Board List | Page List: 1, 2 |
---|---|
Topic | Oh FUCK! Current Events got the LUE treatment and is now a private board |
SunburnCostanza 04/15/24 1:59:47 PM #295 | HashtagSEP posted...
This is dumb, but I'm not sure I understand the "It's so easy to get purg" argument. It is extremely easy to get purged on this board if you talk to the wrong people about things they disagree with lol. You can even be very polite about it and get the boot --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Sorry for making another JK Rowling topic. |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 2:09:47 PM #39 | Sheeeit I didn't even see this thread. Just the smonkey one
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:59:15 PM #49 | CyricZ posted...
Why would you even bother? SunburnCostanza posted... I'm pretty much concerned for the entire section of the left that behaves this way. It really does hurt our image in the view of the general public. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:58:54 PM #48 | creativerealms posted...
I'm not saying she should. She's hyper focused on removing Trans people and only trans people. As so her denial is hyper focused just on ignoring the Nazi's tried to kill them. I'm sure she sees what the Nazis did to all those other groups as a horrible thing. And would never deny that it happened. Sorry I misread your initial post. I thought the people you had in brackets were also people JK Rowling had engaged in denial with. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:53:08 PM #43 | CyricZ posted...
Do you think that makes it better? Pretty rough question. Is it better than outright Holocaust denial? I would say so. Is it good? No. It's bad creativerealms posted... Jews, homosexuals, gypsies, communists, basically anyone they disliked they ether locked up, killed or both. I didn't see her mention any of that --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:50:54 PM #40 | CyricZ posted...
So she only did a "little bit" of Holocaust denial? Add "with respect to trans people" and we have a deal --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:48:14 PM #38 | creativerealms posted...
Yes she is denying that trans people were targeted (along with many other groups) during the holocaust. Which other groups? --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:44:30 PM #35 | spikethedevil posted...
She literally doesnt believe part of it happened now STFU. Tantrums and outrage don't make you right. Try engaging in the conversation rather than trying to farm agreement and blocking people who disagree. Reddit is that way --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:38:28 PM #31 | marthsheretoo posted...
The trans genocide carried out by Nazis was part of the Holocaust. I'm pretty much concerned for the entire section of the left that behaves this way. It really does hurt our image in the view of the general public. I feel like you guys don't realize how out of touch you are with general society when you call JK Rowling a Holocaust denier. I put it in the same category as "Defund the police" meaning "redistribute the money to other services meant to fight crime" and saying racism doesn't apply to white people because it's a combination of prejudice and power or whatever. We don't get to just redefine words and phrases that clearly mean one thing to umbrella over a bunch of things because you think it sounds good or inflammatory or engaging or fits your cause. Just say she's a terf and she doesn't like trans people, it's bad enough. You don't have to try to and pretend she doesn't think the Holocaust happened. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:28:48 PM #25 | spikethedevil posted...
Mod came into the topic and did nothing about it lol. Are you ok? --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:28:12 PM #24 | CyricZ posted...
Thus making this the third topic about this, unless you've got me on Ignore. (I mean all you folks gotta do is type rowling into the search bar, goodness knows I did) If you want to say she's denying trans genocide or anti trans that's fine. If you want to call her a "Holocaust denier" and then people take 5 seconds to google her acknowledging the Holocaust and defending Jewish people you're going to hurt your own cause. I suspect there's a reason people are saying she's denying the Holocaust rather than saying she's engaging in Holocaust denial with specific respect to the way trans people were treated. Basically they just want to inflict the maximum amount of social shame they think is possible --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:23:57 PM #19 | MC_BatCommander posted...
So change Holocaust denial to Trans Genocide denial if you want to be pedantic about it Yes I'd be okay with that change if she's denying it happened. And no it's not pedantic to say we should use our words accurately. Otherwise no one's going to believe what you're saying. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:20:31 PM #14 | marthsheretoo posted...
It might be time for you to quickly read up on what Holocaust denial is. Holocaust denial is denying the Holocaust either happened, or saying it was greatly exaggerated. It's anti-semetic in nature because of the implications that Jews made the whole thing up to help rule the world or whatever the conspiracy is. Adopting that term because she got in another spat with trans people online to label her as anti-semetic seems pretty dishonest to me. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:16:00 PM #5 | marthsheretoo posted...
