The major cites are blue but we have several hundreds of counties, that are really small towns some so small, less than a hundred people living there
and since the electoral college is by county it why we always lose
and since the electoral college is by county it why we always loseWhat?
That's not how it works. That's just congress. The EC, with a few exceptions, is all or nothing by state.
Honestly a waste of time. He isnt winning either. He needs to be focused on the trifecta mi,oh,wi. Cause there's a very goodnchance he loses at least 1 or even all 3.TX has a better chance of flipping blue than OH does. Also MI is pretty safe considering the GOP there are borderline extinct and Dems control the entire State Gov. WI is the one that's going to be uncomfortably close.
Florida went from being a swing state 10 years ago to solid red. No chance there. Texas is equally hopeless. Focus on the rust belt.
The major cites are blue but we have several hundreds of counties, that are really small towns some so small, less than a hundred people living thereCorrect me if I'm wrong but I think it's all or nothing based on popular vote in Texas.
and since the electoral college is by county it why we always lose
The major cites are blue but we have several hundreds of counties, that are really small towns some so small, less than a hundred people living thereNot quite. What you're thinking about is Gerrymandering. That's done for the districts for the House. For the Presidential vote, it's a straight up vote throughout the state.
and since the electoral college is by county it why we always lose
texas is a good investment, we should play there
florida is a good investment if and only if it forces the GOP to waste money investing in ad buys there
texas is very winnable and we should invest lots and lots of money there
The major cites are blue but we have several hundreds of counties, that are really small towns some so small, less than a hundred people living there
and since the electoral college is by county it why we always lose
I would say both are good investments because even if Dems don't win, they force the GOP to spend money there. Money that they don't have.