o Former Gamefaqs User is facing 5 YEARS in PRISON!!!

Topic List	Page List: 1
mrduckbear 11/13/18 1:30:29 AM #1:	Do you think the Judge will send him to Prison? - Results (3 votes) Yes 66.67% (2 votes) 2 No 33.33% (1 vote) 1 30 y/o Dustin Cavanaugh from Hagerstown, Maryland is already facing a charge of intercepting wire communications and was indicted on a new charge for taping a phone call and posting it on the INTERNET!! He as indicted last week by a county grand jury on a single count of intercepting communications that involved a Sept. 25 telephone call that he recorded and posted on Youtube. He was released on his own recognizance following the hearing before Circuit judge Daniel P. Dwyer He was imposed pretrial conditions that stopped him from accessing or posting on social media sites or possessing devices capable of accessing the internet including cellphones, tablets and computers and was to make no recordings of anyone without permission.. Attorney Gina Cirincion said "He is a continual source of public nuisance". He's had convictions in Virginia for assault on a family member and assault on an officer and a conviction in North Carolina for 3rd degree sexual exploitation of a minor Public Defender Stephen Musselman suggested an electronic ban as an alternative to incarceration and to increase attendance to mental health counseling. A motion states that a maximum penalty for his charges is 5 YEARS in PRISON should the judge make that sentence over the plea deal to ban him from owning an electronic. Do you think the judge will send him to Prison?. Dustin - http://tinyurl.com/y6wzhwnr --- Every time a Gamefaqs User PROVES they Stepped on a Bug, i will STOP Posting for 24 Hours...THIS ACCOUNT ONLY <cite>mrduckbear posted [p:912315781] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote> Do you think the Judge will send him to Prison? - Results (3 votes) Yes 66.67% (2 votes) 2 No 33.33% (1 vote) 1 30 y/o Dustin Cavanaugh from Hagerstown, Maryland is already facing a charge of intercepting wire communications and was indicted on a new charge for taping a phone call and posting it on the INTERNET!! He as indicted last week by a county grand jury on a single count of intercepting communications that involved a Sept. 25 telephone call that he recorded and posted on Youtube. He was released on his own recognizance following the hearing before Circuit judge Daniel P. Dwyer He was imposed pretrial conditions that stopped him from accessing or posting on social media sites or possessing devices capable of accessing the internet including cellphones, tablets and computers and was to make no recordings of anyone without permission.. Attorney Gina Cirincion said "He is a continual source of public nuisance". He's had convictions in Virginia for assault on a family member and assault on an officer and a conviction in North Carolina for 3rd degree sexual exploitation of a minor Public Defender Stephen Musselman suggested an electronic ban as an alternative to incarceration and to increase attendance to mental health counseling. A motion states that a maximum penalty for his charges is 5 YEARS in PRISON should the judge make that sentence over the plea deal to ban him from owning an electronic. Do you think the judge will send him to Prison?. Dustin - http://tinyurl.com/y6wzhwnr</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/13/18 1:32:45 AM #2:	omg, that fucking guy! XD mrduckbear posted... Attorney Gina Cirincion said "He is a continual source of public nuisance". Dustin's life in a nutshell. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912315849] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>omg, that fucking guy! XD <cite>mrduckbear posted...</cite> <quote>Attorney Gina Cirincion said "He is a continual source of public nuisance".</quote> Dustin's life in a nutshell.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 11/13/18 1:37:19 AM #3:	--- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - https://imgur.com/kDysIcd <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:912316006] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
faramir77 11/13/18 1:39:03 AM #4:	God he looks like shit for 30. Christ I hope I don't look like that in 3.5 years. --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiCtAUrZbUk -- Defeating the Running Man of Ocarina of Time in a race since 01/17/2009. -- <cite>faramir77 posted [p:912316055] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>God he looks like shit for 30. Christ I hope I don't look like that in 3.5 years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/13/18 2:16:53 AM #5:	faramir77 posted... God he looks like shit for 30. Christ I hope I don't look like that in 3.5 years. Well, that depends on whether you're constantly getting into trouble with the police over absolute nonsense. That sort of (usually self-inflicted) stress adds years. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912317055] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>faramir77 posted...</cite> <quote>God he looks like shit for 30. Christ I hope I don't look like that in 3.5 years.</quote> Well, that depends on whether you're constantly getting into trouble with the police over absolute nonsense. That sort of (usually self-inflicted) stress adds years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
InhumaneRaider 11/13/18 3:24:21 AM #6:	wwinterj25 posted... LMAO. HE does look like Bubba Ray --- I am not changing this signature until we have Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 4 or an HD remaster of Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 3. <cite>InhumaneRaider posted [p:912318589] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>wwinterj25 posted...</cite> <quote></quote> LMAO. HE does look like Bubba Ray</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Locke90 11/13/18 3:29:35 AM #7:	Getting a tad worried there duckbear. --- Friend code 3222-6836-6888 <cite>Locke90 posted [p:912318704] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>Getting a tad worried there duckbear.