Current Events > Ocasio-Cortez says to replace Columbus Day with a holiday for election day

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
CircleOfManias 11/19/18 10:44:35 PM #101:	It's a start, but elections really should be extended to a full week or at the very least a weekend. --- Sick liaisons raise this monumental mark The sun sets forever over Blackwater Park <cite>CircleOfManias posted [p:912712610] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>It's a start, but elections really should be extended to a full week or at the very least a weekend.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 11/19/18 10:49:44 PM #102:	Is early voting not advertised enough? Most states allow voting for one week or more before election day. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:912712933] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>Is early voting not advertised enough? Most states allow voting for one week or more before election day.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Returning_CEmen 11/19/18 10:50:37 PM #103:	I dig --- https://imgur.com/mRP9Jej <cite>Returning_CEmen posted [p:912712981] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>I dig</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trickfinger 11/19/18 10:52:40 PM #104:	Damn_Underscore posted... Is early voting not advertised enough? Most states allow voting for one week or more before election day. it's not advertised nearly enough. early voting needs to be what ppl prioritize honestly --- I survived reading guys like you <cite>Trickfinger posted [p:912713116] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>Is early voting not advertised enough? Most states allow voting for one week or more before election day.</quote> it's not advertised nearly enough. early voting needs to be what ppl prioritize honestly</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 11/19/18 11:00:08 PM #105:	Trickfinger posted... Damn_Underscore posted... Is early voting not advertised enough? Most states allow voting for one week or more before election day. it's not advertised nearly enough. early voting needs to be what ppl prioritize honestly Yeah, I did early voting. Went in around 5-ish which would presumably be their busy time. In and out in 10-15 minutes, and most of that was waiting outside because I saw someone I knew and hang around to say hi. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:912713542] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Trickfinger posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>Is early voting not advertised enough? Most states allow voting for one week or more before election day.</quote> it's not advertised nearly enough. early voting needs to be what ppl prioritize honestly</quote> Yeah, I did early voting. Went in around 5-ish which would presumably be their busy time. In and out in 10-15 minutes, and most of that was waiting outside because I saw someone I knew and hang around to say hi.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 11/19/18 11:03:05 PM #106:	She's right you know --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:912713695] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>She's right you know</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/19/18 11:09:30 PM #107:	Trickfinger posted... Barenziah Boy Toy posted... wah_wah_wah posted... What's wrong with more vacation time, in the country that gets virtually none She was trying to placate conservatives. and they still fuckin complain She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912714023] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Trickfinger posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Barenziah Boy Toy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>What's wrong with more vacation time, in the country that gets virtually none</quote> She was trying to placate conservatives.</quote> and they still fuckin complain</quote> She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 11/19/18 11:15:00 PM #108:	wah_wah_wah posted... She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this! --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:912714323] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. </quote> I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/19/18 11:22:21 PM #109:	Antifar posted... wah_wah_wah posted... She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this! Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912714703] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. </quote> I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this!</quote> Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#110	Post #110 was unavailable or deleted.
DrizztLink 11/19/18 11:27:16 PM #111:	wah_wah_wah posted... Antifar posted... wah_wah_wah posted... She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this! Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately. Alternatively, you're pulling something out of your ass and it makes no sense. huh i wonder which it might be ~~it's your ass~~ --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif https://imgur.com/6ezFwG1 <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:912714937] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. </quote> I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this!</quote> Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately.</quote> Alternatively, you're pulling something out of your ass and it makes no sense. huh i wonder which it might be it's your ass</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/19/18 11:34:53 PM #112:	DrizztLink posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Antifar posted... wah_wah_wah posted... She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this! Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately. Alternatively, you're pulling something out of your ass and it makes no sense. huh i wonder which it might be ~~it's your ass~~ I know you really want to believe in this broad, but sometimes hope is for dopes. She's not very good at debate or negotiation (unsurprisingly, she's a new politician), but all people like you do is coddle her and spin. She'll be another Hillary before you know it. