Lurker > lolife67

This is stupid. He's trying to push his nonsensical idea of "black supremacy" being a possibility when it isn't, at all. It's basically concern trolling.

He was called out on it before and now he's doubling down.

TheVipaGTS posted...

well, Candace Owen is pretty dumb so...

No she isn't, actually. Everything she says and does is calculated. It's not like she really believes what she says but she knows it's lucrative. Owens is a grifter not an idiot.

Blackstar110 posted...

This isnt even a thing. Your question is when do women decided to settle for someone boring with no discernible personality

There is no age at which women seek out guys who will be terrible, its just that unfortunately terrible guys tend to be more charismatic than meek dudes.

This.

Good. It's horrible and not at all how the game is even played.

The Trent posted...

i'm a white male and i just want to say that i don't care if you call them chicken tenders or boneless wings in the end, as long as we agree they're pretty damn good with the right sauce

Wait a sec. Boneless wings and chicken tenders are 2 completely different things.

Tenders are strips and wings are smaller/rounded. This is a very important distinction.

Didn't this take place last year and yet the cops are still employed?

I've got a bad feeling about this...

BlockAddition posted...

What's with the 80s porn music

Every time he uses a popular song, the artist asks him to cease & desist. He probably decided to pick a song nobody knows or cares about.

Dathrowed1 posted...

They still use it for black people. Also the Barbary pirates weren't considered black. The point is black slaves wasn't just some European thing, vast majority of Arab slaves were Sub-Saharan African

What they were considered is irrelevant. The point is proximity and that they weren't targeting a completely different race, as was the case with American chattel slavery.

And nobody claimed having black slaves was just a European thing (I actually was making the opposite point.) But Europeans didn't enslave other Europeans the way they did black people. The Ottoman's were much more equal opportunists. They'd go after whoever got caught slipping.

Dathrowed1 posted...

Umm the Arabic word "Abeed" means slave and was pretty much synonymous for black person. I'll give a hint, this was before 1492

That would probably be because the first slaves likely were "black" (and enslaved by other "black" people) but not sure what that has to do with anything I posted?

coh posted...

Not at all.

Slavery in North Africa? The Ottoman Empire?

North African slavery didn't ONLY target one specific race/ethnicity, they were opportunists and were also enslaving other Africans, too. It was committed by pirates, aka criminals and wasn't actually sanctioned by the "ruling" government (there was no centralized government really.) Also, unlike American slavery, changing to their religion (Islam) would allow you to go free.

coh posted...

If American slavery was genocide then what about slavery elsewhere? Slavery that's still going on today in fact?

There seems to be this notion that slavery in America was somehow unique which isn't true at all

American slavery is unique though.

But what other forms are you speaking of, so we can compare?

Dathrowed1 posted...

The "intent to destroy" implies the action is deliberate and active. They would have had to try to erase black people

Their actions WERE deliberate and active, though. Do you think it was happenstance? They literally took away their slaves actual names and replaced it. They actively took steps to erase their entire culture from them.

Dathrowed1 posted...

Genocide is trying to destroy a tribe actively. The Nazi's actively tried to destroy the Jewish race. The Turks actively tried to destroy the Armenian race. That isn't what happened with slavery. The Europeans would have had to have progoms to kill black people and not as slaves for economics

I didn't see "actively" stated anywhere in the definition. And they did have programs designed to destroy black people in the way I described, so even then they were proactive with it. It didn't just occur out of nowhere with no rhyme/reason.

Dathrowed1 posted...

It says "destroy" before that and also "to bring destruction". The slave masters weren't trying to do exactly that since that was their economy

You can "destroy" someone physically, as well as mentally/emotionally. They wiped out and tried to replace any/all cultural of the slaves. They wanted to take away their humanity and treated them as objects.

Josiah_Is_Back posted...

I understand the sentiment, but such an analogy may push fringe people away because, to the general public, the Confederate flag and the swastika are probably not equally offensive symbols. The Confederate flag symbolizes the systemic oppression and dehumanization of slaves, certainly a horrible institution. The swastika, however, represents the outright slaughter of millions, the attempted annihilation of an entire people.

