Current Events > Moral Dilemma: What do you do if you have proof but it has sensitive material.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Like say you have video footage Donald Trump bribing foreign officials over the phone but it was taken illegally while he was having sex with Miranda Trump.

And to show the footage you have to reveal you took it illegally and in order to show the proof you'd have to expose esstentially a sex tape of an innocent girl?

Or say you have files that show a huge company commiting massive counts of fraud but the files also contain millions of people's private info, banking data, addresses, Netflix passwords etc.

I mean you're in danger if you don't do whatever you're going to do anonymously but anonymously giving the data to the authorities will just probably mean the data is hidden, never revealed later destroyed since the people in power own the authorities ultimately.

However you will hurt people if you go public.
---

DO you want to live or die? In this situation you can show proof and nothing will come out of it do to his power but you will commit suicide with a snapped neck
---

I think you have the moral obligation to society to not show Trump's flubby body flailing around trying to figure out how to have consensual sex so you turn it into a sound file instead.
---