Poll of the Day > Brett Kavanaugh confirmed for Supreme Court.

Topic List	Page List: 1
WastelandCowboy 10/06/18 4:53:41 PM #1:	https://www.npr.org/654409999 Updated at 4:37 p.m. ET A sharply divided Senate reflecting a deeply divided nation voted almost entirely along party lines Saturday afternoon to confirm Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. The vote was 50-48. Only one Democrat, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, joined Republicans in backing Kavanaugh. One Republican, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, voted "present" although she said she opposed the nomination. One GOP senator was absent during the vote because of his daughter's wedding thousands of miles from Washington, D.C. In a tweet soon after the vote, President Trump celebrated the confirmation and said Kavanaugh will be officially sworn in soon. The Supreme Court said in a statement that Kavanaugh will be sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy Saturday evening. Roberts will administer the constitutional oath and Kennedy will administer the judicial oath in private ceremony at the court. "Both oaths will be administered so that (Kavanaugh) can begin to participate in the work of the Court immediately," the statement said. A formal investiture ceremony will take place at a later date, the Supreme Court also said. Senators sat at their desks during Saturday's vote, which was presided over by Vice President Mike Pence. In the debate preceding it, senators sounded as though they were describing two different men. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, called Kavanaugh "among the very best our nation has to offer." Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, called the 53-year-old Kavanaugh a victim of "an ugly left-wing smear campaign," and charged Democrats with character assassination. Kavanaugh had been accused by three women of sexual misconduct while he was in high school and college more than 30 years ago charges he angrily denied. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:910073719] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>https://www.npr.org/654409999 <quote>Updated at 4:37 p.m. ET A sharply divided Senate reflecting a deeply divided nation voted almost entirely along party lines Saturday afternoon to confirm Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. The vote was 50-48. Only one Democrat, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, joined Republicans in backing Kavanaugh. One Republican, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, voted "present" although she said she opposed the nomination. One GOP senator was absent during the vote because of his daughter's wedding thousands of miles from Washington, D.C. In a tweet soon after the vote, President Trump celebrated the confirmation and said Kavanaugh will be officially sworn in soon. The Supreme Court said in a statement that Kavanaugh will be sworn in by Chief Justice John Roberts and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy Saturday evening. Roberts will administer the constitutional oath and Kennedy will administer the judicial oath in private ceremony at the court. "Both oaths will be administered so that (Kavanaugh) can begin to participate in the work of the Court immediately," the statement said. A formal investiture ceremony will take place at a later date, the Supreme Court also said. Senators sat at their desks during Saturday's vote, which was presided over by Vice President Mike Pence. In the debate preceding it, senators sounded as though they were describing two different men. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, called Kavanaugh "among the very best our nation has to offer." Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, called the 53-year-old Kavanaugh a victim of "an ugly left-wing smear campaign," and charged Democrats with character assassination. Kavanaugh had been accused by three women of sexual misconduct while he was in high school and college more than 30 years ago charges he angrily denied.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Far-Queue 10/06/18 4:55:03 PM #2:	When do they rename the US as "Gilead"? --- https://imgur.com/ZwO4qO2 Bluer than velvet was the night... Softer than satin was the light... From the stars... <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:910073776] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>When do they rename the US as "Gilead"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SkynyrdRocker 10/06/18 4:57:07 PM #3:	Well poop <cite>SkynyrdRocker posted [p:910073900] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>Well poop</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TIE543 10/06/18 4:58:05 PM #4:	Yay! --- All I want for my birthday is a big booty hoe Steam: TIE543 <cite>TIE543 posted [p:910073950] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>Yay!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TIE543 10/06/18 4:58:22 PM #5:	Better gun rights incoming :D --- All I want for my birthday is a big booty hoe Steam: TIE543 <cite>TIE543 posted [p:910073966] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>Better gun rights incoming :D</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 10/06/18 4:58:25 PM #6:	Finally! It's about damn time. --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:910073970] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>Finally! It's about damn time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XlaxJynx007 10/06/18 5:10:00 PM #7:	There were plenty of arguments to be made on Kavanaugh's positions on the 4th Amendment and many others but no, democrats had to made up some bullshit that accomplishes nothing but make them look like petty, emotional children --- XB1: MrMegaNutz Steam: Kennetic <cite>XlaxJynx007 posted [p:910074660] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>There were plenty of arguments to be made on Kavanaugh's positions on the 4th Amendment and many others but no, democrats had to made up some bullshit that accomplishes nothing but make them look like petty, emotional children</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WhiskeyDisk 10/06/18 5:11:16 PM #8:	Now we can finally move on the the next thing to be outraged about! --- https://imgur.com/4fmtLFt http://s1.zetaboards.com/sba/ ~there's always free cheese in a mousetrap. <cite>WhiskeyDisk posted [p:910074721] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>Now we can finally move on the the next thing to be outraged about!