Poll of the Day > Blonde Conservative Teacher is SUING for 120 MILLION for REVERSE RACISM!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

White Middle School Ho, Patricia Cummings is suing her New York School for 120 MILLION citing it's REVERSE RACISM after she forced her 3 black students in her classroom to pretend to be SLAVES and then she STOOD on them with her FEET as part of a history lesson!!

The whinestine must have lost a few marbles when she did this history lesson where this happened in the Bronx after she picked out the 3 black kids in her classroom to illustrate conditions of a slave trip and then STEPPED on their BACKS to show "what it's like to be a slave" as she also regurgitated a racial speech in her "pretend lesson"

She was suspended on investigation and exterminated from the school and now she's seeking 120 million smackers in damages but her lawyer says it could be worth a BILLION!!

Her lawyer made bizarre claims that the teacher is a victim of "reverse racism" and that is preventing white parents from sending their kids to Bronx schools.

Tom Liotti said "There is blataant racism and reverse discrimination in the public schools of New York City. This is why white parents do not want to send their children there. The Bronx has been described by some as a 'war zone'. White teachers who work t here should get combat pay"

Cummings singled out the only 3 black kids in there and made them STRETCH OUT on the FLOOR in front of the class with their legs and hands wide part while he acted like a "king" in front of them and said "You see how it was to be a slave? How does it feel?"

According to the student, when one of the girls said she felt fine, Cummings then put her foot on her back and said again "How does it feel now? See how it feels to be a slave?"

She used poor judgement and her employment was terminated at that ponit. She has a bachelors at Adelphi University and a Masters in teaching from New York College of Old Westbury. She taught 7th and 8th grade social studies.

Her final twitter post which has been dormant was ATTACKING NFL PLAYERS who KNEELED!!

Do you think this heifer deserved her firing?.

Patricia - Crowfeet eyes

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1/2018/09/28/15/4612588-6219127-image-a-8_1538146796828.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1/2018/09/28/15/4612586-6219127-image-m-7_1538146792223.jpg

The School -

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2018/02/02/17/48D2EF8B00000578-5345565-image-m-62_1517591760951.jpg
---

Reverse racism isn't a thing. It would still just be called "racism."

JTekashiro posted...

Reverse racism isn't a thing. It would still just be called "racism."

Agreed, but remember, white people can't be the victims of racism!

Which is bullshit, but some idiots actually believe that.
---

what the fuck

wtf did she think would fuckin happen if she did this
---

Her final twitter post which has been dormant was ATTACKING NFL PLAYERS who KNEELED!!

I always love when some kind of incident happens with someone....the first thing people do is check their social media to try and find dirt on them.

"SHE CRITICIZED THE NFL KNEELING!!! SHE MUST BE SUPER RACIST!"

So desperate to smear her character.

And then they keep digging. "Omg, back in 2007 she might have cheated on her boyfriend at the time!"

Literally has nothing to do with the incident at school.

She definitely shouldn't have stepped on her students' backs.....but there also isn't a doubt in my mind that this whole situation has been blown out of proportion.

I remember many years ago, an art teacher got in trouble for teaching a lesson about skin tone in paintings, and had each student in the class try to mix paint to get their exact shade of skin. Of course, no two kids in the class had the same skin color. It was a harmless lesson about skin tone variety, and how it isn't always "white" and "black". But ridiculous parents eager to be outraged...complained about it, and said the lesson was incredibly racist.

For all we know, the students whose backs she stood on, were class clowns who were EAGER to participate in the activity just for shock value. In urban schools, teachers often have to do something dramatic just to keep the students engaged. Make the lesson memorable.

I had a physics teacher in high school talk about gravity, and he said that if everyone in this class were wearing space suits and just floating around in space....everyone would slowly start drifting towards Steve. Steve was the largest kid in our class. The entire class burst out laughing, because we all knew Steve was notorious for being a big motherfucker.

Steve took it like a champ. Didn't care.

In 2018, Steve (or someone on his behalf) would have been triggered and cried to the principal for "body-shaming" Steve.....and the teacher would be fired the next day.
---

GreenKnight127 posted...

She definitely shouldn't have stepped on her students' backs.....but there also isn't a doubt in my mind that this whole situation has been blown out of proportion.