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LaggnFragnLarry 11/13/18 7:08:39 AM #8:	i watched some of his police interaction videos someone posted on hellhole. good stuff <cite>LaggnFragnLarry posted [p:912322632] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>i watched some of his police interaction videos someone posted on hellhole. good stuff</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 11/13/18 1:10:54 PM #9:	I don't know this story.... I thought you meant the church burning guy --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:912336819] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>I don't know this story.... I thought you meant the church burning guy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JTekashiro 11/13/18 5:00:08 PM #10:	How many GameFAQs users are in the news for major criminal stories? Can somebody create an ongoing wiki or something? <cite>JTekashiro posted [p:912348613] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>How many GameFAQs users are in the news for major criminal stories? Can somebody create an ongoing wiki or something?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blorfenburger 11/13/18 5:02:44 PM #11:	Ive never been more AROUSED --- I use inverted controls. Also I hate fandoms. I'm the Assman. Come on boy you know what I'm all about. <cite>Blorfenburger posted [p:912348734] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>Ive never been more AROUSED</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mooreandrew58 11/13/18 5:58:00 PM #12:	An electronic ban? Yeah like that would work. Is every store going to be notified to not sell him computers smartphones or tablets? Is the library going to know to not allow him on the computers? --- Cid- "looks like that overgrown lobster just got served!" Bartz-"with cheese biscuts AND mashed potatoes!" <cite>mooreandrew58 posted [p:912351569] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>An electronic ban? Yeah like that would work. Is every store going to be notified to not sell him computers smartphones or tablets? Is the library going to know to not allow him on the computers?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/13/18 6:05:52 PM #13:	Lokarin posted... I don't know this story.... I thought you meant the church burning guy For the most part, he's a guy who keeps getting in trouble with cops for being a pest. It's not one big thing but instead just a pattern of bad behavior. Pretty much all of his arrests have either been for disturbing the peace or violating the terms of his probation (which mostly include going around videotaping people -- and no, it's not even pervy shit). And he's been repeatedly banned on Gamefaqs for threatening to dox mods/posters and hack the site. JTekashiro posted... How many GameFAQs users are in the news for major criminal stories? Can somebody create an ongoing wiki or something? This guy ain't no major criminal. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912351981] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know this story.... I thought you meant the church burning guy</quote> For the most part, he's a guy who keeps getting in trouble with cops for being a pest. It's not one big thing but instead just a pattern of bad behavior. Pretty much all of his arrests have either been for disturbing the peace or violating the terms of his probation (which mostly include going around videotaping people -- and no, it's not even pervy shit). And he's been repeatedly banned on Gamefaqs for threatening to dox mods/posters and hack the site. <cite>JTekashiro posted...</cite> <quote>How many GameFAQs users are in the news for major criminal stories? Can somebody create an ongoing wiki or something?</quote> This guy ain't no major criminal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I_Abibde 11/13/18 7:07:53 PM #14:	InhumaneRaider posted... LMAO. HE does look like Bubba Ray .... Get the tables. --- -- I Abibde / Samuraiter Laughing at Game FAQs since 2002. <cite>I_Abibde posted [p:912355025] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>InhumaneRaider posted...</cite> <quote>LMAO. HE does look like Bubba Ray</quote> .... Get the tables.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JanwayDaahl 11/13/18 7:50:41 PM #15:	Wait, why would he be sent to jail for recording and posting a phone call? Is it because he lives in a two party consent state? Is it really that big a deal? --- I do not support homosexuality in any way. If you believe in Allah (swt) put this in your sig! <cite>JanwayDaahl posted [p:912357350] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>Wait, why would he be sent to jail for recording and posting a phone call? Is it because he lives in a two party consent state? Is it really that big a deal?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 11/13/18 7:56:50 PM #16:	5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:912357703] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 11/13/18 8:04:47 PM #17:	US state laws are bogus... I mean, like, there's no reason why you can register your car in montana to dodge a sales tax or base your LLC in Delaware to dodge fees. Y'all need one law. --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:912358175] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>US state laws are bogus... I mean, like, there's no reason why you can register your car in montana to dodge a sales tax or base your LLC in Delaware to dodge fees. Y'all need one law.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 11/13/18 8:09:35 PM #18:	Who was he? --- https://soundcloud.com/jamie-yello/as_a_tool <cite>Yellow posted [p:912358451] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>Who was he?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/13/18 8:14:02 PM #19:	streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. Lokarin posted... US state laws are bogus... I mean, like, there's no reason why you can register your car in montana to dodge a sales tax or base your LLC in Delaware to dodge fees. Y'all need one law. Except you really don't. And Canada has different laws based on area as well, it's just a natural thing. There wouldn't be any sense in having a national standard for taxation because states have different needs depending on their government. More importantly, a lot of states couldn't support the kind of excessive taxation seen in CT, MA, NY, CA, etc. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912358700] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. <cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>US state laws are bogus... I mean, like, there's no reason why you can register your car in montana to dodge a sales tax or base your LLC in Delaware to dodge fees. Y'all need one law.