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrndNhbrHdCEman 10/06/18 5:14:03 PM #9:	McConnell took the Senate floor after Schumer, praising Kavanaugh and condemning his Democratic colleagues for perceived obstructionism. Lmao. McConnell, the guy who refused to even consider reviewing Supreme Court candidates for a year because he wanted his own party to be able to nominate a candidate for the seat, is accusing other people of obstructionism. Fun fact: McConnell believes net neutrality rules violate the first amendment rights of internet providers. --- Official nosy neighbor and gossip https://imgur.com/uGKwGsK <cite>FrndNhbrHdCEman posted [p:910074830] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><quote>McConnell took the Senate floor after Schumer, praising Kavanaugh and condemning his Democratic colleagues for perceived obstructionism.</quote> Lmao. McConnell, the guy who refused to even consider reviewing Supreme Court candidates for a year because he wanted his own party to be able to nominate a candidate for the seat, is accusing other people of obstructionism. Fun fact: McConnell believes net neutrality rules violate the first amendment rights of internet providers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Impavid54 10/06/18 5:19:46 PM #10:	lmao --- Embark on your Monarch March. It all begins with the first hope-filled step. United States Naval Academy 2023 Hopeful. Oorah! <cite>Impavid54 posted [p:910075106] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shadowsword87 10/06/18 5:23:08 PM #11:	TIE543 posted... Better gun rights incoming :D You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff. --- ImmortalityV, "I would like to kiss Icoyar to be honest in a non gay way though" <cite>shadowsword87 posted [p:910075308] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote>Better gun rights incoming :D</quote> You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
argonautweakend 10/06/18 5:24:28 PM #12:	FrndNhbrHdCEman posted... Lmao. McConnell, the guy who refused to even consider reviewing Supreme Court candidates for a year because he wanted his own party to be able to nominate a candidate for the seat, is accusing other people of obstructionism. <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:910075382] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>FrndNhbrHdCEman posted...</cite> <quote>Lmao. McConnell, the guy who refused to even consider reviewing Supreme Court candidates for a year because he wanted his own party to be able to nominate a candidate for the seat, is accusing other people of obstructionism. </quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TIE543 10/06/18 5:24:44 PM #13:	shadowsword87 posted... TIE543 posted... Better gun rights incoming :D You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff. My state laws are perfectly fine, stuff I want done is going to have to be federal --- All I want for my birthday is a big booty hoe Steam: TIE543 <cite>TIE543 posted [p:910075394] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>shadowsword87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote>Better gun rights incoming :D</quote> You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff.</quote> My state laws are perfectly fine, stuff I want done is going to have to be federal</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 10/06/18 5:25:44 PM #14:	shadowsword87 posted... TIE543 posted... Better gun rights incoming :D You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff. Historically, yes. But there are efforts being made to have federally-based reciprocity laws for concealed carry permits. People like Kavanaugh could help with that. --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:910075454] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>shadowsword87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote>Better gun rights incoming :D</quote> You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff.</quote> Historically, yes. But there are efforts being made to have federally-based reciprocity laws for concealed carry permits. People like Kavanaugh could help with that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TIE543 10/06/18 5:27:28 PM #15:	shipwreckers posted... shadowsword87 posted... TIE543 posted... Better gun rights incoming :D You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff. Historically, yes. But there are efforts being made to have federally-based reciprocity laws for concealed carry permits. People like Kavanaugh could help with that. Reciprocity and suppressors off the NFA pls :D --- All I want for my birthday is a big booty hoe Steam: TIE543 <cite>TIE543 posted [p:910075562] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shadowsword87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote>Better gun rights incoming :D</quote> You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff.</quote> Historically, yes. But there are efforts being made to have federally-based reciprocity laws for concealed carry permits. People like Kavanaugh could help with that.