How many black people do you think died due to slavery and the racism that followed?

I don't think this was necessary (was anyone even complaining about this?) but if it's her choice and how she feels then ok.

ledbowman posted...

i think there's plenty of twitter that would love to make that illegal

This is a horrible defense lol

"Some people can't explain the 19."

Um yes, a lot of people can explain it. Specifically the people you're supposed to be listening to during briefings on it.

EnragedSlith posted...

When are we going to see a reality show for arranged marriages?

They already have that with 90 Day Fiance.

This doesn't really mean much since they generally just get rehired elsewhere. They need to be filing actual charges.

NeonOctopus posted...

I mean the name and holiday concept of Juneteenth >_> I probably learned the date of the emancipation and definitely what it was about but I forgot the date until now lol

Juneteenth isn't the date of emancipation. That happened in 1863. Juneteenth was when they finally got around to telling the actual slaves they were free in 1865.

The fact he specifically threatens protesters (not just violence/looting) should be a clear violation of the 1st Amendment...but he won't be held accountable.

That was pretty funny lol

Kalkano posted...

There are two cops. The one that shot obviously had his gun. Does he know that the other one does?

How could he not? The other one would say so unless he thought there's a reason to hide that info? is that what you're claiming happened? Or do you think the cop that hot is incapable of looking at his partner?

Kalkano posted...

The other cop's gun. Come on.

A little honesty, please.

Yes, that's the cop I'm talking about lol talk about intellectual dishonesty...

Kalkano posted...

Watching it again (yes, again), they're tumbling around all over the place. He clearly knows he got a taser. No idea if he thought he got more

The cop wouldn't notice if his gun was missing?

Kalkano posted...

When you argue in bad faith like this, you change 0 minds.

Tell me exactly what was said in "bad faith"?

Kalkano posted...

I did, but it was a while ago. I'll watch it again. I suggest you do the same, instead of reflexively siding AGAINST cops. Remember, their lives are in danger. Sometimes they have to do this to survive.

Why would you suggest that since I haven't stated anything contradictory? That was a pretty dumb response lol

But let's continue this after you've actually watched the video "again."

NeoShadowhen posted...

Nah. Did you watch the footage?

Of course not. He/she is just reflexively siding with the cops.

That certainly looked like a group of men that care about black lives...

There's an AIDs vaccine???

This is turning into a rally and how great he is for black people lol

Mike_Stanton posted...

Wait...what's so bad about team based multiplayer, again?

I'm confused too.

PokemonYoutube posted...

Of course history is going to look bad when you judge it based on today's standards. But nobody thought it was wrong back then (apart from the slaves themselves).

Um, wrong. Plenty of other people thought it was wrong. Including a few of the Founding Fathers.

onedarksoul posted...

He's right to use jim crow caricatures to smear black people who 'get out of line'? Another bigot appears.

Lol no. He's right about how the black people, in general, see Candace Owens.

onedarksoul posted...

The biggest credit you could do to the black community and peoples would be to leave them to think and act for themselves, without painting ones you dislike as jim crow inspired caricatures.

No, no he's right. In general, we agree with him on Candace.

Well that was pointless.

So this is supposed to be a discussion but they haven't actually discussed anything...

FrisbeeDude posted...

A grifter who was willing trade her integrity for a very lucrative career.

cjsdowg posted...

She is a horrible person that get paid for saying the racist shit, racist republicans can not say. She says it over and over , then when they say it. They can point to her.

These.

RemixRBG posted...

Hotep means peace

Not when it's used as a noun.

Serious Cat posted...

That's what the entire article I linked to was about.

Right but my point is DESPITE that, it still was. So saying that's the reason the KKK isn't doesn't really track.

Serious Cat posted...

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/31/opinions/trump-antifa-domestic-terrorist-bergen/index.html

Because it would likely be unconstitutional to designate a domestic ideological movement as a terrorist organization.

But Antifa was declared one, though.