Current Events > Are you being suppressed from voting?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Since many claim voter ID laws are voter suppression, etc. I am curious how many on this board are actually unable to vote from current laws in their states/localities.

---

No Im white

---

DespondentDeity posted...

No Im white

---

no, but i'm sure my state legislature will try to come up with a reason to.

---

Yes. The votes of people in swing states count more than mine.

---

DespondentDeity posted...

No Im white

This user continues to display the absurdest shit-takes at an astronomical rate.

---

Yes. Big companies can donate more to candidates than I can.

---

Yes. Voters in low-population states have too much power.

---

I would say gerrymandering is a form of vote suppression, and since wisconsin is the most disproportionately gerrymandered state in the country, yes

---

DespondentDeity posted...

No Im white

How are non white people stopped from voting?

Are there any laws on the books that prohibit nonwhite people from voting?

---

I've been seeing and hearing a lot of MAGAts saying they're done voting because the election was "stolen" from them and their vote clearly doesn't matter.

I didn't try to convince them otherwise

---

RamboCell29 posted...

How are non white people stopped from voting?

Are there any laws on the books that prohibit nonwhite people from voting?

There weren't during the Jim Crow era, either. But laws then and now were created for the purpose of disproportionately impacting the ability for black people to vote without mentioning race explicitly. North Carolina's voter ID laws are a good modern example of this in practice:
https://www.pilotonline.com/nation-world/article_a7c5285f-e3a3-5c8a-9ee5-d47b3d7ba020.html

The federal court in Richmond, Virginia, found that the primary purpose of North Carolina's wasn't to stop voter fraud, but rather to disenfranchise minority voters. The judges found that the provisions "target African Americans with almost surgical precision."
In particular, the court found that North Carolina lawmakers requested data on racial differences in voting behaviors in the state. "This data showed that African Americans disproportionately lacked the most common kind of photo ID, those issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)," the judges wrote.
So the legislators made it so that the only acceptable forms of voter identification were the ones disproportionately used by white people. "With race data in hand, the legislature amended the bill to exclude many of the alternative photo IDs used by African Americans," the judges wrote. "The bill retained only the kinds of IDs that white North Carolinians were more likely to possess."
The data also showed that black voters were more likely to make use of early voting - particularly the first seven days out of North Carolina's 17-day voting period. So lawmakers eliminated these seven days of voting. "After receipt of this racial data, the General Assembly amended the bill to eliminate the first week of early voting, shortening the total early voting period from seventeen to ten days," the court found.
Most strikingly, the judges point to a "smoking gun" in North Carolina's justification for the law, proving discriminatory intent. The state argued in court that "counties with Sunday voting in 2014 were disproportionately black" and "disproportionately Democratic," and said it did away with Sunday voting as a result.
"Thus, in what comes as close to a smoking gun as we are likely to see in modern times, the State's very justification for a challenged statute hinges explicitly on race - specifically its concern that African Americans, who had overwhelmingly voted for Democrats, had too much access to the franchise," the judges write in their decision.
This is about as clear-cut an indictment of the discriminatory underpinnings of voter-ID laws as you'll find anywhere. Studies have already shown a significant link between support for voter ID and racial discrimination, among both lawmakers and white voters in general.
"Faced with this record," the federal court concludes, "we can only conclude that the North Carolina General Assembly enacted the challenged provisions of the law with discriminatory intent."

---

RamboCell29 posted...

How are non white people stopped from voting?

Are there any laws on the books that prohibit nonwhite people from voting?

Asking this is disingenuous.

There has been an influx of city/county lawmakers removing polling places primarily in metropolitan areas (which is where a majority of POC live)

---

No, I just walk in. I dont even show an ID. Its kinda weird that voting for the US president was as easy as voting for my HS president, and I was even in the HS for both

---