</quote> Reciprocity and suppressors off the NFA pls :D</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XlaxJynx007 10/06/18 5:39:22 PM #16:	TIE543 posted... shipwreckers posted... shadowsword87 posted... TIE543 posted... Better gun rights incoming :D You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff. Historically, yes. But there are efforts being made to have federally-based reciprocity laws for concealed carry permits. People like Kavanaugh could help with that. Reciprocity and suppressors off the NFA pls :D Shit, I want the entire NFA gone plus reciprocity plus import bans gone --- XB1: MrMegaNutz Steam: Kennetic <cite>XlaxJynx007 posted [p:910076149] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shadowsword87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote>Better gun rights incoming :D</quote> You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff.</quote> Historically, yes. But there are efforts being made to have federally-based reciprocity laws for concealed carry permits. People like Kavanaugh could help with that.</quote> Reciprocity and suppressors off the NFA pls :D</quote> Shit, I want the entire NFA gone plus reciprocity plus import bans gone</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 10/06/18 6:47:00 PM #17:	I hope we get plenty of idiotic feminists and unhinged sjw's videos resulting from this. Those cancers exist only to entertain me. --- "Whatever! Everyone is woman!" -Bimbo from Super Seducer : How to talk to women <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:910079468] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>I hope we get plenty of idiotic feminists and unhinged sjw's videos resulting from this. Those cancers exist only to entertain me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 10/06/18 6:51:39 PM #18:	The_tall_midget posted... I hope we get plenty of idiotic feminists and unhinged sjw's videos resulting from this. Those cancers exist only to entertain me. Every post you cant help but talk about these invisible sjws and feminists that you seem obsessed with I wonder how much of your day is dedicated to them --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:910079693] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote>I hope we get plenty of idiotic feminists and unhinged sjw's videos resulting from this. Those cancers exist only to entertain me.</quote> Every post you cant help but talk about these invisible sjws and feminists that you seem obsessed with I wonder how much of your day is dedicated to them</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 10/06/18 7:05:57 PM #19:	Mead posted... Every post you cant help but talk about these invisible sjws and feminists that you seem obsessed with I wonder how much of your day is dedicated to them Invisible? Listen, Mead, I can understand you being sour that I was right about the FBI finding jack shit and that I am, once again, proven 100% correct, but even YOU have probably enough mental presence to notice all the mentally-unhinged feminists and sjw's that are infesting society like a terminal phase cancer. Or are you far more dense than I actually believe? --- "Whatever! Everyone is woman!" -Bimbo from Super Seducer : How to talk to women <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:910080460] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote> Every post you cant help but talk about these invisible sjws and feminists that you seem obsessed with I wonder how much of your day is dedicated to them</quote> Invisible? Listen, Mead, I can understand you being sour that I was right about the FBI finding jack shit and that I am, once again, proven 100% correct, but even YOU have probably enough mental presence to notice all the mentally-unhinged feminists and sjw's that are infesting society like a terminal phase cancer. Or are you far more dense than I actually believe?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JixHedgehog 10/06/18 7:11:21 PM #20:	Welp, that's that. . . for now who knows what the left is cooking up next Not saying he didnt do it or that she made up the allegations, there just wasnt any solid evidence to support either side, so you have to let the man walk ... Guess we're going back to the Russian witchhunt for another 10 months :( --- Not changing my sig until Nintendo announces the Switch XL 1/12/2017 <cite>JixHedgehog posted [p:910080738] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>Welp, that's that. . . for now who knows what the left is cooking up next Not saying he didnt do it or that she made up the allegations, there just wasnt any solid evidence to support either side, so you have to let the man walk ... Guess we're going back to the Russian witchhunt for another 10 months :(</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 10/06/18 7:19:09 PM #21:	The_tall_midget posted... Mead posted... Every post you cant help but talk about these invisible sjws and feminists that you seem obsessed with I wonder how much of your day is dedicated to them Invisible? Listen, Mead, I can understand you being sour that I was right about the FBI finding jack shit and that I am, once again, proven 100% correct, but even YOU have probably enough mental presence to notice all the mentally-unhinged feminists and sjw's that are infesting society like a terminal phase cancer. Or are you far more dense than I actually believe? I guess I could see a person believing what you claim if you kept yourself isolated in an online echo chamber and never actually went outside --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:910081114] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote> Every post you cant help but talk about these invisible sjws and feminists that you seem obsessed with I wonder how much of your day is dedicated to them</quote> Invisible? Listen, Mead, I can understand you being sour that I was right about the FBI finding jack shit and that I am, once again, proven 100% correct, but even YOU have probably enough mental presence to notice all the mentally-unhinged feminists and sjw's that are infesting society like a terminal phase cancer. Or are you far more dense than I actually believe?