Current Events > Does art matter if it has no audience?

Topic List	Page List: 1
MedeaLysistrata 09/03/21 4:08:26 PM #1:	Bonus Q, is art bad if it has no audience? --- "Why is ontology so expensive?" - JH [Is this live?][Joyless planet...] <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:957707773] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>Bonus Q, is art bad if it has no audience? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shezarr 09/03/21 4:08:56 PM #2:	Yes No --- The artist formerly known as RebelElite791 <cite>Shezarr posted [p:957707791] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>Yes No </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedeaLysistrata 09/03/21 4:10:26 PM #3:	If you only want to create for an audience are you a sell out? --- "Why is ontology so expensive?" - JH [Is this live?][Joyless planet...] <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:957707825] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>If you only want to create for an audience are you a sell out? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedeaLysistrata 09/03/21 4:13:20 PM #4:	About an hour ago I told myself I would do some reading and am only starting now --- "Why is ontology so expensive?" - JH [Is this live?][Joyless planet...] <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:957707899] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>About an hour ago I told myself I would do some reading and am only starting now </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeoShadowhen 09/03/21 4:15:33 PM #5:	What if the art is only created for the artist to enjoy, and they never let anyone else experience it? <cite>NeoShadowhen posted [p:957707966] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>What if the art is only created for the artist to enjoy, and they never let anyone else experience it? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheOtherMike 09/03/21 4:19:03 PM #6:	Shezarr posted... Yes No This. MedeaLysistrata posted... If you only want to create for an audience are you a sell out? No <cite>TheOtherMike posted [p:957708051] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>Shezarr posted... </cite> <quote>Yes No</quote> This. MedeaLysistrata posted... </cite> <quote>If you only want to create for an audience are you a sell out?</quote> No </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedeaLysistrata 09/03/21 4:19:04 PM #7:	NeoShadowhen posted... What if the art is only created for the artist to enjoy, and they never let anyone else experience it? Then it would be a waste of time to study it --- "Why is ontology so expensive?" - JH [Is this live?][Joyless planet...] <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:957708052] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>NeoShadowhen posted... </cite> <quote>What if the art is only created for the artist to enjoy, and they never let anyone else experience it?</quote>Then it would be a waste of time to study it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#8	Post #8 was unavailable or deleted.
#9	Post #9 was unavailable or deleted.
#10	Post #10 was unavailable or deleted.
garan 09/03/21 5:07:05 PM #11:	16-BITTER posted... Depends on your definition of "matter". Technically no art matters, but acknowledging that doesn't matter either. As for the other point, the creator is always their own first audience, so it's impossible for art to have no audience. I generally agree with this. <cite>garan posted [p:957709348] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>16-BITTER posted...</cite> <quote>Depends on your definition of "matter". Technically no art matters, but acknowledging that doesn't matter either. As for the other point, the creator is always their own first audience, so it's impossible for art to have no audience.</quote> I generally agree with this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedeaLysistrata 09/03/21 5:12:07 PM #12:	Art clearly matters somehow since most people engage with it if they can --- "Why is ontology so expensive?" - JH [Is this live?][Joyless planet...] <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:957709477] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>Art clearly matters somehow since most people engage with it if they can </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 09/03/21 5:20:42 PM #13:	First question: No. Art is about making an impression on an audience. If a piece of art is just in some closet for decades it might as well just be the same thing as the paint on the wall in said closet. And note, that is not to say that under- or non-appreciated art isn't art. Second question: Yes. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:957709708] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>First question: No. Art is about making an impression on an audience. If a piece of art is just in some closet for decades it might as well just be the same thing as the paint on the wall in said closet. And note, that is not to say that under- or non-appreciated art isn't art. Second question: Yes. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shezarr 09/03/21 6:32:51 PM #14:	K181 posted... First question: No. Art is about making an impression on an audience. If a piece of art is just in some closet for decades it might as well just be the same thing as the paint on the wall in said closet. And note, that is not to say that under- or non-appreciated art isn't art. Art is still art and can still have meaning for its creator --- The artist formerly known as RebelElite791 <cite>Shezarr posted [p:957711588] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>K181 posted... </cite> <quote>First question: No. Art is about making an impression on an audience. If a piece of art is just in some closet for decades it might as well just be the same thing as the paint on the wall in said closet. And note, that is not to say that under- or non-appreciated art isn't art.</quote>Art is still art and can still have meaning for its creator </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedeaLysistrata 09/03/21 6:38:53 PM #15:	Shezarr posted... Art is still art and can still have meaning for its creator this is true maybe, but a work of art will never be 'living' if people don't know about it --- "Why is ontology so expensive?" - JH [Is this live?][Joyless planet...] <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:957711738] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>Shezarr posted... </cite> <quote>Art is still art and can still have meaning for its creator</quote>this is true maybe, but a work of art will never be 'living' if people don't know about it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 09/03/21 6:53:16 PM #16:	Shezarr posted... Art is still art and can still have meaning for its creator And a really well-painted wall can be appreciated as well. Art is an interactive experience, as it is inherently meant to evoke emotions. People are free to make art only for themselves, but they're not artists if they just write or paint something and then just shove it into a bin. --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:957712138] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>Shezarr posted... </cite> <quote>Art is still art and can still have meaning for its creator</quote> And a really well-painted wall can be appreciated as well. Art is an interactive experience, as it is inherently meant to evoke emotions. People are free to make art only for themselves, but they're not artists if they just write or paint something and then just shove it into a bin. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheOtherMike 09/03/21 8:27:29 PM #17:	K181 posted... People are free to make art only for themselves, but they're not artists if they just write or paint something and then just shove it into a bin. Yes they are. <cite>TheOtherMike posted [p:957714500] in Does art m... [t:79644673]...</cite> <quote>K181 posted... </cite> <quote>People are free to make art only for themselves, but they're not artists if they just write or paint something and then just shove it into a bin.</quote> Yes they are. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Does art matter if it has no audience? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Does art matter if it has no audience?