Current Events > I'll never get people who say they'd support jury nullification as an argument.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Not only are they typically wrong to support it, but they bring it up when people point out something is, in fact, constitutional and legal, and think it works as an argument against the law, when in reality all it is is them saying "I disagree with the law".

Stick to bagging groceries, pokemon.
---

LightningAce11 posted...

Stick to bagging groceries, pokemon.

I don't bag groceries though

I'm amazed at how much nothing you said in your post. Like, it's obvious you're trying to bait, but I doubt anyone is going to bite when they have to google what the fuck you're talking about.
---

Crazyman93 posted...

I'm amazed at how much nothing you said in your post. Like, it's obvious you're trying to bait, but I doubt anyone is going to bite when they have to google what the fuck you're talking about.

Literally the only even slightly obscure term I used is "jury nullification", and it's still a term plenty of people are very familiar with, particularly as it comes up in legal stories all the time.

Lol, and now I have someone telling me you have a right to resist arrest or searches if they're illegal.