</quote> I guess I could see a person believing what you claim if you kept yourself isolated in an online echo chamber and never actually went outside</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 10/06/18 7:25:37 PM #22:	WastelandCowboy posted... A sharply divided Senate reflecting a deeply divided nation voted almost entirely along party lines Saturday afternoon to confirm Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. tbh, it's hard to imagine that not that long ago SCOTUS nominations received almost unanimous votes. WastelandCowboy posted... One Republican, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, voted "present" although she said she opposed the nomination. Always a classic. It makes the attack ads a little harder. WhiskeyDisk posted... Now we can finally move on the the next thing to be outraged about! This, tbh. Ex-"controversy" to the next "controversy" Mead posted... Every post you cant help but talk about these invisible sjws and feminists that you seem obsessed with Invisible? They're pretty hard to miss. Many of them have been protesting this week. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:910081432] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote>A sharply divided Senate reflecting a deeply divided nation voted almost entirely along party lines Saturday afternoon to confirm Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court.</quote> tbh, it's hard to imagine that not that long ago SCOTUS nominations received almost unanimous votes. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote>One Republican, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, voted "present" although she said she opposed the nomination. </quote> Always a classic. It makes the attack ads a little harder. <cite>WhiskeyDisk posted...</cite> <quote>Now we can finally move on the the next thing to be outraged about!</quote> This, tbh. Ex-"controversy" to the next "controversy" <cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Every post you cant help but talk about these invisible sjws and feminists that you seem obsessed with</quote> Invisible? They're pretty hard to miss. Many of them have been protesting this week.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 10/06/18 7:26:24 PM #23:	Invisible? They're pretty hard to miss. Many of them have been protesting this week. People tend to find the things they look for --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:910081467] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><quote>Invisible? They're pretty hard to miss. Many of them have been protesting this week.</quote> People tend to find the things they look for</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 10/06/18 7:29:31 PM #24:	Mead posted... Invisible? They're pretty hard to miss. Many of them have been protesting this week. People tend to find the things they look for You don't need to look for them, unless you count "turning on the news" (and anything except purposefully burying your hand) as looking. Granted, to some extent the media overreports on incidents like these to give a greater appearance of significance (either deliberately to advance an agenda or simply to make it more newsworthy) so it might not necessarily be as big a thing, although those groups are certainly very loud. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:910081616] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Invisible? They're pretty hard to miss. Many of them have been protesting this week.</quote> People tend to find the things they look for</quote> You don't need to look for them, unless you count "turning on the news" (and anything except purposefully burying your hand) as looking. Granted, to some extent the media overreports on incidents like these to give a greater appearance of significance (either deliberately to advance an agenda or simply to make it more newsworthy) so it might not necessarily be as big a thing, although those groups are certainly very loud.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EvilMegas 10/06/18 7:32:14 PM #25:	WhiskeyDisk posted... Now we can finally move on the the next thing to be outraged about! --- Official King of Black People https://imgur.com/Zk3VS3o http://imgur.com/a/UeQiE <cite>EvilMegas posted [p:910081754] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>WhiskeyDisk posted...</cite> <quote>Now we can finally move on the the next thing to be outraged about!</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Monopoman 10/06/18 7:35:04 PM #26:	TIE543 posted... shadowsword87 posted... TIE543 posted... Better gun rights incoming :D You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff. My state laws are perfectly fine, stuff I want done is going to have to be federal Yeah if you want to buy a fully operational tank you will need some federal laws passed. --- BF ID: Birck #1559845599 Leads: Elaina, Astrid, Tsovinar <cite>Monopoman posted [p:910081886] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shadowsword87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote>Better gun rights incoming :D</quote> You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff.</quote> My state laws are perfectly fine, stuff I want done is going to have to be federal</quote> Yeah if you want to buy a fully operational tank you will need some federal laws passed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 10/06/18 7:39:04 PM #27:	TIE543 posted... shipwreckers posted... shadowsword87 posted... TIE543 posted... Better gun rights incoming :D You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff. Historically, yes. But there are efforts being made to have federally-based reciprocity laws for concealed carry permits. People like Kavanaugh could help with that. Reciprocity and suppressors off the NFA pls :D What is "reciprocity" in this context? <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:910082091] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shadowsword87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TIE543 posted...</cite> <quote>Better gun rights incoming :D</quote> You would be better off looking at state laws rather than the supreme court for that sort of stuff.</quote> Historically, yes. But there are efforts being made to have federally-based reciprocity laws for concealed carry permits. People like Kavanaugh could help with that.</quote> Reciprocity and suppressors off the NFA pls :D</quote> What is "reciprocity" in this context?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 10/06/18 7:41:28 PM #28:	streamofthesky posted... What is "reciprocity" in this context? Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina. --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:910082215] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>What is "reciprocity" in this context?</quote> Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 10/06/18 7:42:01 PM #29:	https://www.gunstocarry.com/ccw-reciprocity-map/ --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:910082241] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>https://www.gunstocarry.com/ccw-reciprocity-map/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 10/06/18 7:43:41 PM #30:	Mead posted... I guess I could see a person believing what you claim if you kept yourself isolated in an online echo chamber and never actually went outside I literally walked 4 miles today in addition to doing my usual hour of cardio. Mead, doesn't it ever get tired of always being wrong? Nevertheless, I must end my usual enjoyment of your sjw antics. Reddit is currently filled to the brim with pathetic lefties, sjw's, and feminists who are outraged and figuratively (some are probably literally) on suicide watch. I cannot miss this opportunity to fuel the flames of their mental disabilities! --- "Whatever! Everyone is woman!" -Bimbo from Super Seducer : How to talk to women <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:910082340] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote> I guess I could see a person believing what you claim if you kept yourself isolated in an online echo chamber and never actually went outside</quote> I literally walked 4 miles today in addition to doing my usual hour of cardio. Mead, doesn't it ever get tired of always being wrong? Nevertheless, I must end my usual enjoyment of your sjw antics. Reddit is currently filled to the brim with pathetic lefties, sjw's, and feminists who are outraged and figuratively (some are probably literally) on suicide watch. I cannot miss this opportunity to fuel the flames of their mental disabilities!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 10/06/18 7:43:54 PM #31:	As much as I hate kavanaugh, I love seeing the dems petty political posturing blow up in their faces <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:910082354] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>As much as I hate kavanaugh, I love seeing the dems petty political posturing blow up in their faces</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 10/06/18 7:53:01 PM #32:	shipwreckers posted... streamofthesky posted... What is "reciprocity" in this context? Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina. That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:910082797] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>What is "reciprocity" in this context?</quote> Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina.</quote> That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 10/06/18 7:55:19 PM #33:	Ew. <cite>Yellow posted [p:910082920] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>Ew.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 10/06/18 8:10:57 PM #34:	streamofthesky posted... shipwreckers posted... streamofthesky posted... What is "reciprocity" in this context? Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina. That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent. Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation. They're trying to REDUCE the amount of regulations. Some states take gun laws to extreme (borderline unconstitutional) measures (e.g. California). By having federally-based reciprocity, you'd be REMOVING regulation, not increasing it. May want to read up on this a bit more before making knocks at the guy. Then again, if people actually did their homework, most of his controversy wouldn't have happened in the first place. --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:910083628] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>What is "reciprocity" in this context?</quote> Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina.</quote> That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent.</quote> Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation. They're trying to REDUCE the amount of regulations. Some states take gun laws to extreme (borderline unconstitutional) measures (e.g. California). By having federally-based reciprocity, you'd be REMOVING regulation, not increasing it. May want to read up on this a bit more before making knocks at the guy. Then again, if people actually did their homework, most of his controversy wouldn't have happened in the first place.