Current Events > $3,478 but radical feminists win the Presidency in 2024

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
UnfairRepresent 06/02/23 2:21:01 PM #1:	Would you take it? Yes No Would you take it? - Results (128 votes) Yes 60.16% (77 votes) 77 No 39.84% (51 votes) 51 Money is after tax but if you take it then in 2024 radical feminists from an independent party will take advantage of the infighting among Democrats and Republicans (+ encouragment of young voters/contrarians and memes) to sneak in the back door and win the election. They get destroyed in the popular vote coming a distant 3rd but win enough key states to barely win the Electoral Vote with 273. Trump is livid, Joe Biden doesn't know what's going on because he's 200 years old and is probably doing a victory speech akin to Zoolander despite losing. Kamala Harris is fuming that she's not the first female prez. The new president elect is already making a speech about how she is going to abolish the patriarchy and liberate women in our unjust society by challenging existing social norms and institutions. Laying out plans to give big tax break for vegans. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/0/4/AAZiH8AAEiFs.jpg Inverse to your country's next leadership contest if not American. Would you take it? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973882806] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote> Would you take it? Yes No Vote View Results Would you take it? - Results (128 votes) Yes 60.16% (77 votes) 77 No 39.84% (51 votes) 51 Show Voting Form function poll_vote() { var vote_option = $("input[name='poll_vote']:checked").val(); if(!vote_option) return; $.ajax({ type: 'POST', url: '/ajax/forum_poll_vote', data: { option: vote_option, board: '400', topic: '80464161', message: '0', key: '20ada062' }, success: function(response) { if(response.error) { alert(response.error); } else { $("#poll_vote").hide(); $("#poll_results").html(response.html).show(); } } }); } function view_results_legacy() { $("#poll_vote").hide(); $("#poll_results").show(); } function hide_results_legacy() { $("#poll_results").hide(); $("#poll_vote").show(); } Money is after tax but if you take it then in 2024 radical feminists from an independent party will take advantage of the infighting among Democrats and Republicans (+ encouragment of young voters/contrarians and memes) to sneak in the back door and win the election. They get destroyed in the popular vote coming a distant 3rd but win enough key states to barely win the Electoral Vote with 273. Trump is livid, Joe Biden doesn't know what's going on because he's 200 years old and is probably doing a victory speech akin to Zoolander despite losing. Kamala Harris is fuming that she's not the first female prez. The new president elect is already making a speech about how she is going to abolish the patriarchy and liberate women in our unjust society by challenging existing social norms and institutions. Laying out plans to give big tax break for vegans. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/0/4/AAZiH8AAEiFs.jpg Inverse to your country's next leadership contest if not American. Would you take it? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedeaLysistrata 06/02/23 2:21:49 PM #2:	Do they respond? --- updated 5/22/2023 https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1568-100-presidents <cite>MedeaLysistrata posted [p:973882823] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Do they respond?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#3	Post #3 was unavailable or deleted.
Tenlaar 06/02/23 2:22:37 PM #4:	Why do you equate radical feminism with veganism? Thats weird. <cite>Tenlaar posted [p:973882838] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Why do you equate radical feminism with veganism? Thats weird. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ANort175 06/02/23 2:22:44 PM #5:	Still better than the GOP winning --- Are we the baddies? <cite>ANort175 posted [p:973882841] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Still better than the GOP winning</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ellis123 06/02/23 2:23:27 PM #6:	Tenlaar posted... Why do you equate radical feminism with veganism? Thats weird. Chuds view both as woke. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:973882855] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Tenlaar posted... </cite><quote>Why do you equate radical feminism with veganism? Thats weird.</quote>Chuds view both as woke.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DD_Divine 06/02/23 2:23:44 PM #7:	Yes. Take back the streets. take back the night! Respect for women! --- while driving yesterday I saw a banana peel in the road and I instinctively swerved to miss it, thanks a lot Mario Kart. <cite>DD_Divine posted [p:973882860] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Yes.Take back the streets. take back the night! Respect for women!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 06/02/23 2:24:08 PM #8:	deal just to ensure 2024 doesnt go to the GOP. at this point i almost dont care who wins as long as it's not a Republican Tenlaar posted... Why do you equate radical feminism with veganism? Thats weird. would you say that TC unfairly represented something? --- I hope something good happens to you today Playing: Octopath Traveler 2 <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:973882868] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>deal just to ensure 2024 doesnt go to the GOP. at this point i almost dont care who wins as long as it's not a Republican Tenlaar posted... </cite><quote>Why do you equate radical feminism with veganism? Thats weird.</quote>would you say that TC unfairly represented something?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 06/02/23 2:25:10 PM #9:	Tenlaar posted... Why do you equate radical feminism with veganism? Thats weird. Sigless user logic Look up vegetarian ecofeminism The links between radical feminism, enviromentalism and veganism/vegetarianism are stronger than the links between Conservatives, Guns, Religion and NASCAR. