Current Events > Do you think a national ban on abortion is even likely to happen?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Smallville 11/16/24 3:36:51 PM #1:	Read something that some think birth control could be restricted pretty soon, do you believe this is likely? --- "That won't work Boss, hide the target in a place they're unlikely to be found"---GZ <cite>Smallville posted [p:982965043] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>Read something that some think birth control could be restricted pretty soon, do you believe this is likely?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DnDer 11/16/24 3:53:36 PM #2:	If you'd asked me two weeks ago... --- What has books ever teached us? -- Captain Afrohead Subject-verb agreement. -- t3h 0n3 <cite>DnDer posted [p:982965248] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>If you'd asked me two weeks ago...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TommyVercetti 11/16/24 3:53:42 PM #3:	No not really <cite>TommyVercetti posted [p:982965250] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>No not really</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TommyVercetti 11/16/24 3:53:59 PM #4:	DnDer posted... If you'd asked me two weeks ago... 2 weeks ago? <cite>TommyVercetti posted [p:982965253] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>DnDer posted... </cite><quote>If you'd asked me two weeks ago...</quote>2 weeks ago?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DnDer 11/16/24 3:54:42 PM #5:	TommyVercetti posted... 2 weeks ago? Yes. Two weeks ago. --- What has books ever teached us? -- Captain Afrohead Subject-verb agreement. -- t3h 0n3 <cite>DnDer posted [p:982965260] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>TommyVercetti posted... </cite><quote>2 weeks ago?</quote>Yes. Two weeks ago.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ItsNotA2Mer 11/16/24 3:56:48 PM #6:	Very likely. --- It's not the cough that carries you off, it's the coffin they carry you off in. (He/Him). <cite>ItsNotA2Mer posted [p:982965275] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>Very likely.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
leonkr41138 11/16/24 3:56:55 PM #7:	No, state officials want to keep their power --- Im a walking disaster im a demolition man <cite>leonkr41138 posted [p:982965277] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>No, state officials want to keep their power </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Phoro 11/16/24 3:57:25 PM #8:	If it ever does happen, I sincerely hope women stop having sex with men en masse. --- *It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.* - George Carlin <cite>Phoro posted [p:982965285] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>If it ever does happen, I sincerely hope women stop having sex with men en masse. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TommyVercetti 11/16/24 4:03:04 PM #9:	DnDer posted... Yes. Two weeks ago. The election was two weeks ago, time flies <cite>TommyVercetti posted [p:982965350] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>DnDer posted... </cite><quote>Yes. Two weeks ago.</quote>The election was two weeks ago, time flies</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheShadowViper 11/16/24 4:04:40 PM #10:	No. Republicans don't actually want a national ban because then they've completely won and they can't use the issue anymore. They'd rather pretend to be pushing towards that but never get there. <cite>TheShadowViper posted [p:982965368] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>No. Republicans don't actually want a national ban because then they've completely won and they can't use the issue anymore. They'd rather pretend to be pushing towards that but never get there.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DnDer 11/16/24 4:05:29 PM #11:	TommyVercetti posted... The election was two weeks ago, time flies There you go, chief. You solved the puzzle. My answer would have been very different two weeks ago because of the election. --- What has books ever teached us? -- Captain Afrohead Subject-verb agreement. -- t3h 0n3 <cite>DnDer posted [p:982965377] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>TommyVercetti posted... </cite><quote>The election was two weeks ago, time flies</quote>There you go, chief. You solved the puzzle.My answer would have been very different two weeks ago because of the election. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LeTigre 11/16/24 4:10:41 PM #12:	TheShadowViper posted... No. Republicans don't actually want a national ban because then they've completely won and they can't use the issue anymore. They'd rather pretend to be pushing towards that but never get there. --- The world's a mess and yr my only cure (formerly BrohammedAli) <cite>LeTigre posted [p:982965421] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>TheShadowViper posted... </cite><quote>No. Republicans don't actually want a national ban because then they've completely won and they can't use the issue anymore. They'd rather pretend to be pushing towards that but never get there.