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 10/06/18 8:12:48 PM #35:	They reduce corporate regulation for the most part. Personally, I don't care about guns, but I reeeally don't want Mr. Burns having his way with me. <cite>Yellow posted [p:910083716] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>They reduce corporate regulation for the most part. Personally, I don't care about guns, but I reeeally don't want Mr. Burns having his way with me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Superlinkbro 10/06/18 8:13:16 PM #36:	I don't even like the guy and I accepted that he would get in a long time ago. --- Basically the internet: https://youtu.be/M5Yqav2Juis <cite>Superlinkbro posted [p:910083735] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>I don't even like the guy and I accepted that he would get in a long time ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XlaxJynx007 10/06/18 8:15:55 PM #37:	streamofthesky posted... shipwreckers posted... streamofthesky posted... What is "reciprocity" in this context? Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina. That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent. It's actually to stop the states from violating the Constitution. The point of reciprocity it to make carry permits like drivers licenses, you get it in one state and it's valid in all states. Right now, it's convoluted as shit and some states and counties make it impossible to get one at all, which is unconstitutional. As for me, I'm of the opinion that requiring a citizen to pay for a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is complete and utter bullshit, but I'll take what I can get for now. --- XB1: MrMegaNutz Steam: Kennetic <cite>XlaxJynx007 posted [p:910083885] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>What is "reciprocity" in this context?</quote> Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina.</quote> That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent.</quote> It's actually to stop the states from violating the Constitution. The point of reciprocity it to make carry permits like drivers licenses, you get it in one state and it's valid in all states. Right now, it's convoluted as shit and some states and counties make it impossible to get one at all, which is unconstitutional. As for me, I'm of the opinion that requiring a citizen to pay for a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is complete and utter bullshit, but I'll take what I can get for now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 10/06/18 8:21:39 PM #38:	shipwreckers posted... streamofthesky posted... shipwreckers posted... streamofthesky posted... What is "reciprocity" in this context? Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina. That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent. Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation. They're trying to REDUCE the amount of regulations. Some states take gun laws to extreme (borderline unconstitutional) measures (e.g. California). By having federally-based reciprocity, you'd be REMOVING regulation, not increasing it. May want to read up on this a bit more before making knocks at the guy. Then again, if people actually did their homework, most of his controversy wouldn't have happened in the first place. If CA's laws are unconstitutional, a citizen can argue the case in a court of law to have it overturned. I'm sure they have and continue to do so. If it's not unconstitutional...too bad. Way to miss the point of the conversation, though. CA decides it wants to place restrictions on gun carrying, and the same people who whine about "big government" trampling all over "states' rights" want the federal government to force CA to adopt different laws. Laws that its own citizens don't want forced on them. Sounds like tyranny. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:910084171] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>What is "reciprocity" in this context?</quote> Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina.</quote> That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent.</quote> Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation. They're trying to REDUCE the amount of regulations. Some states take gun laws to extreme (borderline unconstitutional) measures (e.g. California). By having federally-based reciprocity, you'd be REMOVING regulation, not increasing it. May want to read up on this a bit more before making knocks at the guy. Then again, if people actually did their homework, most of his controversy wouldn't have happened in the first place.</quote> If CA's laws are unconstitutional, a citizen can argue the case in a court of law to have it overturned. I'm sure they have and continue to do so. If it's not unconstitutional...too bad. Way to miss the point of the conversation, though. CA decides it wants to place restrictions on gun carrying, and the same people who whine about "big government" trampling all over "states' rights" want the federal government to force CA to adopt different laws. Laws that its own citizens don't want forced on them. Sounds like tyranny.