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973882895] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Tenlaar posted... </cite><quote>Why do you equate radical feminism with veganism? Thats weird.</quote>Sigless user logicLook up vegetarian ecofeminismThe links between radical feminism, enviromentalism and veganism/vegetarianism are stronger than the links between Conservatives, Guns, Religion and NASCAR.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AloneIBreak 06/02/23 2:25:18 PM #10:	Maybe. Whats radical about them? --- "Never confuse education with intelligence, you can have a PhD and still be an idiot." -Richard Feynman <cite>AloneIBreak posted [p:973882898] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Maybe. Whats radical about them?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 06/02/23 2:25:34 PM #11:	So a few grand, and a not-fascist is guaranteed to take the executive branch? What's the downside? Congress would temper any bs I don't agree with. --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man#Steelmanning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:973882903] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>So a few grand, and a not-fascist is guaranteed to take the executive branch?What's the downside? Congress would temper any bs I don't agree with. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 06/02/23 2:26:02 PM #12:	UnfairRepresent posted... Laying out plans to give big tax break for vegans. fuck yeah. end subsidies for meat, dairy and eggs, too! --- I hope something good happens to you today Playing: Octopath Traveler 2 <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:973882914] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>Laying out plans to give big tax break for vegans.</quote>fuck yeah. end subsidies for meat, dairy and eggs, too!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ricemills 06/02/23 2:26:51 PM #13:	I'd take it for free --- You have the right to remain silent. Anything you posted will be misquoted, then be used against you. http://error1355.com/ce/Ricemills.html <cite>Ricemills posted [p:973882933] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>I'd take it for free</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 06/02/23 2:27:47 PM #14:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Congress would temper any bs I don't agree with. To me this is why I would take the money And it's actually a bad thing. If a weird 3rd party ever actually did win the presidency, congress would just block literally everything they ever did. So it'd be pretty much the same as just not having a president. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973882956] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Anarchy_Juiblex posted... </cite><quote>Congress would temper any bs I don't agree with.</quote>To me this is why I would take the moneyAnd it's actually a bad thing.If a weird 3rd party ever actually did win the presidency, congress would just block literally everything they ever did.So it'd be pretty much the same as just not having a president. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ironman2009 06/02/23 2:28:22 PM #15:	Don't want an extremist of any sort to be president. --- THRILLHO <cite>ironman2009 posted [p:973882969] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Don't want an extremist of any sort to be president. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bandit_Keith 06/02/23 2:34:14 PM #16:	UnfairRepresent posted... They get destroyed in the popular vote coming a distant 3rd but win enough key states to barely win the Electoral Vote with 273. That's actually literally impossible. --- http://i.imgur.com/nq0Fn6a.jpg <cite>Bandit_Keith posted [p:973883088] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>They get destroyed in the popular vote coming a distant 3rd but win enough key states to barely win the Electoral Vote with 273.</quote>That's actually literally impossible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
willythemailboy 06/02/23 2:53:25 PM #17:	Bandit_Keith posted... That's actually literally impossible. If voter turnout was low enough in some states it's actually quite possible, depending on your definition of "distant" third. It's highly unlikely, as it would require bare minimum 34% wins in 38 states with the other 12 large states going entirely D/R. Some of the small states could be won with as few as 90,000 votes (or fewer, if voter turnout is substantially lower than 2020). --- There are four lights. <cite>willythemailboy posted [p:973883435] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Bandit_Keith posted... </cite><quote>That's actually literally impossible.</quote>If voter turnout was low enough in some states it's actually quite possible, depending on your definition of "distant" third. It's highly unlikely, as it would require bare minimum 34% wins in 38 states with the other 12 large states going entirely D/R. Some of the small states could be won with as few as 90,000 votes (or fewer, if voter turnout is substantially lower than 2020).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Euripides 06/02/23 2:54:03 PM #18:	win/win --- he/him/his <cite>Euripides posted [p:973883444] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>win/win</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nocturnal_traveler 06/02/23 2:54:52 PM #19:	Radical feminism is the minority even amongst other feminists, and only incels and conservatives think otherwise. Like with the Democrats, they'd hardly get anything through. So while our country would be stagnant for a few years, that's still better than a chance of having a Republican in power. --- --I understand your opinion. I just don't care about it. ~Jedah-- <cite>nocturnal_traveler posted [p:973883456] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Radical feminism is the minority even amongst other feminists, and only incels and conservatives think otherwise. Like with the Democrats, they'd hardly get anything through. So while our country would be stagnant for a few years, that's still better than a chance of having a Republican in power.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#20	Post #20 was unavailable or deleted.
