Current Events > Hypothetical: Should a clone of Hitler be punished for the original's actions?

Topic List	Page List: 1
DK9292 10/09/18 4:16:58 PM #1:	What do you think, CE? --- A hero's role is one that cannot be forsaken, Caring for those with hearts that are breaking. <cite>DK9292 posted [p:910243378] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>What do you think, CE?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 10/09/18 4:17:20 PM #2:	No. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:910243401] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>No.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#3	Post #3 was unavailable or deleted.
Dash_Harber 10/09/18 4:19:38 PM #4:	No. People should only be punished for actions they take. There are a lot of questions left unanswered, though, in this scenario; - Does the clone carry the memories of the original? - Did the clone 'grow up' independent of his proginetor's childhood? - Is the clone aware of Hitler's actions? And so much more. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:910243536] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>No. People should only be punished for actions they take. There are a lot of questions left unanswered, though, in this scenario; - Does the clone carry the memories of the original? - Did the clone 'grow up' independent of his proginetor's childhood? - Is the clone aware of Hitler's actions? And so much more.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 10/09/18 4:19:48 PM #5:	No let the clone of Hitler go to art school. --- Sarcasm is my basic function. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:910243549] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>No let the clone of Hitler go to art school.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 10/09/18 4:21:41 PM #6:	Dash_Harber posted... No. People should only be punished for actions they take. There are a lot of questions left unanswered, though, in this scenario; - Does the clone carry the memories of the original? - Did the clone 'grow up' independent of his proginetor's childhood? - Is the clone aware of Hitler's actions? And so much more. Cloning works the same as having a baby. There is no such thing as cloning into adulthood with intact memory. Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:910243649] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote>No. People should only be punished for actions they take. There are a lot of questions left unanswered, though, in this scenario; - Does the clone carry the memories of the original? - Did the clone 'grow up' independent of his proginetor's childhood? - Is the clone aware of Hitler's actions? And so much more.</quote> Cloning works the same as having a baby. There is no such thing as cloning into adulthood with intact memory. Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ricemills 10/09/18 4:25:57 PM #7:	darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor? --- You have the right to remain silent. anything you post will be misquoted, then be used against you. <cite>Ricemills posted [p:910243874] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 10/09/18 4:30:07 PM #8:	Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor? They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:910244101] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor?</quote> They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PiOverlord 10/09/18 4:39:47 PM #9:	What about the case of teleporting via cloning? --- Number of legendary 500 post topics: 26, 500th posts: 20; PiO ATTN: 3 RotM wins 1, https://i.imgtc.com/Ejs0WrG.jpg <cite>PiOverlord posted [p:910244641] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>What about the case of teleporting via cloning?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 10/09/18 4:41:44 PM #10:	PiOverlord posted... What about the case of teleporting via cloning? How would that work without the ability to make an adult clone with memory intact? --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:910244721] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote>What about the case of teleporting via cloning?</quote> How would that work without the ability to make an adult clone with memory intact?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/09/18 4:41:45 PM #11:	If it's a clone, no, that's really a seperate person who just shares the same DNA. If it's literally the actual Hitler brought back to life, then of course. --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910244722] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>If it's a clone, no, that's really a seperate person who just shares the same DNA. If it's literally the actual Hitler brought back to life, then of course.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrNintendo1213 10/09/18 4:45:43 PM #12:	darkphoenix181 posted... PiOverlord posted... What about the case of teleporting via cloning? How would that work without the ability to make an adult clone with memory intact? It wouldn't. That's what he is talking about. Like in Star Trek, the "beaming up" is just destroying their body and making an exact copy sonewhere else. --- Dot Dot Dot... <cite>MrNintendo1213 posted [p:910244941] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote> What about the case of teleporting via cloning? </quote> How would that work without the ability to make an adult clone with memory intact?</quote> It wouldn't. That's what he is talking about. Like in Star Trek, the "beaming up" is just destroying their body and making an exact copy sonewhere else.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenLurker 10/09/18 4:49:12 PM #13:	If the only thing they share is DNA no. If memories yes. Punishing a biological clone with no history sounds like the fastest way to get a Hitler 2, WWIV edition. --- [Insert tired meme here] <cite>HiddenLurker posted [p:910245095] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>If the only thing they share is DNA no. If memories yes. Punishing a biological clone with no history sounds like the fastest way to get a Hitler 2, WWIV edition.