Poll of the Day > Should Trump be impeached?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Troll_Police_ 05/25/17 5:44:44 PM #52:	as much as the dems dont want to admit it, they stopped any possibility of it happening on their own when they decided that clinton deserved to stay in office after lying under oath. we've dont a pretty good job of making it clear that we are not going to reprimand anyone in the higher echelons of our government --- Is this going to be one of those times when you pretend not to have a plan until the last moment? And then turn out to really not have one? <cite>Troll_Police_ posted [p:879804137] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>as much as the dems dont want to admit it, they stopped any possibility of it happening on their own when they decided that clinton deserved to stay in office after lying under oath. we've dont a pretty good job of making it clear that we are not going to reprimand anyone in the higher echelons of our government</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blitzoff1987 05/25/17 5:57:47 PM #53:	After how he acted at the NATO convention..... Yes, he should. Literally every civilized country hates the man. <cite>Blitzoff1987 posted [p:879804878] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>After how he acted at the NATO convention..... Yes, he should. Literally every civilized country hates the man.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 05/25/17 6:57:57 PM #54:	BlackScythe0 posted... gguirao posted... Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence. Depending on how things go he might get the boot too which would leave us with Ryan which is even more terrifying. Pence is worse than Ryan. Pence is all the Ryanomics you love + Christian jihadist added in. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:879808448] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gguirao posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence.</quote> Depending on how things go he might get the boot too which would leave us with Ryan which is even more terrifying.</quote> Pence is worse than Ryan. Pence is all the Ryanomics you love + Christian jihadist added in.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/25/17 6:59:16 PM #55:	Blitzoff1987 posted... After how he acted at the NATO convention..... Yes, he should. Literally every civilized country hates the man. He really is a fat little rich boy that never matured to adulthood. --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead "I'm Mary Poppins ya'll!" <cite>Mead posted [p:879808541] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Blitzoff1987 posted...</cite> <quote>After how he acted at the NATO convention..... Yes, he should. Literally every civilized country hates the man.</quote> He really is a fat little rich boy that never matured to adulthood.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
papercup 05/25/17 7:00:52 PM #56:	jfc That NATO summit. Good luck Europe =( --- Nintendo Network ID: papercups 3DS FC: 4124 5916 9925 <cite>papercup posted [p:879808640] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>jfc That NATO summit. Good luck Europe =(</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/25/17 7:21:16 PM #57:	streamofthesky posted... BlackScythe0 posted... gguirao posted... Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence. Depending on how things go he might get the boot too which would leave us with Ryan which is even more terrifying. Pence is worse than Ryan. Pence is all the Ryanomics you love + Christian jihadist added in. The reason Ryan is terrifying is I believe he is the republican most likely to make big legislative accomplishments. And given that republicans in congress are all trying to be cartoon villains it's bad. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879809892] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gguirao posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence.</quote> Depending on how things go he might get the boot too which would leave us with Ryan which is even more terrifying.</quote> Pence is worse than Ryan. Pence is all the Ryanomics you love + Christian jihadist added in.</quote> The reason Ryan is terrifying is I believe he is the republican most likely to make big legislative accomplishments. And given that republicans in congress are all trying to be cartoon villains it's bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/25/17 7:23:30 PM #58:	I think Ryan would be far more likely to make more moderate legislation choices. He wants the red states to stay red after all. I don't think Trump really cares about that. --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead "I'm Mary Poppins ya'll!" <cite>Mead posted [p:879810037] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>I think Ryan would be far more likely to make more moderate legislation choices. He wants the red states to stay red after all. I don't think Trump really cares about that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 05/25/17 7:35:17 PM #59:	BlackScythe0 posted... streamofthesky posted... BlackScythe0 posted... gguirao posted... Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence. Depending on how things go he might get the boot too which would leave us with Ryan which is even more terrifying. Pence is worse than Ryan. Pence is all the Ryanomics you love + Christian jihadist added in. The reason Ryan is terrifying is I believe he is the republican most likely to make big legislative accomplishments. And given that republicans in congress are all trying to be cartoon villains it's bad. Pence might be slightly less accomplished at the task, but he's quite competent himself, and has prior legislative experience. And his agenda would be far worse than even Ryan's. In any case, the Dems should want a long, thorough process that gathers as much evidence and documentation as possible both to quash as much bs about it being an unjust witch hunt as possible (some will never care about facts, but at least avoid angering those who somewhat do) and to stave off time till after 2018 so that by then enough dirt can be found on Pence's campaign involvement to take him out of office as well and to regain the House majority. Regaining Congress needs to be their top focus, the Trump sideshow should just be gently pushed along to make sure the investigation continues (since Trump and many congressional Repubs would love to have it fade away) <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:879810782] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gguirao posted...