Current Events > What if all woman stopped wearing bras.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Would life be better or worse?
---

awoooo
---

I don't think wolf life would really be affected
---

It would put a lot of people out of work.
---

there would be an epidemic of droopy boobs. no one wants that.
---

Does this specifically mean bra's only or do swimsuit tops count too. Just saying, some of those can be counted as bras.
---

KILBOTz posted...

there would be an epidemic of droopy boobs. no one wants that.

I thought it was proven that wearing bras too much causes sagging.
---

Duncanwii posted...

KILBOTz posted...

there would be an epidemic of droopy boobs. no one wants that.

I thought it was proven that wearing bras too much causes sagging.

I thought that there was no proof either way.

Not wearing =/= sagging, wearing =/= sagging


---

KILBOTz posted...

there would be an epidemic of droopy boobs. no one wants that.

this
---

Things would be worse, a lot of saggy tits, a lot of land whales disgusting people, lots of women who bras help would be see for the unattractive women they actually are.
---

Lots of people seem to have the misconception that not wearing bras causes sagging. Way to buy into big bra propaganda.
---

A bra helps support boobs and gives the appearance that they do not sag for many women. A woman can look great with a bra and having saggy tits once it comes off.
---

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

Things would be worse, a lot of saggy tits, a lot of land whales disgusting people, lots of women who bras help would be see for the unattractive women they actually are.

Yet your chances of pulling these women would still be zero.
---

I would love it.

I adore hangers and udders. All the extra nipping would be great too.
---

Y'all act like seeing ugly people is the worst part of your existence. They're just people. Jesus christ.

Natural titties, dude.
---

Highwind07 posted...

Good for us for the most part.

Bad for them because some women legit need them to support their boobs because they are way too heavy.

I find it unlikely that women evolved to have bodies that require specific clothing in order to function properly. At least not healthy women. Obviously, someone that is overweight might have issues supporting their weight. But that isn't exclusive to women or their breasts.
---

Ouch, no. And I'm not "heavy" there at all.
---

ImmatureContent posted...

Highwind07 posted...

Good for us for the most part.

Bad for them because some women legit need them to support their boobs because they are way too heavy.

I find it unlikely that women evolved to have bodies that require specific clothing in order to function properly. At least not healthy women. Obviously, someone that is overweight might have issues supporting their weight. But that isn't exclusive to women or their breasts.

Hey, you'd think we wouldn't evolve club feet, lactose intolerance, gluten sensitivity, sickle cell anemia, hunchbacks, hairlips, appendixes, and a thousand other things but guess what? Evolution isn't perfect. In fact, the evolutionary path might have been perfectly fine based on the diet we consumed during the time it took place but turned into a detriment based on caloric and hormonal surpluses, or a hundred other reasons.
---

Pogo_Marimo posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

Highwind07 posted...

Good for us for the most part.

Bad for them because some women legit need them to support their boobs because they are way too heavy.

I find it unlikely that women evolved to have bodies that require specific clothing in order to function properly. At least not healthy women. Obviously, someone that is overweight might have issues supporting their weight. But that isn't exclusive to women or their breasts.

Hey, you'd think we wouldn't evolve club feet, lactose intolerance, gluten sensitivity, sickle cell anemia, hunchbacks, hairlips, appendixes, and a thousand other things but guess what? Evolution isn't perfect. In fact, the evolutionary path might have been perfectly fine based on the diet we consumed during the time it took place but turned into a detriment based on caloric and hormonal surpluses, or a hundred other reasons.

That is not the baseline for the evolution of the human race. Those are outliers. Also, bras were invented in the 20th century. I doubt women have significantly evolved since then to adapt to a necessity for wearing bras.

Highwind07 posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

Highwind07 posted...

Good for us for the most part.

Bad for them because some women legit need them to support their boobs because they are way too heavy.

I find it unlikely that women evolved to have bodies that require specific clothing in order to function properly. At least not healthy women. Obviously, someone that is overweight might have issues supporting their weight. But that isn't exclusive to women or their breasts.

Some women can have Macromastia and they don't have to be all overweight to have them.

Fair enough, but that is a statistical anomaly. Most women don't have that condition.
---

ImmatureContent posted...

That is not the baseline for the evolution of the human race

What is the baseline?

ImmatureContent posted...

I doubt women have significantly evolved since then to adapt to a necessity for wearing bras.

We haven't evolved to need medicine but it certainly helps.
---

Pogo_Marimo posted...

Y'all act like seeing ugly people is the worst part of your existence. They're just people. Jesus christ.

Natural titties, dude.

They really do man. I wonder if when they walk pass the mirror they get mad that they had to look at themselves.
---

EpicMickeyDrew posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

That is not the baseline for the evolution of the human race

What is the baseline?

ImmatureContent posted...