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912715279] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>DrizztLink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. </quote> I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this!</quote> Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately.</quote> Alternatively, you're pulling something out of your ass and it makes no sense. huh i wonder which it might be it's your ass</quote> I know you really want to believe in this broad, but sometimes hope is for dopes. She's not very good at debate or negotiation (unsurprisingly, she's a new politician), but all people like you do is coddle her and spin. She'll be another Hillary before you know it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 11/19/18 11:38:50 PM #113:	wah_wah_wah posted... Antifar posted... wah_wah_wah posted... She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this! Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately. You're doing that thing where we give advice to people we don't want to succeed. It's extremely bad faith. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:912715485] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. </quote> I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this!</quote> Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately.</quote> You're doing that thing where we give advice to people we don't want to succeed. It's extremely bad faith.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 11/19/18 11:42:53 PM #114:	Who's fucking shitty alt is this --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:912715706] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>Who's fucking shitty alt is this</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/19/18 11:51:15 PM #115:	hockeybub89 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Antifar posted... wah_wah_wah posted... She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this! Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately. You're doing that thing where we give advice to people we don't want to succeed. It's extremely bad faith. I'd want her to succeed. I'm saying, she won't succeed unless she starts messaging less recklessly. "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. It's almost perfectly designed to confuse your base voters and energize the other side. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912716230] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She wasn't trying to placate anyone. She was setting up the "you're racist" card, increasingly the only card in the liberal deck. </quote> I think that's a super bad faith interpretation of this!</quote> Yeah you're not allowed to be critical of her approach. Which is why she's probably going to get worse and worse as a politician, rather than better, unfortunately.</quote> You're doing that thing where we give advice to people we don't want to succeed. It's extremely bad faith.</quote> I'd want her to succeed. I'm saying, she won't succeed unless she starts messaging less recklessly. "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. It's almost perfectly designed to confuse your base voters and energize the other side.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/19/18 11:53:41 PM #116:	wah_wah_wah posted... "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. Pretty sure that is very straightforward. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:912716389] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>"Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means.</quote> Pretty sure that is very straightforward.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FLUFFYGERM 11/19/18 11:58:28 PM #117:	If she was smart she'd keep Columbus Day and still aim to make election day a holiday. That way we get two fucking holidays --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:912716656] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>If she was smart she'd keep Columbus Day and still aim to make election day a holiday. That way we get two fucking holidays</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 11/20/18 12:00:34 AM #118:	FLUFFYGERM posted... If she was smart she'd keep Columbus Day and still aim to make election day a holiday. That way we get two fucking holidays But Columbus Day is a stupid fucking holiday and we should just give everyone more mandatory vacation time. Millions of people work on holidays anyway --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:912716794] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote>If she was smart she'd keep Columbus Day and still aim to make election day a holiday. That way we get two fucking holidays</quote> But Columbus Day is a stupid fucking holiday and we should just give everyone more mandatory vacation time. Millions of people work on holidays anyway</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 12:04:40 AM #119:	Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. Pretty sure that is very straightforward. Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something? <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912717021] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>"Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means.</quote> Pretty sure that is very straightforward.</quote> Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 11/20/18 12:05:28 AM #120:	Bio1590 posted... Who's fucking shitty alt is this --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:912717065] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>Who's fucking shitty alt is this</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 11/20/18 12:07:31 AM #121:	wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. Pretty sure that is very straightforward. Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something? ICE literally didn't exist until 15 years ago. We wouldn't just become a borderless hellhole of scum and villainy if it went bye bye. Shouldn't conservatives love the idea of cutting government fat? --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:912717157] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>"Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means.</quote> Pretty sure that is very straightforward.</quote> Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something?</quote> ICE literally didn't exist until 15 years ago. We wouldn't just become a borderless hellhole of scum and villainy if it went bye bye. Shouldn't conservatives love the idea of cutting government fat?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/20/18 12:09:10 AM #122:	wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. Pretty sure that is very straightforward. Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something? ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:912717237] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>"Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means.</quote> Pretty sure that is very straightforward.</quote> Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something?</quote> ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 11/20/18 12:14:35 AM #123:	Why not? Columbus day isn't shit and I have to vote early in election years because early vote place is on my walking route and election day polling place is way off. I would like to have election day voting as an option if I don't get to early vote. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:912717452] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>Why not? Columbus day isn't shit and I have to vote early in election years because early vote place is on my walking route and election day polling place is way off. I would like to have election day voting as an option if I don't get to early vote.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 2:34:22 AM #124:	Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. Pretty sure that is very straightforward. Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something? ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework. I never said anything about their working on the border. Smartphones are relatively new too, that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them and everything will go back to the way it was smoothly as ever. "Abolish ICE" is a slogan without any plan whatsoever, and you'd be a fool to think it's effective to nationalize House races. It's one reason why a slam dunk midterm ended up in such a draw in so many races. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912722059] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>"Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means.</quote> Pretty sure that is very straightforward.</quote> Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something?</quote> ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework.</quote> I never said anything about their working on the border. Smartphones are relatively new too, that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them and everything will go back to the way it was smoothly as ever. "Abolish ICE" is a slogan without any plan whatsoever, and you'd be a fool to think it's effective to nationalize House races. It's one reason why a slam dunk midterm ended up in such a draw in so many races.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 11/20/18 3:11:29 AM #125:	Bio1590 posted... Bio1590 posted... Who's fucking shitty alt is this --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:912722891] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>Who's fucking shitty alt is this</quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 11/20/18 10:02:24 AM #126:	wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. Pretty sure that is very straightforward. Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something? ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework. I never said anything about their working on the border. Smartphones are relatively new too, that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them and everything will go back to the way it was smoothly as ever. "Abolish ICE" is a slogan without any plan whatsoever, and you'd be a fool to think it's effective to nationalize House races. It's one reason why a slam dunk midterm ended up in such a draw in so many races. Her plan is to restore INS which functions as part of the Department of Justice. Shes stated this literally hundreds of times by now. Its on her website. No need to lie about this. --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:912732540] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>"Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means.</quote> Pretty sure that is very straightforward.</quote> Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something?</quote> ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework.</quote> I never said anything about their working on the border. Smartphones are relatively new too, that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them and everything will go back to the way it was smoothly as ever. "Abolish ICE" is a slogan without any plan whatsoever, and you'd be a fool to think it's effective to nationalize House races. It's one reason why a slam dunk midterm ended up in such a draw in so many races.</quote> Her plan is to restore INS which functions as part of the Department of Justice. Shes stated this literally hundreds of times by now. Its on her website. No need to lie about this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EnragedSlith 11/20/18 10:03:08 AM #127:	frozenshock posted... There is absolutely no way republicans will allow people to get a day off on election day. No way. This would mean that too many people in urban areas would be able to vote. --- ultimate milf hunter https://imgur.com/lCEdce6 https://imgur.com/2N1Ezia https://imgur.com/ukJ6sPJ https://youtu.be/IDYaHvDiTr4 <cite>EnragedSlith posted [p:912732559] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>There is absolutely no way republicans will allow people to get a day off on election day. No way. This would mean that too many people in urban areas would be able to vote.