One can defend Jews and engage in Holocaust denial, dude. This is a really weird look. She clearly acknowledged the Holocaust happened? --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Did JK Rowling Deny the Holocaust? |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:12:43 PM #1 | Sorry but I felt like discussing this and looks like Shock Monkey blocked me for saying that it seemed like a reach in his thread.
https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1767912990366388735?s=20 To me this looks like at worst, ignorance of a specific event, and at best, she was just calling out the dude for making a massive reach when placing her opinion. I don't think she denies the Holocaust outright. JK Rowling has to my knowledge defended Jews online before. The overall premise seems like a reach to me: https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/986624639983063040?s=20 https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1712379734900805837?s=20 Here's another tweet clearly indicating she knew the Holocaust existed. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | This lady is a "tiktok npc" |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 12:24:26 PM #12 | These are the people far left and right zoomers get their world news on
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Bye bye, TikTok: House votes overwhelmingly to ban it |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 11:39:10 AM #19 | Where will gen Z get their """""""""""news""""""""""" now??
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Chrono Trigger has imo the best over world theme in classic JRPGs |
SunburnCostanza 03/13/24 1:13:33 AM #33 | I was hoping it would be that song TC. Ya did good
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Man, Jon Stewart is reeeaallllly not taking any of this shit anymore |
SunburnCostanza 03/12/24 10:12:17 PM #87 | thekosmicfool posted...
I feel like a little bit of "both sides"ing can be an effective tool to sway fence sitters. You go too hard on Trump(even though he absolutely deserves every single bit of criticism) he comes off looking like a bullied underdog in their minds. You ease them into it, presenting both sides as imperfect and building trust in the idea that you're unbiased, and gradually convince them that Biden is overall better. Yeah if this is the plan, and I hope it is because Kimmel and Colbert are hopeless, then it's great. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Man, Jon Stewart is reeeaallllly not taking any of this shit anymore |
SunburnCostanza 03/12/24 8:55:55 PM #55 | ButteryMales posted...
Jon was comparing a genocidal zionist protestant to a genocidal zionist catholic. Hey adults are talking, come back later --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Man, Jon Stewart is reeeaallllly not taking any of this shit anymore |
SunburnCostanza 03/12/24 8:34:55 PM #42 | I will caveat what I'm saying with one other thought - if the idea from the beginning of leaning hard into the "both sides" strategy on episode one was to lure in the empty headed "centrists" like Elon Musk, and then hit them with this segment, that's pretty brilliant strategy.
Someone like modern Colbert will never be able to pull something like that off. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Man, Jon Stewart is reeeaallllly not taking any of this shit anymore |
SunburnCostanza 03/12/24 8:29:50 PM #40 | Look, if you're going to strawman anyone with criticism of your teenage hero Jon Stewart (who I think is great by the way) - at least get the right mindset
It's not that we want Biden to be an untouchable godlike figure to be worshipped. It's that Trump needs to be presented as the absolute bottom of the toilet stinking turd that he is. He shouldn't be compared to Biden because he shouldn't be compared to anyone sane, decent, or non-criminal. You talk about blue MAGA, sounds a bit like cult worship in here for the host of the daily show --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Man, Jon Stewart is reeeaallllly not taking any of this shit anymore |
SunburnCostanza 03/12/24 8:01:11 PM #25 | gp1829 posted...