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanglyKhan 10/06/18 8:22:16 PM #39:	XlaxJynx007 posted... As for me, I'm of the opinion that requiring a citizen to pay for a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is complete and utter bullshit, but I'll take what I can get for now. It's also a bullshit Amendment considering it was written in a time where the musket was the world's most useful weapon. There was also a need for citizens to arm themselves in case of insurgency or further invasion from foreign countries. Taking all of this into consideration, the 2nd Amendment served as a means of self-protection in a very unsure and unstable new world, not for tens of thousands of people to abuse so that they can commit gun crimes. This is also coming from someone who finds the annual deaths from firearms underwhelming in the big scheme of things. I don't care which way it goes, but I find much more logic in gun control than not. <cite>GanglyKhan posted [p:910084192] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>XlaxJynx007 posted...</cite> <quote>As for me, I'm of the opinion that requiring a citizen to pay for a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is complete and utter bullshit, but I'll take what I can get for now.</quote> It's also a bullshit Amendment considering it was written in a time where the musket was the world's most useful weapon. There was also a need for citizens to arm themselves in case of insurgency or further invasion from foreign countries. Taking all of this into consideration, the 2nd Amendment served as a means of self-protection in a very unsure and unstable new world, not for tens of thousands of people to abuse so that they can commit gun crimes. This is also coming from someone who finds the annual deaths from firearms underwhelming in the big scheme of things. I don't care which way it goes, but I find much more logic in gun control than not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 10/06/18 8:32:57 PM #40:	streamofthesky posted... shipwreckers posted... streamofthesky posted... shipwreckers posted... streamofthesky posted... What is "reciprocity" in this context? Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina. That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent. Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation. They're trying to REDUCE the amount of regulations. Some states take gun laws to extreme (borderline unconstitutional) measures (e.g. California). By having federally-based reciprocity, you'd be REMOVING regulation, not increasing it. May want to read up on this a bit more before making knocks at the guy. Then again, if people actually did their homework, most of his controversy wouldn't have happened in the first place. If CA's laws are unconstitutional, a citizen can argue the case in a court of law to have it overturned. I'm sure they have and continue to do so. If it's not unconstitutional...too bad. Way to miss the point of the conversation, though. CA decides it wants to place restrictions on gun carrying, and the same people who whine about "big government" trampling all over "states' rights" want the federal government to force CA to adopt different laws. Laws that its own citizens don't want forced on them. Sounds like tyranny. Reciprocity is tyranny??? XlaxJynx007 posted... It's actually to stop the states from violating the Constitution. The point of reciprocity it to make carry permits like drivers licenses, you get it in one state and it's valid in all states. Right now, it's convoluted as shit and some states and counties make it impossible to get one at all, which is unconstitutional. As for me, I'm of the opinion that requiring a citizen to pay for a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is complete and utter bullshit, but I'll take what I can get for now. Yeah, pretty much this. --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:910084693] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>What is "reciprocity" in this context?</quote> Reciprocity is the concept that a legal permit in one state can be legally recognized in a different state, even though the state-specific laws may vary a bit. So, if I get a concealed handgun carry permit in, say..., North Carolina, it's still legal for me to concealed carry the gun in South Carolina.</quote> That's what I figured. So mr. "small government conservative" wants the federal government to step in and override state law. How...ideologically consistent.</quote> Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation. They're trying to REDUCE the amount of regulations. Some states take gun laws to extreme (borderline unconstitutional) measures (e.g. California). By having federally-based reciprocity, you'd be REMOVING regulation, not increasing it. May want to read up on this a bit more before making knocks at the guy. Then again, if people actually did their homework, most of his controversy wouldn't have happened in the first place.</quote> If CA's laws are unconstitutional, a citizen can argue the case in a court of law to have it overturned. I'm sure they have and continue to do so. If it's not unconstitutional...too bad. Way to miss the point of the conversation, though. CA decides it wants to place restrictions on gun carrying, and the same people who whine about "big government" trampling all over "states' rights" want the federal government to force CA to adopt different laws. Laws that its own citizens don't want forced on them. Sounds like tyranny.</quote> Reciprocity is tyranny??? <cite>XlaxJynx007 posted...</cite> <quote>It's actually to stop the states from violating the Constitution. The point of reciprocity it to make carry permits like drivers licenses, you get it in one state and it's valid in all states. Right now, it's convoluted as shit and some states and counties make it impossible to get one at all, which is unconstitutional. As for me, I'm of the opinion that requiring a citizen to pay for a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is complete and utter bullshit, but I'll take what I can get for now.</quote> Yeah, pretty much this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/06/18 9:44:47 PM #41:	shipwreckers posted... Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation. Irony. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:910087913] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote> Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation.</quote> Irony.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
