Current Events > Lady who snitched on black Metro worker suing publisher after book cancellation

Topic List
Page List: 1, 2
FrisbeeDude
06/09/19 5:26:57 PM
#1:


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/tasneemnashrulla/dc-metro-writer-tweet-eating-train-book-sue-publisher?__twitter_impression=true

Before May 10, Natasha Tynes, a Jordanian American writer, a mother of three, the sole breadwinner of her family of five, and a communications officer for World Bank Group, was looking forward to the June release of her new book, They Called Me Wyatt. Shed worked on it for four years.

Then, on May 10, Tynes a self-described social media maven tweeted a photo of a black DC Metro employee eating on a train, calling her out for breaking the transit authoritys rules.

The tweet went viral, inviting fierce backlash from people accusing Tynes of being anti-black, entitled, and a terrible person.

The subsequent uproar over her tweet cost Tynes her original book deal and pushed her to the brink of suicide, according to a new lawsuit Tynes filed against Rare Bird Books, the publisher for her book about the murder of a Jordanian student in Maryland.

Tynes is suing Rare Bird Books for $13 million, alleging, among other things, that the California-based company breached its contract and defamed her with false public statements that caused her extreme emotional distress.

According to the lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of California, Tynes was hospitalized with chest pains and anxiety and was forced to temporarily leave the US after her family was subjected to death threats and racial slurs in the tweets aftermath.

The lawsuit said that the issue of race did not occur to Tynes, an immigrant woman of color with a prominent accent, when she sent her tweet.

In a statement on Sunday, David Eisen, an attorney for Rare Bird Books, called Tynes' lawsuit "baseless."

Referring to the $13 million Tynes was seeking in damages, Eisen said that less than 50 copies of her books had been pre-ordered and "only a few hundred scheduled to be printed."

"It is ironic that, having taken advantage of her First Amendment rights with an ill-advised tweet, Ms. Tynes now seeks to stifle and punish use of those very same rights of a respected book publisher who legitimately expressed its opinions of her conduct, rather than take responsibility for her own actions," Eisen's statement said. "Ms. Tynes would have been better served to have simply let this episode disappear into the annals of history," he said.

The union for Metro workers at the time said riders like Tynes are often unaware that bus operators have an average of 20 minutes to eat and get to their next access point to ensure buses and trains run on time. The unidentified Metro worker did not face any disciplinary action for eating on the train, but was hurt and embarrassed for being blasted on social media, according to her union representative.

Tynes said her schedule, as a novelist and mother of three young children with a day job, meant that she often did not get a chance to eat before work and commuted on an empty stomach for fear of being ticketed by a Metro employee for eating on the train, according to the lawsuit.

After the furor over her tweet, Tynes deleted it and issued an apology. She later deactivated her Twitter account and took down her personal website.

Soon after her tweet started getting attention, Tynes informed her publishers that she had contacted WMATA to ensure that they would not discipline the Metro worker, the lawsuit said.

She explained to her publishers that having not grown up in the United States, the issue of race had not even occurred to her when she made the tweet.

But in the midst of the Twitter outrage, Rare Bird Books issued a statement announcing that it had canceled her books distribution because Tynes did something truly horrible today.


Lmao tried to get a black women fired, only to her own world crumble. Get rekt
---
If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me
... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral
06/09/19 5:30:58 PM
#2:


So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?
---
- The Admiral
... Copied to Clipboard!
RiderofHogs
06/09/19 5:31:36 PM
#3:


FrisbeeDude posted...
The union for Metro workers at the time said riders like Tynes are often unaware that bus operators have an average of 20 minutes to eat and get to their next access point to ensure buses and trains run on time.

Plenty of people have to live by shitty rules like that and can barely find time to eat, so if they have to obey the rules than so should the workers. It is only fair.
---
I'll be riding shotgun, underneath the hot sun,
Feeling like a someone.
... Copied to Clipboard!
HHH is the game
06/09/19 5:32:55 PM
#4:


What does that have to do with her race though?
---
Shelton undoubtedly wants Cena's championship belt. And Cena undoubtedly wants Shelton's black heritage.- looseiver
... Copied to Clipboard!
NES4EVER
06/09/19 5:34:40 PM
#5:


The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


Oh Jesus that's your takeaway from this?
---
nu-horsemen 4evar
[A GameFAQs Moderator was deleted by this message]
... Copied to Clipboard!
VipaGTS
06/09/19 5:35:26 PM
#6:


NES4EVER posted...
The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


Oh Jesus that's your takeaway from this?