Yeah I saw the backlash. It was ridiculous. He said mild things about Biden while showing that Trump is awful. People are dense. I mean when you title a segment "what are we doing??" And have half your rant be about Biden being old while the other guy is trying to establish a dictatorship... You can probably do better than that. The "both sides suck" argument is incredibly lazy and easy engagement and simple people lap it up because they feel unbiased. He seems to be rectifying this a bit now that Joe is showing he has some life in him and Trump is still being Trump, so I'm glad for that --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Man, Jon Stewart is reeeaallllly not taking any of this shit anymore |
SunburnCostanza 03/12/24 7:09:28 PM #9 | Glad he's done going easy on Trump for now, this was great
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Is it weird that I miss being 20, but only physically? |
SunburnCostanza 03/12/24 10:25:17 AM #8 | How old are you now? If you're in your 30s you can probably get pretty close to how you were in your 20s
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Agree or Disagree: All inclusive resorts = Most boring type of vacation |
SunburnCostanza 03/11/24 5:07:56 PM #21 | Nah resorts are based. They actually feel like a vacation. Walking around somewhere else for hours a day and taking pictures of monuments or whatever is quite un-vacation like
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Joe Rogan told yo shut up about COVID on his own podcast |
SunburnCostanza 03/11/24 2:08:43 PM #6 | too tongue in cheek
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Rare really shat the bed with DK64 huh? |
SunburnCostanza 03/08/24 9:57:30 PM #3 | I loved that game. Stop it right now
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | So the only knock on Biden is his age? |
SunburnCostanza 03/08/24 4:43:32 PM #4 | actually after last night he's too energetic. we gotta get trump back in there to cool things down
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Republicans butt hurt over Diamond Joe showing too much energy during SOTU |
SunburnCostanza 03/08/24 4:39:24 PM #37 | [LFAQs-redacted-quote]
Heh --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Undecided voter watched the SotU and was bored because Biden didn't talk policy |
SunburnCostanza 03/08/24 1:36:43 PM #3 | It's hard for me to imagine someone that is both an undecided voter and also not completely empty headed in the year 2024
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | But yeah, Biden tore that SOTU up though frfr |
SunburnCostanza 03/08/24 10:01:03 AM #25 | It was kino. Most energetic I've seen Biden since uhhh... I dunno since I saw old clips of him I guess
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | SOTU response was definitely something. |
SunburnCostanza 03/08/24 9:16:50 AM #5 | Any threads on the actual sotu? Thought it was banging
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Trump is gonna win again, isn't he? |
SunburnCostanza 03/08/24 7:40:54 AM #2 | I don't think people are apathetic about abortion rights being taken away or an authoritarian trying to work his way back into office.
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 7:20:06 PM #209 | It feels like progressives genuinely don't care about changing minds or persuading people sometimes. They just want to feel righteous and scream at people.
When you have a controversial idea like diverting police funds elsewhere, you need to explain that as straightforward and clear as you can as to why it's a good idea. Say where the funds are going and why it would improve things. Defund the Police just sounds like less cops, worse cops, more crime. How are you supposed to get most of the population on this - people who don't enjoy crime? --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 5:08:11 PM #194 | legendary_zell posted...
See, as always, it's not actually about the wording. You have a different and fundamentally incompatible political position than them. That is and has always been the issue, it's not marketing, phrasing, or any of that. You are simply to the right of them on policing and don't want their desired policy outcomes. Yeah, no. Regardless of my stance, Defund the Police was an absolutely indefensible slogan assuming you meant divert the funds - unless you literally just wanted to Defund the Police and that's it. Then you can defend the slogan, but the position itself is pretty unpopular. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 5:00:03 PM #188 | 1337toothbrush posted...
You remind me of those people who took "black lives matter" to mean "*only* black lives matter". You're arguing that the slogan is worded poorly, but you and other diehard democrats don't care for directing funding meant for police to social services that would better serve situations that police aren't capable of handling properly. Biden came out and said that we shouldn't defund the police and that we should actually do the opposite and be funding the police MORE, as if they don't get enough funding. Biden might be right though. The solution to shit cops killing people isn't less money. It's better training, better hiring (requires better pay as well). They should probably be funded more. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 4:52:59 PM #182 | legendary_zell posted...
I was talking about the issue with Porter, not defunding the police. Maybe that was unclear. Well no I haven't seen anyone talk about Katie Porter outside of Twitter or whatever. It's not nearly as bad as Defund the Police. And Defund the Police should never have been the framing to begin with. An inaccurate 3 word slogan is indefensible. In the context of getting refracted by the right wing, you may as well be giving them a tennis ball and a 3 foot high basketball net --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 4:40:56 PM #172 | legendary_zell posted...
Let me just ask: do any of you know anyone who is bent out of shape about this who is: Yes. Literally every normal person I know thought Defund the police was stupid. They vote for the left pretty much every election. I know maybe 2 progressives that supported it and even they admitted the framing was pretty bad and could have been better. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 2:06:44 PM #98 | Let's look at if "Defund the Police" was a good idea, assuming "good" in this context was getting places to divert funding as suggested.
Was the catchphrase popular with the right wing? No, not at all, it made them hate the left even more. Fair enough I guess, we have different ideas. Did it catch on with Liberals? Well no not then either. Obama hated it, Biden hated it. They felt it made them look really stupid and they had to clarify what it was "supposed to mean" over and over or they just tossed the idea out as fringe. So how in any way shape or form was it a good catch phrase? Again, firing up your own little bubble does very little in terms of successful actual progress. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 1:58:31 PM #91 | legendary_zell posted...
