Current Events > How can Democrats even pretend to have the moral high ground right now?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
Iodine 05/02/20 4:32:33 PM #101:	Smashingpmkns posted... https://twitter.com/ReadeAlexandra/status/1256672559396864001 Ok now this is interesting. --- In Belichick we Trust <cite>Iodine posted [p:938496381] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Smashingpmkns posted... </cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/ReadeAlexandra/status/1256672559396864001</quote>Ok now this is interesting. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Spellcaster 05/02/20 4:33:48 PM #102:	"Our fake news about Biden having dementia didn't work, let's smear him some more with allegations!" -guys who have been defending Donald "Grab Em By the [BLANK]" Trump for 4 years. --- i am goatthief hear me roar i know people say a lot of mean things about me, many of them untrue. If you want to know me, message me. Don't believe the lies. <cite>Spellcaster posted [p:938496424] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>"Our fake news about Biden having dementia didn't work, let's smear him some more with allegations!" -guys who have been defending Donald "Grab Em By the [BLANK]" Trump for 4 years. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 05/02/20 4:36:07 PM #103:	Spellcaster posted... "Our fake news about Biden having dementia didn't work, let's smear him some more with allegations!" -guys who have been defending Donald "Grab Em By the [BLANK]" Trump for 4 years. But both our 2020 Presidential candidates do have dying brains and should be removed from consideration immediately and permanently. Just because Trump supporters don't have self awareness to criticize Trump doesn't mean we should accept old, senile fucks for President. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:938496543] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Spellcaster posted... </cite> <quote>"Our fake news about Biden having dementia didn't work, let's smear him some more with allegations!" -guys who have been defending Donald "Grab Em By the [BLANK]" Trump for 4 years.</quote>But both our 2020 Presidential candidates do have dying brains and should be removed from consideration immediately and permanently. Just because Trump supporters don't have self awareness to criticize Trump doesn't mean we should accept old, senile fucks for President. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
tennisdude818 05/02/20 4:37:22 PM #104:	Democrats are so confident in their moral high ground that they have anointed themselves as the only people who can decide when due process is allowed and when a rape accusation can be questioned. They dont need intellectual consistency because they just know better. --- "Those who need leaders are not qualified to choose them." -Michael Malice <cite>tennisdude818 posted [p:938496619] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Democrats are so confident in their moral high ground that they have anointed themselves as the only people who can decide when due process is allowed and when a rape accusation can be questioned. They dont need intellectual consistency because they just know better. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 05/02/20 4:39:51 PM #105:	tennisdude818 posted... Democrats are so confident in their moral high ground that they have anointed themselves as the only people who can decide when due process is allowed and when a rape accusation can be questioned. Your orange god is a rapist --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:938496768] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>tennisdude818 posted... </cite> <quote>Democrats are so confident in their moral high ground that they have anointed themselves as the only people who can decide when due process is allowed and when a rape accusation can be questioned.</quote>Your orange god is a rapist </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenRoar 05/02/20 4:40:38 PM #106:	Tyranthraxus posted... And I don't care about Biden's refusal to commit to anything. It's not his decision to keep the University docs sealed. Launch an investigation and open it up anyway. During Fridays interview, *Brzezinski pressed Biden to call on the University of Delaware to release his work papers just in case Reades complaint was there, rather than at the National Archives. Biden declined* You were saying? <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:938496819] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>And I don't care about Biden's refusal to commit to anything. It's not his decision to keep the University docs sealed. Launch an investigation and open it up anyway.</quote> During Fridays interview, Brzezinski pressed Biden to call on the University of Delaware to release his work papers just in case Reades complaint was there, rather than at the National Archives. Biden declined You were saying? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 05/02/20 4:43:24 PM #107:	HiddenRoar posted... During Fridays interview, *Brzezinski pressed Biden to call on the University of Delaware to release his work papers just in case Reades complaint was there, rather than at the National Archives. Biden declined* You were saying? I was saying what I already said in the post you quoted. If the Senate launched an investigation like they should, they wouldn't need to ask Biden anything. Launch an investigation and open it up anyway. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:938496989] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>HiddenRoar posted... </cite> <quote>During Fridays interview, Brzezinski pressed Biden to call on the University of Delaware to release his work papers just in case Reades complaint was there, rather than at the National Archives. Biden declined You were saying?</quote> I was saying what I already said in the post you quoted. If the Senate launched an investigation like they should, they wouldn't need to ask Biden anything. <quote>Launch an investigation and open it up anyway.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenRoar 05/02/20 4:49:17 PM #108:	Tyranthraxus posted... If the Senate launched an investigation like they should, they wouldn't need to ask Biden anything. Explain what jurisdiction they have to be able to do so? Because they don't. <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:938497336] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>If the Senate launched an investigation like they should, they wouldn't need to ask Biden anything.</quote> Explain what jurisdiction they have to be able to do so? Because they don't. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 05/02/20 4:50:43 PM #109:	HiddenRoar posted... Explain what jurisdiction they have to be able to do so? Because they don't. The exact same jurisdiction they used to unanimously appoint Mueller as special prosecutor. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:938497405] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>HiddenRoar posted... </cite> <quote>Explain what jurisdiction they have to be able to do so? Because they don't.