Current Events > Jon Stewart is on my side with Lab Leak

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
joe40001 06/16/21 2:16:30 AM #1:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSfejgwbDQ8 You can tell the audience doesn't know how to respond, it's still somewhat counter-narrative, but he's talking too much sense. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955077251] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSfejgwbDQ8 You can tell the audience doesn't know how to respond, it's still somewhat counter-narrative, but he's talking too much sense. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smackems 06/16/21 2:19:04 AM #2:	Alt right jon stewart --- Common sense baked a funk cookie - some dude <cite>Smackems posted [p:955077292] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Alt right jon stewart </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 06/16/21 2:19:13 AM #3:	Don't worry, if he got to know you, he'd know to dislike you despite your agreement. --- https://imgur.com/Er6TT https://imgur.com/Er6TT https://imgur.com/Er6TT So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:955077294] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Don't worry, if he got to know you, he'd know to dislike you despite your agreement. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlueTigerLion 06/16/21 2:13:59 PM #4:	Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao. --- Hey now. <cite>BlueTigerLion posted [p:955094721] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 06/16/21 2:14:52 PM #5:	BlueTigerLion posted... Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao. Because they were being conspiracy theorists alleging a released bioweapon? Somehow was also a hoax though --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:955094754] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>BlueTigerLion posted... </cite> <quote>Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao.</quote>Because they were being conspiracy theorists alleging a released bioweapon? Somehow was also a hoax though </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 06/16/21 2:16:47 PM #6:	BlueTigerLion posted... Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao. Republicans were saying it as if it were absolute fact, and have since voted against actually investigating it --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg https://imgur.com/8kjZU <cite>eston posted [p:955094822] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>BlueTigerLion posted... </cite> <quote>Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao.</quote>Republicans were saying it as if it were absolute fact, and have since voted against actually investigating it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Background_Guy 06/16/21 2:18:48 PM #7:	He's obviously doing a bit. He's not even being subtle. The Wuhan lab isn't called the "Coronavirus lab", come on. This is like people falling for Colbert's act 15 years ago. <cite>Background_Guy posted [p:955094898] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>He's obviously doing a bit. He's not even being subtle. The Wuhan lab isn't called the "Coronavirus lab", come on. This is like people falling for Colbert's act 15 years ago. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 06/16/21 2:20:57 PM #8:	BlueTigerLion posted... Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao. And that hate is still justified. There is a huge difference between it being possible and it being insisted on to remove blame from the US government's crappy response. Even if it was a biological attack aimed at the US directly the way he handled it was very very poor. And it wasn't a direct attack. --- Occam's razor: The simplest solution (answer) is most likely the right one <cite>creativerealms posted [p:955094986] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>BlueTigerLion posted... </cite> <quote>Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao.</quote>And that hate is still justified. There is a huge difference between it being possible and it being insisted on to remove blame from the US government's crappy response. Even if it was a biological attack aimed at the US directly the way he handled it was very very poor. And it wasn't a direct attack. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Background_Guy 06/16/21 2:22:03 PM #9:	creativerealms posted... And that hate is still justified. Any hate against Republicans is justified <cite>Background_Guy posted [p:955095024] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>creativerealms posted... </cite> <quote>And that hate is still justified.</quote>Any hate against Republicans is justified </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
B18Champ 06/16/21 2:22:31 PM #10:	I am not a fan of Jon Stewart but I loved this. Colbert looked like a complete fool. <cite>B18Champ posted [p:955095040] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>I am not a fan of Jon Stewart but I loved this. Colbert looked like a complete fool. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WrkHrdPlayHrdr 06/16/21 2:23:40 PM #11:	eston posted... since voted against actually investigating it I'm not sure that's true. They didn't want the Covid Relief, but they for sure want the investigation into the origins of Covid. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/555942-house-republicans-demand-congressional-investigation-into-covid-19-origin --- "No. I'm a man so theyll get me a full size McDouble." - DuncanWii https://imgur.com/cSxy3Od <cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted [p:955095083] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>eston posted... </cite> <quote>since voted against actually investigating it</quote> I'm not sure that's true. They didn't want the Covid Relief, but they for sure want the investigation into the origins of Covid. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/555942-house-republicans-demand-congressional-investigation-into-covid-19-origin </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dat_Cracka_Jax 06/16/21 2:24:08 PM #12:	B18Champ posted... Colbert looked like a complete fool. Par for the course --- http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/8131/flame201010170949481638.jpg http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/5517/cateyes.gif Rams: 7-9 <cite>Dat_Cracka_Jax posted [p:955095099] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>B18Champ posted... </cite> <quote>Colbert looked like a complete fool.</quote>Par for the course </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jeff AKA Snoopy 06/16/21 2:32:52 PM #13:	You know it was all a little tongue-in-cheek right Joe? Obviously it was being studied in a Wuhan lab. He's not saying it was literally created BY a team of scientists in a lab. They discovered it, were studying it, and bungled it. --- https://imgur.com/GWG5c3r <cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted [p:955095421] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>You know it was all a little tongue-in-cheek right Joe? Obviously it was being studied in a Wuhan lab. He's not saying it was literally created BY a team of scientists in a lab. They discovered it, were studying it, and bungled it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 06/16/21 2:35:07 PM #14:	Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... You know it was all a little tongue-in-cheek right Joe? Obviously it was being studied in a Wuhan lab. He's not saying it was literally created BY a team of scientists in a lab. They discovered it, were studying it, and bungled it. Joe's been running victory laps for weeks because "the possibility of a lab leak has been proven correct", which seems to destroy the meaning of "possibility", "proven" and "correct". --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:955095507] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... </cite> <quote>You know it was all a little tongue-in-cheek right Joe? Obviously it was being studied in a Wuhan lab. He's not saying it was literally created BY a team of scientists in a lab. They discovered it, were studying it, and bungled it.</quote>Joe's been running victory laps for weeks because "the possibility of a lab leak has been proven correct", which seems to destroy the meaning of "possibility", "proven" and "correct". </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ANort175 06/16/21 2:36:05 PM #15:	joe40001 posted... You can tell the audience doesn't know how to respond No, you can tell they know exactly how to respond. They're laughing because they realize the whole thing is a bit and he's not being serious, because they're not dipshit idiotic conservative trolls like you. --- Are we the baddies? <cite>ANort175 posted [p:955095551] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>You can tell the audience doesn't know how to respond</quote> No, you can tell they know exactly how to respond. They're laughing because they realize the whole thing is a bit and he's not being serious, because they're not dipshit idiotic conservative trolls like you. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 06/16/21 2:37:02 PM #16:	ITT: Lou Gehrig caused ALS --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:955095581] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>ITT: Lou Gehrig caused ALS </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/17/21 4:21:16 AM #17:	hockeybub89 posted... Joe's been running victory laps for weeks because "the possibility of a lab leak has been proven correct", which seems to destroy the meaning of "possibility", "proven" and "correct". I looked at the facts and said "based on the information available the lab leak hypothesis is a valid hypothesis." And up until very recently you and people like you said "no, it is impossible, and anybody who thinks it's possible is crackpot and should be censored" Between the two of us, I was saying something true, and you were saying something false. It's not my fault the other side was so stupid as to insist the theory was impossible despite all the evidence pointing the other direction. Maybe they should learn for next time not to "debunk as false" something that is perfectly possible and has compelling evidence. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955119162] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite> <quote>Joe's been running victory laps for weeks because "the possibility of a lab leak has been proven correct", which seems to destroy the meaning of "possibility", "proven" and "correct".</quote> I looked at the facts and said "based on the information available the lab leak hypothesis is a valid hypothesis." And up until very recently you and people like you said "no, it is impossible, and anybody who thinks it's possible is crackpot and should be censored" Between the two of us, I was saying something true, and you were saying something false. It's not my fault the other side was so stupid as to insist the theory was impossible despite all the evidence pointing the other direction. Maybe they should learn for next time not to "debunk as false" something that is perfectly possible and has compelling evidence. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 06/17/21 4:23:35 AM #18:	Why does anyone give these topics posts? --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:955119187] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Why does anyone give these topics posts? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/17/21 4:40:10 AM #19:	Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... You know it was all a little tongue-in-cheek right Joe? Good comedians make arguments through comedy. He broke through the counter-narrative so well because he knows on some base level any sensible person can see that it's not a crackpot conspiracy theory. And it gets even more compelling when you look at the evidence. Obviously it was being studied in a Wuhan lab. He's not saying it was literally created BY a team of scientists in a lab. They discovered it, were studying it, and bungled it. It's worth pointing out that your "obviously" wouldn't have existed 2 weeks ago, despite the facts on the ground not changing and just public opinion shifting. It's worth paying attention to who is right about things before the mainstream acknowledges they are right. But, secondly what you are saying isn't exactly true, they didn't "discover it", Coronavirus is well known. This is a novel strain of something we've had/known about for a while. What they do in these labs is use serial passaging to alter the virus, the end goal being to see how it behaves under different contexts. Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens. So to put it in a metaphor: Let's say you had a group of people who were worried about vicious dog attacks, and so they thought the best way to protect society from vicious dog attacks was to take some existing vicious dogs and study them. But imagine that these dogs they took don't usually attack humans and when they do they aren't that aggressive, so imagine the lab did "gain of function" training on the dogs, to train the dogs to be more likely to attack humans or animals like humans. The lab is working with good intentions, they want to see how dogs like the vicious dogs they are training in the lab are likely to behave if they ever do get the taste for humans. The goal of their research is to know how best to stop/prevent the vicious dog attacks on humans if similar vicious dog attacks ever come in from the wild. But then the lab fucks up and the dogs get loose into the public. Did the lab "create" the dogs? No. But to say they "discovered" them only is also a misrepresentation. If they were just investigating viruses it would be called "research" and not "gain of function research". The gain of function means they are using serial passaging in a lab to allow the virus to mutate itself in meaningful and significant ways. Ways that likely made it more transmissible or more virulent. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955119398] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... </cite> <quote>You know it was all a little tongue-in-cheek right Joe? </quote> Good comedians make arguments through comedy. He broke through the counter-narrative so well because he knows on some base level any sensible person can see that it's not a crackpot conspiracy theory. And it gets even more compelling when you look at the evidence. <quote>Obviously it was being studied in a Wuhan lab. He's not saying it was literally created BY a team of scientists in a lab. They discovered it, were studying it, and bungled it.</quote> It's worth pointing out that your "obviously" wouldn't have existed 2 weeks ago, despite the facts on the ground not changing and just public opinion shifting. It's worth paying attention to who is right about things before the mainstream acknowledges they are right. But, secondly what you are saying isn't exactly true, they didn't "discover it", Coronavirus is well known. This is a novel strain of something we've had/known about for a while. What they do in these labs is use serial passaging to alter the virus, the end goal being to see how it behaves under different contexts. Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens. So to put it in a metaphor: Let's say you had a group of people who were worried about vicious dog attacks, and so they thought the best way to protect society from vicious dog attacks was to take some existing vicious dogs and study them. But imagine that these dogs they took don't usually attack humans and when they do they aren't that aggressive, so imagine the lab did "gain of function" training on the dogs, to train the dogs to be more likely to attack humans or animals like humans. The lab is working with good intentions, they want to see how dogs like the vicious dogs they are training in the lab are likely to behave if they ever do get the taste for humans. The goal of their research is to know how best to stop/prevent the vicious dog attacks on humans if similar vicious dog attacks ever come in from the wild. But then the lab fucks up and the dogs get loose into the public. Did the lab "create" the dogs? No. But to say they "discovered" them only is also a misrepresentation. If they were just investigating viruses it would be called "research" and not "gain of function research". The gain of function means they are using serial passaging in a lab to allow the virus to mutate itself in meaningful and significant ways. Ways that likely made it more transmissible or more virulent. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryuko_Chan 06/17/21 4:56:35 AM #20:	does this make you happy --- - silverhyruler post <cite>Ryuko_Chan posted [p:955119574] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>does this make you happy </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrowaBarton7 06/18/21 3:03:39 AM #21:	Background_Guy posted... He's obviously doing a bit. He's not even being subtle. The Wuhan lab isn't called the "Coronavirus lab", come on. This is like people falling for Colbert's act 15 years ago. Lmao at so many people not realizing this. He literally says to Colbert, ""Oh stop with the logic." --- I am Iron Man <cite>TrowaBarton7 posted [p:955157690] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Background_Guy posted... </cite> <quote>He's obviously doing a bit. He's not even being subtle. The Wuhan lab isn't called the "Coronavirus lab", come on. This is like people falling for Colbert's act 15 years ago.</quote> Lmao at so many people not realizing this. He literally says to Colbert, ""Oh stop with the logic." </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/18/21 3:06:26 AM #22:	TrowaBarton7 posted... Lmao at so many people not realizing this. He literally says to Colbert, ""Oh stop with the logic." The joke is "stop with the stuffy faux-logic and listen to your obvious intuition", he's doing a bit for comedic effect but he's on the side that it seems to have come from a lab, or at least he thinks that's the most obvious answer. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955157730] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>TrowaBarton7 posted... </cite> <quote>Lmao at so many people not realizing this. He literally says to Colbert, ""Oh stop with the logic."</quote> The joke is "stop with the stuffy faux-logic and listen to your obvious intuition", he's doing a bit for comedic effect but he's on the side that it seems to have come from a lab, or at least he thinks that's the most obvious answer. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Frolex 06/18/21 3:40:49 AM #23:	joe40001 posted... The joke is "stop with the stuffy faux-logic and listen to your obvious intuition" the fact that joenumbers parses "don't use logic, follow your knee jerk reaction" as a level-headed appeal explains alot --- https://imgur.com/HOLHd4k https://imgur.com/six2WTN <cite>Frolex posted [p:955158154] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>The joke is "stop with the stuffy faux-logic and listen to your obvious intuition"</quote> the fact that joenumbers parses "don't use logic, follow your knee jerk reaction" as a level-headed appeal explains alot </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/18/21 4:30:23 AM #24:	Frolex posted... the fact that joenumbers parses "don't use logic, follow your knee jerk reaction" as a level-headed appeal explains alot I said was the joke angle. I love logic. But as we've seen anybody who is concerned with logic and critical thinking understood the lab leak was plausible a long time ago. The people remaining aren't persuaded by data but by narrative, so Stewart adeptly framed the narrative is such a way to get through to those people. Those people you don't convince their minds but their gut and their narrative. If you are in a room laughing with others at how yeah it does feel fishy, all of the sudden you realize that this opinion you didn't think you were allowed to have is something many people around you feel. His argument wasn't the best data driven argument for why people think it came from a lab, but it was one of the more effective arguments one could make to persuade those still in that bubble. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955158736] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Frolex posted... </cite> <quote>the fact that joenumbers parses "don't use logic, follow your knee jerk reaction" as a level-headed appeal explains alot</quote> I said was the joke angle. I love logic. But as we've seen anybody who is concerned with logic and critical thinking understood the lab leak was plausible a long time ago. The people remaining aren't persuaded by data but by narrative, so Stewart adeptly framed the narrative is such a way to get through to those people. Those people you don't convince their minds but their gut and their narrative. If you are in a room laughing with others at how yeah it does feel fishy, all of the sudden you realize that this opinion you didn't think you were allowed to have is something many people around you feel. His argument wasn't the best data driven argument for why people think it came from a lab, but it was one of the more effective arguments one could make to persuade those still in that bubble. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
indica 06/18/21 4:35:33 AM #25:	joe40001 posted... I said was the joke angle. I love logic. But as we've seen anybody who is concerned with logic and critical thinking understood the lab leak was plausible a long time ago. The people remaining aren't persuaded by data but by narrative, so Stewart adeptly framed the narrative is such a way to get through to those people. Those people you don't convince their minds but their gut and their narrative. If you are in a room laughing with others at how yeah it does feel fishy, all of the sudden you realize that this opinion you didn't think you were allowed to have is something many people around you feel. His argument wasn't the best data driven argument for why people think it came from a lab, but it was one of the more effective arguments one could make to persuade those still in that bubble. How did he frame the narrative? He didn't make an argument. He didn't say anything of value. Here's my response to you in a similar topic: I agree with you that it is a reasonable