Dont feed him.
---
"I devour urine just like my Portland Trailblazers, with piss poor defense."
... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude
06/09/19 5:35:44 PM
#7:


The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


According to her Union, essentially, not really

https://thetakeout.com/natasha-tynes-metro-worker-eating-train-tweet-book-1834721870

The response was swift, and not in the way Tynes probably expected. While Metro rules do ban eating and drinking on trains, the union representing transit workers cites a May 8 email from Metro Transit Police Chief Ron Pavlik that instructed officers to cease and desist from issuing criminal citations in the District of Columbia for fare evasion; eating; drinking; spitting, and playing musical instruments without headphones until further advised. Basically, the email seems to de-prioritize these minor infractions in favor of policing presumably more important matters. The union further told The Washington Post that the employee was on a break, during which workers have an average of 20 minutes to consume a meal and get to their next access point. Not mentioned but clearly implied: Cut the worker some slack, eh?
---
If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me
... Copied to Clipboard!
Gamerguymass
06/09/19 5:36:30 PM
#9:


So if the train employee was white it would have been ok? We're just not allowed to critisize or point out wrong doing by any black person now?

I don't think she should have posted the picture in the first place, it was kind of an ass thing to do, but to say she deserved to be subject to racial slurs and death threats and having her book cancelled is fucking absurd.
---
Now Playing: "The Hunt for the Two Missing Nintendo 64 Games"
An expansion came out, but I'm still a third of the way through!
... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral
06/09/19 5:37:02 PM
#10:


FrisbeeDude posted...
The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


According to her Union, essentially, not really

https://thetakeout.com/natasha-tynes-metro-worker-eating-train-tweet-book-1834721870

The response was swift, and not in the way Tynes probably expected. While Metro rules do ban eating and drinking on trains, the union representing transit workers cites a May 8 email from Metro Transit Police Chief Ron Pavlik that instructed officers to cease and desist from issuing criminal citations in the District of Columbia for fare evasion; eating; drinking; spitting, and playing musical instruments without headphones until further advised. Basically, the email seems to de-prioritize these minor infractions in favor of policing presumably more important matters. The union further told The Washington Post that the employee was on a break, during which workers have an average of 20 minutes to consume a meal and get to their next access point. Not mentioned but clearly implied: Cut the worker some slack, eh?


Okay, so then the tweet was fucked up and inappropriate. Author should have apologized.

With that said, I don't really see the racial angle here. Nor do I see why this woman should lose a book deal over it.
---
- The Admiral
... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger
06/09/19 5:37:05 PM
#11:


VipaGTS posted...
NES4EVER posted...
The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


Oh Jesus that's your takeaway from this?

Dont feed him.

this

but also...

FrisbeeDude posted...
The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


According to her Union, essentially, not really

https://thetakeout.com/natasha-tynes-metro-worker-eating-train-tweet-book-1834721870

The response was swift, and not in the way Tynes probably expected. While Metro rules do ban eating and drinking on trains, the union representing transit workers cites a May 8 email from Metro Transit Police Chief Ron Pavlik that instructed officers to cease and desist from issuing criminal citations in the District of Columbia for fare evasion; eating; drinking; spitting, and playing musical instruments without headphones until further advised. Basically, the email seems to de-prioritize these minor infractions in favor of policing presumably more important matters. The union further told The Washington Post that the employee was on a break, during which workers have an average of 20 minutes to consume a meal and get to their next access point. Not mentioned but clearly implied: Cut the worker some slack, eh?

admiral fails again
---
-Only dead fish swim with the current
http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html
... Copied to Clipboard!
#12
Post #12 was unavailable or deleted.
alimajor
06/09/19 5:47:36 PM
#13:


The Admiral posted...
FrisbeeDude posted...
The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


According to her Union, essentially, not really

https://thetakeout.com/natasha-tynes-metro-worker-eating-train-tweet-book-1834721870

The response was swift, and not in the way Tynes probably expected. While Metro rules do ban eating and drinking on trains, the union representing transit workers cites a May 8 email from Metro Transit Police Chief Ron Pavlik that instructed officers to cease and desist from issuing criminal citations in the District of Columbia for fare evasion; eating; drinking; spitting, and playing musical instruments without headphones until further advised. Basically, the email seems to de-prioritize these minor infractions in favor of policing presumably more important matters. The union further told The Washington Post that the employee was on a break, during which workers have an average of 20 minutes to consume a meal and get to their next access point. Not mentioned but clearly implied: Cut the worker some slack, eh?


Okay, so then the tweet was fucked up and inappropriate. Author should have apologized.

With that said, I don't really see the racial angle here. Nor do I see why this woman should lose a book deal over it.