</cite> <quote>Yes, unfortunately, that will leave us with President Pence.</quote> Depending on how things go he might get the boot too which would leave us with Ryan which is even more terrifying.</quote> Pence is worse than Ryan. Pence is all the Ryanomics you love + Christian jihadist added in.</quote> The reason Ryan is terrifying is I believe he is the republican most likely to make big legislative accomplishments. And given that republicans in congress are all trying to be cartoon villains it's bad.</quote> Pence might be slightly less accomplished at the task, but he's quite competent himself, and has prior legislative experience. And his agenda would be far worse than even Ryan's. In any case, the Dems should want a long, thorough process that gathers as much evidence and documentation as possible both to quash as much bs about it being an unjust witch hunt as possible (some will never care about facts, but at least avoid angering those who somewhat do) and to stave off time till after 2018 so that by then enough dirt can be found on Pence's campaign involvement to take him out of office as well and to regain the House majority. Regaining Congress needs to be their top focus, the Trump sideshow should just be gently pushed along to make sure the investigation continues (since Trump and many congressional Repubs would love to have it fade away)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
James xeno 05/25/17 8:22:39 PM #60:	Mead posted... Blitzoff1987 posted... After how he acted at the NATO convention..... Yes, he should. Literally every civilized country hates the man. He really is a fat little rich boy that never matured to adulthood. Ironically (or maybe not) that just about sums up every adult hardline leftist/rightist i've ever seen. --- http://imgur.com/a/s2O4b Koto and Juri and Ruka oh my! <cite>James xeno posted [p:879813511] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Blitzoff1987 posted...</cite> <quote>After how he acted at the NATO convention..... Yes, he should. Literally every civilized country hates the man.</quote> He really is a fat little rich boy that never matured to adulthood.</quote> Ironically (or maybe not) that just about sums up every adult hardline leftist/rightist i've ever seen.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RazorX2003 05/25/17 8:24:41 PM #61:	What?! Sorry but not being a democrat isn't a good enough reason to impeach somebody. --- I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant. <cite>RazorX2003 posted [p:879813614] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>What?! Sorry but not being a democrat isn't a good enough reason to impeach somebody.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheWorstPoster 05/25/17 8:27:52 PM #62:	RazorX2003 posted... What?! Sorry but not being a democrat isn't a good enough reason to impeach somebody. Yes it is, especially when he more or less "stole" the position from the thing the Media demanded be next in line. So they made some bullshit claim about Russia, and of course, falsified rumors with no evidence whatsoever, is enough to impeach a man who dare had the audacity of winning an election. <cite>TheWorstPoster posted [p:879813836] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>RazorX2003 posted...</cite> <quote>What?! Sorry but not being a democrat isn't a good enough reason to impeach somebody.</quote> Yes it is, especially when he more or less "stole" the position from the thing the Media demanded be next in line. So they made some bullshit claim about Russia, and of course, falsified rumors with no evidence whatsoever, is enough to impeach a man who dare had the audacity of winning an election.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/25/17 8:29:00 PM #63:	TheWorstPoster posted... RazorX2003 posted... What?! Sorry but not being a democrat isn't a good enough reason to impeach somebody. Yes it is, especially when he more or less "stole" the position from the thing the Media demanded be next in line. So they made some bullshit claim about Russia, and of course, falsified rumors with no evidence whatsoever, is enough to impeach a man who dare had the audacity of winning an election. The amazing thing is you have no clue if Icoyar is serious with the things he says. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879813893] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheWorstPoster posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RazorX2003 posted...</cite> <quote>What?! Sorry but not being a democrat isn't a good enough reason to impeach somebody.</quote> Yes it is, especially when he more or less "stole" the position from the thing the Media demanded be next in line. So they made some bullshit claim about Russia, and of course, falsified rumors with no evidence whatsoever, is enough to impeach a man who dare had the audacity of winning an election.</quote> The amazing thing is you have no clue if Icoyar is serious with the things he says.