Current Events > A war between the US and China is almost inevitable

Topic List	Page List: 1
AlBundy33 10/18/21 8:07:33 PM #1:	Assuming no nukes are used, that is a war that should be over in about 45 minutes --- Shoe Salesman. Four Touchdowns, one game. This post may contain my opinion. My opinions may be offensive, deal with it <cite>AlBundy33 posted [p:959168927] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Assuming no nukes are used, that is a war that should be over in about 45 minutes </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Payzmaykr 10/18/21 8:08:50 PM #2:	Count me out. We would get stomped by China, tbh. --- So long, Thanks for all the fish! <cite>Payzmaykr posted [p:959168967] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Count me out. We would get stomped by China, tbh. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Njolk 10/18/21 8:09:44 PM #3:	Doubt it, the US will just continue to fade into a secondary power and China will dominate --- Suffering is expecting things to last forever <cite>Njolk posted [p:959169000] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Doubt it, the US will just continue to fade into a secondary power and China will dominate </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gamerguymass 10/18/21 8:15:59 PM #4:	Payzmaykr posted... Count me out. We would get stomped by China, tbh. Our navy and air force would completely obliterate theirs. China has one aircraft carrier. We have 15. It wouldn't be possible for China to get troops to America to even attempt an invasion because we would have them trapped in China with no navy or air force left to speak of. That said, an invasion of China is obviously never happening. Let alone with anything that could even approach anything being described as success. --- Now Playing: "The Hunt for the Two Missing Nintendo 64 Games" An expansion came out, but I'm still a third of the way through! <cite>Gamerguymass posted [p:959169200] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Payzmaykr posted... </cite> <quote>Count me out. We would get stomped by China, tbh.</quote> Our navy and air force would completely obliterate theirs. China has one aircraft carrier. We have 15. It wouldn't be possible for China to get troops to America to even attempt an invasion because we would have them trapped in China with no navy or air force left to speak of. That said, an invasion of China is obviously never happening. Let alone with anything that could even approach anything being described as success. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Itachi157 10/18/21 8:16:34 PM #5:	Payzmaykr posted... Count me out. We would get stomped by China, tbh. US conventional military power is still greater than China's by a decent amount. Factor in US allies and it's over. This is assuming a conventional war over like Taiwan with no attempted occupation of China afterwards. People like to bring up how the US "lost to rice farmers so how could you beat China?!" but trying to occupy land and fight an insurgency is far different than a conventional war, which is the type of conflict the hypothetical China war would likely be. <cite>Itachi157 posted [p:959169216] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Payzmaykr posted... </cite> <quote>Count me out. We would get stomped by China, tbh.</quote> US conventional military power is still greater than China's by a decent amount. Factor in US allies and it's over. This is assuming a conventional war over like Taiwan with no attempted occupation of China afterwards. People like to bring up how the US "lost to rice farmers so how could you beat China?!" but trying to occupy land and fight an insurgency is far different than a conventional war, which is the type of conflict the hypothetical China war would likely be. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#6	Post #6 was unavailable or deleted.
TreyFlowers 10/18/21 8:16:59 PM #7:	It's going to be a cold war. No shots or missiles are ever going to be fired at each other. --- ...for it is better to be alone than in bad company. <cite>TreyFlowers posted [p:959169229] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>It's going to be a cold war. No shots or missiles are ever going to be fired at each other. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Criminalt 10/19/21 11:44:29 AM #8:	TreyFlowers posted... It's going to be a cold war. It's going to be a low-intensity war in cyberspace as every system, every piece of infrastructure whose functioning is dependent upon an online connection comes under attack. The battlefield will be electronic. And both parties will stubbornly deny any kind of involvement. Why try to fight your way past your enemy's military when you can reach targets in his homeland from your office chair? --- Take me to the dark <cite>Criminalt posted [p:959187306] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>TreyFlowers posted... </cite> <quote>It's going to be a cold war.</quote>It's going to be a low-intensity war in cyberspace as every system, every piece of infrastructure whose functioning is dependent upon an online connection comes under attack. The battlefield will be electronic. And both parties will stubbornly deny any kind of involvement. Why try to fight your way past your enemy's military when you can reach targets in his homeland from your office chair? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sackgurl 10/19/21 11:45:43 AM #9:	Gamerguymass posted... Our navy and air force would completely obliterate theirs. China has one aircraft carrier. We have 15. It wouldn't be possible for China to get troops to America to even attempt an invasion because we would have them trapped in China with no navy or air force left to speak of. this is extremely naive Itachi157 posted... People like to bring up how the US "lost to rice farmers so how could you beat China?!" but trying to occupy land and fight an insurgency is far different than a conventional war, which is the type of conflict the hypothetical China war would likely be. china has been working for twenty years to alter the nature of 'conventional war' to suit their needs --- LittleBigPlanet is like merging dress-up with a real game. <cite>Sackgurl posted [p:959187343] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Gamerguymass posted... </cite> <quote>Our navy and air force would completely obliterate theirs. China has one aircraft carrier. We have 15. It wouldn't be possible for China to get troops to America to even attempt an invasion because we would have them trapped in China with no navy or air force left to speak of. </quote> this is extremely naive Itachi157 posted... </cite> <quote>People like to bring up how the US "lost to rice farmers so how could you beat China?!" but trying to occupy land and fight an insurgency is far different than a conventional war, which is the type of conflict the hypothetical China war would likely be.</quote> china has been working for twenty years to alter the nature of 'conventional war' to suit their needs </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SoggyBottomBoy 10/19/21 11:53:00 AM #10:	Payzmaykr posted... We would get stomped by China In a numbers game on their home turf, maybe. --- Fingah POP'n each otha's <cite>SoggyBottomBoy posted [p:959187521] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Payzmaykr posted... </cite> <quote>We would get stomped by China</quote>In a numbers game on their home turf, maybe. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EmbraceOfDeath 10/19/21 11:56:14 AM #11:	Sackgurl posted... this is extremely naive The only thing naive is thinking anyone could successfully invade the US by sea. --- PSN/GT: BigDaffej <cite>EmbraceOfDeath posted [p:959187603] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Sackgurl posted... </cite> <quote>this is extremely naive</quote>The only thing naive is thinking anyone could successfully invade the US by sea. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#12	Post #12 was unavailable or deleted.