I doubt women have significantly evolved since then to adapt to a necessity for wearing bras.

We haven't evolved to need medicine but it certainly helps.

The baseline is a typical human sans any sort of rare conditions. And yes, we have always needed medicine. The fact that we didn't have medicine in the past doesn't mean we didn't need it. It just means we died because we didn't have it yet.

Look, you guys can just admit you own stock in a bra company. No one will judge you... much.
---

ImmatureContent posted...

EpicMickeyDrew posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

That is not the baseline for the evolution of the human race

What is the baseline?

ImmatureContent posted...

I doubt women have significantly evolved since then to adapt to a necessity for wearing bras.

We haven't evolved to need medicine but it certainly helps.

The baseline is a typical human sans any sort of rare conditions. And yes, we have always needed medicine. The fact that we didn't have medicine in the past doesn't mean we didn't need it. It just means we died because we didn't have it yet.

Look, you guys can just admit you own stock in a bra company. No one will judge you... much.

Oh jeez, this is embarassing. Listen buddy, do you talk to women? Because an extremely common issue large-breasted women have is severe back pain, so much so that it is the primary reason women request breast-reduction surgery. The typical size of the breasts in these cases are usually not statistical outliers in terms of size. Furthermore, if you've actually talked with women before, you'd know that trying to run, jump, or even go down a flight of stairs with just averaged sized breasts is physically painful and encumbering.

In fact, human beasts are bizarre in that they are the only mammary gland in Primates that both develops independently of becoming pregnant and stays even after breastfeeding is stopped. Do you know why breasts in other primates and most other mammals go away when they aren't needed? Because they're useless and obtrusive, yet here we are. Evolution. Our baseline breasts are biologically disadvantuous and, frankly, a mystery to evolutionary biologists, but life finds a way.
---

Oh jeez, this is embarassing. Listen buddy, do you talk to women? Because an extremely common issue large-breasted women have is severe back pain, so much so that it is the primary reason women request breast-reduction surgery. The typical size of the breasts in these cases are usually not statistical outliers in terms of size. Furthermore, if you've actually talked with women before, you'd know that trying to run, jump, or even go down a flight of stairs with just averaged sized breasts is physically painful and encumbering.

In fact, human beasts are bizarre in that they are the only mammary gland in Primates that both develops independently of becoming pregnant and stays even after breastfeeding is stopped. Do you know why breasts in other primates and most other mammals go away when they aren't needed? Because they're useless and obtrusive, yet here we are. Evolution. Our baseline breasts are biologically disadvantuous and, frankly, a mystery to evolutionary biologists, but life finds a way.

We'd have a lot more disposable income.
---

Devil_Katt_II posted...

Oh jeez, this is embarassing. Listen buddy, do you talk to women? Because an extremely common issue large-breasted women have is severe back pain, so much so that it is the primary reason women request breast-reduction surgery. The typical size of the breasts in these cases are usually not statistical outliers in terms of size. Furthermore, if you've actually talked with women before, you'd know that trying to run, jump, or even go down a flight of stairs with just averaged sized breasts is physically painful and encumbering.

In fact, human beasts are bizarre in that they are the only mammary gland in Primates that both develops independently of becoming pregnant and stays even after breastfeeding is stopped. Do you know why breasts in other primates and most other mammals go away when they aren't needed? Because they're useless and obtrusive, yet here we are. Evolution. Our baseline breasts are biologically disadvantuous and, frankly, a mystery to evolutionary biologists, but life finds a way.

*Tips fedora*
---

Pogo_Marimo posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

EpicMickeyDrew posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

That is not the baseline for the evolution of the human race

What is the baseline?

ImmatureContent posted...

I doubt women have significantly evolved since then to adapt to a necessity for wearing bras.

We haven't evolved to need medicine but it certainly helps.

The baseline is a typical human sans any sort of rare conditions. And yes, we have always needed medicine. The fact that we didn't have medicine in the past doesn't mean we didn't need it. It just means we died because we didn't have it yet.

Look, you guys can just admit you own stock in a bra company. No one will judge you... much.

Oh jeez, this is embarassing. Listen buddy, do you talk to women? Because an extremely common issue large-breasted women have is severe back pain, so much so that it is the primary reason women request breast-reduction surgery. The typical size of the breasts in these cases are usually not statistical outliers in terms of size. Furthermore, if you've actually talked with women before, you'd know that trying to run, jump, or even go down a flight of stairs with just averaged sized breasts is physically painful and encumbering.

In fact, human beasts are bizarre in that they are the only mammary gland in Primates that both develops independently of becoming pregnant and stays even after breastfeeding is stopped. Do you know why breasts in other primates and most other mammals go away when they aren't needed? Because they're useless and obtrusive, yet here we are. Evolution. Our baseline breasts are biologically disadvantuous and, frankly, a mystery to evolutionary biologists, but life finds a way.