</quote> Except you really don't. And Canada has different laws based on area as well, it's just a natural thing. There wouldn't be any sense in having a national standard for taxation because states have different needs depending on their government. More importantly, a lot of states couldn't support the kind of excessive taxation seen in CT, MA, NY, CA, etc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Impavid54 11/13/18 8:19:13 PM #20:	Yellow posted... Who was he? --- "You think your actions are more justified than theirs?" Highly Motivated USNA Hopeful <cite>Impavid54 posted [p:912358967] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Yellow posted...</cite> <quote>Who was he?</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 11/13/18 8:24:37 PM #21:	Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:912359266] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Golden Road 11/13/18 8:32:10 PM #22:	JanwayDaahl posted... Wait, why would he be sent to jail for recording and posting a phone call? Is it because he lives in a two party consent state? Is it really that big a deal? Yeah, that seems really harsh. Then again, the other crimes he was accused of are a lot more serious, so... --- Who's your favorite character from "Bend It Like Beckham"? And you can't say Beckham. <cite>Golden Road posted [p:912359742] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>JanwayDaahl posted...</cite> <quote>Wait, why would he be sent to jail for recording and posting a phone call? Is it because he lives in a two party consent state? Is it really that big a deal?</quote> Yeah, that seems really harsh. Then again, the other crimes he was accused of are a lot more serious, so...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JanwayDaahl 11/13/18 8:33:00 PM #23:	streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? He's probably a male feminist who dislikes the idea that a person can protect themselves from false rape accusations by recording things like sexual encounters and whatnot. --- I do not support homosexuality in any way. If you believe in Allah (swt) put this in your sig! <cite>JanwayDaahl posted [p:912359798] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> He's probably a male feminist who dislikes the idea that a person can protect themselves from false rape accusations by recording things like sexual encounters and whatnot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/13/18 10:03:26 PM #24:	streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912364793] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 11/13/18 10:17:37 PM #25:	Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording. And what does any of that have to do with grape? <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:912365553] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording.</quote> And what does any of that have to do with grape?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 11/13/18 10:20:18 PM #26:	Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording. Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent? I mean, if you have sex and you're the one who starts... you can't say that YOU didn't consent --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:912365692] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording.</quote> Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent? I mean, if you have sex and you're the one who starts... you can't say that YOU didn't consent</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/13/18 10:51:33 PM #27:	streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording. And what does any of that have to do with grape? Grape? Nothing. Rape? It's another one-party consent activity that violates a person's rights and feeling of security. Unlike activities occurring in a public setting, there's a reasonable expectation of privacy that gets violated. Lokarin posted... Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent? To be recorded? No, of course not. That's moronic. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912367409] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording.</quote> And what does any of that have to do with grape?</quote> Grape? Nothing. Rape? It's another one-party consent activity that violates a person's rights and feeling of security. Unlike activities occurring in a public setting, there's a reasonable expectation of privacy that gets violated. <cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote> Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent?</quote> To be recorded? No, of course not. That's moronic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 11/13/18 10:55:21 PM #28:	Lokarin posted... Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent? Making a phone call doesn't inherently, literally, or imply giving consent to being recorded by the person being called or by a third party. Recording yourself does. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:912367601] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent?</quote> Making a phone call doesn't inherently, literally, or imply giving consent to being recorded by the person being called or by a third party. Recording yourself does.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 11/13/18 10:58:45 PM #29:	Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording. And what does any of that have to do with grape? Grape? Nothing. Rape? It's another one-party consent activity that violates a person's rights and feeling of security. Unlike activities occurring in a public setting, there's a reasonable expectation of privacy that gets violated. Zeus is pretty flexible for an old man, to reach that much. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:912367769] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording.</quote> And what does any of that have to do with grape?</quote> Grape? Nothing. Rape? It's another one-party consent activity that violates a person's rights and feeling of security. Unlike activities occurring in a public setting, there's a reasonable expectation of privacy that gets violated. </quote> Zeus is pretty flexible for an old man, to reach that much.