firedoom666 06/02/23 2:58:19 PM #21:	Where's the downside? --- We're on a journey to forever! Dreams eternal in a wondrous world without walls We are Forever, wondering what the future holds <cite>firedoom666 posted [p:973883517] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Where's the downside?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pitlord_Special 06/02/23 2:59:12 PM #22:	It would basically be like Lincoln being elected again. The South would secede, Civil War II would erupt, and the stock market would implode. --- Posted from my iPhone 13 <cite>Pitlord_Special posted [p:973883528] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>It would basically be like Lincoln being elected again. The South would secede, Civil War II would erupt, and the stock market would implode.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
xlr_big-coop 06/02/23 3:02:38 PM #23:	Hell no --- :) <cite>xlr_big-coop posted [p:973883588] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Hell no</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sheiky-Baby 06/02/23 3:03:17 PM #24:	UnfairRepresent posted... Money is after tax No. --- Once you lose your integrity, everything comes easy afterwards. <cite>Sheiky-Baby posted [p:973883605] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>Money is after tax</quote>No.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bandit_Keith 06/02/23 3:27:53 PM #25:	willythemailboy posted... If voter turnout was low enough in some states it's actually quite possible, depending on your definition of "distant" third. It's highly unlikely, as it would require bare minimum 34% wins in 38 states with the other 12 large states going entirely D/R. Some of the small states could be won with as few as 90,000 votes (or fewer, if voter turnout is substantially lower than 2020). Voter turnout would have to be both substantially lower in some states and also stay high in the other states. To get to 273 specifically you have to pick up some highly populated(top 10) states or you'll never get to 273. --- http://i.imgur.com/nq0Fn6a.jpg <cite>Bandit_Keith posted [p:973884034] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>willythemailboy posted... </cite><quote>If voter turnout was low enough in some states it's actually quite possible, depending on your definition of "distant" third. It's highly unlikely, as it would require bare minimum 34% wins in 38 states with the other 12 large states going entirely D/R. Some of the small states could be won with as few as 90,000 votes (or fewer, if voter turnout is substantially lower than 2020).</quote>Voter turnout would have to be both substantially lower in some states and also stay high in the other states. To get to 273 specifically you have to pick up some highly populated(top 10) states or you'll never get to 273. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryangrad 06/02/23 3:27:57 PM #26:	I love the idea of places like Montana, North and South Dakota, Mississippi, and Alabama voting for a radical feminist. --- http://i.imgur.com/v3SzL0d.gif http://i.imgur.com/n8MtRqd.jpg <cite>Ryangrad posted [p:973884036] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>I love the idea of places like Montana, North and South Dakota, Mississippi, and Alabama voting for a radical feminist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KI_Simpson 06/02/23 3:29:13 PM #27:	This would destroy the Electoral College and be less damaging than a Republican presidency, I'd let this scenario happen for free. --- They/them <cite>KI_Simpson posted [p:973884061] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>This would destroy the Electoral College and be less damaging than a Republican presidency, I'd let this scenario happen for free.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
willythemailboy 06/02/23 3:33:04 PM #28:	Bandit_Keith posted... Voter turnout would have to be both substantially lower in some states and also stay high in the other states. To get to 273 specifically you have to pick up some highly populated(top 10) states or you'll never get to 273. The top ten states are worth 256, so you could theoretically get there without any of them. --- There are four lights. <cite>willythemailboy posted [p:973884118] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Bandit_Keith posted... </cite><quote>Voter turnout would have to be both substantially lower in some states and also stay high in the other states. To get to 273 specifically you have to pick up some highly populated(top 10) states or you'll never get to 273.