</quote> The exact same jurisdiction they used to unanimously appoint Mueller as special prosecutor. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 05/02/20 4:51:46 PM #110:	Dunno why a Republican majority Senate would open up the investigation before the convention. --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:938497461] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Dunno why a Republican majority Senate would open up the investigation before the convention.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenRoar 05/02/20 5:00:20 PM #111:	Tyranthraxus posted... The exact same jurisdiction they used to unanimously appoint Mueller as special prosecutor. There's a difference between a Federal branch of the government appointing an individual to rummage through federal offices for information, and being able to do so against an academic institution that's not inherently part of the government. <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:938497890] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote> The exact same jurisdiction they used to unanimously appoint Mueller as special prosecutor.</quote> There's a difference between a Federal branch of the government appointing an individual to rummage through federal offices for information, and being able to do so against an academic institution that's not inherently part of the government. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 05/02/20 5:05:23 PM #112:	HiddenRoar posted... There's a difference between a Federal branch of the government appointing an individual to rummage through federal offices for information, and being able to do so against an academic institution that's not inherently part of the government. This isn't "rummaging" I'm talking about a literal investigation with a prosecutor and warrants and subpoenas and so on. If Mitch has time to confirm more shit ass judges he's got time to appoint a special prosecutor. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:938498108] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>HiddenRoar posted... </cite> <quote>There's a difference between a Federal branch of the government appointing an individual to rummage through federal offices for information, and being able to do so against an academic institution that's not inherently part of the government.</quote> This isn't "rummaging" I'm talking about a literal investigation with a prosecutor and warrants and subpoenas and so on. If Mitch has time to confirm more shit ass judges he's got time to appoint a special prosecutor. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenRoar 05/02/20 5:15:04 PM #113:	Tyranthraxus posted... I'm talking about a literal investigation with a prosecutor and warrants and subpoenas and so on. The statue of limitations has expired. No judge is going to issue a warrant/subpoena when there's technically no "active" crime. Are you even paying attention or what? <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:938498622] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote> I'm talking about a literal investigation with a prosecutor and warrants and subpoenas and so on.</quote> The statue of limitations has expired. No judge is going to issue a warrant/subpoena when there's technically no "active" crime. Are you even paying attention or what? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 05/02/20 5:17:09 PM #114:	HiddenRoar posted... The statue of limitations has expired. No judge is going to issue a warrant/subpoena when there's technically no "active" crime. Are you even paying attention or what? Literally doesn't matter. You conduct an investigation and then at the end of it write "we determined there was considerable evidence Biden assaulted Tara but due to statute of limitations no charges can be filed." --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:938498756] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>HiddenRoar posted... </cite> <quote>The statue of limitations has expired. No judge is going to issue a warrant/subpoena when there's technically no "active" crime. Are you even paying attention or what?</quote> Literally doesn't matter. You conduct an investigation and then at the end of it write "we determined there was considerable evidence Biden assaulted Tara but due to statute of limitations no charges can be filed." </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenRoar 05/02/20 5:24:10 PM #115:	Tyranthraxus posted... Literally doesn't matter. You conduct an investigation and then at the end of it write "we determined there was considerable evidence Biden assaulted Tara but due to statute of limitations no charges can be filed." How can you conduct an investigation if the courts won't give the investigator a subpoena to go through documents at UD (because there exists no legal reason to grant one)? Holy ***** are you not able to follow. <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:938499160] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote> Literally doesn't matter. You conduct an investigation and then at the end of it write "we determined there was considerable evidence Biden assaulted Tara but due to statute of limitations no charges can be filed."</quote> How can you conduct an investigation if the courts won't give the investigator a subpoena to go through documents at UD (because there exists no legal reason to grant one)? Holy *** ** are you not able to follow. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 05/02/20 5:25:25 PM #116:	HiddenRoar posted... How can you conduct an investigation if the courts won't give the investigator a subpoena to go through documents at UD (because there exists no legal reason to grant one)? Holy ***** ** are you not able to follow. What courts? this would be done on authority of the DoJ and Barr. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:938499235] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>HiddenRoar posted... </cite> <quote>How can you conduct an investigation if the courts won't give the investigator a subpoena to go through documents at UD (because there exists no legal reason to grant one)? Holy ***** ** are you not able to follow.</quote>What courts? this would be done on authority of the DoJ and Barr. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenRoar 05/02/20 5:26:30 PM #117:	Tyranthraxus posted... What courts? this would be done on authority of the DoJ and Barr. It's clear you're trolling. <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:938499311] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>What courts? this would be done on authority of the DoJ and Barr.</quote> It's clear you're trolling. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
closetjpopfan 05/02/20 7:12:42 PM #118:	Because Democrats do not support Donald Trump. Well, that was easy. <cite>closetjpopfan posted [p:938504609] in How can De... [t:78650186]...</cite> <quote>Because Democrats do not support Donald Trump. Well, that was easy. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > How can Democrats even pretend to have the moral high ground right now? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > How can Democrats even pretend to have the moral high ground right now?