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 10:27:23 AM #128:	King_Hellebuyck posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... wah_wah_wah posted... "Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means. Pretty sure that is very straightforward. Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something? ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework. I never said anything about their working on the border. Smartphones are relatively new too, that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them and everything will go back to the way it was smoothly as ever. "Abolish ICE" is a slogan without any plan whatsoever, and you'd be a fool to think it's effective to nationalize House races. It's one reason why a slam dunk midterm ended up in such a draw in so many races. Her plan is to restore INS which functions as part of the Department of Justice. Shes stated this literally hundreds of times by now. Its on her website. No need to lie about this. Voters don't read the website. If your plan is to restore INS, then make the slogan "Restore INS"... but she wanted to be a little firebrand about it, and it backfired. She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She is very inspired by Bernie, but does nothing that made him so popular in Vermont. She seems to continually enter the arena on Republican terms, which is a loser strategy. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912733572] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>"Abolish ICE!"... no one knows what that means.</quote> Pretty sure that is very straightforward.</quote> Not to anyone who can say the words, "And then what"... what are you saying, really? Just get rid of all immigration agents? Is she funded by human traffickers or something?</quote> ICE doesn't work on the border. Also the fact that ICE is relatively new addition. Seems like the issue here is you don't do your homework.</quote> I never said anything about their working on the border. Smartphones are relatively new too, that doesn't mean we can just get rid of them and everything will go back to the way it was smoothly as ever. "Abolish ICE" is a slogan without any plan whatsoever, and you'd be a fool to think it's effective to nationalize House races. It's one reason why a slam dunk midterm ended up in such a draw in so many races.</quote> Her plan is to restore INS which functions as part of the Department of Justice. Shes stated this literally hundreds of times by now. Its on her website. No need to lie about this.</quote> Voters don't read the website. If your plan is to restore INS, then make the slogan "Restore INS"... but she wanted to be a little firebrand about it, and it backfired. She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She is very inspired by Bernie, but does nothing that made him so popular in Vermont. She seems to continually enter the arena on Republican terms, which is a loser strategy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 11/20/18 10:30:07 AM #129:	Thats a real weird backtrack followed by some blatantly obvious bullshit --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:912733712] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>Thats a real weird backtrack followed by some blatantly obvious bullshit</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/20/18 10:31:29 AM #130:	All I gathered here is that wah_wah_wah is proud to be an uneducated voter. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:912733787] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>All I gathered here is that wah_wah_wah is proud to be an uneducated voter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 11/20/18 10:32:25 AM #131:	@wah_wah_wah posted... She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She won her district with like 80% of the vote --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:912733829] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>@wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win.</quote> She won her district with like 80% of the vote</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 10:34:06 AM #132:	King_Hellebuyck posted... Thats a real weird backtrack followed by some blatantly obvious bullshit "Abolish ICE" is not the same message as "Restore INS" no matter how much you want to run your mouth about it. But you've got Obama fever again. There's a reason why big corporate interests want to keep booking her for TV appearances. Underneath all the fire she's a lightweight, and fawning supporters like you guys just keep enabling her. We'll make an Obama out of her yet. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912733899] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote>Thats a real weird backtrack followed by some blatantly obvious bullshit</quote> "Abolish ICE" is not the same message as "Restore INS" no matter how much you want to run your mouth about it. But you've got Obama fever again. There's a reason why big corporate interests want to keep booking her for TV appearances. Underneath all the fire she's a lightweight, and fawning supporters like you guys just keep enabling her. We'll make an Obama out of her yet.