Sackgurl 10/19/21 11:59:04 AM #13:	EmbraceOfDeath posted... The only thing naive is thinking anyone could successfully invade the US by sea. no, what's naive is thinking that is the battlefield that matters --- LittleBigPlanet is like merging dress-up with a real game. <cite>Sackgurl posted [p:959187674] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>EmbraceOfDeath posted... </cite> <quote>The only thing naive is thinking anyone could successfully invade the US by sea.</quote> no, what's naive is thinking that is the battlefield that matters </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RiKuToTheMiGhtY 10/19/21 11:59:10 AM #14:	If you think that Biden would go to war against China your living under a rock. --- doa-plus.com - We Press Forward. . . By Pressing Back. <cite>RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted [p:959187678] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>If you think that Biden would go to war against China your living under a rock. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Xavier_On_High 10/19/21 11:59:45 AM #15:	Never get involved in a land war in Asia. Everybody knows that. Just as everyone knows never to go up against a Sicilian when death is on the line. --- http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ltnafhjcUz1qmxswbo1_500.gif <cite>Xavier_On_High posted [p:959187689] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Never get involved in a land war in Asia. Everybody knows that. Just as everyone knows never to go up against a Sicilian when death is on the line. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pick4six 10/19/21 12:00:51 PM #16:	I seriously doubt that, China is US greatest friend and ally --- Bitcoin! <cite>pick4six posted [p:959187718] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>I seriously doubt that, China is US greatest friend and ally </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Spiderman23JII 10/19/21 12:02:24 PM #17:	a nuke on America would probably trigger Yellowstone to erupt and the whole world is toast --- buss on life <cite>Spiderman23JII posted [p:959187751] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>a nuke on America would probably trigger Yellowstone to erupt and the whole world is toast </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3PiesAndAFork 10/19/21 12:03:49 PM #18:	All the American billionaires who get all their shit made in China, like Tim Apple and Jeff Bezos, would never allow war against it. --- @('_')@ <cite>3PiesAndAFork posted [p:959187794] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>All the American billionaires who get all their shit made in China, like Tim Apple and Jeff Bezos, would never allow war against it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RiKuToTheMiGhtY 10/19/21 12:07:17 PM #19:	pick4six posted... I seriously doubt that, China is US greatest friend and ally Yes keep spreading that propaganda, maybe if you keep saying it one day you will actually believe it. --- doa-plus.com - We Press Forward. . . By Pressing Back. <cite>RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted [p:959187902] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>pick4six posted... </cite> <quote>I seriously doubt that, China is US greatest friend and ally</quote>Yes keep spreading that propaganda, maybe if you keep saying it one day you will actually believe it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pick4six 10/19/21 12:11:31 PM #20:	RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted... Yes keep spreading that propaganda, maybe if you keep saying it one day you will actually believe it. Who is China biggest export? Who is Americas greatest import? Thanks, have a nice day, seems like Im not the one fooled by propaganda aka Fox News --- Bitcoin! <cite>pick4six posted [p:959188023] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted... </cite> <quote>Yes keep spreading that propaganda, maybe if you keep saying it one day you will actually believe it.</quote>Who is China biggest export? Who is Americas greatest import? Thanks, have a nice day, seems like Im not the one fooled by propaganda aka Fox News </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#21	Post #21 was unavailable or deleted.
wackyteen 10/19/21 4:37:59 PM #22:	Lmao not happening. The world economy would go to shambles and there'd be absolutely no money, let alone desire, to go to war --- The name is wackyteen for a reason. Never doubt. <cite>wackyteen posted [p:959195861] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Lmao not happening. The world economy would go to shambles and there'd be absolutely no money, let alone desire, to go to war </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Feline_Heart 10/19/21 4:42:35 PM #23:	Doesn't China have more soldiers? --- Pickles the Drummer, doodily doo, dingdong doodlily doodily doo <cite>Feline_Heart posted [p:959195992] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Doesn't China have more soldiers? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wackyteen 10/19/21 4:44:25 PM #24:	Feline_Heart posted... Doesn't China have more soldiers? What use are more soldiers when you can level entire cities with a handful of bombs? --- The name is wackyteen for a reason. Never doubt. <cite>wackyteen posted [p:959196034] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>Feline_Heart posted... </cite> <quote>Doesn't China have more soldiers?</quote>What use are more soldiers when you can level entire cities with a handful of bombs? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shironinja 10/19/21 4:45:04 PM #25:	It already happened and Biden lost a game of marbles against Xi. --- Now or never. <cite>shironinja posted [p:959196059] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>It already happened and Biden lost a game of marbles against Xi. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
monkmith 10/19/21 4:45:13 PM #26:	maybe if china doesn't collapse first. real issue is when it does collapse and one of the splinter countries takes control of their nuclear supply. --- Taarsidath-an halsaam. Quando il gioco e finito, il re e il pedone vanno nella stessa scatola <cite>monkmith posted [p:959196061] in A war betw... [t:79717391]...</cite> <quote>maybe if china doesn't collapse first. real issue is when it does collapse and one of the splinter countries takes control of their nuclear supply. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > A war between the US and China is almost inevitable (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > A war between the US and China is almost inevitable