Poll of the Day > Alternatively, straight PotDers would you take a pill to make you gay/bi?

(+) Yeah! (+)

Irreversible. One time pill.

For gay potders you now have an option to be bi.

maybe bi then i'd at least be more open to the idea of threesomes in case my boyfriend wanted to and i felt comfortable

but i'm not even remotely sexually attracted to women in real life so i'd not really be interested in a ffm threesome.
---

Bi, sure. More options isn't a bad thing, even if it only ends up applying to my porn.
---

Jen0125 posted...

but i'm not even remotely sexually attracted to women in real life so i'd not really be interested in a ffm threesome.

You are not very much aroused at the site of a naked woman?!
---

Sarcasthma posted...

Jen0125 posted...

but i'm not even remotely sexually attracted to women in real life so i'd not really be interested in a ffm threesome.

You are not very much aroused at the site of a naked woman?!

I'm Jen0125, not Dan0429!
---

I'd take a pill to make you gay. I have too much test juicing out of me to ever be gay. I-t's ---It's squirting out of my ears! Fuck yeah! Raaage!!
---

Being gay has nothing to do with your T levels
---

Bi is cool, I hooked up with a dude
---

The option to be bi?

Oh hell yeah. I think that'd be sweet.
---

Jen0125 posted...

I'm Jen0125, not Dan0429!

I'm not buying it!
---

I certainly wouldn't mind being bi.

Sarcasthma posted...

Jen0125 posted...

I'm Jen0125, not Dan0429!

I'm not buying it!

you can clearly see the names are similar but different! CLEARLY
---

Stop assaulting me with your ALTERNATIVE FACTS!
---

Hmmm I don't know. Maybe being bi for threesome+ fun. That way, everyone gets some fun with everyone.
---

Fuck no. I'm straight and proud.

that being said, though, i have no problem against admiring beauty in anyone, even other males. there are some really, really fucking good looking boys out there, y'all. just saying

But I'm not sexually attracted to them. Nothing wrong with 'mirin', though.
---

Sarcasthma posted...

Stop assaulting me with your ALTERNATIVE FACTS!

Don't tell me how to liiiive
---

Not sure if I'd go for being just gay, I'd take a pill to be Bi, that way I had more options, but I wouldn't wanna give up being attracted to women all together either.


Also FFM doesn't have to involve the girls doing much with each other, both focus on the guy and work kinda like team mates heh, same with MMF (the guys don't have to be into each other, or really even touch).

So yeah, you don't have to dig chicks to expiriment with that if you want.

Gotta be ok with your guy touching/enjoying etc another girl though, and not get upset or possessive. Generally a good idea to set rules and have a plan going in.

Alot of girls like couples as they feel safer, so finding someone to join in isn't really hard.
---

I didn't realize wolfy was the rule writer for FFM threesomes
---

GrimCyclone posted...

I'd take a pill to make you gay. I have too much test juicing out of me to ever be gay. I-t's ---It's squirting out of my ears! Fuck yeah! Raaage!!

Uh wat? Testosterone levels don't equate to sexuality. Going on steroids doesn't suddenly make gay people straight. It just makes them hornier...for men.
---

Jen0125 posted...

I didn't realize wolfy was the rule writer for FFM threesomes

now now don't be rude, child

chaosbowser posted...

Uh wat? Testosterone levels don't equate to sexuality. Going on steroids doesn't suddenly make gay people straight. It just makes them hornier...for men.

actually bro i'm pretty sure it has the same effect for females. don't be sexist
---

The thing is if it was a choice, there wouldn't be a tremendous benefit to making the choice. I guess being bi doubles your options and, if you're a guy with limited economic power, you're probably better off with a man. However, for the purposes of carrying on your genes, there's an inherent benefit in hetero due to the genetics of partner selection; and while you can use a partner's sibling (or even parent, if you need a sperm donor) for surrogacy, that's still just settling for close rather than exact. Granted, none of this would be an issue if we had the technology which would allow one partner to carry out the reproductive functions of the other gender because you'd technically have the same reproductive benefits.

Granted, if you don't care about your carrying on your genes (and, in the case of women, if you're reasonably economically self-reliant), it *might* make a lot of sense to take the choice because most people are naturally able to get along better with their own gender and taking the possibility of pregnancy off the table simplifies relations. However, given that men and women naturally complement each other, there would still be advantages for hetero.
---

Zeus posted...

The thing is if it was a choice, there wouldn't be a tremendous benefit to making the choice. I guess being bi doubles your options and, if you're a guy with limited economic power, you're probably better off with a man. However, for the purposes of carrying on your genes, there's an inherent benefit in hetero due to the genetics of partner selection; and while you can use a partner's sibling (or even parent, if you need a sperm donor) for surrogacy, that's still just settling for close rather than exact. Granted, none of this would be an issue if we had the technology which would allow one partner to carry out the reproductive functions of the other gender because you'd technically have the same reproductive benefits.

Granted, if you don't care about your carrying on your genes (and, in the case of women, if you're reasonably economically self-reliant), it *might* make a lot of sense to take the choice because most people are naturally able to get along better with their own gender and taking the possibility of pregnancy off the table simplifies relations. However, given that men and women naturally complement each other, there would still be advantages for hetero.

Was kinda hoping u'd say granted a third time

Zeus posted...

The thing is if it was a choice, there wouldn't be a tremendous benefit to making the choice. I guess being bi doubles your options and, if you're a guy with limited economic power, you're probably better off with a man. However, for the purposes of carrying on your genes, there's an inherent benefit in hetero due to the genetics of partner selection; and while you can use a partner's sibling (or even parent, if you need a sperm donor) for surrogacy, that's still just settling for close rather than exact. Granted, none of this would be an issue if we had the technology which would allow one partner to carry out the reproductive functions of the other gender because you'd technically have the same reproductive benefits.

Granted, if you don't care about your carrying on your genes (and, in the case of women, if you're reasonably economically self-reliant), it *might* make a lot of sense to take the choice because most people are naturally able to get along better with their own gender and taking the possibility of pregnancy off the table simplifies relations. However, given that men and women naturally complement each other, there would still be advantages for hetero.

Uh you realize you give up none of the things you mentioned about being heterosexual by being bisexual right?
---

Nah. Although chances are I'd get laid if I were Bi so eh.
---