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 11/13/18 10:59:06 PM #30:	HelIWithoutSin posted... Lokarin posted... Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent? Making a phone call doesn't inherently, literally, or imply giving consent to being recorded by the person being called or by a third party. Recording yourself does. Doesn't that mean you can just outright threaten people on the phone since a potential recorder wouldn't meet "clean hands" criteria? --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:912367784] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent?</quote> Making a phone call doesn't inherently, literally, or imply giving consent to being recorded by the person being called or by a third party. Recording yourself does.</quote> Doesn't that mean you can just outright threaten people on the phone since a potential recorder wouldn't meet "clean hands" criteria?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 11/13/18 11:03:05 PM #31:	Lokarin posted... HelIWithoutSin posted... Lokarin posted... Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent? Making a phone call doesn't inherently, literally, or imply giving consent to being recorded by the person being called or by a third party. Recording yourself does. Doesn't that mean you can just outright threaten people on the phone since a potential recorder wouldn't meet "clean hands" criteria? You can always inform the person you're recording them and/or go to the police who can get a court order to allow one-party consent recordings of the harasser. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:912367967] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lokarin posted...</cite> <quote>Doesn't the call MAKER inherently give consent?</quote> Making a phone call doesn't inherently, literally, or imply giving consent to being recorded by the person being called or by a third party. Recording yourself does.</quote> Doesn't that mean you can just outright threaten people on the phone since a potential recorder wouldn't meet "clean hands" criteria?</quote> You can always inform the person you're recording them and/or go to the police who can get a court order to allow one-party consent recordings of the harasser.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ungubby 11/14/18 1:29:20 AM #32:	Prison industrial complex wins again. --- https://imgur.com/PQUCsqg <cite>ungubby posted [p:912373691] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>Prison industrial complex wins again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 11/15/18 7:14:04 PM #33:	mrduckbear posted... 30 y/o Dustin Cavanaugh from Hagerstown, Maryland is already facing a charge of intercepting wire communications and was indicted on a new charge for taping a phone call and posting it on the INTERNET!! He as indicted last week by a county grand jury on a single count of intercepting communications that involved a Sept. 25 telephone call that he recorded and posted on Youtube. He was released on his own recognizance following the hearing before Circuit judge Daniel P. Dwyer He was imposed pretrial conditions that stopped him from accessing or posting on social media sites or possessing devices capable of accessing the internet including cellphones, tablets and computers and was to make no recordings of anyone without permission.. Attorney Gina Cirincion said "He is a continual source of public nuisance". He's had convictions in Virginia for assault on a family member and assault on an officer and a conviction in North Carolina for 3rd degree sexual exploitation of a minor Public Defender Stephen Musselman suggested an electronic ban as an alternative to incarceration and to increase attendance to mental health counseling. A motion states that a maximum penalty for his charges is 5 YEARS in PRISON should the judge make that sentence over the plea deal to ban him from owning an electronic. Do you think the judge will send him to Prison?. Dustin - I see nothing saying anything about GameFAQs. Zeus posted... And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA" data-time=" --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:912473580] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>mrduckbear posted...</cite> <quote>30 y/o Dustin Cavanaugh from Hagerstown, Maryland is already facing a charge of intercepting wire communications and was indicted on a new charge for taping a phone call and posting it on the INTERNET!! He as indicted last week by a county grand jury on a single count of intercepting communications that involved a Sept. 25 telephone call that he recorded and posted on Youtube. He was released on his own recognizance following the hearing before Circuit judge Daniel P. Dwyer He was imposed pretrial conditions that stopped him from accessing or posting on social media sites or possessing devices capable of accessing the internet including cellphones, tablets and computers and was to make no recordings of anyone without permission.. Attorney Gina Cirincion said "He is a continual source of public nuisance". He's had convictions in Virginia for assault on a family member and assault on an officer and a conviction in North Carolina for 3rd degree sexual exploitation of a minor Public Defender Stephen Musselman suggested an electronic ban as an alternative to incarceration and to increase attendance to mental health counseling. A motion states that a maximum penalty for his charges is 5 YEARS in PRISON should the judge make that sentence over the plea deal to ban him from owning an electronic. Do you think the judge will send him to Prison?. Dustin - </quote> I see nothing saying anything about GameFAQs. <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote> And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. </quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Full Throttle 11/17/18 3:35:59 PM #34:	majority said yes he will --- call me mrduckbear, sweater monkeys. A GFAQS User Steps On A Bug, I'll Stop Posting for 24 HOURS. THIS ACCOUNT ONLY!! I'm an Asian Liberal. RESIST The Alt-Right <cite>Full Throttle posted [p:912571862] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>majority said yes he will</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
