoly. This is the same reason public utilities cannot deny service simply because they dont like the political views of someone.</quote> It isn't the same at all. 1) Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube are 3 separate entities. 2) You agree to the terms of service when you make an account on each of those 3 entitites 3) Alex Jones wasn't banned "simply because they don't like his political views." He was banned because of multiple offenses, the last straw being him calling for drag queens to be burned alive. You'd risk getting banned from Youtube, Facebook, Spotify, GameFAQs, and even Infowars' comment section if you said that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/20/18 2:42:14 PM #29:	On that note, what about all the players who thank God for their touchdowns afterwards? They're bringing religion in. Are you fine with that? --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907224227] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>On that note, what about all the players who thank God for their touchdowns afterwards? They're bringing religion in. Are you fine with that?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rimmer_Dall 08/20/18 2:43:45 PM #30:	--- "The cheese it yours turtles." ~ William Shakespeare <cite>Rimmer_Dall posted [p:907224322] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zodd3224 08/20/18 2:45:51 PM #31:	The Admiral posted... Zodd3224 posted... The Admiral posted... Zodd3224 posted... The Admiral posted... mario2000 posted... "this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality" Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them. Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations. I'm fine with them being banned in both cases. How do you feel about the hypocricy of Trump's stance on these matters? I think Trump's an idiot in general, so him being a hypocrite is not a surprise to me. Not sure how the other folks in this topic and on CE square also being hypocrites given their disdain for Trump on this issue, though. Fair enough. --- https://imgur.com/qAas5O2 <cite>Zodd3224 posted [p:907224440] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zodd3224 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zodd3224 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>"this guy calling for families of sandy hook victims to be harassed deserves more credibility and respect that someone making an inoffensive statement against police brutality"</quote> Man, those goal posts went flying so fast I could hardly see them.</quote> Im curious to hear your opinion on both the Alex Jones and the kneeling situations.</quote> I'm fine with them being banned in both cases.</quote> How do you feel about the hypocricy of Trump's stance on these matters?</quote> I think Trump's an idiot in general, so him being a hypocrite is not a surprise to me. Not sure how the other folks in this topic and on CE square also being hypocrites given their disdain for Trump on this issue, though.</quote> Fair enough.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMikh 08/20/18 2:58:31 PM #32:	mario2000 posted... you are entitled to freedom of speech you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform they have every right to decide whether or not they want you on their platform and if you're expressing hatred and stirring up shit, they have every right to kick you out, just as i have every right to kick you out of my house if you're stirring up shit there hope this helps two points 1. monopolies established as a result of corporate cronyism by state intervention is a proxy for state censorship especially seeing as these big platforms are in cahoots with the government itself - and other governments as well there should not be further government intervention in this trend - but conversely the market should be made dramatically freer from a regulatory and taxation standpoint to allow for competitors to bring more accountability to these players 2. the terms of service for these platforms are effectively a contract between the platforms and their contributors by arbitrarily banning unsavory parties from the platform without clarifying the specifics as to how that contract was breached by the parties in question is by its very nature a breach of contract a breach of contract, particularly which causes significant monetary damage, puts the platform in a position of liability - though the case for actionable litigation on these grounds is undermined by the very state cronyism that allows such platforms to assume unnatural monopolies to begin with conclusion. crony capitalism ruins everything for everyone, left and right, and though you may laugh because you're not affected, in good time the shoe will be on the other foot such was and is why i was as sympathetic to both sides of the proverbial aisle with respect to criticism of state-facilitated corporate excesses/abuses, monopolies, and the like --- https://imgur.com/A0TAfek <cite>TheMikh posted [p:907225231] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>you are entitled to freedom of speech you are not entitled to another person's or entity's privately owned platform they have every right to decide whether or not they want you on their platform and if you're expressing hatred and stirring up shit, they have every right to kick you out, just as i have every right to kick you out of my house if you're stirring up shit there hope this helps</quote> two points 1. monopolies established as a result of corporate cronyism by state intervention is a proxy for state censorship especially seeing as these big platforms are in cahoots with the government itself - and other governments as well there should not be further government intervention in this trend - but conversely the market should be made dramatically freer from a regulatory and taxation standpoint to allow for competitors to bring