There is no racial angle but that was still a s***** thing for her to do. I dont think her career should be ruined but at the same time I dont really feel bad for either since her wound was self inflicted. She wasnt being a good citizen she was just being a Karen
... Copied to Clipboard!
rexcrk
06/09/19 5:50:18 PM
#14:


M_Live posted...
I mean, she really is a shithead for getting mad about a guy for eating on a train. The hell does that matter?

Honestly this is my takeaway too. Mind your business and stop trying to create controversy.
---
These pretzels are making me thirsty!
... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude
06/09/19 5:53:16 PM
#15:


rexcrk posted...
M_Live posted...
I mean, she really is a shithead for getting mad about a guy for eating on a train. The hell does that matter?

Honestly this is my takeaway too. Mind your business and stop trying to create controversy.


She tried to get this woman in trouble and potentially fuck her money up. Black women already have to put up with too much shit, so I'm happy this BBQ Becky, in turn, saw her money get fucked up
---
If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me
... Copied to Clipboard!
Siaperaz
06/09/19 5:53:41 PM
#16:


Lucky woman is going to earn millions from that shitty publisher now.
---
GO KNICKS!!!
... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck
06/09/19 5:56:15 PM
#17:


Siaperaz posted...
Lucky woman is going to earn millions from that shitty publisher now.

Shes not
---
All Hail King Connor!
Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy
... Copied to Clipboard!
Esrac
06/09/19 5:56:25 PM
#18:


FrisbeeDude posted...
The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


According to her Union, essentially, not really

https://thetakeout.com/natasha-tynes-metro-worker-eating-train-tweet-book-1834721870

The response was swift, and not in the way Tynes probably expected. While Metro rules do ban eating and drinking on trains, the union representing transit workers cites a May 8 email from Metro Transit Police Chief Ron Pavlik that instructed officers to cease and desist from issuing criminal citations in the District of Columbia for fare evasion; eating; drinking; spitting, and playing musical instruments without headphones until further advised. Basically, the email seems to de-prioritize these minor infractions in favor of policing presumably more important matters. The union further told The Washington Post that the employee was on a break, during which workers have an average of 20 minutes to consume a meal and get to their next access point. Not mentioned but clearly implied: Cut the worker some slack, eh?


Sounds more like "yeah, it's against the rules, but we're looking the other way on it". And how is a random rider supposed to know that?

Tynes did nothing wrong.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude
06/09/19 5:58:51 PM
#19:


Sounds more like "yeah, it's against the rules, but we're looking the other way on it". And how is a random rider supposed to know that?

Tynes did nothing wrong.


If she was so vigilant about Metro policy, she shoulda done her research. Nah, she was mad she was dismissed and decided to try and fuck with this black women's livelihood. Fuck her.
---
If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kastrada
06/09/19 6:20:56 PM
#20:


VipaGTS posted...
NES4EVER posted...
The Admiral posted...
So was it actually against the rules for that woman to be eating on the subway?


Oh Jesus that's your takeaway from this?

Dont feed him.


Good guy Vipey not wanting Admiral getting fired from his metro job.
---
PoW '09 Topic of the Year Co-Winners (Rada and Texy) FFD
... Copied to Clipboard!
eston
06/09/19 6:27:09 PM
#21:


My understanding from friends who've lived in DC is that in the past, the no eating rule has been very harshly enforced to the point of basically being unreasonable. So to see an employee doing it and suffer no consequences is like a kick in the teeth
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
MacadamianNut3
06/09/19 6:28:31 PM
#22:


Literally every single time I take the DC metro someone is eating or drinking something on it

Just another case of when not minding your own fucking business backfires

I also find the harshly enforced thing hard to believe since another rule is to not play music or musical instruments without headphones in the train cars, yet that doesn't seem to affect the rando performers in the downtown stops that hop on and do whatever for 1-2 stops. And that is way more obvious than someone eating or drinking something
---
Roll Tide & Go Irish
... Copied to Clipboard!
ZeroKelvin
06/09/19 6:36:42 PM
#23:


How the fuck did race come into this story in the first place? It doesnt sound like she implied anything negative about the persons race in her ill-advised tweet. Apparently the outraged idiots think criticizing a black person automatically = racism which is dumb as fuck.
... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl
06/09/19 6:44:11 PM
#24:


Remember, don't snitch. Especially if it's not your job and nobody's being hurt by it.
---
Pew pew!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten
06/09/19 6:46:06 PM
#25:


I think people are overreacting to her tweet. Everything is about fucking race now. And now an immigrant woman's life is ruined just cause she took a picture without knowing the sacred rules of modern American society

Pretty fucking messed up that she almost killed herself and we have like TC saying "lol get rekt"

I say for shame on anyone who mocks this woman. We are always told you can't eat on a bus. How was she supposed to know that the company had put out a rule saying drivers can quickly eat?