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lightning Bolt 05/25/17 9:30:35 PM #65:	RazorX2003 posted... What?! Sorry but not being a democrat isn't a good enough reason to impeach somebody. What about the collusion with Russia, the releasing of classified information for bragging reasons, the lack of understanding of issues, the tainting of international relationships (German newspapers are currently railing against Trump for his attitude towards and ignorance of US-EU trade policy due how he acted while meeting NATO), the praising of extremist dictators, or the obstruction of justice? Granted the russia thing is still in the early parts of what's probably a several year investigation. But he looks super guilty to me, what with all the obstruction. Could be drummed up. --- One day dude, I'm just gonna get off the bus, and I'm gonna run in the woods and never come back, and when I come back I'm gonna be the knife master! -The Rev <cite>Lightning Bolt posted [p:879817477] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>RazorX2003 posted...</cite> <quote>What?! Sorry but not being a democrat isn't a good enough reason to impeach somebody.</quote> What about the collusion with Russia, the releasing of classified information for bragging reasons, the lack of understanding of issues, the tainting of international relationships (German newspapers are currently railing against Trump for his attitude towards and ignorance of US-EU trade policy due how he acted while meeting NATO), the praising of extremist dictators, or the obstruction of justice? Granted the russia thing is still in the early parts of what's probably a several year investigation. But he looks super guilty to me, what with all the obstruction. Could be drummed up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RazorX2003 05/26/17 8:10:56 PM #66:	Trump isn't perfect by any means. In fact, he's far from it. But he's also nowhere even close to impeachable. Even the experts who hate his guts and want him impeached can admit that. There was no collusion with Russia. That's a democratic lie to hide the fact that their very own Seth Rich was the likely leaker. He has made some mistakes for sure, im with you on a few of those issues, but they aren't impeachable level mistakes. --- I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant. <cite>RazorX2003 posted [p:879876266] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>Trump isn't perfect by any means. In fact, he's far from it. But he's also nowhere even close to impeachable. Even the experts who hate his guts and want him impeached can admit that. There was no collusion with Russia. That's a democratic lie to hide the fact that their very own Seth Rich was the likely leaker. He has made some mistakes for sure, im with you on a few of those issues, but they aren't impeachable level mistakes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Erik_P 05/26/17 8:12:59 PM #67:	RazorX2003 posted... Trump isn't perfect by any means. In fact, he's far from it. But he's also nowhere even close to impeachable. Even the experts who hate his guts and want him impeached can admit that. There was no collusion with Russia. That's a democratic lie to hide the fact that their very own Seth Rich was the likely leaker. He has made some mistakes for sure, im with you on a few of those issues, but they aren't impeachable level mistakes. Thank you for letting everyone know your opinion isn't worth taking seriously just by promoting an idiotic alt right conspiracy. --- #welchingalldayerrday <cite>Erik_P posted [p:879876390] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>RazorX2003 posted...</cite> <quote>Trump isn't perfect by any means. In fact, he's far from it. But he's also nowhere even close to impeachable. Even the experts who hate his guts and want him impeached can admit that. There was no collusion with Russia. That's a democratic lie to hide the fact that their very own Seth Rich was the likely leaker. He has made some mistakes for sure, im with you on a few of those issues, but they aren't impeachable level mistakes.</quote> Thank you for letting everyone know your opinion isn't worth taking seriously just by promoting an idiotic alt right conspiracy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/26/17 8:52:26 PM #68:	RazorX2003 posted... Trump isn't perfect by any means. In fact, he's far from it. But he's also nowhere even close to impeachable. Even the experts who hate his guts and want him impeached can admit that. There was no collusion with Russia. That's a democratic lie to hide the fact that their very own Seth Rich was the likely leaker. He has made some mistakes for sure, im with you on a few of those issues, but they aren't impeachable level mistakes. Yea, he leaked everything and convinced all the intelligence agencies in the country that Russia was responsible. Sounds totally reasonable. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879878414] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>RazorX2003 posted...</cite> <quote>Trump isn't perfect by any means. In fact, he's far from it. But he's also nowhere even close to impeachable. Even the experts who hate his guts and want him impeached can admit that. There was no collusion with Russia. That's a democratic lie to hide the fact that their very own Seth Rich was the likely leaker. He has made some mistakes for sure, im with you on a few of those issues, but they aren't impeachable level mistakes.</quote> Yea, he leaked everything and convinced all the intelligence agencies in the country that Russia was responsible. Sounds totally reasonable.