hypothesis, but Jon gave no evidence to support the hypothesis other than the name of the lab which we already knew, and as Colbert pointed out, the lab is called that because of the number of novel coronaviruses that are found in the area...but, like I said, it's still a reasonable hypothesis, I just want more evidence...Also, Jon is still a funny motherfucker --- There is no good. There is no evil. There just is. <cite>indica posted [p:955158783] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>I said was the joke angle. I love logic. But as we've seen anybody who is concerned with logic and critical thinking understood the lab leak was plausible a long time ago. The people remaining aren't persuaded by data but by narrative, so Stewart adeptly framed the narrative is such a way to get through to those people. Those people you don't convince their minds but their gut and their narrative. If you are in a room laughing with others at how yeah it does feel fishy, all of the sudden you realize that this opinion you didn't think you were allowed to have is something many people around you feel. His argument wasn't the best data driven argument for why people think it came from a lab, but it was one of the more effective arguments one could make to persuade those still in that bubble.</quote>How did he frame the narrative? He didn't make an argument. He didn't say anything of value. Here's my response to you in a similar topic: I agree with you that it is a reasonable hypothesis, but Jon gave no evidence to support the hypothesis other than the name of the lab which we already knew, and as Colbert pointed out, the lab is called that because of the number of novel coronaviruses that are found in the area...but, like I said, it's still a reasonable hypothesis, I just want more evidence...Also, Jon is still a funny motherfucker </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/18/21 4:39:50 AM #26:	indica posted... How did he frame the narrative? He didn't make an argument. He didn't say anything of value. Here's my response to you in a similar topic: I agree with you that it is a reasonable hypothesis, but Jon gave no evidence to support the hypothesis other than the name of the lab which we already knew, and as Colbert pointed out, the lab is called that because of the number of novel coronaviruses that are found in the area...but, like I said, it's still a reasonable hypothesis, I just want more evidence...Also, Jon is still a funny motherfucker Yes he is funny. And yeah sorry we are playing tag on these responses. If you like we can limit it to this topic or the other, I did respond to you there, whatever you want. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955158836] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>indica posted... </cite> <quote>How did he frame the narrative? He didn't make an argument. He didn't say anything of value. Here's my response to you in a similar topic: I agree with you that it is a reasonable hypothesis, but Jon gave no evidence to support the hypothesis other than the name of the lab which we already knew, and as Colbert pointed out, the lab is called that because of the number of novel coronaviruses that are found in the area...but, like I said, it's still a reasonable hypothesis, I just want more evidence...Also, Jon is still a funny motherfucker</quote> Yes he is funny. And yeah sorry we are playing tag on these responses. If you like we can limit it to this topic or the other, I did respond to you there, whatever you want. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Iodine 06/18/21 5:30:56 AM #27:	How likely is this lab leak theory? --- In Belichick we Trust <cite>Iodine posted [p:955159420] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>How likely is this lab leak theory? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gwynevere 06/18/21 6:13:43 AM #28:	Ryuko_Chan posted... does this make you happy The sad part is, I think it really does. I don't think TC is trolling, I think he's getting legitimate joy from having his views reaffirmed and boasting about it on CE. It's kind of a pathetic existence if I'm being honest --- A hunter is a hunter...even in a dream <cite>Gwynevere posted [p:955159850] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Ryuko_Chan posted... </cite> <quote>does this make you happy</quote>The sad part is, I think it really does. I don't think TC is trolling, I think he's getting legitimate joy from having his views reaffirmed and boasting about it on CE. It's kind of a pathetic existence if I'm being honest </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lordgold666 06/18/21 9:09:45 AM #29:	Lmao @ some people in denial --- "May the Father of Understanding guide you." http://error1355.com/ce/Lordgold666.html <cite>Lordgold666 posted [p:955162608] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Lmao @ some people in denial </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkRoast 06/18/21 9:11:12 AM #30:	BlueTigerLion posted... Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao. No, because they were saying it was genetically engineered --- Razer Blade 15 - Core i7-9750H, 32 GB RAM (2666), RTX 2080 MQ <cite>DarkRoast posted [p:955162647] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>BlueTigerLion posted... </cite> <quote>Remember all the hate Republicans were getting for saying this last year lmao.