Current Events > Less than 2 hours until Starfield reviews drop

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Northlane 08/31/23 10:05:34 AM #1:	Predict the Metacritic score - Results (36 votes) 97-100 8.33% (3 votes) 3 94-96 8.33% (3 votes) 3 90-93 19.44% (7 votes) 7 87-89 27.78% (10 votes) 10 84-86 16.67% (6 votes) 6 80-83 11.11% (4 votes) 4 77-79 2.78% (1 vote) 1 74-76 0% (0 votes) 0 70-73 0% (0 votes) 0 69 or below 5.56% (2 votes) 2 Well? We'll have like 8 hours to decide before we wanna drop $30 on early access if you're a game pass subscriber I'm still playing AC6 so likely won't but who knows --- "It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life. <cite>Northlane posted [p:975770041] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote> Predict the Metacritic score - Results (36 votes) 97-100 8.33% (3 votes) 3 94-96 8.33% (3 votes) 3 90-93 19.44% (7 votes) 7 87-89 27.78% (10 votes) 10 84-86 16.67% (6 votes) 6 80-83 11.11% (4 votes) 4 77-79 2.78% (1 vote) 1 74-76 0% (0 votes) 0 70-73 0% (0 votes) 0 69 or below 5.56% (2 votes) 2 Show Voting Form Well?We'll have like 8 hours to decide before we wanna drop $30 on early access if you're a game pass subscriberI'm still playing AC6 so likely won't but who knows </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 08/31/23 10:06:03 AM #2:	69 --- See profile pic <cite>Irony posted [p:975770051] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>69 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pinky0926 08/31/23 10:07:45 AM #3:	I'm guessing a safe 85 or so. With a tagline like "Bethesda's newest installment offers an ambitious if flawed take on first person RPG genre, with incredible immersion and world building marred by performance issues and game-breaking bugs." --- CE's Resident Scotsman. http://i.imgur.com/ILz2ZbV.jpg <cite>pinky0926 posted [p:975770081] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>I'm guessing a safe 85 or so. With a tagline like "Bethesda's newest installment offers an ambitious if flawed take on first person RPG genre, with incredible immersion and world building marred by performance issues and game-breaking bugs." </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 08/31/23 10:08:30 AM #4:	pinky0926 posted... I'm guessing a safe 85 or so. With a tagline like "Bethesda's newest installment offers an ambitious if flawed take on first person RPG genre, with incredible immersion and world building marred by performance issues and game-breaking bugs." That's basically Fallout 76 but it had a lower score than that --- See profile pic <cite>Irony posted [p:975770091] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>pinky0926 posted... </cite><quote>I'm guessing a safe 85 or so. With a tagline like "Bethesda's newest installment offers an ambitious if flawed take on first person RPG genre, with incredible immersion and world building marred by performance issues and game-breaking bugs."</quote>That's basically Fallout 76 but it had a lower score than that </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 08/31/23 10:12:08 AM #5:	It's a Bethesda game so it'll probably range from 85-95 but 80% of the reviews will say something like "as you would expect from a Bethesda game" in defense of some really bad jank that lost its novelty 4 games ago. --- http://i.imgur.com/x04tPRZ.jpg http://i.imgur.com/t7T392I.jpg <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:975770135] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>It's a Bethesda game so it'll probably range from 85-95 but 80% of the reviews will say something like "as you would expect from a Bethesda game" in defense of some really bad jank that lost its novelty 4 games ago. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Requiem 08/31/23 10:14:45 AM #6:	Honestly, for a big games like this, I feel like reviewers should at least play for a several days ~ one week before dropping a number (unless the game is so horrid as to be unplayable). But of course, that's not realistic. Anyways, expect it to be in the high 80s, but I don't think it'll break 90. Too much hype that just can't be met and will inevitably leave some reviewers disappointed/let down. --- Copyright free literature available at http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page... otherwise known as Tex-Mex <cite>Requiem posted [p:975770174] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Honestly, for a big games like this, I feel like reviewers should at least play for a several days ~ one week before dropping a number (unless the game is so horrid as to be unplayable).But of course, that's not realistic.Anyways, expect it to be in the high 80s, but I don't think it'll break 90.Too much hype that just can't be met and will inevitably leave some reviewers disappointed/let down. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ratchetrockon 08/31/23 10:19:16 AM #7:	97-100 I just want one game to score this high this year. two came close . One could have maybe achieved this if it had 2 dozen fewer reviewers (and still have like 100+ reviewers lol) tho tbf. maybe not achievable anymore for popular titles idk --- I'm a Taurus. Currently playing: Baldurs Gate 3, Carol Reed Mysteries series, & Spyro 3.5: Return to the Forgotten Realms He/Him <cite>Ratchetrockon posted [p:975770293] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>97-100I just want one game to score this high this year. two came close . One could have maybe achieved this if it had 2 dozen fewer reviewers (and still have like 100+ reviewers lol) tho tbf. maybe not achievable anymore for popular titles idk </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Crimsoness 08/31/23 10:20:03 AM #8:	72 --- She/her Dynamite with a laser beam <cite>Crimsoness posted [p:975770317] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>72 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ironman2009 08/31/23 10:25:02 AM #9:	I hope it's 95ish but my brain tells me 85 or so --- THRILLHO <cite>ironman2009 posted [p:975770421] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>I hope it's 95ish but my brain tells me 85 or so </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darkninja42 08/31/23 10:28:43 AM #10:	Requiem posted... Honestly, for a big games like this, I feel like reviewers should at least play for a several days ~ one week before dropping a number (unless the game is so horrid as to be unplayable). But of course, that's not realistic. Anyways, expect it to be in the high 80s, but I don't think it'll break 90. Too much hype that just can't be met and will inevitably leave some reviewers disappointed/let down. That's what they do. They get early codes like a couple weeks before the review. How else would that work? Unless I'm misunderstanding what you're saying --- I'm far from high end, I just know what suits me. <cite>Darkninja42 posted [p:975770490] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Requiem posted... </cite><quote>Honestly, for a big games like this, I feel like reviewers should at least play for a several days ~ one week before dropping a number (unless the game is so horrid as to be unplayable).But of course, that's not realistic.Anyways, expect it to be in the high 80s, but I don't think it'll break 90.Too much hype that just can't be met and will inevitably leave some reviewers disappointed/let down.</quote>That's what they do. They get early codes like a couple weeks before the review. How else would that work? Unless I'm misunderstanding what you're saying </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
g980 08/31/23 10:30:26 AM #11:	Requiem posted... Honestly, for a big games like this, I feel like reviewers should at least play for a several days ~ one week before dropping a number (unless the game is so horrid as to be unplayable). But of course, that's not realistic. Anyways, expect it to be in the high 80s, but I don't think it'll break 90. Too much hype that just can't be met and will inevitably leave some reviewers disappointed/let down. Didnt they releasw reviewer codes like 2 weeks ago? Im guessing mid 80's There is definitelt a sizeable population of folk with unrealistic expectations out there I'm looking forward to Fallout in space tho --- These old bones live to learn her wanton ways: (I measure time by how a body sways). <cite>g980 posted [p:975770519] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Requiem posted...</cite><quote>Honestly, for a big games like this, I feel like reviewers should at least play for a several days ~ one week before dropping a number (unless the game is so horrid as to be unplayable).But of course, that's not realistic.Anyways, expect it to be in the high 80s, but I don't think it'll break 90.Too much hype that just can't be met and will inevitably leave some reviewers disappointed/let down.</quote>Didnt they releasw reviewer codes like 2 weeks ago?Im guessing mid 80'sThere is definitelt a sizeable population of folk with unrealistic expectations out thereI'm looking forward to Fallout in space tho </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 08/31/23 10:30:39 AM #12:	depends on how honest and critical the reviewers are about the guaranteed plethora of bugs --- I hope something good happens to you today Playing: Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:975770525] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>depends on how honest and critical the reviewers are about the guaranteed plethora of bugs </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Requiem 08/31/23 10:31:54 AM #13:	Ah, I misunderstood how the system worked. Thanks for clarifying it for me. I was under the impression that reviewers got the codes like a day or so before (to prevent leaks) and had a limited time to play before posting a review. --- Copyright free literature available at http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page... otherwise known as Tex-Mex <cite>Requiem posted [p:975770546] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Ah, I misunderstood how the system worked.Thanks for clarifying it for me.I was under the impression that reviewers got the codes like a day or so before (to prevent leaks) and had a limited time to play before posting a review. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nemu 08/31/23 10:32:27 AM #14:	With how bleh it looks so far, I hope it hits the 60-70 range. I hate when they're rewarded for their mediocrity like with Pokemon. <cite>Nemu posted [p:975770558] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>With how bleh it looks so far, I hope it hits the 60-70 range. I hate when they're rewarded for their mediocrity like with Pokemon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
McSame_as_Bush 08/31/23 10:33:40 AM #15:	Depends on the reviewers tolerance for game-breaking bugs. --- not a lot, just forever <cite>McSame_as_Bush posted [p:975770575] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Depends on the reviewers tolerance for game-breaking bugs. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Foppe 08/31/23 10:40:31 AM #16:	McSame_as_Bush posted... Depends on the reviewers tolerance for game-breaking bugs. I mean, they gave Skyrim pre-patched version a high score... --- GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site. -CJayC <cite>Foppe posted [p:975770696] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>McSame_as_Bush posted... </cite><quote>Depends on the reviewers tolerance for game-breaking bugs.</quote>I mean, they gave Skyrim pre-patched version a high score... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SrRd_RacinG 08/31/23 10:46:23 AM #17:	92 --- https://media.giphy.com/media/l3vRn3I4UyDoKyWLC/giphy.gif <cite>SrRd_RacinG posted [p:975770818] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>92 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hyperpowder 08/31/23 11:13:19 AM #18:	Ive heard game journalists that I follow hinting that the game might be boring. So probably around 70-80 --- Whoever beats my score I will give them a $10 PSN or Live card: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpiorAx40GY <cite>hyperpowder posted [p:975771334] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Ive heard game journalists that I follow hinting that the game might be boring. So probably around 70-80 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hereforemnant 08/31/23 11:13:55 AM #19:	Smashingpmkns posted... It's a Bethesda game so it'll probably range from 85-95 but 80% of the reviews will say something like "as you would expect from a Bethesda game" in defense of some really bad jank that lost its novelty 4 games ago. --- 3DS Friend Code: FC: 0318-7199-1150 <cite>hereforemnant posted [p:975771346] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Smashingpmkns posted... </cite><quote>It's a Bethesda game so it'll probably range from 85-95 but 80% of the reviews will say something like "as you would expect from a Bethesda game" in defense of some really bad jank that lost its novelty 4 games ago.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kloe_Rinz 08/31/23 11:14:02 AM #20:	people slurp bethesda so it will get good reviews. its still gonna be a shit game because they are incapable of performing any QA at all. For no particular reason people will treat this game completely differently from cyberpunk <cite>Kloe_Rinz posted [p:975771348] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>people slurp bethesda so it will get good reviews. its still gonna be a shit game because they are incapable of performing any QA at all. For no particular reason people will treat this game completely differently from cyberpunk</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pauIie 08/31/23 11:19:00 AM #21:	Irony posted... That's basically Fallout 76 but it had a lower score than that idk if fo76 had incredible immersion with it's no towns or npcs at launch tho --- http://i.imgur.com/O5APL.jpg http://www.last.fm/user/jaeganja <cite>pauIie posted [p:975771435] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Irony posted... </cite><quote>That's basically Fallout 76 but it had a lower score than that</quote>idk if fo76 had incredible immersion with it's no towns or npcs at launch tho </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Crimsoness 08/31/23 11:22:16 AM #22:	Kloe_Rinz posted... For no particular reason people will treat this game completely differently from cyberpunk Cyberpunk got rave reviews lol --- She/her Dynamite with a laser beam <cite>Crimsoness posted [p:975771496] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Kloe_Rinz posted... </cite><quote>For no particular reason people will treat this game completely differently from cyberpunk</quote>Cyberpunk got rave reviews lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarthAragorn 08/31/23 11:24:25 AM #23:	Kloe_Rinz posted... people slurp bethesda so it will get good reviews. its still gonna be a shit game because they are incapable of performing any QA at all. For no particular reason people will treat this game completely differently from cyberpunk Fallout 4 really wasn't that buggy at launch It sucked, but it wasn't due to bugs --- Asus ROG Strix Z790-E \| Core i9-13900k \| 64GB DDR5-6000 \| RTX 4090 24GB Dell AW3423DW QD-OLED - 1440p Ultrawide, 175hz, GSync <cite>DarthAragorn posted [p:975771544] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Kloe_Rinz posted... </cite><quote>people slurp bethesda so it will get good reviews. its still gonna be a shit game because they are incapable of performing any QA at all. For no particular reason people will treat this game completely differently from cyberpunk</quote>Fallout 4 really wasn't that buggy at launchIt sucked, but it wasn't due to bugs </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hereforemnant 08/31/23 11:29:01 AM #24:	DarthAragorn posted... Fallout 4 really wasn't that buggy at launch It sucked, but it wasn't due to bugs I was still having it crash & corrupt save data years after launch lol, or you couldn't load into an area, or the towns & encampments were janky & not working properly. Glitching out of environments, quests not loading or NPCs not being in the right spaces. I platinumed it, it was very much buggy --- 3DS Friend Code: FC: 0318-7199-1150 <cite>hereforemnant posted [p:975771634] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>DarthAragorn posted... </cite><quote>Fallout 4 really wasn't that buggy at launchIt sucked, but it wasn't due to bugs</quote>I was still having it crash & corrupt save data years after launch lol, or you couldn't load into an area, or the towns & encampments were janky & not working properly. Glitching out of environments, quests not loading or NPCs not being in the right spaces. I platinumed it, it was very much buggy </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Northlane 08/31/23 11:30:04 AM #25:	30 minutes --- "It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life. <cite>Northlane posted [p:975771651] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>30 minutes </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CADE_FOSTER 08/31/23 11:32:26 AM #26:	75-80 tbh <cite>CADE_FOSTER posted [p:975771712] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>75-80 tbh </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BignutzisBack 08/31/23 11:32:56 AM #27:	Low 80's and I think BG3 absolutely impacts reviews --- http://i.imgur.com/plA0Vg9.gif https://media.giphy.com/media/dgK22exekwOLm/giphy.gif <cite>BignutzisBack posted [p:975771721] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Low 80's and I think BG3 absolutely impacts reviews </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darkninja42 08/31/23 11:41:38 AM #28:	Requiem posted... Ah, I misunderstood how the system worked. Thanks for clarifying it for me. I was under the impression that reviewers got the codes like a day or so before (to prevent leaks) and had a limited time to play before posting a review. Nah, so when you see reviews later after the game has been out for a while after the game has released that means they didn't get a code early and had to wait till release to play it like everyone else. If a reviewer was to break an embargo and leak something they would get blacklisted from future coverage and possibly legal action probably depending on whatever their agreement was --- I'm far from high end, I just know what suits me. <cite>Darkninja42 posted [p:975771919] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Requiem posted... </cite><quote>Ah, I misunderstood how the system worked.Thanks for clarifying it for me.I was under the impression that reviewers got the codes like a day or so before (to prevent leaks) and had a limited time to play before posting a review.</quote>Nah, so when you see reviews later after the game has been out for a while after the game has released that means they didn't get a code early and had to wait till release to play it like everyone else. If a reviewer was to break an embargo and leak something they would get blacklisted from future coverage and possibly legal action probably depending on whatever their agreement was </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Crimson_Corsair 08/31/23 11:47:32 AM #29:	I don't know what the critic score will be, but the user scores will be 20-30 points below it. --- My head's not torn off, my sunglasses aren't broken. Amen, hallelujah, peanut butter. <cite>Crimson_Corsair posted [p:975772054] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>I don't know what the critic score will be, but the user scores will be 20-30 points below it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CRON 08/31/23 11:48:37 AM #30:	I'm thinking mid 80s - low 90s. The only truly disappointing aspect of the game based on leaks is that ~~you can't actually explore the entirety of planets~~. --- Thanks for reading! <cite>CRON posted [p:975772067] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>I'm thinking mid 80s - low 90s.The only truly disappointing aspect of the game based on leaks is that you can't actually explore the entirety of planets. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