The drivers job was never in jeopardy and i don't think she was trying to get anyone fired. Just complain. Is that worth her death?
... Copied to Clipboard!
K181
06/09/19 6:46:47 PM
#26:


Yeah, how the fuck is this an issue? Dumb thing to tweet over, but how the hell is the takeaway racist?
---
Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less.
... Copied to Clipboard!
KarmaMuffin
06/09/19 7:20:02 PM
#27:


Without knowing anything else about her, I don't think she's racist, just an idiot who deserves to fade into obscurity. The kind of person who gets pissed off enough to tweet and take a picture of a person doing something that harms no one, solely for the fact that she's upset it's against policy, is the kind of person who should get fucked over on a book deal.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten
06/09/19 7:24:15 PM
#28:


KarmaMuffin posted...
solely for the fact that she's upset it's against policy, is the kind of person who should get fucked over on a book deal.

I dont know about that. she worked on it for like 4 years and poured her soul into it and it sounds like it's a worthy cause. it's about a true murder I think or something. she sounds like a good person. I wouldn't have done what she did but that's cause I am shy and avoid confrontation but I would have been annoyed that they don't let us eat on the bus but they can. and I don't think she was trying to get the driver fired. was just venting on a random tweet and didn't expect it to get so famous. and we now know the job was never in jeopardy. the company told the driver they can eat. so the tweet would have literally done nothing. she didn't hurt anyone

on the flip side, a minor little venting tweet ruined her life and almost ended her life. just cause people get so upset these days and want revenge for everything. she barely scratches and they want to slaughter her.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
06/09/19 7:26:28 PM
#29:


Shes a terrible person no doubt. She should just fuck off. Even in the slim chance shes not a racist.
---
Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kastrada
06/09/19 7:30:44 PM
#30:


Zikten posted...
KarmaMuffin posted...
solely for the fact that she's upset it's against policy, is the kind of person who should get fucked over on a book deal.

I dont know about that. she worked on it for like 4 years and poured her soul into it and it sounds like it's a worthy cause. it's about a true murder I think or something. she sounds like a good person. I wouldn't have done what she did but that's cause I am shy and avoid confrontation but I would have been annoyed that they don't let us eat on the bus but they can. and I don't think she was trying to get the driver fired. was just venting on a random tweet and didn't expect it to get so famous. and we now know the job was never in jeopardy. the company told the driver they can eat. so the tweet would have literally done nothing. she didn't hurt anyone

on the flip side, a minor little venting tweet ruined her life and almost ended her life. just cause people get so upset these days and want revenge for everything. she barely scratches and they want to slaughter her.


It's a piece of fiction. The murdered woman resurrects into the body of a child or something.

And we know now that the driver is fine. But the woman never knew that when she posted that rant. Venting is one thing but the recording and posting of the driver is entirely different. Common sense should factor in that by the author doing that, she was jeopardizing that woman's job.
---
PoW '09 Topic of the Year Co-Winners (Rada and Texy) FFD
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten
06/09/19 7:31:59 PM
#31:


Rika_Furude posted...
Even in the slim chance shes not a racist.

she's not a white american. she's a Jordanian immigrant

and why is she a terrible person? what was so horrible about what she did? I already debunked any of the reasons why people would be mad.

the driver was never going to be fired. the job was not at risk

she is not a white nazi lady. she's from Jordan

she doesn't understand the race clash between white and black people. and doesn't get that in modern america everyone freaks out when you scold a black person

she saw the driver as a human being, not a black person

it was just a venting tweet that she didn't expect to gain traction and she meant nothing by it. she was just annoyed that the driver gets to eat but we can't

now tell me why she deserves to die and have her life's work ruined?
... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck
06/09/19 7:32:16 PM
#32:


Zikten posted...
it sounds like it's a worthy cause. it's about a true murder I think or something.