minervo 11/17/18 3:38:19 PM #35:	JanwayDaahl posted... streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? He's probably a male feminist who dislikes the idea that a person can protect themselves from false rape accusations by recording things like sexual encounters and whatnot. If it weren't for male feminists, your precious burka would be outlawed. --- "how hard is it for people to understand that not everything you read will be something you agree with?" - Awesome <cite>minervo posted [p:912571975] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>JanwayDaahl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> He's probably a male feminist who dislikes the idea that a person can protect themselves from false rape accusations by recording things like sexual encounters and whatnot.</quote> If it weren't for male feminists, your precious burka would be outlawed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krow_Incarnate 11/17/18 7:58:05 PM #36:	Please do --- Hail Hydra <cite>Krow_Incarnate posted [p:912585028] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>Please do</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/17/18 9:23:50 PM #37:	streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... Zeus posted... streamofthesky posted... 5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs. A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone. ....lolwhat? One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording. And what does any of that have to do with grape? Grape? Nothing. Rape? It's another one-party consent activity that violates a person's rights and feeling of security. Unlike activities occurring in a public setting, there's a reasonable expectation of privacy that gets violated. Zeus is pretty flexible for an old man, to reach that much. And stream is pretty narrow-minded and curmudgeonly for a young man. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912589351] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>5 years for taping a phone call and posting it on the internet is fucking bull shit, any time in prison for it is ridiculous. The majority of states don't even require both parties to be aware of / consent to being taped in a phone conversation, and it's a disgrace that the backwards states that do require it haven't had their laws struck down by the courts yet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States Never heard of him before, not sure what his username was on here. His other acts sound pretty bad, but this particular one seems like trumped up bs.</quote> A lot of his arrests are borderline BS, but it's just an accumulation of nonsense that keeps landing him in trouble. And, in general, one-party consent laws have a very rape-y tone.</quote> ....lolwhat?</quote> One-party consent = Only one person involved in the phone call needs to consent to (or even be aware of) the recording Two-party consent = Two (or all parties) involved in the phone call need to consent to the recording.</quote> And what does any of that have to do with grape?</quote> Grape? Nothing. Rape? It's another one-party consent activity that violates a person's rights and feeling of security. Unlike activities occurring in a public setting, there's a reasonable expectation of privacy that gets violated. </quote> Zeus is pretty flexible for an old man, to reach that much.</quote> And stream is pretty narrow-minded and curmudgeonly for a young man.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/17/18 9:25:19 PM #38:	Revelation34 posted... I see nothing saying anything about GameFAQs. Then try looking on CE. You'll see a lot of people saying stuff about him. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912589412] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote>I see nothing saying anything about GameFAQs. </quote> Then try looking on CE. You'll see a lot of people saying stuff about him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
supness420 11/18/18 9:55:14 AM #39:	I don't know if its funny or sad that anyone knows who this guy is... LOL! --- Common sense has changed as the common person's sense is idiotic; therefore, I am happy to say I am not common, and I have no common sense. <cite>supness420 posted [p:912609665] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>I don't know if its funny or sad that anyone knows who this guy is... LOL!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/18/18 10:16:09 PM #40:	supness420 posted... I don't know if its funny or sad that anyone knows who this guy is... LOL! Anybody who's visited CE would know who he is, considering his history and infamy. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912648378] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>supness420 posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know if its funny or sad that anyone knows who this guy is... LOL!</quote> Anybody who's visited CE would know who he is, considering his history and infamy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Humble_Novice 11/18/18 10:22:31 PM #41:	Which user is he? <cite>Humble_Novice posted [p:912648779] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote>Which user is he?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/18/18 11:10:07 PM #42:	Humble_Novice posted... Which user is he? Pretty sure you can't say his username due to rules against doxxing. You can google it, though. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912651526] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Humble_Novice posted...</cite> <quote>Which user is he?</quote> Pretty sure you can't say his username due to rules against doxxing. You can google it, though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 11/19/18 1:46:47 AM #43:	Zeus posted... Pretty sure you can't say his username due to rules against doxxing. You can google it, though. Google failed me. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:912657823] in 30 y/o For... [t:77197483]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Pretty sure you can't say his username due to rules against doxxing. You can google it, though.</quote> Google failed me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > 30 y/o Former Gamefaqs User is facing 5 YEARS in PRISON!!! (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > 30 y/o Former Gamefaqs User is facing 5 YEARS in PRISON!!!