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeoSioType 05/26/17 9:52:14 PM #69:	The media is overly biased and obsessed with manufacturing or finding legit scandals because the DNC and deep state is terrified he's in office. They weren't supposed to lose. Wikileaks, now heavily associated with Russia, has irreparably damaged the party by revealing collusion and corruption. Fake News originated by WaPo and was a response to "shutdown" uncontrolled Wikileaks discussion and discredit claims on alternative media platforms. /conspiracytheory <cite>NeoSioType posted [p:879881610] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>The media is overly biased and obsessed with manufacturing or finding legit scandals because the DNC and deep state is terrified he's in office. They weren't supposed to lose. Wikileaks, now heavily associated with Russia, has irreparably damaged the party by revealing collusion and corruption. Fake News originated by WaPo and was a response to "shutdown" uncontrolled Wikileaks discussion and discredit claims on alternative media platforms. /conspiracytheory</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RazorX2003 05/27/17 1:06:11 AM #70:	BlackScythe0 posted... Yea, he leaked everything and convinced all the intelligence agencies in the country that Russia was responsible. Wait, you guys don't know about Seth Rich?? He didn't convince anyone of anything because he was killed... yeah it's currently 'conspiracy' but way back last year after the leaks happened, Julian Assange of wikileaks offered reward for anyone with information about his killer... why would he care about a random DNC guy who got shot in the back in what was 'concluded' to be a robbery... even though nothing of his was stolen and no proper investigation took place? He kept very careful about speaking on the details for his reasons... Anyway, there was no proof at the time but definite suspicion... but all of a sudden in the last week, the story has come up again and is making news again because of new information here's a quick run down, but i suggest you look up more about him and the circumstances... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJE3vp7dVRA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObW8tSrMJjo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARqKdNd3Glk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQRDkppCqNM --- I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you understood is not necessarily what I meant. <cite>RazorX2003 posted [p:879890331] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Yea, he leaked everything and convinced all the intelligence agencies in the country that Russia was responsible.</quote> Wait, you guys don't know about Seth Rich?? He didn't convince anyone of anything because he was killed... yeah it's currently 'conspiracy' but way back last year after the leaks happened, Julian Assange of wikileaks offered reward for anyone with information about his killer... why would he care about a random DNC guy who got shot in the back in what was 'concluded' to be a robbery... even though nothing of his was stolen and no proper investigation took place? He kept very careful about speaking on the details for his reasons... Anyway, there was no proof at the time but definite suspicion... but all of a sudden in the last week, the story has come up again and is making news again because of new information here's a quick run down, but i suggest you look up more about him and the circumstances... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJE3vp7dVRA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObW8tSrMJjo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARqKdNd3Glk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQRDkppCqNM</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 05/27/17 6:15:07 AM #71:	It's not a popular opinion, and I don't agree with him on social issues, but Putin is a fucking badass, and he is the only one who can shake things up to the point we get a slight do-over globally. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:879897971] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>It's not a popular opinion, and I don't agree with him on social issues, but Putin is a fucking badass, and he is the only one who can shake things up to the point we get a slight do-over globally.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iDarthDub 05/31/17 5:05:41 AM #72:	No. <cite>iDarthDub posted [p:880128728] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote>No.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 06/01/17 4:31:29 PM #73:	jamieyello3 posted... Zues shut the hell up about me being a troll. You're the only one who thinks that because I'm one of the few posters who even bothers responding to you anymore. You call me a troll because that's easier than defending Trump against his own words. >Pretends that nobody responds to me >Claims that he's not a troll darkknight109 posted... Zeus posted... Honestly, he's no worse than anybody else and the hyperbolic claims about that are silly. Agreed. I mean, aside from the multitude of ways he is demonstrably worse and in way over his head, he`s totally the greatest. Except he's not demonstrably worse nor has anybody claimed he's the greatest. Not even Trump himself has claimed that he's the greatest and he's got an ego bigger than his skyscrapers. BlackScythe0 posted... DirtBasedSoap posted... slacker03150 posted... Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point. So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut He would still be guilty of Obstruction of Justice. "Silencing journalists" -- which isn't a thing in this case -- in no way constitutes obstruction. He did nothing to stop an "investigation against him," especially since he wasn't solely being investigated nor is Comey solely investigating him. And the alleged threat was made in a fucking tweet -_- HornedLion posted... The real impeachable offense was 2 weeks ago and had nothing to do with obstruction, Comey, FBI, Russia, Tweets, none of that. It had to do when he ordered that attack. President CANNOT just attack countries WITHOUT the consent of Congress unless we have been attacked first. We're in peace time. Now, we can argue that the republicans would've probably made it pass anyway but... that's not how it works. I can't assume that my swinger friend is probably gonna be fine with me banging his wife and do it before I ask him. Ordered which attack? Syria? Even if you could somehow claim that's not within the president's powers, previous presidents have literally ordered strikes without congressional approval. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:880222052] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>jamieyello3 posted...</cite> <quote>Zues shut the hell up about me being a troll. You're the only one who thinks that because I'm one of the few posters who even bothers responding to you anymore. You call me a troll because that's easier than defending Trump against his own words.</quote> >Pretends that nobody responds to me >Claims that he's not a troll <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, he's no worse than anybody else and the hyperbolic claims about that are silly.</quote> Agreed. I mean, aside from the multitude of ways he is demonstrably worse and in way over his head, he`s totally the greatest.</quote> Except he's not demonstrably worse nor has anybody claimed he's the greatest. Not even Trump himself has claimed that he's the greatest and he's got an ego bigger than his skyscrapers. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DirtBasedSoap posted...</cite> <quote><cite>slacker03150 posted...</cite> <quote>Even if there is nothing to the Russia scandal, the evidence shows that he has tried to intimidate witnesses, silence journalists, and stop an investigation against him, so even if we end up with mike pence, I think impeachment would be fair at this point.</quote> So if it turns out he's innocent he should still be impeached? lolwut</quote> He would still be guilty of Obstruction of Justice.</quote> "Silencing journalists" -- which isn't a thing in this case -- in no way constitutes obstruction. He did nothing to stop an "investigation against him," especially since he wasn't solely being investigated nor is Comey solely investigating him. And the alleged threat was made in a fucking tweet -_- <cite>HornedLion posted...</cite> <quote>The real impeachable offense was 2 weeks ago and had nothing to do with obstruction, Comey, FBI, Russia, Tweets, none of that. It had to do when he ordered that attack. President CANNOT just attack countries WITHOUT the consent of Congress unless we have been attacked first. We're in peace time. Now, we can argue that the republicans would've probably made it pass anyway but... that's not how it works. I can't assume that my swinger friend is probably gonna be fine with me banging his wife and do it before I ask him.</quote> Ordered which attack? Syria? Even if you could somehow claim that's not within the president's powers, previous presidents have literally ordered strikes without congressional approval.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 06/01/17 4:32:36 PM #74:	Lightning Bolt posted... What about the collusion with Russia, the releasing of classified information for bragging reasons, the lack of understanding of issues, the tainting of international relationships (German newspapers are currently railing against Trump for his attitude towards and ignorance of US-EU trade policy due how he acted while meeting NATO), the praising of extremist dictators, or the obstruction of justice? He didn't collude with Russia, as the highest authority in the land (save perhaps SCOTUS) he has the ability to share classified information (assuming it was what people are claiming), anything to do with international relations is in no way impeachable plus countless previous presidents did the same, Obama praised Hugo fucking Chavez who was twenty times the dictator that people think Putin is, and the obstruction charges are trumped up bullshit. Lightning Bolt posted... Granted the russia thing is still in the early parts of what's probably a several year investigation. But he looks super guilty to me, what with all the obstruction. Could be drummed up. His handling is so ridiculous he couldn't possibly be guilty, nor does the scenario itself necessitate any involvement. Occam's Razor cuts through the conspiracy. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:880222122] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lightning Bolt posted...</cite> <quote>What about the collusion with Russia, the releasing of classified information for bragging reasons, the lack of understanding of issues, the tainting of international relationships (German newspapers are currently railing against Trump for his attitude towards and ignorance of US-EU trade policy due how he acted while meeting NATO), the praising of extremist dictators, or the obstruction of justice?</quote> He didn't collude with Russia, as the highest authority in the land (save perhaps SCOTUS) he has the ability to share classified information (assuming it was what people are claiming), anything to do with international relations is in no way impeachable plus countless previous presidents did the same, Obama praised Hugo fucking Chavez who was twenty times the dictator that people think Putin is, and the obstruction charges are trumped up bullshit. <cite>Lightning Bolt posted...</cite> <quote>Granted the russia thing is still in the early parts of what's probably a several year investigation. But he looks super guilty to me, what with all the obstruction. Could be drummed up.</quote> His handling is so ridiculous he couldn't possibly be guilty, nor does the scenario itself necessitate any involvement. Occam's Razor cuts through the conspiracy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jamieyello3 06/01/17 5:56:48 PM #75:	Zeus posted... >Pretends that nobody responds to me >Claims that he's not a troll Oh piss off already More like no one relative to the amount of people you're constantly arguing with <cite>jamieyello3 posted [p:880227164] in Should Tru... [t:75381703]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>>Pretends that nobody responds to me >Claims that he's not a troll</quote> Oh piss off already More like no one relative to the amount of people you're constantly arguing with</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Should Trump be impeached? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Should Trump be impeached?