There is an absolute CHASM between the games going by level 1 through 4.
The best games (RBY and MGS 2) are #5 and #32 respectively. The second best games (BW and MGS) are 38 and top 50 respectively. The third best games (GSC and MGS4) are top 50 and top 60 respectively And the fourth best games (DPPHGSS and MGS 3) are top 60 and top 80 respectively.
In short, ***** every single Snake sucking fanboi on this board, these are not even on the same level
MGS is the 10th best series ever, Pokemon is the 4th
From: TheKnightOfNee | #007 Thank god you clarified, I would've assumed you meant the MGS series was only better than 45% of the Pokemon series if there were no specifications.
From: TheKnightOfNee | #007 Thank god you clarified, I would've assumed you meant the MGS series was only better than 45% of the Pokemon series if there were no specifications.
I thought he meant the Pokemon Stadium series specifically until I saw the clarification.
-- Ace Detective in Sir Chris' Police I read your posts like you're a sourpuss because you often come across that way. - LeonhartFour
How are these things actually remotely comparable? One is a story-driven single-player oriented stealth/shooter hybrid series, the other is a multiplayer-oriented RPG series focused on collection. It's like comparing night and oranges.
--
xfd dude, it's just a popularity contest on the internets. -Vlado
From: Tehmoosey1 | #021 How are these things actually remotely comparable? One is a story-driven single-player oriented stealth/shooter hybrid series, the other is a multiplayer-oriented RPG series focused on collection. It's like comparing night and oranges.
No, it's like comparing two video games.
Which is easy.
--
"So cold. I am always by your side." "There ain't no gettin' off of this train we on!"