buddhamonster 08/31/23 11:51:58 AM #31:	pinky0926 posted... I'm guessing a safe 85 or so. With a tagline like "Bethesda's newest installment offers an ambitious if flawed take on first person RPG genre, with incredible immersion and world building marred by performance issues and game-breaking bugs." This is fully my expectation. It'll be big and ambitious, but because it's Bethesda, will be marred by the normal Bethesda bullshit. --- Hey Trashcan Man! What did old lady Semple say when you burned her pension check? Boston Bruins - 2011 Stanley Cup Champs! <cite>buddhamonster posted [p:975772136] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>pinky0926 posted... </cite><quote>I'm guessing a safe 85 or so. With a tagline like "Bethesda's newest installment offers an ambitious if flawed take on first person RPG genre, with incredible immersion and world building marred by performance issues and game-breaking bugs."</quote>This is fully my expectation.It'll be big and ambitious, but because it's Bethesda, will be marred by the normal Bethesda bullshit. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Northlane 08/31/23 12:01:56 PM #32:	IGN and GameSpot getting hammered --- "It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life. <cite>Northlane posted [p:975772320] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>IGN and GameSpot getting hammered </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Northlane 08/31/23 12:02:53 PM #33:	7 from both IGN and GameSpot Welp --- "It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life. <cite>Northlane posted [p:975772336] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>7 from both IGN and GameSpotWelp </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Drumiester 08/31/23 12:03:27 PM #34:	Bust confirmed --- I Love Mercedes Mone! Currently Playing: CoD Cold War Multiplayer <cite>Drumiester posted [p:975772350] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Bust confirmed </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 08/31/23 12:04:45 PM #35:	Xbox in shambles --- See profile pic <cite>Irony posted [p:975772382] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Xbox in shambles </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 08/31/23 12:06:20 PM #36:	Surprised to see "average" scores. Bethesda was very picky about who got review codes in time. --- http://i.imgur.com/6VeX04D.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEcqHA7dbwM <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:975772407] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Surprised to see "average" scores. Bethesda was very picky about who got review codes in time. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
g980 08/31/23 12:06:49 PM #37:	Northlane posted... 7 from both IGN and GameSpot Welp Oof Thats like a 5/10 in non AAA terms --- These old bones live to learn her wanton ways: (I measure time by how a body sways). <cite>g980 posted [p:975772421] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Northlane posted...</cite><quote>7 from both IGN and GameSpotWelp</quote>OofThats like a 5/10 in non AAA terms </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
boxoto 08/31/23 12:07:32 PM #38:	it's currently at 86 on Opencritic: https://opencritic.com/game/14907/starfield --- Don't you agree, Zach? https://streamable.com/xqplw1 <cite>boxoto posted [p:975772439] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>it's currently at 86 on Opencritic:https://opencritic.com/game/14907/starfield </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
archizzy 08/31/23 12:08:42 PM #39:	90-93. --- PSN ID: sled_dogs76 60" Pioneer Kuro Elite PRO151FD, Yamaha RX-V3900 A/V Receiver, Oppo DV983-H player. Coming soon: 2 Seaton Submersives from Mark Seaton <cite>archizzy posted [p:975772462] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>90-93. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ratchetrockon 08/31/23 12:10:36 PM #40:	boxoto posted... it's currently at 86 on Opencritic: https://opencritic.com/game/14907/starfield wtffff --- I'm a Taurus. Currently playing: Baldurs Gate 3, Carol Reed Mysteries series, & Spyro 3.5: Return to the Forgotten Realms He/Him <cite>Ratchetrockon posted [p:975772508] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>boxoto posted... </cite><quote>it's currently at 86 on Opencritic:https://opencritic.com/game/14907/starfield</quote>wtffff </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 08/31/23 12:12:51 PM #41:	https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/0/5/AAZ1peAAEzLd.jpg --- http://i.imgur.com/6VeX04D.