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trumble 11/16/24 4:12:50 PM #13:	TheShadowViper posted... No. Republicans don't actually want a national ban because then they've completely won and they can't use the issue anymore. They'd rather pretend to be pushing towards that but never get there. This. And similar logic goes for the Democrats not going further in protecting it, too. You'll see small steps towards what the party in power claims to want, they need to at least be convincing enough for the average random person, but saying that they want it to be banned (R) / completely protected (D) is 100% a case of strategic PR. --- Without your Trumble, you are but an empty shell. <cite>Trumble posted [p:982965437] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>TheShadowViper posted... </cite><quote>No. Republicans don't actually want a national ban because then they've completely won and they can't use the issue anymore. They'd rather pretend to be pushing towards that but never get there.</quote>This. And similar logic goes for the Democrats not going further in protecting it, too. You'll see small steps towards what the party in power claims to want, they need to at least be convincing enough for the average random person, but saying that they want it to be banned (R) / completely protected (D) is 100% a case of strategic PR.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smallville 11/16/24 4:17:10 PM #14:	Trumble posted... This. And similar logic goes for the Democrats not going further in protecting it, too. You'll see small steps towards what the party in power claims to want, they need to at least be convincing enough for the average random person, but saying that they want it to be banned (R) / completely protected (D) is 100% a case of strategic PR. Oh really? you believe that dems don't really want to 100 percent protect it? Interesting. Have not heard lots of people say that --- "That won't work Boss, hide the target in a place they're unlikely to be found"---GZ <cite>Smallville posted [p:982965485] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>Trumble posted... </cite><quote>This. And similar logic goes for the Democrats not going further in protecting it, too. You'll see small steps towards what the party in power claims to want, they need to at least be convincing enough for the average random person, but saying that they want it to be banned (R) / completely protected (D) is 100% a case of strategic PR.</quote>Oh really? you believe that dems don't really want to 100 percent protect it? Interesting. Have not heard lots of people say that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trumble 11/16/24 4:21:19 PM #15:	Smallville posted... Oh really? you believe that dems don't really want to 100 percent protect it? Interesting. Have not heard lots of people say that To be clear, I'm talking about Dem politicans, not Dem supporters. But yes, I would absolutely believe that a major political party with a history of saying one thing and doing another (or more often, saying one thing and just doing nothing) - which yes, is indeed an accurate description of many political parties and is in no way unique to the Dems in the US - are also saying what they think their supporters (and more importantly, potential supporters) want to hear. --- Without your Trumble, you are but an empty shell. <cite>Trumble posted [p:982965515] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>Smallville posted... </cite><quote>Oh really? you believe that dems don't really want to 100 percent protect it? Interesting. Have not heard lots of people say that</quote>To be clear, I'm talking about Dem politicans, not Dem supporters. But yes, I would absolutely believe that a major political party with a history of saying one thing and doing another (or more often, saying one thing and just doing nothing) - which yes, is indeed an accurate description of many political parties and is in no way unique to the Dems in the US - are also saying what they think their supporters (and more importantly, potential supporters) want to hear.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smallville 11/16/24 4:26:28 PM #16:	Trumble posted... To be clear, I'm talking about Dem politicans, not Dem supporters. But yes, I would absolutely believe that a major political party with a history of saying one thing and doing another (or more often, saying one thing and just doing nothing) - which yes, is indeed an accurate description of many political parties and is in no way unique to the Dems in the US - are also saying what they think their supporters (and more importantly, potential supporters) want to hear. oh, but do you consider yourself more democratic leaning than, gop though? I kinda agree with you though. Great quote from bill gates, he said he thinks the difference between the dem and gop party in general is much much less than many americans believe. --- "That won't work Boss, hide the target in a place they're unlikely to be found"---GZ <cite>Smallville posted [p:982965567] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>Trumble posted... </cite><quote>To be clear, I'm talking about Dem politicans, not Dem supporters. But yes, I would absolutely believe that a major political party with a history of saying one thing and doing another (or more often, saying one thing and just doing nothing) - which yes, is indeed an accurate description of many political parties and is in no way unique to the Dems in the US - are also saying what they think their supporters (and more importantly, potential supporters) want to hear.</quote>oh, but do you consider yourself more democratic leaning than, gop though? I kinda agree with you though. Great quote from bill gates, he said he thinks the difference between the dem and gop party in general is much much less than many americans believe.