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 11/20/18 10:36:50 AM #133:	wah_wah_wah posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Thats a real weird backtrack followed by some blatantly obvious bullshit "Abolish ICE" is not the same message as "Restore INS" no matter how much you want to run your mouth about it. But you've got Obama fever again. There's a reason why big corporate interests want to keep booking her for TV appearances. Underneath all the fire she's a lightweight, and fawning supporters like you guys just keep enabling her. We'll make an Obama out of her yet. Yeah we get it, youre trolling --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:912734019] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote>Thats a real weird backtrack followed by some blatantly obvious bullshit</quote> "Abolish ICE" is not the same message as "Restore INS" no matter how much you want to run your mouth about it. But you've got Obama fever again. There's a reason why big corporate interests want to keep booking her for TV appearances. Underneath all the fire she's a lightweight, and fawning supporters like you guys just keep enabling her. We'll make an Obama out of her yet.</quote> Yeah we get it, youre trolling</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 11/20/18 10:37:53 AM #134:	I think you're wearing that shovel a little thin with how deep your digging after being found out. --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:912734067] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>I think you're wearing that shovel a little thin with how deep your digging after being found out.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 11/20/18 10:39:14 AM #135:	wah_wah_wah posted... We'll make an Obama out of her yet. Go on --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:912734132] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>We'll make an Obama out of her yet. </quote> Go on</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 10:43:32 AM #136:	Doom_Art posted... @wah_wah_wah posted... She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She won her district with like 80% of the vote Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912734346] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win.</quote> She won her district with like 80% of the vote</quote> Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 11/20/18 10:47:17 AM #137:	wah_wah_wah posted... Doom_Art posted... @wah_wah_wah posted... She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She won her district with like 80% of the vote Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters. Do you have any proof whatsoever that she harmed national races? Or are you going to keep repeating this like a broken record? --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:912734532] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win.</quote> She won her district with like 80% of the vote</quote> Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters.</quote> Do you have any proof whatsoever that she harmed national races? Or are you going to keep repeating this like a broken record?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 11:01:54 AM #138:	King_Hellebuyck posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Doom_Art posted... @wah_wah_wah posted... She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She won her district with like 80% of the vote Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters. Do you have any proof whatsoever that she harmed national races? Or are you going to keep repeating this like a broken record? Her big slogan "Abolish ICE" is a loser issue. Here's all the polling you need on that. Only 1 and 4 support reform when you reframe it as abolishing ICE. About as many people as believe the Sun goes around the Earth. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/11/immigration-ice-abolish-poll-708703 "BUT PLURALITY OF DEMOCRATS!!"... barely, and educated white women are a higher priority vote to get in swing suburban districts. "BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN SAINT CORTEZ LOST IT!!!"... but I mean if you keep centering your now-national campaign on a slogan that is unpopular and tends to provoke either confusion or genuine disgust, yeah I don't think it's the rest of the world that has the problem here. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912735254] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win.</quote> She won her district with like 80% of the vote</quote> Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters.</quote> Do you have any proof whatsoever that she harmed national races? Or are you going to keep repeating this like a broken record?</quote> Her big slogan "Abolish ICE" is a loser issue. Here's all the polling you need on that. Only 1 and 4 support reform when you reframe it as abolishing ICE. About as many people as believe the Sun goes around the Earth. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/11/immigration-ice-abolish-poll-708703 "BUT PLURALITY OF DEMOCRATS!!"... barely, and educated white women are a higher priority vote to get in swing suburban districts. "BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN SAINT CORTEZ LOST IT!!!"... but I mean if you keep centering your now-national campaign on a slogan that is unpopular and tends to provoke either confusion or genuine disgust, yeah I don't think it's the rest of the world that has the problem here.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 11/20/18 11:04:04 AM #139:	Catering your message to what polls suggests is popular in the here and now will lead to some real shitty policies. --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:912735347] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>Catering your message to what polls suggests is popular in the here and now will lead to some real shitty policies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 11/20/18 11:06:28 AM #140:	wah_wah_wah posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Doom_Art posted... @wah_wah_wah posted... She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She won her district with like 80% of the vote Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters. Do you have any proof whatsoever that she harmed national races? Or are you going to keep repeating this like a broken record? Her big slogan "Abolish ICE" is a loser issue. Here's all the polling you need on that. Only 1 and 4 support reform when you reframe it as abolishing ICE. About as many people as believe the Sun goes around the Earth. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/11/immigration-ice-abolish-poll-708703 "BUT PLURALITY OF DEMOCRATS!!"... barely, and educated white women are a higher priority vote to get in swing suburban districts. "BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN SAINT CORTEZ LOST IT!!!"... but I mean if you keep centering your now-national campaign on a slogan that is unpopular and tends to provoke either confusion or genuine disgust, yeah I don't think it's the rest of the world that has the problem here. Ok so do you have any proof that she harmed national races? --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:912735463] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win.</quote> She won her district with like 80% of the vote</quote> Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters.</quote> Do you have any proof whatsoever that she harmed national races? Or are you going to keep repeating this like a broken record?</quote> Her big slogan "Abolish ICE" is a loser issue. Here's all the polling you need on that. Only 1 and 4 support reform when you reframe it as abolishing ICE. About as many people as believe the Sun goes around the Earth. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/11/immigration-ice-abolish-poll-708703 "BUT PLURALITY OF DEMOCRATS!!"... barely, and educated white women are a higher priority vote to get in swing suburban districts. "BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN SAINT CORTEZ LOST IT!!!"... but I mean if you keep centering your now-national campaign on a slogan that is unpopular and tends to provoke either confusion or genuine disgust, yeah I don't think it's the rest of the world that has the problem here.</quote> Ok so do you have any proof that she harmed national races?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 11/20/18 11:08:24 AM #141:	wah_wah_wah posted... wah_wah_wah --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:912735558] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>wah_wah_wah</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 11:20:01 AM #142:	King_Hellebuyck posted... wah_wah_wah posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... wah_wah_wah posted... Doom_Art posted... @wah_wah_wah posted... She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win. She won her district with like 80% of the vote Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters. Do you have any proof whatsoever that she harmed national races? Or are you going to keep repeating this like a broken record? Her big slogan "Abolish ICE" is a loser issue. Here's all the polling you need on that. Only 1 and 4 support reform when you reframe it as abolishing ICE. About as many people as believe the Sun goes around the Earth. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/11/immigration-ice-abolish-poll-708703 "BUT PLURALITY OF DEMOCRATS!!"... barely, and educated white women are a higher priority vote to get in swing suburban districts. "BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN SAINT CORTEZ LOST IT!!!"... but I mean if you keep centering your now-national campaign on a slogan that is unpopular and tends to provoke either confusion or genuine disgust, yeah I don't think it's the rest of the world that has the problem here. Ok so do you have any proof that she harmed national races? Keep moving the goalposts. It's enough to show that one of her campaign slogans is not a winning issue, and it did get play beyond her district. The establishment liberal media figures amplified it, and all it did was help to energize Trump's base. But I suppose there's more important principles than winning... like losing. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912736130] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>She continues to nationalize her office. Nationalizing the office = Republican win. Constituent service = Democrat win.</quote> She won her district with like 80% of the vote</quote> Crowley was under no threat either in that district. I'm not talking so much about her particular race, but how her platform and what she was saying resonated in other districts in a negative way. Of course if she's being a typical politician, she should only care about herself and her district, but she was also accepting this national mantle by going on Colbert and other programs, and she seems guided by a racial politics that made easy wins in swing districts more contested. I don't think the midterms were a total bust, but there should have been way, way more gains than what happened. And I think a lot of that was forsaking traditional voting bases (particularly white women) for this sort of chest poundy "LET'S SHUT THE FUCKER DOWN" stuff that doesn't land on the kitchen table of likely voters.</quote> Do you have any proof whatsoever that she harmed national races? Or are you going to keep repeating this like a broken record?</quote> Her big slogan "Abolish ICE" is a loser issue. Here's all the polling you need on that. Only 1 and 4 support reform when you reframe it as abolishing ICE. About as many people as believe the Sun goes around the Earth. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/11/immigration-ice-abolish-poll-708703 "BUT PLURALITY OF DEMOCRATS!!"... barely, and educated white women are a higher priority vote to get in swing suburban districts. "BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN SAINT CORTEZ LOST IT!!!"... but I mean if you keep centering your now-national campaign on a slogan that is unpopular and tends to provoke either confusion or genuine disgust, yeah I don't think it's the rest of the world that has the problem here.</quote> Ok so do you have any proof that she harmed national races?