Current Events > Trump may have violated copyright law by selling merch with his mugshot

(+) Yeah! (+)

Donald Trump surrendered to authorities in Georgia last week and had his mug shot taken by the Fulton County sheriff. He wasted no time in turning that photo into a massive moneymaker. You name it, the Trump campaign slapped his mug shot on it: a $34 mug shot T-shirt, a Never Surrender coffee mug for $25, beverage coolers at $15 for a pair and much, much more.

While there has been no official report on how much the sale of these items has brought in, Politico reported last week that the campaign had raised north of $7 million since the mug shots release, powered by the sales of merchandise bearing Trumps scowling mugshot.

But as various legal experts have noted, Trumps sale of that mug shot, taken by the Fulton County sheriff, may violate U.S. copyright laws. This could mean that theoretically, the millions he is making off that photo may rightfully belong to the Fulton County sheriff an entity that just happens to be in desperate need of funds to address the horrific conditions in the Fulton County Jail.

As a general principle, the owner of a photos copyright is the person (or entity) who takes that photo, not its subject. In federal criminal cases, the U.S. government is not permitted to own the copyright to booking photos, so they are considered in the public domain. However, that is generally not the case with mug shots taken in state and local criminal proceedings.

Betsy Rosenblatt, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, recently explained to Spectrum News 1 Ohio that the copyright owner of Trumps mug shot is likely the Fulton County Sheriffs Office. Other legal experts support that interpretation, including a 2022 article in the University of Georgia School of Laws Journal of Intellectual Property Law that noted, In the context of photographs taken by law enforcement during the booking process, the author of the mugshot photograph is the law enforcement agency.

That would, again theoretically mean the Fulton County Sheriffs Office has exclusive rights under U.S. copyright law to reproduce, sell or otherwise distribute Trumps mug shot, except for certain uses like publishing the photo for news purposes. (I emailed the Fulton County Sheriffs Office on Wednesday to confirm it owns the copyright and to ask if the Trump campaign has permission to use the image to sell for a profit. I have not received a response.)

Its true the Fulton County Sheriffs Office did release the mug shot, but that doesnt necessarily mean anyone else has the right to reproduce and sell it for a profit, as the Trump campaign is doing.

In fact, the Trump campaign itself clearly understands the photos commercial value, as evidenced by its recent threat to come after anyone else who wants to use the image to make a profit. Chris LaCivita, one of Trumps top advisers, made that clear in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that said: "If you are a campaign, PAC , scammer and you try raising money off the mugshot of @realDonaldTrump and you have not received prior permission ...WE ARE COMING AFTER YOU you will NOT SCAM DONORS".

Trump could pursue such a claim, not based in copyright law, however, but because he has the right to control the use of his image for commercial purposes. But again, that is in no way a defense for Trump and his campaigns apparent violation of copyright law.

...

What happens now? As Rosenblatt noted, the sheriff office's decision "to enforce its copyright is entirely up to them.

To be clear, this seems very unlikely. But if it did, the damages to which it could be entitled under U.S. copyright law, while not criminal, could still be very costly for Team Trump. Specifically, all the money that the Trump campaign made from selling the mug shot.

Recently, Fulton County Sheriff Patrick Labat pleaded with county commissioners for funding he desperately needs to address conditions in the county jail, according to local station 11 Alive. LaBat told the commissioners, Its a human crisis, and I have been begging for the resources, adding, Im really, really tired of begging for money to do my job.

If LaBat brings a claim of copyright infringement against Trumps campaign and wins, he could see millions of dollars come his agencys way to address those issues. That would at least be a just result.

Do it.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-mug-shot-georgia-t-shirt-cash-grab-rcna102825

I bet the shirts aren't even Glidden quality

Why is this guy not locked up again

Why is it unlikely that the Sheriff will pursue it?

As far as I care, those photos are public domain.

I don't get it

I thought mugshots were public domain?

A bunch of people started selling it on shirts and stuff. If they go after Trump with it they will have to go after others, like the band Green Day.

UnfairRepresent posted...

I don't get it

I thought mugshots were public domain?

"As a general principle, the owner of a photos copyright is the person (or entity) who takes that photo, not its subject. In federal criminal cases, the U.S. government is not permitted to own the copyright to booking photos, so they are considered in the public domain. However, that is generally not the case with mug shots taken in state and local criminal proceedings."

Starks posted...

As far as I care, those photos are public domain.

What kinda whiny shit is this??

UnfairRepresent posted...

I don't get it

I thought mugshots were public domain?

The quoted article explains that in federal jurisdictions they are, but might not be in state and lower level jurisdictions.

At the very least, it'd still be hilarious if he were just forced to stop selling his mugshot. You know he would be seething mad.

AceAttorneyist posted...

Why is it unlikely that the Sheriff will pursue it?

Because of the same reason that normal people don't sue rich people all the time: they can't afford it.

ellis123 posted...

Because of the same reason that normal people don't sue rich people all the time: they can't afford it.

Also, they probably don't want to deal with an angry MAGA-Cult.

I don't know the law but what stands out most to me is trump and co saying they won't allow anyone else to use the image. Something seems very off about that.

If people can publicly release your mugshot it should be public domain imo. Regardless of political position

That's what I figured, that it was public domain. Anyone could use it to make money.

ragnarokius posted...

I don't know the law but what stands out most to me is trump and co saying they won't allow anyone else to use the image. Something seems very off about that.

They are saying it, because they have no actual right to prevent people from doing so.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/2/8/1/AABhrNAAEWY5.jpg

Starks posted...

As far as I care, those photos are public domain.

i guess its a good thing thats not how we decide the laws, then?