</quote>The top ten states are worth 256, so you could theoretically get there without any of them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bandit_Keith 06/02/23 3:39:40 PM #29:	willythemailboy posted... The top ten states are worth 256, so you could theoretically get there without any of them. Yeah, you're right. I'm wrong. This here's the way it would have to shake out. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/3/1/AAcLysAAEiGH.jpg That's hilarious. --- http://i.imgur.com/nq0Fn6a.jpg <cite>Bandit_Keith posted [p:973884230] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>willythemailboy posted... </cite><quote>The top ten states are worth 256, so you could theoretically get there without any of them.</quote>Yeah, you're right. I'm wrong. This here's the way it would have to shake out.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/3/1/AAcLysAAEiGH.jpg That's hilarious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AnsestralRecall 06/02/23 3:45:30 PM #30:	TERFs and their kind? No Better define the content of your question <cite>AnsestralRecall posted [p:973884315] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>TERFs and their kind? No Better define the content of your question </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KI_Simpson 06/02/23 3:47:39 PM #31:	Keep in mind that Trump wouldn't have been able to do much damage if sociopathic Republicans weren't enabling him, if someone won the presidency through an Electoral College fluke then both major parties wouldn't cooperate with any damaging things they tried to push through and the Electoral College would be gone by the next election. --- They/them <cite>KI_Simpson posted [p:973884368] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Keep in mind that Trump wouldn't have been able to do much damage if sociopathic Republicans weren't enabling him, if someone won the presidency through an Electoral College fluke then both major parties wouldn't cooperate with any damaging things they tried to push through and the Electoral College would be gone by the next election.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 06/02/23 4:24:46 PM #32:	Ryangrad posted... I love the idea of places like Montana, North and South Dakota, Mississippi, and Alabama voting for a radical feminist. They don't need a majority So long as more than 34% of them do, the Radical feminists could potentially win on a plurality. North Dakota only had a 62% turnout for the 2020 election. You can get a ton of votes from those 38% who didn't bother alone. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973885088] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Ryangrad posted... </cite><quote>I love the idea of places like Montana, North and South Dakota, Mississippi, and Alabama voting for a radical feminist.</quote>They don't need a majoritySo long as more than 34% of them do, the Radical feminists could potentially win on a plurality.North Dakota only had a 62% turnout for the 2020 election.You can get a ton of votes from those 38% who didn't bother alone. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bass 06/02/23 4:25:30 PM #33:	You act like that's a bad thing. As long as they're not TERFs I say good. The money is just a bonus. --- Many Bothans died to bring you this post. <cite>Bass posted [p:973885097] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>You act like that's a bad thing. As long as they're not TERFs I say good. The money is just a bonus. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 06/02/23 5:57:54 PM #34:	Looks like 2/3rds of CE say yes --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973887040] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Looks like 2/3rds of CE say yes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KI_Simpson 06/02/23 5:59:03 PM #35:	UnfairRepresent posted... Looks like 2/3rds of CE say yes Your scenario pretty much guaranteed they couldn't do any harm and that something very good would happen as a result. --- They/them <cite>KI_Simpson posted [p:973887066] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>Looks like 2/3rds of CE say yes</quote>Your scenario pretty much guaranteed they couldn't do any harm and that something very good would happen as a result.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#36	Post #36 was unavailable or deleted.
#37	Post #37 was unavailable or deleted.