vicedungwinsgam 10/06/18 10:13:22 PM #42:	errrrr buuuttttt --- gee <cite>vicedungwinsgam posted [p:910089266] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>errrrr buuuttttt</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
XlaxJynx007 10/06/18 10:36:30 PM #43:	GanglyKhan posted... XlaxJynx007 posted... As for me, I'm of the opinion that requiring a citizen to pay for a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is complete and utter bullshit, but I'll take what I can get for now. It's also a bullshit Amendment considering it was written in a time where the musket was the world's most useful weapon. There was also a need for citizens to arm themselves in case of insurgency or further invasion from foreign countries. Taking all of this into consideration, the 2nd Amendment served as a means of self-protection in a very unsure and unstable new world, not for tens of thousands of people to abuse so that they can commit gun crimes. This is also coming from someone who finds the annual deaths from firearms underwhelming in the big scheme of things. I don't care which way it goes, but I find much more logic in gun control than not. Question: Does the 1st Amendment apply to the internet? Should we just throw away the 3rd Amendment because it's never used? The 2nd Amendment is as adaptable as every other Amendment. It's as much for self protection as it is for combating tyranny. What if all guns were banned and turned in, then Trump decides to shred the Constitution and throwing people he doesn't like from helicopters Pinochet-style? The founding fathers recognized that a centralized government was a necessary evil and made sure that the American people had the ability to keep it in check (which we've done a shit job of) --- XB1: MrMegaNutz Steam: Kennetic <cite>XlaxJynx007 posted [p:910090385] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>XlaxJynx007 posted...</cite> <quote>As for me, I'm of the opinion that requiring a citizen to pay for a permit to exercise a Constitutional right is complete and utter bullshit, but I'll take what I can get for now.</quote> It's also a bullshit Amendment considering it was written in a time where the musket was the world's most useful weapon. There was also a need for citizens to arm themselves in case of insurgency or further invasion from foreign countries. Taking all of this into consideration, the 2nd Amendment served as a means of self-protection in a very unsure and unstable new world, not for tens of thousands of people to abuse so that they can commit gun crimes. This is also coming from someone who finds the annual deaths from firearms underwhelming in the big scheme of things. I don't care which way it goes, but I find much more logic in gun control than not.</quote> Question: Does the 1st Amendment apply to the internet? Should we just throw away the 3rd Amendment because it's never used? The 2nd Amendment is as adaptable as every other Amendment. It's as much for self protection as it is for combating tyranny. What if all guns were banned and turned in, then Trump decides to shred the Constitution and throwing people he doesn't like from helicopters Pinochet-style? The founding fathers recognized that a centralized government was a necessary evil and made sure that the American people had the ability to keep it in check (which we've done a shit job of)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shipwreckers 10/06/18 11:02:55 PM #44:	Revelation34 posted... shipwreckers posted... Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation. Irony. You think reciprocity is tyranny too? If so, that's fine. Nobody can make you believe one way or the other. It's your right. --- Money is overrated... <cite>shipwreckers posted [p:910091742] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote> Wow, way to miss the point of the conversation.</quote> Irony.</quote> You think reciprocity is tyranny too? If so, that's fine. Nobody can make you believe one way or the other. It's your right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 10/07/18 6:04:26 AM #45:	shipwreckers posted... You think reciprocity is tyranny too? If so, that's fine. Nobody can make you believe one way or the other. It's your right. I don't give a shit. I was pointing out the irony of your post and completely missing his point. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:910105131] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote><cite>shipwreckers posted...</cite> <quote>You think reciprocity is tyranny too? If so, that's fine. Nobody can make you believe one way or the other. It's your right.</quote> I don't give a shit. I was pointing out the irony of your post and completely missing his point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shinebolt 10/07/18 10:05:01 AM #46:	So...as the world erupted into a blazing inferno and all of human civilization collapsed yet? Checks outside Nope...nothing. Guess we have to wait a couple more days? --- "Why bother with statistics when reality has already given you its answer." - Purple Heart <cite>Shinebolt posted [p:910109599] in Brett Kava... [t:77073759]...</cite> <quote>So...as the world erupted into a blazing inferno and all of human civilization collapsed yet? Checks outside Nope...nothing. Guess we have to wait a couple more days?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Brett Kavanaugh confirmed for Supreme Court. (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Brett Kavanaugh confirmed for Supreme Court.