Regardless of whether it is or isnt being blown out of proportion, common sense shoulda told her that the entire scenario probably wasnt going to end well.
---

The Popo posted...

GreenKnight127 posted...

She definitely shouldn't have stepped on her students' backs.....but there also isn't a doubt in my mind that this whole situation has been blown out of proportion.

Regardless of whether it is or isnt being blown out of proportion, common sense shoulda told her that the entire scenario probably wasnt going to end well.

None of us know what the environment of that classroom was like. The articles want to make it sound like she forced the students onto the ground and smashed their spines with the heels of her shoes because she's an evil racist white woman. I'm giving her the benefit of the doubt, because I've seen how teachers are always under a microscope and people are almost (disturbingly) EAGER to get teachers fired over the littlest shit.

I've been alive long enough to see how the media exaggerates shit for their precious click-baity headlines to get people all fired up for nothing. Gets the views pouring in. Drink up that sweet sweet ad revenue.

News outlets don't make money by printing facts. They make money by getting advertisements.

I am willing to bet the students were more than eager to participate in her activity. I'm sure there was also lots of laughter in the classroom, followed by discussion.

But it took just one whiny kid in the class to go home and tell mommy about what happened. And mommy got triggered on everyone's behalf....and complained.
---

I cant tell if youre agreeing with me or arguing against me.
---

Look at all of that nothing he posted lol
---

umm, that's not reverse racism - that's not even racism, that's a lesson on the burdens of slavery and why slavery is bad. At WORST it's battery.
---

Black teachers aren't allowed to walk on their students backs, either, so how does "reverse racism" come into this at all?
---

It seems like there was more to it than racism, she called out the only black students and straight up abused and humiliated them in front of the class. Even if she had no racist intentions (which she did), she deserved to get fired based on that alone.
---

This sounds really stupid. I kind of see the point in that people have no idea what slavery was really like and hold it against society like it's still going on today. But this sounds really stupid. I think the firing has less to do with race and more that she touched a student.

The_tall_midget posted...

JTekashiro posted...

Reverse racism isn't a thing. It would still just be called "racism."

Agreed, but remember, white people can't be the victims of racism!

That's a racist thing to say. Of course they can. They're members of a race, they can face discrimination on the basis of being a member of a race.
---

The_tall_midget posted...

JTekashiro posted...

Reverse racism isn't a thing. It would still just be called "racism."

Agreed, but remember, white people can't be the victims of racism!

Which is bullshit, but some idiots actually believe that.

I mean, it really depends on how one defines racism. Some people use the term "racism" to describe a system of oppression, not racially prejudiced acts. In that sense, only white people could be racist in an American context. I think it is a silly change but the English language evolves over time, one just has to adapt to the changes.

JTekashiro posted...

I mean, it really depends on how one defines racism. Some people use the term "racism" to describe a system of oppression, not racially prejudiced acts. In that sense, only white people could be racist in an American context. I think it is a silly change but the English language evolves over time, one just has to adapt to the changes.

It use to be a simple matter of ones race being used for the basis of discrimination. The discrimination alone was the problem and it was widely accepted that racism was a bad thing because of it. I have no idea when it became okay for one group to discriminate against another. Or to put it another way I have no idea when it was decided that some groups can't experience discrimination, even when that's what it would be called if the roles were swapped. Suddenly it's not so bad despite being the same action and/or the same attitude motivating it. Find me another word in the English language that operates that way.
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

That's a racist thing to say. Of course they can. They're members of a race, they can face discrimination on the basis of being a member of a race.

You do realize that you quoted ONE out of TWO sentences I said, disagreed with me, and then left out the second sentence which basically shows that I was sarcastic and actually agreed with you.

You are a fucking genius!
---

I wouldn't mind if she stood on top of me with racial implications
---

Full Throttle posted...

she STOOD on them with her FEET

As opposed to standing on them with something else?

The_tall_midget posted...

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

That's a racist thing to say. Of course they can. They're members of a race, they can face discrimination on the basis of being a member of a race.

You do realize that you quoted ONE out of TWO sentences I said, disagreed with me, and then left out the second sentence which basically shows that I was sarcastic and actually agreed with you.

You do realize that I realized that and was continuing the theme of sarcastic replies by mocking the inherent racism of people obsessed with things being racist.
---

thats an odd way to punish someone....

Lol. Duckbears catty af.
---