Current Events > If Russia fires a nuke at the US, think US will fire a nuke back?

Topic List	Page List: 1
IdiotMachine 05/07/22 10:37:42 AM #1:	If Russia fires a nuke at an uninhabited area of the US as a warning, think US will fire a nuke back? Yes. No. If Russia fires a nuke at an uninhabited area of the US as a warning, think US will fire a nuke back? - Results (73 votes) Yes. 90.41% (66 votes) 66 No. 9.59% (7 votes) 7 Obviously if they fire one in a populated area, US will retailiate like crazy. But what if they fire one at a flyover state with no population, so that no one actually got hurt/killed from the initial blast? --- https://i.imgur.com/XNEdLrJ.png <cite>IdiotMachine posted [p:964855836] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote> If Russia fires a nuke at an uninhabited area of the US as a warning, think US will fire a nuke back? Yes. No. Vote View Results If Russia fires a nuke at an uninhabited area of the US as a warning, think US will fire a nuke back? - Results (73 votes) Yes. 90.41% (66 votes) 66 No. 9.59% (7 votes) 7 Show Voting Form Obviously if they fire one in a populated area, US will retailiate like crazy. But what if they fire one at a flyover state with no population, so that no one actually got hurt/killed from the initial blast? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
uwnim 05/07/22 10:38:34 AM #2:	We'd likely retaliate before it even hits. --- I want a pet Lavos Spawn. [Order of the Cetaceans: Phocoena dioptrica] <cite>uwnim posted [p:964855854] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>We'd likely retaliate before it even hits. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 05/07/22 10:39:10 AM #3:	Ours would be in the air before theirs even hit the ground --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:964855863] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Ours would be in the air before theirs even hit the ground </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Error1355 05/07/22 10:39:34 AM #4:	Nuclear deterrence only works if there is mutually assured destruction. --- As pieces start coming apart she'll stitch those wings to your heart But it's not what you wanted she looks deep in your eyes she sees all your flaws <cite>Error1355 posted [p:964855869] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Nuclear deterrence only works if there is mutually assured destruction. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
faizan_faizan 05/07/22 10:42:01 AM #5:	IdiotMachine posted... Obviously if they fire one in a populated area, US will retailiate like crazy. But what if they fire one at a flyover state with no population, so that no one actually got hurt/killed from the initial blast? If anyone actually fires a nuke, it's going to drop in a population center. --- Allergic to bull****. <cite>faizan_faizan posted [p:964855904] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>IdiotMachine posted... </cite> <quote>Obviously if they fire one in a populated area, US will retailiate like crazy. But what if they fire one at a flyover state with no population, so that no one actually got hurt/killed from the initial blast?</quote>If anyone actually fires a nuke, it's going to drop in a population center. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Glob 05/07/22 10:42:20 AM #6:	Would the only country to ever use nuclear weapons against another, who have spent the time since spending a ridiculous amount on their military including nuclear stockpiling so that they feel that nobody will fuck with them, retaliate to a nuclear attack? That's your question? <cite>Glob posted [p:964855907] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Would the only country to ever use nuclear weapons against another, who have spent the time since spending a ridiculous amount on their military including nuclear stockpiling so that they feel that nobody will fuck with them, retaliate to a nuclear attack? That's your question? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Arcanine2009 05/07/22 10:43:16 AM #7:	Absolutely. I don't think U.S. will target a civilian location though. --- Less is more. Everything you want, isn't everything you need. <cite>Arcanine2009 posted [p:964855916] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Absolutely. I don't think U.S. will target a civilian location though. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
littlebro07 05/07/22 10:43:35 AM #8:	all of Russia would probably be blown the fuck up within a day --- https://i.imgtc.com/MGGa6Os.gif <cite>littlebro07 posted [p:964855923] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>all of Russia would probably be blown the fuck up within a day </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kloe_Rinz 05/07/22 10:45:03 AM #9:	Could a nuke be intercepted somehow if we knew it was coming? Like launch a drone and shoot it down over the ocean? <cite>Kloe_Rinz posted [p:964855949] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Could a nuke be intercepted somehow if we knew it was coming? Like launch a drone and shoot it down over the ocean? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IdiotMachine 05/07/22 10:45:36 AM #10:	Consider that if we fire back, it would actually be worse for the entire world. I wonder if we would "think of the world" and not fire back. --- https://i.imgur.com/XNEdLrJ.png <cite>IdiotMachine posted [p:964855957] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Consider that if we fire back, it would actually be worse for the entire world. I wonder if we would "think of the world" and not fire back. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Popo 05/07/22 10:47:14 AM #11:	If a single nuke gets launched, Id imagine a decent chunk of the populated parts of the US, Europe, Russia, Israel, and possibly China, India, Pakistan, and Korea (depending on if they get involved) will be in ashes very quickly. --- Live action Hungry Hungry Hippos though, now that was a sport. ~Aeon Azuran <cite>The Popo posted [p:964855973] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>If a single nuke gets launched, Id imagine a decent chunk of the populated parts of the US, Europe, Russia, Israel, and possibly China, India, Pakistan, and Korea (depending on if they get involved) will be in ashes very quickly. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivynn 05/07/22 10:47:36 AM #12:	They'd have to or else MAD means nothing. --- http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif <cite>Ivynn posted [p:964855980] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>They'd have to or else MAD means nothing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 05/07/22 10:48:20 AM #13:	thronedfire2 posted... Ours would be in the air before theirs even hit the ground --- Oda break tracker 2022- 3 (2) \| THE Ohio State: 12-2 \| Las Vegas Raiders: 10-8 <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:964855989] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>thronedfire2 posted...</cite> <quote>Ours would be in the air before theirs even hit the ground </quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IdiotMachine 05/07/22 10:49:06 AM #14:	Ivynn posted... They'd have to or else MAD means nothing. Theory of MAD is fine, but the actual use of it.... You're just asking for more death and destruction. --- https://i.imgur.com/XNEdLrJ.png <cite>IdiotMachine posted [p:964856003] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Ivynn posted... </cite> <quote>They'd have to or else MAD means nothing.</quote>Theory of MAD is fine, but the actual use of it.... You're just asking for more death and destruction. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dummy420 05/07/22 10:52:41 AM #15:	IdiotMachine posted... Theory of MAD is fine, but the actual use of it.... You're just asking for more death and destruction. Its either let them win or noone wins when it comes to nukes. Who in power do you think isnt going with the second option? --- Trying is the first step towards failure, so just dont give it a shot and you cant dissapoint. <cite>dummy420 posted [p:964856053] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>IdiotMachine posted... </cite> <quote>Theory of MAD is fine, but the actual use of it.... You're just asking for more death and destruction.</quote>Its either let them win or noone wins when it comes to nukes. Who in power do you think isnt going with the second option? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
K181 05/07/22 10:54:04 AM #16:	IdiotMachine posted... Obviously if they fire one in a populated area, US will retailiate like crazy. But what if they fire one at a flyover state with no population, so that no one actually got hurt/killed from the initial blast? You mean the areas where most of our nuclear weapons are based? Oh yeah, sure, wed totally let the Ruskies get a first strike on our nuclear arsenal without responding. /s --- Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:964856079] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>IdiotMachine posted... </cite> <quote>Obviously if they fire one in a populated area, US will retailiate like crazy. But what if they fire one at a flyover state with no population, so that no one actually got hurt/killed from the initial blast?</quote> You mean the areas where most of our nuclear weapons are based? Oh yeah, sure, wed totally let the Ruskies get a first strike on our nuclear arsenal without responding. /s </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ratchetrockon 05/07/22 10:55:06 AM #17:	Ya --- I'm a Taurus I like collecting headphones and iems. My fave game of all time is DMC 3 SE on PC w/ style switch mod. IMO it the best button masher on earth <cite>Ratchetrockon posted [p:964856096] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Ya </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 05/07/22 11:05:46 AM #18:	No I think they would go "We had a good run" and surrender WTF question is this? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:964856259] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>No I think they would go "We had a good run" and surrender WTF question is this? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
faizan_faizan 05/07/22 11:07:22 AM #19:	IdiotMachine posted... Consider that if we fire back, it would actually be worse for the entire world. I wonder if we would "think of the world" and not fire back. Are you living in some kind of fantasy world? Too many movies dude. --- Allergic to bull****. <cite>faizan_faizan posted [p:964856288] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>IdiotMachine posted... </cite> <quote>Consider that if we fire back, it would actually be worse for the entire world. I wonder if we would "think of the world" and not fire back.</quote>Are you living in some kind of fantasy world? Too many movies dude. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
waterjoe 05/07/22 11:27:29 AM #20:	Nobody is gonna do anything they are just dick swinging. <cite>waterjoe posted [p:964856613] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Nobody is gonna do anything they are just dick swinging. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3PiesAndAFork 05/07/22 11:30:35 AM #21:	Nobody in their right mind (or even crazy mind) would ever use a nuke as a warning shot. As soon as one launches, they all launch. That's the point of MAD. --- @('_')@ <cite>3PiesAndAFork posted [p:964856677] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>Nobody in their right mind (or even crazy mind) would ever use a nuke as a warning shot. As soon as one launches, they all launch. That's the point of MAD. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
toreysback 05/07/22 11:34:58 AM #22:	more than one --- Debussy understood that a work of art, or any effort to create beauty was always regarded by some people as a personal attack <cite>toreysback posted [p:964856765] in If Russia ... [t:80012403]...</cite> <quote>more than one </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > If Russia fires a nuke at the US, think US will fire a nuke back? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > If Russia fires a nuke at the US, think US will fire a nuke back?