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 10/09/18 4:51:57 PM #14:	MrNintendo1213 posted... darkphoenix181 posted... PiOverlord posted... What about the case of teleporting via cloning? How would that work without the ability to make an adult clone with memory intact? It wouldn't. That's what he is talking about. Like in Star Trek, the "beaming up" is just destroying their body and making an exact copy sonewhere else. Well I don't think you can punish a clone hitler like that for crimes he never actually did. You can however assume and prove he shares the same toxic thinking and force him into a reform program and prevent him from having power to hurt people. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:910245232] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrNintendo1213 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote> What about the case of teleporting via cloning? </quote> How would that work without the ability to make an adult clone with memory intact?</quote> It wouldn't. That's what he is talking about. Like in Star Trek, the "beaming up" is just destroying their body and making an exact copy sonewhere else.</quote> Well I don't think you can punish a clone hitler like that for crimes he never actually did. You can however assume and prove he shares the same toxic thinking and force him into a reform program and prevent him from having power to hurt people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 10/09/18 6:43:41 PM #15:	darkphoenix181 posted... Dash_Harber posted... No. People should only be punished for actions they take. There are a lot of questions left unanswered, though, in this scenario; - Does the clone carry the memories of the original? - Did the clone 'grow up' independent of his proginetor's childhood? - Is the clone aware of Hitler's actions? And so much more. Cloning works the same as having a baby. There is no such thing as cloning into adulthood with intact memory. Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. I know, I was just trying to set the rules for this fantasy scenario. Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor? No, because a child is the offspring of two people. They contain the genetic material of two separate individuals. A clone is just one set. Therefore, a clone is a clone and nothing else. MrNintendo1213 posted... darkphoenix181 posted... PiOverlord posted... What about the case of teleporting via cloning? How would that work without the ability to make an adult clone with memory intact? It wouldn't. That's what he is talking about. Like in Star Trek, the "beaming up" is just destroying their body and making an exact copy sonewhere else. I'm like 99% certain that is just fanon. IIRC, nothing in the entire series ever even remotely hints at this being the case. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:910251095] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote>No. People should only be punished for actions they take. There are a lot of questions left unanswered, though, in this scenario; - Does the clone carry the memories of the original? - Did the clone 'grow up' independent of his proginetor's childhood? - Is the clone aware of Hitler's actions? And so much more.</quote> Cloning works the same as having a baby. There is no such thing as cloning into adulthood with intact memory. Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> I know, I was just trying to set the rules for this fantasy scenario. <cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor?</quote> No, because a child is the offspring of two people. They contain the genetic material of two separate individuals. A clone is just one set. Therefore, a clone is a clone and nothing else. <cite>MrNintendo1213 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>PiOverlord posted...</cite> <quote> What about the case of teleporting via cloning? </quote> How would that work without the ability to make an adult clone with memory intact?</quote> It wouldn't. That's what he is talking about. Like in Star Trek, the "beaming up" is just destroying their body and making an exact copy sonewhere else.</quote> I'm like 99% certain that is just fanon. IIRC, nothing in the entire series ever even remotely hints at this being the case.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 10/09/18 6:52:43 PM #16:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr6UAKupEhM" data-time=" <cite>Zikten posted [p:910251621] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr6UAKupEhM" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nemu 10/09/18 6:55:01 PM #17:	No. Anyone who says that has no idea how cloning works in real life. Now, if he starts trying to create an uprising to kill Jews, sure. And even if super science could bring someone back to life, it would be unethical to do that just to make them suffer. <cite>nemu posted [p:910251738] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>No. Anyone who says that has no idea how cloning works in real life. Now, if he starts trying to create an uprising to kill Jews, sure. And even if super science could bring someone back to life, it would be unethical to do that just to make them suffer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Devil_Katt_II 10/09/18 7:11:08 PM #18:	no that would be awful <cite>Devil_Katt_II posted [p:910252673] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>no that would be awful</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ricemills 10/09/18 7:54:15 PM #19:	darkphoenix181 posted... Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor? They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons. and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level? --- You have the right to remain silent. anything you post will be misquoted, then be used against you. <cite>Ricemills posted [p:910254839] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor?</quote> They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons.</quote> and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 10/09/18 7:57:41 PM #20:	Considering there are no cloned people, I don't see the point in trying to shoehorn it into a category like that, I'd say it's separate into a "new" category. ie just clone. That said, I'd still say it's the informal child of the mother that gestated it. Of course with cloned plants, they're just clones. Not progeny but the original is often called the mother. --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:910255032] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>Considering there are no cloned people, I don't see the point in trying to shoehorn it into a category like that, I'd say it's separate into a "new" category. ie just clone. That said, I'd still say it's the informal child of the mother that gestated it. Of course with cloned plants, they're just clones. Not progeny but the original is often called the mother.