</quote> Keep moving the goalposts. It's enough to show that one of her campaign slogans is not a winning issue, and it did get play beyond her district. The establishment liberal media figures amplified it, and all it did was help to energize Trump's base. But I suppose there's more important principles than winning... like losing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Sonic 11/20/18 11:23:01 AM #143:	Damn_Underscore posted... Columbus Day could be called Explorer's Day to honor guys like Amerigo Vespucci, Sir Francis Drake, even Marco Polo I thought Vespucci was a cartographer. --- Washable toilet paper. <cite>Solid Sonic posted [p:912736282] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Damn_Underscore posted...</cite> <quote>Columbus Day could be called Explorer's Day to honor guys like Amerigo Vespucci, Sir Francis Drake, even Marco Polo</quote> I thought Vespucci was a cartographer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 11/20/18 11:25:31 AM #144:	wah_wah_wah posted... Keep moving the goalposts He's not tho wah_wah_wah posted... The establishment liberal media figures amplified it, and all it did was help to energize Trump's base. And they lost the House What does that tell you --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:912736391] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>Keep moving the goalposts</quote> He's not tho <cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>The establishment liberal media figures amplified it, and all it did was help to energize Trump's base. </quote> And they lost the House What does that tell you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 11:28:42 AM #145:	Doom_Art posted... He's not tho I guess it's not moving the goalposts as much as denying reality. I mean, I can ask him if she didn't go on a national program of Colbert, if we're all being gaslit. But I'm tired of arguing with an idiot who can't see a bunk message when confronted with the data. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912736545] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Doom_Art posted...</cite> <quote>He's not tho </quote> I guess it's not moving the goalposts as much as denying reality. I mean, I can ask him if she didn't go on a national program of Colbert, if we're all being gaslit. But I'm tired of arguing with an idiot who can't see a bunk message when confronted with the data.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/20/18 11:33:43 AM #146:	Ah the classic "calling your opponent an idiot" technique. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:912736762] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote>Ah the classic "calling your opponent an idiot" technique.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 11:33:53 AM #147:	Antifar posted... Catering your message to what polls suggests is popular in the here and now will lead to some real shitty policies. But losing on an unpopular message will lead to literally no policies. The first priority is power. And it's not like there's not very popular issues that Democrats can promise, win on, and perform, issues that are far better than, "ABOLISH ICE" and its 1 and 4 approval. You don't literally have to promise everything you are going to do before you run for office. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912736769] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>Catering your message to what polls suggests is popular in the here and now will lead to some real shitty policies.</quote> But losing on an unpopular message will lead to literally no policies. The first priority is power. And it's not like there's not very popular issues that Democrats can promise, win on, and perform, issues that are far better than, "ABOLISH ICE" and its 1 and 4 approval. You don't literally have to promise everything you are going to do before you run for office.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah 11/20/18 11:35:23 AM #148:	Tmaster148 posted... Ah the classic "calling your opponent an idiot" technique. I guess I'll put it in PC language. "Someone who repeatedly fails to see the reality of both polling and specific actions of a candidate." I prefer the brevity, but I suppose I'm talking to the mediocre right now. <cite>wah_wah_wah posted [p:912736851] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Ah the classic "calling your opponent an idiot" technique.</quote> I guess I'll put it in PC language. "Someone who repeatedly fails to see the reality of both polling and specific actions of a candidate." I prefer the brevity, but I suppose I'm talking to the mediocre right now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 11/20/18 11:39:04 AM #149:	wah_wah_wah posted... Tmaster148 posted... Ah the classic "calling your opponent an idiot" technique. I guess I'll put it in PC language. "Someone who repeatedly fails to see the reality of both polling and specific actions of a candidate." I prefer the brevity, but I suppose I'm talking to the mediocre right now. It's not about being PC. It's just resorting to insults in a debate makes you look bad. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:912737020] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Ah the classic "calling your opponent an idiot" technique.</quote> I guess I'll put it in PC language. "Someone who repeatedly fails to see the reality of both polling and specific actions of a candidate." I prefer the brevity, but I suppose I'm talking to the mediocre right now.</quote> It's not about being PC. It's just resorting to insults in a debate makes you look bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 11/20/18 11:39:20 AM #150:	Bio1590 posted... Bio1590 posted... Bio1590 posted... Who's fucking shitty alt is this --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:912737028] in Ocasio-Cor... [t:77218137]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>Who's fucking shitty alt is this</quote></quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > Ocasio-Cortez says to replace Columbus Day with a holiday for election day (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Ocasio-Cortez says to replace Columbus Day with a holiday for election day