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEcqHA7dbwM <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:975772560] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/0/5/AAZ1peAAEzLd.jpg </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DepreceV2 08/31/23 12:12:53 PM #42:	Its currently 88 on Metacritic https://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-series-x/starfield --- Atlanta Falcons choking a 28-3 lead in the 3rd qtr: https://youtu.be/gY8exXZgyqc Atlanta Falcons choking a 26-10 lead in the 4th qtr: https://youtu.be/BYJHgyXiwvs <cite>DepreceV2 posted [p:975772562] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Its currently 88 on Metacritic https://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-series-x/starfield </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ratchetrockon 08/31/23 12:13:14 PM #43:	Vyrulisse posted... https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/0/5/AAZ1peAAEzLd.jpg ign is the worst dude! --- I'm a Taurus. Currently playing: Baldurs Gate 3, Carol Reed Mysteries series, & Spyro 3.5: Return to the Forgotten Realms He/Him <cite>Ratchetrockon posted [p:975772573] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Vyrulisse posted... </cite><quote>https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/0/5/AAZ1peAAEzLd.jpg</quote>ign is the worst dude! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ViewtifulJoe 08/31/23 12:14:34 PM #44:	So what wins? Blind hype and having already pre-ordered? Or Metacritic, where any casual with a pencil's opinion gets factored in? --- Still waiting on that third threat <cite>ViewtifulJoe posted [p:975772608] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>So what wins? Blind hype and having already pre-ordered? Or Metacritic, where any casual with a pencil's opinion gets factored in? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 08/31/23 12:17:31 PM #45:	It's not going to win Game of the Year Probably will come down to Tears of the Kingdom and Baldurs Gate 3 <cite>Zikten posted [p:975772673] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>It's not going to win Game of the YearProbably will come down to Tears of the Kingdom and Baldurs Gate 3</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ratchetrockon 08/31/23 12:18:17 PM #46:	my day is ruined i shouldn't have put so much of my emotional energy into starfield was really hoping it'd get 97-100 --- I'm a Taurus. Currently playing: Baldurs Gate 3, Carol Reed Mysteries series, & Spyro 3.5: Return to the Forgotten Realms He/Him <cite>Ratchetrockon posted [p:975772694] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>my day is ruined i shouldn't have put so much of my emotional energy into starfieldwas really hoping it'd get 97-100 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CADE_FOSTER 08/31/23 12:19:33 PM #47:	Northlane posted... 7 from both IGN and GameSpot Welp Lol <cite>CADE_FOSTER posted [p:975772740] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Northlane posted... </cite><quote>7 from both IGN and GameSpotWelp</quote>Lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 08/31/23 12:22:00 PM #48:	Saddest revelation to me is that it seems Bethesda didn't really dream big in terms of imagination. --- http://i.imgur.com/6VeX04D.jpg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEcqHA7dbwM <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:975772806] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Saddest revelation to me is that it seems Bethesda didn't really dream big in terms of imagination. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Northlane 08/31/23 12:23:55 PM #49:	Vyrulisse posted... Saddest revelation to me is that it seems Bethesda didn't really dream big in terms of imagination. I don't think we will ever get the space game of our dreams --- "It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness; that is life. <cite>Northlane posted [p:975772856] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>Vyrulisse posted... </cite><quote>Saddest revelation to me is that it seems Bethesda didn't really dream big in terms of imagination.</quote>I don't think we will ever get the space game of our dreams </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Crimsoness 08/31/23 12:25:23 PM #50:	lol Final Fantasy 16 gets an 88 on opencritic = GOTY material Starfield gets an 87 = Trash! --- She/her Dynamite with a laser beam <cite>Crimsoness posted [p:975772893] in Less than ... [t:80551548]...</cite> <quote>lolFinal Fantasy 16 gets an 88 on opencritic = GOTY materialStarfield gets an 87 = Trash! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Less than 2 hours until Starfield reviews drop (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Less than 2 hours until Starfield reviews drop