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LeTigre 11/16/24 4:30:43 PM #17:	Smallville posted... Oh really? you believe that dems don't really want to 100 percent protect it? Interesting. Have not heard lots of people say that really? its a pretty common leftist argument. The Democrats have had several opportunities to codify Roe v Wade on a federal level, as well as pass the Equal Rights Act. Both are major fundraising campaigns; it doesnt feel that shocking to suggest that a major party that acts like a corporation in all other elements of its operation would act like one in this instance and protect its cash flow. --- The world's a mess and yr my only cure (formerly BrohammedAli) <cite>LeTigre posted [p:982965621] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>Smallville posted... </cite><quote>Oh really? you believe that dems don't really want to 100 percent protect it? Interesting. Have not heard lots of people say that</quote>really?its a pretty common leftist argument. The Democrats have had several opportunities to codify Roe v Wade on a federal level, as well as pass the Equal Rights Act. Both are major fundraising campaigns; it doesnt feel that shocking to suggest that a major party that acts like a corporation in all other elements of its operation would act like one in this instance and protect its cash flow. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smallville 11/16/24 4:40:27 PM #18:	LeTigre posted... really? its a pretty common leftist argument. The Democrats have had several opportunities to codify Roe v Wade on a federal level, as well as pass the Equal Rights Act. Both are major fundraising campaigns; it doesnt feel that shocking to suggest that a major party that acts like a corporation in all other elements of its operation would act like one in this instance and protect its cash flow. would codifying roe make the supreme court ruling on abortion null and void? like abortion would be completely legal, but what is required to codify Roe.....? --- "That won't work Boss, hide the target in a place they're unlikely to be found"---GZ <cite>Smallville posted [p:982965742] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>LeTigre posted... </cite><quote>really?its a pretty common leftist argument. The Democrats have had several opportunities to codify Roe v Wade on a federal level, as well as pass the Equal Rights Act. Both are major fundraising campaigns; it doesnt feel that shocking to suggest that a major party that acts like a corporation in all other elements of its operation would act like one in this instance and protect its cash flow.</quote>would codifying roe make the supreme court ruling on abortion null and void? like abortion would be completely legal, but what is required to codify Roe.....?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Proto_Spark 11/16/24 4:43:35 PM #19:	Smallville posted... would codifying roe make the supreme court ruling on abortion null and void? like abortion would be completely legal, but what is required to codify Roe.....? Technically it wouldn't void the ruling on Roe v. Wade, it'd just make Abortion an actual part of the law, instead of only kind of being protected by an old court ruling that always was sort of sketchy. There's nothing unconstitutional about making a law to guarantee abortion (or to put it in the constitution), just that conservatives have been blocking every attempt to actually do so since Roe/Wade happened. <cite>Proto_Spark posted [p:982965772] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>Smallville posted... </cite><quote>would codifying roe make the supreme court ruling on abortion null and void? like abortion would be completely legal, but what is required to codify Roe.....?</quote>Technically it wouldn't void the ruling on Roe v. Wade, it'd just make Abortion an actual part of the law, instead of only kind of being protected by an old court ruling that always was sort of sketchy.There's nothing unconstitutional about making a law to guarantee abortion (or to put it in the constitution), just that conservatives have been blocking every attempt to actually do so since Roe/Wade happened.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkbuster 11/16/24 4:50:08 PM #20:	No, but I'm sure a lot of Republicans would like to try. Though even if it only exists on the black market, it'll never go away, since even Republicans need to cover up a few scandalous pregnancies. --- Remember kids, it's only an RPG until someone gets hit with a meteor; Then it's a JRPG! SSBB: 3869 0521 7142 <cite>darkbuster posted [p:982965826] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>No, but I'm sure a lot of Republicans would like to try. Though even if it only exists on the black market, it'll never go away, since even Republicans need to cover up a few scandalous pregnancies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kingdrake2 11/16/24 5:24:26 PM #21:	Phoro posted... I sincerely hope women stop having sex with men en masse. i'm all for it imo. punishes the republican's who voted trump. --- currently playing: nickelodeon kart racers 3: slime speedway (daily until disc arrives) RIP Sophie the dog: February 2011-april 2024. we'll miss you alot. <cite>kingdrake2 posted [p:982966177] in Do you thi... [t:80886199]...</cite> <quote>Phoro posted...</cite><quote>I sincerely hope women stop having sex with men en masse.</quote>i'm all for it imo. punishes the republican's who voted trump.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Do you think a national ban on abortion is even likely to happen? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Do you think a national ban on abortion is even likely to happen?