Current Events > Wtf are these BF 2042 specs?

Topic List	Page List: 1
UnholyMudcrab 09/28/21 5:33:37 PM #1:	R5 3600 and i5 6600k are listed as minimum, but those aren't at all equivalent to one another, and the R5 3600 is faster than the R7 2700x. I guess number of cores really matters? But then they have the i7 4790 as recommended, which is 7 years old, only has 4 cores, and is much worse than either of the minimum required. That doesn't make any sense at all. --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:958505852] in Wtf are th... [t:79684208]...</cite> <quote> R5 3600 and i5 6600k are listed as minimum, but those aren't at all equivalent to one another, and the R5 3600 is faster than the R7 2700x. I guess number of cores really matters? But then they have the i7 4790 as recommended, which is 7 years old, only has 4 cores, and is much worse than either of the minimum required. That doesn't make any sense at all. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn 09/28/21 5:35:25 PM #2:	CPU on min/recommended specs basically never mean anything --- MSI MEG X570 Unify \| Ryzen 7 5800X \| 32GB DDR4-3600 \| RTX 3080 Samsung Odyssey G7 32" - 1440p, 240hz, GSync <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:958505930] in Wtf are th... [t:79684208]...</cite> <quote>CPU on min/recommended specs basically never mean anything </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab 09/28/21 5:40:33 PM #3:	I don't usually pay much attention to specs, but this one caught my eye. The i7 4790 in particular is just baffling. --- https://imgur.com/VeNBg https://imgur.com/gd5jC8q https://imgur.com/PKIy7 https://imgur.com/3p29JqP <cite>UnholyMudcrab posted [p:958506108] in Wtf are th... [t:79684208]...</cite> <quote>I don't usually pay much attention to specs, but this one caught my eye. The i7 4790 in particular is just baffling. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1