Current Events > Republican Party On Destroying Abortion Rights: Get Over It

(+) Yeah! (+)

gatorsPENSbucs posted...

The only republican I can name is Trump. Or I guess also the Bushs. Sorry, I dont care for political people and if I hear a name other than a president then its pretty much gibberish to me. Still, theres no reason to claim one person represents an entire group, which I think everyone here can put their bias aside and agree with.

Well I'm sorry to inform you that the Republicans have made it very clear that they do agree with him through their actions, inactions and words. When the poster said that he was speaking for the party, he wasn't exaggerating.

Always fun to witness a meltdown that leads into a moderation lol

gatorsPENSbucs posted...

Nah, I dont vote, and according to some what side are you thing Ive seen on here Id be voting for the left.

When someone says theyll federally legalize weed is the day Ill vote.

Ah, so your opinion literally doesn't matter since you are a lazy, leaching, non-participant.

Got it.

Agent_Stroud posted...

Hey, it sure stopped Japan back during WWII, as they didnt fancy going up against a country that, I quote, had a rifle pointed at them from behind every rock and tree.

No, it was nuclear weapons that did that.

Read a book.

Doesn't seem like a winning electoral strategy imho

National abortion freedom: OH NO! UNDO IT!!!!
National abortion ban: GET OVER IT, LOL.

"Get over it" and "Calm down" were 2 of the most common responses our resident MAGAs here gave.

Mr_Sandbag posted...

My wife, who is a women, disagrees. What is the point of having the right to life, without an effective way of protecting it?

You've never been on a date before.

Popcorn2000 posted...

sad thing is they arent even conservative views, theyre fascist ones

Most people have no idea.

In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote that the folkish state a Nazi term for an idealized and racially pure greater Germany, must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people.

In this same passage, Hitler wrote that, It must be considered reprehensible to withhold healthy children from the nation, adding that the state must act as the guardian of a millennial future in the face of which the wishes and the selfishness of the individual must appear as nothing and submit.

Hitler also spoke of these issues in a 1934 speech to the National Socialist Womens League:

https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=1557

Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the existence of her people. [] Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist womens movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Womens movement has in reality but one single point, and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole life-struggle.

Indeed, this view was codified in German law by 1943, which stated:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/4397988

A woman who kills her fetus or permits such a killing by another will be punished by a prison sentence and, in especially serious cases, by penitentiary. An attempt is punishable. Whoever else kills the fetus of a pregnant woman will be punished by a penitentiary sentence, in milder cases by prison.

If the perpetrator through such deeds continuously impairs the vitality of the German Volk, the death penalty can be imposed. Whoever procures for the pregnant woman a means or objects for killing the fetus will be punished by prison sentence, and in especially serious cases, by penitentiary.

The cruelty is the point

I dont doubt the dude in the OP actually said that in response but

Are we legit at the point where we just snip 2% of someones response without the question even being in the video? The dude was clearly going to say more. We dont even know what hes replying to lol.