mybbqrules 06/02/23 6:34:35 PM #38:	Imagine thinking a radical feminist president would get any part of her likely radical feminist policy started with the house and senate still weighing in. You think people like Gaetz, Boebert, Graham, Jordan, Tuberville, Gosar, Empty-G, etc are going to allow that? L. M. F. A. O. --- Currently playing: Megaman Collection 1 and 2 <cite>mybbqrules posted [p:973887776] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Imagine thinking a radical feminist president would get any part of her likely radical feminist policy started with the house and senate still weighing in.You think people like Gaetz, Boebert, Graham, Jordan, Tuberville, Gosar, Empty-G, etc are going to allow that?L. M. F. A. O.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TerraSeeker 06/02/23 9:59:34 PM #39:	No way. It's not even a lot of money, and putting a group in power that is actively anti-man is unjust. --- Your words are as empty as your soul <cite>TerraSeeker posted [p:973891843] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>No way. It's not even a lot of money, and putting a group in power that is actively anti-man is unjust. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 06/02/23 10:53:42 PM #40:	Trans-exclusionary or not? --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:973892911] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Trans-exclusionary or not?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 06/03/23 8:37:28 AM #41:	TerraSeeker posted... No way. It's not even a lot of money, and putting a group in power that is actively anti-man is unjust. So let's put groups that are actively anti-women into power instead? Because that's what Republicans and Democrats are --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973898358] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>TerraSeeker posted... </cite><quote>No way. It's not even a lot of money, and putting a group in power that is actively anti-man is unjust.</quote>So let's put groups that are actively anti-women into power instead?Because that's what Republicans and Democrats are</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 06/03/23 8:38:31 AM #42:	it's worth it just to see what happens <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:973898373] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>it's worth it just to see what happens</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
deoxxys 06/03/23 8:40:57 AM #43:	Neverrrr --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 <cite>deoxxys posted [p:973898410] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Neverrrr</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 06/03/23 11:42:51 AM #44:	deoxxys posted... Neverrrr https://youtu.be/UNkRvcUn6VM?t=21 --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973900925] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>deoxxys posted... </cite><quote>Neverrrr</quote>https://youtu.be/UNkRvcUn6VM?t=21</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hyperskate65 06/03/23 12:04:51 PM #45:	Absolutely not --- his comparison suggests we're closet african americans. PSN BlahblahUnicornx <cite>hyperskate65 posted [p:973901280] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>Absolutely not</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
deoxxys 06/03/23 12:07:24 PM #46:	UnfairRepresent posted... https://youtu.be/UNkRvcUn6VM?t=21 Lmao --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 <cite>deoxxys posted [p:973901320] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>https://youtu.be/UNkRvcUn6VM?t=21</quote>Lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CSCA33 06/03/23 12:39:01 PM #47:	That depends if by radical feminists you mean actual feminists, or misogynistic TERFs who have appropriated feminism. --- [click here] (She/Her) <cite>CSCA33 posted [p:973901877] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>That depends if by radical feminists you mean actual feminists, or misogynistic TERFs who have appropriated feminism. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 06/03/23 5:27:05 PM #48:	UnfairRepresent posted... So let's put groups that are actively anti-women into power instead? Because that's what Republicans and Democrats are Democrats are not "anti-women." We have a female veep, the last three SCOTUS justices appointed by Democrats have been women, and we just had a female speaker. --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:973907219] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>UnfairRepresent posted... </cite><quote>So let's put groups that are actively anti-women into power instead?Because that's what Republicans and Democrats are</quote>Democrats are not "anti-women." We have a female veep, the last three SCOTUS justices appointed by Democrats have been women, and we just had a female speaker.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 06/03/23 5:31:39 PM #49:	And Republicans ran Sarah Pallin as the option for VP Mitt Romney has binders full of women after all. You can't just say "Because they have women around they're not anti-women." Harris voted *TWICE* in favour of the Hyde Amendment. And fought hard to keep prostitution strictly illegal in California despite knowing full well this was resulting in the death and inprisonment of sex workers. Something she openly admitted. Democrats LOVE having women around.... who shut up and do as they are told to tow the status quo. Just like Hiliary Clinton Don't be fooled into forgetting that the Democrats are right-wing and pro status quo just because the GOP is considerably worse. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973907281] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>And Republicans ran Sarah Pallin as the option for VPMitt Romney has binders full of women after all.You can't just say "Because they have women around they're not anti-women." Harris voted TWICE in favour of the Hyde Amendment.And fought hard to keep prostitution strictly illegal in California despite knowing full well this was resulting in the death and inprisonment of sex workers. Something she openly admitted.Democrats LOVE having women around.... who shut up and do as they are told to tow the status quo. Just like Hiliary ClintonDon't be fooled into forgetting that the Democrats are right-wing and pro status quo just because the GOP is considerably worse.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 06/05/23 4:30:06 AM #50:	And he was never seen again --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair! http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:973935952] in $3,478 but... [t:80464161]...</cite> <quote>And he was never seen again </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > $3,478 but radical feminists win the Presidency in 2024 (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > $3,478 but radical feminists win the Presidency in 2024