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheOlJollyRoger 10/09/18 7:58:15 PM #21:	Just overwrite the clones memory with your own. Boom immortality and upgrades --- psn: googathepirate <cite>TheOlJollyRoger posted [p:910255051] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>Just overwrite the clones memory with your own. Boom immortality and upgrades</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheOlJollyRoger 10/09/18 7:58:52 PM #22:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Considering there are no cloned people, I don't see the point in trying to shoehorn it into a category like that, I'd say it's separate into a "new" category. ie just clone. That said, I'd still say it's the informal child of the mother that gestated it. Of course with cloned plants, they're just clones. Not progeny but the original is often called the mother. There are already human clones. --- psn: googathepirate <cite>TheOlJollyRoger posted [p:910255086] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote>Considering there are no cloned people, I don't see the point in trying to shoehorn it into a category like that, I'd say it's separate into a "new" category. ie just clone. That said, I'd still say it's the informal child of the mother that gestated it. Of course with cloned plants, they're just clones. Not progeny but the original is often called the mother.</quote> There are already human clones.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 10/09/18 8:01:08 PM #23:	Is he tiny and a perfect clone or a perfect copy --- butts <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:910255206] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>Is he tiny and a perfect clone or a perfect copy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 10/09/18 8:01:17 PM #24:	Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor? They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons. and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level? I mean, your sibling doesn't inherit anything from you. Your clone on the other hand does. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:910255217] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor?</quote> They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons.</quote> and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level?</quote> I mean, your sibling doesn't inherit anything from you. Your clone on the other hand does.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ricemills 10/09/18 8:01:38 PM #25:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Considering there are no cloned people, I don't see the point in trying to shoehorn it into a category like that, I'd say it's separate into a "new" category. ie just clone. That said, I'd still say it's the informal child of the mother that gestated it. Of course with cloned plants, they're just clones. Not progeny but the original is often called the mother. I think I agree with your statement that a clone should be just clone, not a sibling or child. --- You have the right to remain silent. anything you post will be misquoted, then be used against you. <cite>Ricemills posted [p:910255234] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote>Considering there are no cloned people, I don't see the point in trying to shoehorn it into a category like that, I'd say it's separate into a "new" category. ie just clone. That said, I'd still say it's the informal child of the mother that gestated it. Of course with cloned plants, they're just clones. Not progeny but the original is often called the mother.</quote> I think I agree with your statement that a clone should be just clone, not a sibling or child.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 10/09/18 8:02:39 PM #26:	TheOlJollyRoger posted... There are already human clones. Walking among us, infiltrating and taking over the lives of the original, working as expendable fodder for despots weary of assassination plots! --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:910255290] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheOlJollyRoger posted...</cite> <quote>There are already human clones.</quote> Walking among us, infiltrating and taking over the lives of the original, working as expendable fodder for despots weary of assassination plots!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 10/09/18 8:02:57 PM #27:	In the Paranoia RPG, which is an extremely dystopian oppressive society where almost every single offense gets you executed on the spot, you get "6" clones. If you get executed, you're replaced by your clone and your clone is considered blameless. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:910255307] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>In the Paranoia RPG, which is an extremely dystopian oppressive society where almost every single offense gets you executed on the spot, you get "6" clones. If you get executed, you're replaced by your clone and your clone is considered blameless.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DK9292 10/09/18 8:03:00 PM #28:	darkphoenix181 posted... Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor? They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons. and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level? I mean, your sibling doesn't inherit anything from you. Your clone on the other hand does. Way I see it, it's more like twins than children or siblings. --- A hero's role is one that cannot be forsaken, Caring for those with hearts that are breaking. <cite>DK9292 posted [p:910255314] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor?</quote> They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons.</quote> and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level?</quote> I mean, your sibling doesn't inherit anything from you. Your clone on the other hand does.</quote> Way I see it, it's more like twins than children or siblings.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SH_expert44 10/09/18 8:03:49 PM #29:	but the clone is literally hitler. --- It's thinking... PSN: REexpert44 <cite>SH_expert44 posted [p:910255366] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>but the clone is literally hitler.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 10/09/18 8:04:44 PM #30:	I don't think genetics were the cause of Hitler's crimes. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:910255409] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>I don't think genetics were the cause of Hitler's crimes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 10/09/18 8:15:17 PM #31:	SH_expert44 posted... but the clone is literally hitler. Not if he was raised as someone else. Antifar posted... I don't think genetics were the cause of Hitler's crimes. This is really important, as well. Well he's entirely responsible for the choices he made, and was without a doubt one of the most unabashedly evil historical figures, the environment shaped his ideas much more than some genetic predisposition towards antisemitism. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:910256022] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>SH_expert44 posted...</cite> <quote>but the clone is literally hitler.</quote> Not if he was raised as someone else. <cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>I don't think genetics were the cause of Hitler's crimes.</quote> This is really important, as well. Well he's entirely responsible for the choices he made, and was without a doubt one of the most unabashedly evil historical figures, the environment shaped his ideas much more than some genetic predisposition towards antisemitism.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ricemills 10/09/18 8:15:41 PM #32:	DK9292 posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor? They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons. and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level? I mean, your sibling doesn't inherit anything from you. Your clone on the other hand does. Way I see it, it's more like twins than children or siblings. aren't twins siblings? well, this is why I asked my question. --- You have the right to remain silent. anything you post will be misquoted, then be used against you. <cite>Ricemills posted [p:910256047] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>DK9292 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor?</quote> They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons.</quote> and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level?</quote> I mean, your sibling doesn't inherit anything from you. Your clone on the other hand does.</quote> Way I see it, it's more like twins than children or siblings.</quote> aren't twins siblings? well, this is why I asked my question.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DK9292 10/09/18 8:17:09 PM #33:	Ricemills posted... DK9292 posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Ricemills posted... darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor? They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons. and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level? I mean, your sibling doesn't inherit anything from you. Your clone on the other hand does. Way I see it, it's more like twins than children or siblings. aren't twins siblings? well, this is why I asked my question. Yeah, but I mean how my sister and I, while we both inherited our parents genes, inherited them slightly differently. Twins are (as I understand it, please correct me if I'm wrong) one being that divided into two in the womb, and as such as almost perfect genetic matches to one another. --- A hero's role is one that cannot be forsaken, Caring for those with hearts that are breaking. <cite>DK9292 posted [p:910256144] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DK9292 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ricemills posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son.</quote> this makes me curious, are clones considered as the children or the sibling of the progenitor?</quote> They are literally their child. The big difference is they have 100% the clone person dna rather than having only parts of it and another persons.</quote> and that part is also an argument point for siblings, as a "child" will inherit the genes of their parents. a clone is a literal copy, therefore also has the inherited genes from progenitor's parents. let's say you copy a folder, will that copy be a sub folder or another folder of same level?</quote> I mean, your sibling doesn't inherit anything from you. Your clone on the other hand does.</quote> Way I see it, it's more like twins than children or siblings.</quote> aren't twins siblings? well, this is why I asked my question.</quote> Yeah, but I mean how my sister and I, while we both inherited our parents genes, inherited them slightly differently. Twins are (as I understand it, please correct me if I'm wrong) one being that divided into two in the womb, and as such as almost perfect genetic matches to one another.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Laserion 10/11/18 5:09:33 PM #34:	darkphoenix181 posted... Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. Or time-delayed twin. --- There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of". There is "would've", "should've" and "could've". <cite>Laserion posted [p:910364628] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkphoenix181 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically the clone is hitler's biological son. </quote> Or time-delayed twin.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Laserion 10/11/18 5:13:32 PM #35:	HiddenLurker posted... If the only thing they share is DNA no. If memories yes. What if he has Hitler's memories, but knows they are not his own, like the Goa'uld? --- There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of". There is "would've", "should've" and "could've". <cite>Laserion posted [p:910364817] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenLurker posted...</cite> <quote>If the only thing they share is DNA no. If memories yes.</quote> What if he has Hitler's memories, but knows they are not his own, like the Goa'uld?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
__aCEr__ 10/11/18 5:16:31 PM #36:	Why clone a guy just to give him the death penalty? <cite>__aCEr__ posted [p:910364946] in Hypothetic... [t:77082625]...</cite> <quote>Why clone a guy just to give him the death penalty?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Hypothetical: Should a clone of Hitler be punished for the original's actions? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Hypothetical: Should a clone of Hitler be punished for the original's actions?