</quote> No, because they were saying it was genetically engineered </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Frolex 06/18/21 9:11:44 AM #31:	joe40001 posted... I love logic. But as we've seen anybody who is concerned with logic and critical thinking understood the lab leak was plausible a long time ago. The people remaining aren't persuaded by data but by narrative, so Stewart adeptly framed the narrative is such a way to get through to those people. what data proves the lab leak? --- https://imgur.com/HOLHd4k https://imgur.com/six2WTN <cite>Frolex posted [p:955162657] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote> I love logic. But as we've seen anybody who is concerned with logic and critical thinking understood the lab leak was plausible a long time ago. The people remaining aren't persuaded by data but by narrative, so Stewart adeptly framed the narrative is such a way to get through to those people.</quote> what data proves the lab leak? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DezDroppedFreak 06/18/21 9:22:29 AM #32:	Bro you fell for a bit lmao shit like this is why I say your level of comprehension of the things you consume is at like the bottom of the barrel --- I feel like Ratatouille when I'm whipping that cheddar <cite>DezDroppedFreak posted [p:955162881] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Bro you fell for a bit lmao shit like this is why I say your level of comprehension of the things you consume is at like the bottom of the barrel </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 06/18/21 9:26:37 AM #33:	DarkRoast posted... No, because they were saying it was genetically engineered Just to be explicit, this is what joenumbers is saying as well, so everyone is aware. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:955162985] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>DarkRoast posted... </cite> <quote>No, because they were saying it was genetically engineered</quote> Just to be explicit, this is what joenumbers is saying as well, so everyone is aware. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hayame Zero 06/18/21 9:30:08 AM #34:	DezDroppedFreak posted... Bro you fell for a bit lmao shit like this is why I say your level of comprehension of the things you consume is at like the bottom of the barrel Takes me back to when old conservative relatives would believe The Colbert Report --- ...I think I'm done here... <cite>Hayame Zero posted [p:955163058] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>DezDroppedFreak posted... </cite> <quote>Bro you fell for a bit lmao shit like this is why I say your level of comprehension of the things you consume is at like the bottom of the barrel</quote>Takes me back to when old conservative relatives would believe The Colbert Report </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Choco 06/18/21 9:31:34 AM #35:	Iodine posted... How likely is this lab leak theory? 50% either it's true or it's not --- https://imgur.com/286sD4e http://error1355.com/ce/Choco.html <cite>Choco posted [p:955163097] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Iodine posted... </cite> <quote>How likely is this lab leak theory?</quote>50% either it's true or it's not </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 06/18/21 9:34:44 AM #36:	Everyone talking about Colbert looked like a fool. He was shook oh man!these shows arent live, guys. Colbert and his team kept it in the show for a reason lol. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:955163180] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Everyone talking about Colbert looked like a fool. He was shook oh man!these shows arent live, guys. Colbert and his team kept it in the show for a reason lol. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YourDrunkFather 06/18/21 10:05:15 AM #37:	Choco posted... 50% either it's true or it's not Bill Maher had two scientists on a couple months who said it was more like 90% --- One bourbon,one scotch,one beer <cite>YourDrunkFather posted [p:955163943] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Choco posted... </cite> <quote>50% either it's true or it's not</quote> Bill Maher had two scientists on a couple months who said it was more like 90% </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 06/18/21 10:08:48 AM #38:	this topic is a perfect representation of why conservatives are bad at comedy --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:955164057] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>this topic is a perfect representation of why conservatives are bad at comedy </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/18/21 11:33:18 AM #39:	COVxy posted... Just to be explicit, this is what joenumbers is saying as well, so everyone is aware. This is not, nor has it ever been what I said. DR assumed this was what I meant because they assumed I was just some trunp supporting idiot. But I'm not an idiot and I don't support Trump and I always claimed that it wasn't an argument that it was genetically engineered but rather altered in meaningful ways during gain of function research. I can prove that too, if you want to look even more foolish/dishonest. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955166506] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted... </cite> <quote>Just to be explicit, this is what joenumbers is saying as well, so everyone is aware.</quote> This is not, nor has it ever been what I said. DR assumed this was what I meant because they assumed I was just some trunp supporting idiot. But I'm not an idiot and I don't support Trump and I always claimed that it wasn't an argument that it was genetically engineered but rather altered in meaningful ways during gain of function research. I can prove that too, if you want to look even more foolish/dishonest. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/18/21 11:34:50 AM #40:	Doom_Art posted... this topic is a perfect representation of why conservatives are bad at comedy Jon Stewart isn't conservative and was quite funny in the clip. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955166551] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>Doom_Art posted... </cite> <quote>this topic is a perfect representation of why conservatives are bad at comedy</quote>Jon Stewart isn't conservative and was quite funny in the clip. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 06/18/21 11:39:41 AM #41:	joe40001 posted... This is not, nor has it ever been what I said. DR assumed this was what I meant because they assumed I was just some trunp supporting idiot. But I'm not an idiot and I don't support Trump and I always claimed that it wasn't an argument that it was genetically engineered but rather altered in meaningful ways during gain of function research. I can prove that too, if you want to look even more foolish/dishonest. Lmao. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:955166717] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>This is not, nor has it ever been what I said. DR assumed this was what I meant because they assumed I was just some trunp supporting idiot. But I'm not an idiot and I don't support Trump and I always claimed that it wasn't an argument that it was genetically engineered but rather altered in meaningful ways during gain of function research. I can prove that too, if you want to look even more foolish/dishonest.</quote> Lmao. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
What_ 06/18/21 11:41:05 AM #42:	This is such a pathetic gimmick <cite>What_ posted [p:955166762] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>This is such a pathetic gimmick </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 06/18/21 12:05:02 PM #43:	joe40001 posted... Jon Stewart isn't conservative and was quite funny in the clip. Right. He isnt a conservative and was quite funny. And you, as a conservative, didnt get it and thought he was on your side lmao. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:955167647] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>Jon Stewart isn't conservative and was quite funny in the clip.</quote>Right. He isnt a conservative and was quite funny. And you, as a conservative, didnt get it and thought he was on your side lmao. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/18/21 3:03:41 PM #44:	TheVipaGTS posted... Right. He isnt a conservative and was quite funny. And you, as a conservative, didnt get it and thought he was on your side lmao. He is on my side. --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955173512] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>TheVipaGTS posted... </cite> <quote>Right. He isnt a conservative and was quite funny. And you, as a conservative, didnt get it and thought he was on your side lmao.</quote>He is on my side. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
joe40001 06/18/21 3:04:36 PM #45:	COVxy posted... Lmao. What is funny about a true statement? --- "joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9 <cite>joe40001 posted [p:955173551] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>COVxy posted... </cite> <quote>Lmao.</quote> What is funny about a true statement? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doom_Art 06/18/21 3:09:31 PM #46:	God damn it really is like those people who thought Colbert wasn't playing a character lol --- Not removing this until Mega Man 64 is released on the Wii Virtual Console. Started on: 12/1/2009 https://imgur.com/mPvcy <cite>Doom_Art posted [p:955173711] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>God damn it really is like those people who thought Colbert wasn't playing a character lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Delirious_Beard 06/18/21 3:09:48 PM #47:	https://twitter.com/wuooods/status/1252051656344317953 --- https://imgur.com/hLHUnOI You act like I don't know my own way home <cite>Delirious_Beard posted [p:955173722] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>https://twitter.com/wuooods/status/1252051656344317953 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheApexPredator 06/18/21 3:56:18 PM #48:	3.84 million deaths worldwide. But you know who cares how it started. --- I live in a shack and poop in an out house. <cite>TheApexPredator posted [p:955175278] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>3.84 million deaths worldwide. But you know who cares how it started. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 06/18/21 4:11:43 PM #49:	joe40001 posted... What is funny about a true statement? You don't know what you're talking about. "I'm not claiming genetic engineering, but rather [genetic engineering]. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:955175774] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>What is funny about a true statement?</quote> You don't know what you're talking about. "I'm not claiming genetic engineering, but rather [genetic engineering]. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 06/18/21 4:12:42 PM #50:	joe40001 posted... He is on my side. lmao its still funny every time --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:955175808] in Jon Stewar... [t:79516383]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>He is on my side.</quote>lmao its still funny every time </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Jon Stewart is on my side with Lab Leak (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Jon Stewart is on my side with Lab Leak