I would not call being sexually appealing a useless piece of evolution

There's lots of parts to life that serve no purpose except to attract a mate. Maintaining boob size outside of breast feeding may just be that

kayoticdreamz posted...

Pogo_Marimo posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

EpicMickeyDrew posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

That is not the baseline for the evolution of the human race

What is the baseline?

ImmatureContent posted...

I doubt women have significantly evolved since then to adapt to a necessity for wearing bras.

We haven't evolved to need medicine but it certainly helps.

The baseline is a typical human sans any sort of rare conditions. And yes, we have always needed medicine. The fact that we didn't have medicine in the past doesn't mean we didn't need it. It just means we died because we didn't have it yet.

Look, you guys can just admit you own stock in a bra company. No one will judge you... much.

Oh jeez, this is embarassing. Listen buddy, do you talk to women? Because an extremely common issue large-breasted women have is severe back pain, so much so that it is the primary reason women request breast-reduction surgery. The typical size of the breasts in these cases are usually not statistical outliers in terms of size. Furthermore, if you've actually talked with women before, you'd know that trying to run, jump, or even go down a flight of stairs with just averaged sized breasts is physically painful and encumbering.

In fact, human beasts are bizarre in that they are the only mammary gland in Primates that both develops independently of becoming pregnant and stays even after breastfeeding is stopped. Do you know why breasts in other primates and most other mammals go away when they aren't needed? Because they're useless and obtrusive, yet here we are. Evolution. Our baseline breasts are biologically disadvantuous and, frankly, a mystery to evolutionary biologists, but life finds a way.

I would not call being sexually appealing a useless piece of evolution

There's lots of parts to life that serve no purpose except to attract a mate. Maintaining boob size outside of breast feeding may just be that

Yes, but why is that sexually appealing as opposed to traits that actually benefit survival?
---

Pogo_Marimo posted...

*Tips fedora*

you wear a fedora?

If Seinfeld has taught me anything, it would probably cause car accidents ... or prevent car accidents. You know, what, I gotta go watch Seinfeld again.

A lot of back pain.

Pogo_Marimo posted...

kayoticdreamz posted...

Pogo_Marimo posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

EpicMickeyDrew posted...

ImmatureContent posted...

That is not the baseline for the evolution of the human race

What is the baseline?

ImmatureContent posted...

I doubt women have significantly evolved since then to adapt to a necessity for wearing bras.

We haven't evolved to need medicine but it certainly helps.

The baseline is a typical human sans any sort of rare conditions. And yes, we have always needed medicine. The fact that we didn't have medicine in the past doesn't mean we didn't need it. It just means we died because we didn't have it yet.

Look, you guys can just admit you own stock in a bra company. No one will judge you... much.

Oh jeez, this is embarassing. Listen buddy, do you talk to women? Because an extremely common issue large-breasted women have is severe back pain, so much so that it is the primary reason women request breast-reduction surgery. The typical size of the breasts in these cases are usually not statistical outliers in terms of size. Furthermore, if you've actually talked with women before, you'd know that trying to run, jump, or even go down a flight of stairs with just averaged sized breasts is physically painful and encumbering.

In fact, human beasts are bizarre in that they are the only mammary gland in Primates that both develops independently of becoming pregnant and stays even after breastfeeding is stopped. Do you know why breasts in other primates and most other mammals go away when they aren't needed? Because they're useless and obtrusive, yet here we are. Evolution. Our baseline breasts are biologically disadvantuous and, frankly, a mystery to evolutionary biologists, but life finds a way.

I would not call being sexually appealing a useless piece of evolution

There's lots of parts to life that serve no purpose except to attract a mate. Maintaining boob size outside of breast feeding may just be that

Yes, but why is that sexually appealing as opposed to traits that actually benefit survival?

nature be weird bruh
---

catboy0_0 posted...

KILBOTz posted...

there would be an epidemic of droopy boobs. no one wants that.

this

Evolution is not about survival. It is about passing on your genes. An animal that lives a long life due to excellent survival skills, but never manages to mate, will not pass on any of those survival traits to future generations. Evolution is not about a species advancing into something better. That is just a potential byproduct. Evolution is simply the changes a species has overtime due to hereditary traits being passed on. Logic would suggest that positive traits tend to be passed on, because the organisms with the most positive traits would be the ones to thrive. But ecological phenomenons could also affect evolution. Living in an environment with few natural predators and an abundant food supply would allow animals in that area to pass on their genes at uncommon rate.

And yes, some women have back pain due to large breasts. I never debated this. Lots of men have back pain, too. Back pain is actually pretty common and for lots more reasons than just having large breasts. It doesn't mean that all women require bras, which is all I ever claimed in the first place.
---

What an odd topic.
---

Kitt posted...

What an odd topic.

Look at the TC.
---