First, those are different situations because those have to do with conduct related to actual elections, rather than talking about campaign finance and the disproportionate influence of the wealthy. No one cares. We live in a society where 95% of society reads headlines, YouTube videos titles, and watches TikTok for info. Stop saying dumb shit like "defund the police" and "this was rigged" and getting mad when people either co opt it to use it "wrongly" or people take it at face value because they don't belong to your club or message board where you're giving out the full details. Second and more importantly, conservatives will always disingenuously say whatever they can to attack liberals and defend their attempts to institute fascism. Stop treating these people as if they're serious and are making serious arguments in response to actual realities. They're just saying the combos of words they think will have the effect they want. They want to overthrow democracy because of their fundamental disposition toward power, not because any politician correctly said our political and economic systems are rigged. If it's not this piece of "ammo" it'll be another, the belief comes first, not the ammo. That's no reason to unilaterally disarm and censor our own language. Stop treating the other side like everything they say is willful deception. Many of them are misguided and confused and are capable of changing their minds. Acting like they are subhuman and getting mad that they will never understand our confusing catch phrases when 90% of our own side doesn't even like them is a loser strategy. Again you are trying to persuade people here. Not rile up your own tiny radical gang. Thirdly, no leftist or even liberal political project has any chance for long term success without acknowledging and combatting the sense that all of these systems are rigged. That's absolutely crucial and it's one of the biggest ways Dems kneecap themselves. Almost everyone across the political spectrum feels that way, because it's true. The differences come in the stories each ideology tells for why it is the way it is. It's our job to tell the truth and accurately identify the problems rather than blaming them on immigrants or minorities, or woke colleges, etc or to say it's not happening. If you even attempt that, you cede the field to Republicans to be the only ones talking about the system's flaws (that they themselves create) and the only ones providing (false) solutions. I agree with the need to change some aspects of the system. This needs to be done carefully or you'll end up with a bunch of anti establishment losers like MAGA that don't believe anything is ever real out of the government. What Katie Porter did was not careful. It was emotional and reactionary and she knows better, hence the follow up explanation --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 1:47:34 PM #78 | FunWithAFryPan posted...
This is perfectly on par with the level of discourse Ive come to expect from people like you. Completely untethered from reality. Completely disconnected by incapable of even a modicum of self-reflection. Do you just hit up Chat GPT with the input "incoherent righteous whining followed up with 'boot licker' metaphor" over and over? --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 1:43:50 PM #72 | CheshireSimper posted...
"Defund [some program]" or "[some program] has been defunded" has always meant all funds have been removed and program shuttered. Everybody interprets it that way. They know this. They just can't admit it was not an optimal thing to chant after doing it for so long, and tagging along with the more radical people that legitimately meant it. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 1:38:27 PM #65 | legendary_zell posted...
Defund the Police was not a focus grouped "slogan", it was what people actually wanted to happen. It was a political demand. Many of you seem to have forgotten what's it's like to want/need specific things to happen rather than everything being a relativistic marketing game. It's not a fake concern. Watch any debate on Trump trying to overthrow the election in the last 4 years and the conservative rebuttal is "what about Hillary when she took more than 0.00001 seconds to concede? What about Stacy Abrams?" This is more ammo to the other side to think they have a right to overthrow democracy. Now they get to say "what about Katie Porter?" She should know better --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 1:36:38 PM #61 | FunWithAFryPan posted...
SLOGANS ARENT MEANT TO CLARIFY POLICY. THEYRE MEANT TO BE EASY FOR A CROWD OF PEOPLE TO SHOUT IN UNISON. Theyre intended to make a pithy sign. You would probably chant "Kill All Dogs" and get mad when people were confused that they didn't understand you meant spaying and neutering your pets to keep the stray population down. --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 1:31:08 PM #55 | You could literally chant Fix the Police and double your popularity. It even chants better
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 1:29:39 PM #53 | MrMojoRising posted...
what did you think they were gonna do with the money? have a party with it? did you miss the whole part about reimagining public safety? or did you just see a phrase you didn't like and decided to look no further You could do anything with it. You could take less taxes from the public. You could put it into utilities. You could build a park. You could shove it up your bum. The slogan doesn't clarify anything --- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Topic | Katie porter is getting dog piled on twitter. |
SunburnCostanza 03/07/24 1:23:42 PM #48 | Defund doesn't mean divert, your slogan literally fails on word one. Horrendous.
--- http://i.imgur.com/xUxeltw.jpg |
Board List | Page List: 1, 2 |