---
All Hail King Connor!
Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy
... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy
06/09/19 7:41:58 PM
#33:


Good, I hope she wins and gets to publish her book.
---
"How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot? V-E-G-Y https://imgur.com/AqR3aeX https://imgur.com/vvuUXpp https://i.imgtc.com/lyRboFN.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten
06/09/19 7:42:45 PM
#34:


I thought about it some more and the tweet was probably more aimed at the bus company than the driver in the photo. she just used the driver to make a point and the driver represents the company
... Copied to Clipboard!
VipaGTS
06/09/19 7:54:14 PM
#35:


The tweet wasnt aimed at anyone. She was just being an insufferable person and hoped everyone would give her the positive attention she was seeking and it backfired on her. If she really cares about the rules of the metro then take it up with the station, theres no need to put someone on blast on social media. Also Im sure shes seen other rules broken but only decided to act on this one? She just seems bitter about something. Maybe she was told not to eat, saw that and decided to be obnoxious about it.
---
"I devour urine just like my Portland Trailblazers, with piss poor defense."
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten
06/09/19 7:55:16 PM
#36:


well that doesn't make her deserve to die. people are being too harsh on her. like I said, she made a light scratch. and they fight back by wanting to disembowel her
... Copied to Clipboard!
#37
Post #37 was unavailable or deleted.
fuzzylittlbunny
06/09/19 8:09:06 PM
#38:


It annoys me when people break the rules of the bus. When they chew loudly then stuff their rubbish between the sides of the seats. Or when they exit through the front door rather than the rear one(s), backing up the people trying to board. Or when they fucking FaceTime. And especially that one super inconsiderate jerkwad who was playing a goddamn electric piano. I mean it had to have a headphone jack, but he chooses to just play it out loud? And if it didn't, then all the more reason to just wait until he got to his destination <_<

These people all annoy me so much...But I've never been the type to take pictures to post on social media. Although looking back on it, if I had another chance, I may be tempted to do so with that douche with the electric piano.
---
( ^_^)/\(^_^ )
Maya high five!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rebel_Patriot
06/09/19 8:17:09 PM
#39:


No one did anything wrong but the publisher. Hope the have to pay out the ass.
---
Horses?! We can't afford t'lose no horses!
... Copied to Clipboard!
#40
Post #40 was unavailable or deleted.
#41
Post #41 was unavailable or deleted.
Smashingpmkns
06/09/19 8:25:47 PM
#42:


She should have minded her own damn business
---
Clean Butt Crew
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten
06/09/19 8:25:49 PM
#43:


metallica846 posted...
F*** her book and her for getting angry at someone eating. My god. 13 million!?!? BAHAHAHAH this gets thrown out in 3.2.1....

thanks for providing a proof of what I am saying about overreaction

you are out for blood over a tiny little offense. she barely did anything at all and you want to destroy her entire life over it. grow up
... Copied to Clipboard!
#44
Post #44 was unavailable or deleted.
Zikten
06/09/19 8:33:45 PM
#45:


metallica846 posted...
"Hey aren't you the person who screamed at a person for trying to eat her lunch!?"


it wasn't a scream. it was a tongue in cheek tweet just mentioning hypocrisy about the bus company.

and fuck your life lesson

SHE DOES NOT DESERVE TO DIE BECAUSE ONE TWEET THAT WASN"T EVEN THAT BAD

I am defending her because she almost killed herself and I feel bad for her and I think people like you are torturing her over a thing that was not even bad. she did nothing wrong. and you are being cruel
... Copied to Clipboard!
#46
Post #46 was unavailable or deleted.
Zikten
06/09/19 8:38:17 PM
#47:


it wasn't stupid shit. her tweet was fine and I defend what she said. they are hypocrites to tell us we can't eat but they can. fuck that bus company. she did nothing wrong. and I said die because she almost died over this. because people like you can't fucking let it go. you have to whine and ruin her life. when you could just ignore it and do nothing. she didn't hurt anyone.
... Copied to Clipboard!
monkeysRfunny
06/09/19 8:40:04 PM
#48:


Zikten posted...
she didn't hurt anyone.

But the worker was "hurt and embarrassed". Gotta remember feelings.
---
The story of your fighting is a poem of two words: you suck.
... Copied to Clipboard!
MelzezDoor
06/09/19 8:40:46 PM
#49:


Snitched on someone for eating? Would she notify the authorities if she saw someone outside a pool of lava if it were against policy? Saying the worker's job wasn't at risk is a terrible argument. We have no idea how the company would have reacted.

God I enjoyed this article. What a terrible person. I'm glad it escalated as there was absolutely no reason for her to attempt to ruin someone's livelihood over something like hunger. I noticed it doesn't mention her age but how old do you have to be to have a sliver of empathy jfc.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten
06/09/19 8:43:04 PM
#50:


MelzezDoor posted...
We have no idea how the company would have reacted.

it says in the story that they gave the driver permission long before this happened to eat. the woman didn't know this. but I still say she wasn't trying to get anyone fired.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Comfy_Pillow
06/09/19 8:44:20 PM
#51:


So eating on the job outside of a scheduled break is okay now according to CE?

There was nothing wrong with her tweet.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1, 2