more accountability to these players 2. the terms of service for these platforms are effectively a contract between the platforms and their contributors by arbitrarily banning unsavory parties from the platform without clarifying the specifics as to how that contract was breached by the parties in question is by its very nature a breach of contract a breach of contract, particularly which causes significant monetary damage, puts the platform in a position of liability - though the case for actionable litigation on these grounds is undermined by the very state cronyism that allows such platforms to assume unnatural monopolies to begin with conclusion. crony capitalism ruins everything for everyone, left and right, and though you may laugh because you're not affected, in good time the shoe will be on the other foot such was and is why i was as sympathetic to both sides of the proverbial aisle with respect to criticism of state-facilitated corporate excesses/abuses, monopolies, and the like</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SuperMedz3 08/20/18 3:02:02 PM #33:	So it is okay for a baker to refuse to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding and the NFL forcing their players to stand during the anthem? I agree --- Fallout 4 <cite>SuperMedz3 posted [p:907225425] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>So it is okay for a baker to refuse to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding and the NFL forcing their players to stand during the anthem? I agree</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMikh 08/20/18 3:12:00 PM #34:	SuperMedz3 posted... So it is okay for a baker to refuse to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding and the NFL forcing their players to stand during the anthem? I agree the nfl shouldn't be able to force players to stand if it's not a contractual term, but if it is a contractual term, they have the right to demand it as a condition of employment regardless, they should also be competing with other football leagues for viewership and sponsorships but they're deeply enmeshed with the corporate monopolies of big entertainment / big broadcasting which are enabled by the same state-interventionist forces i previously describe, which is perhaps at the root of this issue where there is not flexibility in the form of free economic competition and the spontaneous organization of the market it facilitates, politics emerges - if people don't like the nfl for allowing players to kneel, they should have access to view other football leagues; if they don't like the nfl for for forcing players to stand, they should have access to view other football leagues as well there are thousands of bakeries, and while i loathe the fact that some refuse to cater to gay weddings, there are abundant alternatives of comparable if not superior quality why sue for the right to give homophobes your money, when money (or the deprivation of such) seems to talk more than anything else --- https://imgur.com/A0TAfek <cite>TheMikh posted [p:907225993] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>SuperMedz3 posted...</cite> <quote>So it is okay for a baker to refuse to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding and the NFL forcing their players to stand during the anthem? I agree</quote> the nfl shouldn't be able to force players to stand if it's not a contractual term, but if it is a contractual term, they have the right to demand it as a condition of employment regardless, they should also be competing with other football leagues for viewership and sponsorships but they're deeply enmeshed with the corporate monopolies of big entertainment / big broadcasting which are enabled by the same state-interventionist forces i previously describe, which is perhaps at the root of this issue where there is not flexibility in the form of free economic competition and the spontaneous organization of the market it facilitates, politics emerges - if people don't like the nfl for allowing players to kneel, they should have access to view other football leagues; if they don't like the nfl for for forcing players to stand, they should have access to view other football leagues as well there are thousands of bakeries, and while i loathe the fact that some refuse to cater to gay weddings, there are abundant alternatives of comparable if not superior quality why sue for the right to give homophobes your money, when money (or the deprivation of such) seems to talk more than anything else</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CableZL 08/20/18 3:26:08 PM #35:	SuperMedz3 posted... So it is okay for a baker to refuse to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding and the NFL forcing their players to stand during the anthem? I agree The NFL would actually need the NFLPA to agree to such a policy before they could implement it. --- https://imgur.com/ByKGlJb https://imgur.com/nZdaA8D https://imgur.com/VBLBILg <cite>CableZL posted [p:907226839] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote><cite>SuperMedz3 posted...</cite> <quote>So it is okay for a baker to refuse to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding and the NFL forcing their players to stand during the anthem? I agree</quote> The NFL would actually need the NFLPA to agree to such a policy before they could implement it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 08/20/18 3:28:16 PM #36:	p sure forcing someone to stand for the anthem would be a violation of their freedom of speech --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:907226961] in attn: cons... [t:76920360]...</cite> <quote>p sure forcing someone to stand for the anthem would be a violation of their freedom of speech</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > attn: conservatives (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > attn: conservatives