Poll of the Day > Would you say that the Ghostbusters 2016 reboot is grossly overrated since...

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 6:04:07 PM #1:	Rotten Tomatoes gave it a good score while most of the casual audience disliked it while the core audience refused to watch this movie to begin with? While I believe people should stop depending on "Professional Reviewers" to figure out if whether or not a movie or video game is good, I think it's quite dumb how Rotten Tomatoes gave this crap movie a 73% rating, which is even one percent higher than Forest Gump so let than sink in for a minute. Most of the reviews that Rotten Tomatoes gathered are from pretty biased SJW "Professional reviewers" who praised the movie based on it's political motives rather than it's actual story, acting and overall movie content. It was obvious that the director rebooted this film to deliberately piss off the original Ghostbusters fan base and male audience with this SJW feminist crap being shoved down our throats, when the GB fans could have gotten a movie sequel that they've been long asking for but instead were given an unnecessary SJW reboot that no one ever asked for. I don't have anything against female Ghostbuster members as protagonists of the film at all as long as the film was a sequel and respected the original movie while the female Ghostbusters were brand new characters mentored by the original Ghostbusters members but no, instead we get a deliberately misandric and insulting reboot which I don't get what Paul Feig(director) hoped to have accomplished with this trying to make women "even" with men by making all the male characters complete idiots when the original Ghostbusters movie never made any of the female characters idiotic. All it did was bit Paul Feig back in the ass by having his GB reboot bomb in the box office, which he deserved for his and Sony Pictures' stupid decision of not handling criticism well at all and resorted to pulling the "misogynist" card on the critics and insulting them and core GB fanbase(which happens to be very predominantly male). https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/ <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884008239] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>Rotten Tomatoes gave it a good score while most of the casual audience disliked it while the core audience refused to watch this movie to begin with? While I believe people should stop depending on "Professional Reviewers" to figure out if whether or not a movie or video game is good, I think it's quite dumb how Rotten Tomatoes gave this crap movie a 73% rating, which is even one percent higher than Forest Gump so let than sink in for a minute. Most of the reviews that Rotten Tomatoes gathered are from pretty biased SJW "Professional reviewers" who praised the movie based on it's political motives rather than it's actual story, acting and overall movie content. It was obvious that the director rebooted this film to deliberately piss off the original Ghostbusters fan base and male audience with this SJW feminist crap being shoved down our throats, when the GB fans could have gotten a movie sequel that they've been long asking for but instead were given an unnecessary SJW reboot that no one ever asked for. I don't have anything against female Ghostbuster members as protagonists of the film at all as long as the film was a sequel and respected the original movie while the female Ghostbusters were brand new characters mentored by the original Ghostbusters members but no, instead we get a deliberately misandric and insulting reboot which I don't get what Paul Feig(director) hoped to have accomplished with this trying to make women "even" with men by making all the male characters complete idiots when the original Ghostbusters movie never made any of the female characters idiotic. All it did was bit Paul Feig back in the ass by having his GB reboot bomb in the box office, which he deserved for his and Sony Pictures' stupid decision of not handling criticism well at all and resorted to pulling the "misogynist" card on the critics and insulting them and core GB fanbase(which happens to be very predominantly male). https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pus_N_Pecans 08/01/17 6:13:01 PM #2:	tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous. --- My arts- http://gopherguy.deviantart.com/ <cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted [p:884008727] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 6:17:35 PM #3:	Pus_N_Pecans posted... tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous. The hate train was pretty well deserved considering Sony Pictures and the director's intention of insulting the potential male audience and forcing their 3rd Wave Feminist agenda down on people's throats. <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884008980] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted...</cite> <quote>tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous.</quote> The hate train was pretty well deserved considering Sony Pictures and the director's intention of insulting the potential male audience and forcing their 3rd Wave Feminist agenda down on people's throats.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheOrangeMisfit 08/01/17 6:18:21 PM #4:	Pus_N_Pecans posted... tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc --- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8Ik55J7RKO_d9U_9RIrYUQ <cite>TheOrangeMisfit posted [p:884009018] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted...</cite> <quote>tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous.</quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 08/01/17 6:18:38 PM #5:	It's not Adam Sandler bad but it's... What was I saying? reads what was just typed Now that I mention it, I'm surprised Adam Sandler wasn't in it. It seems exactly like his type of movie. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:884009033] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>It's not Adam Sandler bad but it's... What was I saying? reads what was just typed Now that I mention it, I'm surprised Adam Sandler wasn't in it. It seems exactly like his type of movie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pus_N_Pecans 08/01/17 6:24:42 PM #6:	Juggernaut480 posted... The hate train was pretty well deserved considering Sony Pictures and the director's intention of insulting the potential male audience and forcing their 3rd Wave Feminist agenda down on people's throats. Nah, he really only did this after they'd already outed themselves. It never looked like it was going to be some great movie, but the reaction it got was the same kind of reaction you'd expect from a sympathetic Hitler biopic with Rob Schneider in the lead role. --- My arts- http://gopherguy.deviantart.com/ <cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted [p:884009341] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote>The hate train was pretty well deserved considering Sony Pictures and the director's intention of insulting the potential male audience and forcing their 3rd Wave Feminist agenda down on people's throats. </quote> Nah, he really only did this after they'd already outed themselves. It never looked like it was going to be some great movie, but the reaction it got was the same kind of reaction you'd expect from a sympathetic Hitler biopic with Rob Schneider in the lead role.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Golden Road 08/01/17 6:26:00 PM #7:	I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated." --- Who's your favorite character from "Bend It Like Beckham"? And you can't say Beckham. <cite>Golden Road posted [p:884009405] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 6:27:42 PM #8:	Golden Road posted... I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated." I was pointing how how this movie was overrated by "professional reviewers" gathered by Rotten Tomatoes. <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884009486] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Golden Road posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated."</quote> I was pointing how how this movie was overrated by "professional reviewers" gathered by Rotten Tomatoes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/01/17 6:28:11 PM #9:	Golden Road posted... I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated." --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mead "I'm Mary Poppins ya'll!" <cite>Mead posted [p:884009511] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Golden Road posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated."</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Far-Queue 08/01/17 6:35:04 PM #10:	Pus_N_Pecans posted... tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous. Mead posted... Golden Road posted... I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated." --- https://i.imgur.com/ZwO4qO2.gifv this place is a fresh new hell every day - Lightning Bolt <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:884009883] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted...</cite> <quote>tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous.</quote> <cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Golden Road posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated."</quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/01/17 6:35:27 PM #11:	It has a good rating some reviewers were too scared to give it a bad one for fear of looking sexist, which was revealed as a Sony marketing tactic, while others praised it for being socially progressive. The film itself, which I'd watch if it was on NFI but wouldn't pay a dime for, is supposedly mediocre at best so it should have at the most a 50% rating. Juggernaut480 posted... while the core audience refused to watch this movie to begin with? That shouldn't factor into its ratings. Pus_N_Pecans posted... tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous. A claim which makes no sense given its great ratings which clearly weren't impacted by any hate. Pus_N_Pecans posted... Juggernaut480 posted... The hate train was pretty well deserved considering Sony Pictures and the director's intention of insulting the potential male audience and forcing their 3rd Wave Feminist agenda down on people's throats. Nah, he really only did this after they'd already outed themselves. It never looked like it was going to be some great movie, but the reaction it got was the same kind of reaction you'd expect from a sympathetic Hitler biopic with Rob Schneider in the lead role. At least that had the potential to be funny. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:884009904] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>It has a good rating some reviewers were too scared to give it a bad one for fear of looking sexist, which was revealed as a Sony marketing tactic, while others praised it for being socially progressive. The film itself, which I'd watch if it was on NFI but wouldn't pay a dime for, is supposedly mediocre at best so it should have at the most a 50% rating. <cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote>while the core audience refused to watch this movie to begin with?</quote> That shouldn't factor into its ratings. <cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted...</cite> <quote>tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous.</quote> A claim which makes no sense given its great ratings which clearly weren't impacted by any hate. <cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote>The hate train was pretty well deserved considering Sony Pictures and the director's intention of insulting the potential male audience and forcing their 3rd Wave Feminist agenda down on people's throats. </quote> Nah, he really only did this after they'd already outed themselves. It never looked like it was going to be some great movie, but the reaction it got was the same kind of reaction you'd expect from a sympathetic Hitler biopic with Rob Schneider in the lead role.</quote> At least that had the potential to be funny.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Far-Queue 08/01/17 6:37:28 PM #12:	Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic --- https://i.imgur.com/ZwO4qO2.gifv this place is a fresh new hell every day - Lightning Bolt <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:884010016] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Duck-I-Says 08/01/17 6:43:59 PM #13:	TheOrangeMisfit posted... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc More people in this thread need to watch this video. <cite>Duck-I-Says posted [p:884010355] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheOrangeMisfit posted...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc</quote> More people in this thread need to watch this video.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 6:47:47 PM #14:	Far-Queue posted... Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic Well one thing for sure is that this discussion board or the internet in general is clearly NOT a "Safe Space" for easily triggered SJW idiots who resorts to calling anyone who disagrees with them "insecure man-children", lol. <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884010582] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote>Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic</quote> Well one thing for sure is that this discussion board or the internet in general is clearly NOT a "Safe Space" for easily triggered SJW idiots who resorts to calling anyone who disagrees with them "insecure man-children", lol.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/01/17 6:51:54 PM #15:	Far-Queue posted... Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic Outed as an SJW! lol pathetic --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:884010809] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote>Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic</quote> Outed as an SJW! lol pathetic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/01/17 6:52:11 PM #16:	After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters... --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884010832] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/01/17 6:55:49 PM #17:	TheCyborgNinja posted... After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters... Don't get me wrong, the trailers look awful -- as have the clips I saw -- and I'm expecting very little, but I'll still likely watch it eventually. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:884011019] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters...</quote> Don't get me wrong, the trailers look awful -- as have the clips I saw -- and I'm expecting very little, but I'll still likely watch it eventually.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 6:56:36 PM #18:	TheCyborgNinja posted... After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters... From what I've heard about Paul Feig, the guy is a cuck who suffers from self-hatred of being a male after being bullied a lot in high school by jocks or just by boys in general and then decided to take a jab back at "misogynist men" by trashing a classic movie franchise. <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884011062] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters...</quote> From what I've heard about Paul Feig, the guy is a cuck who suffers from self-hatred of being a male after being bullied a lot in high school by jocks or just by boys in general and then decided to take a jab back at "misogynist men" by trashing a classic movie franchise.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#19	Post #19 was unavailable or deleted.
VeeVees 08/01/17 7:01:05 PM #20:	The good reviews are either from SJWs or people who don't want to be harassed by SJWs. --- Rudy sucks <cite>VeeVees posted [p:884011309] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>The good reviews are either from SJWs or people who don't want to be harassed by SJWs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pus_N_Pecans 08/01/17 7:16:44 PM #21:	I know you won't listen to reason because you're clearly part of the hatetrain I already mentioned but Paul Feig isn't a hack. Freaks and Geeks is real solid and Spy and Bridemaids were pretty decent too. --- My arts- http://gopherguy.deviantart.com/ <cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted [p:884012163] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>I know you won't listen to reason because you're clearly part of the hatetrain I already mentioned but Paul Feig isn't a hack. Freaks and Geeks is real solid and Spy and Bridemaids were pretty decent too.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
demonfang178 08/01/17 7:36:46 PM #22:	TheOrangeMisfit posted... Pus_N_Pecans posted... tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc "In fact, it was widely reported that Sony was deleting general negative comments about the film, BUT leaving the childish, misogynistic ones in order to have a market to target their terrible film." Earned sub and ** you Sony. <cite>demonfang178 posted [p:884013198] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheOrangeMisfit posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pus_N_Pecans posted...</cite> <quote>tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous.</quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc</quote> "In fact, it was widely reported that Sony was deleting general negative comments about the film, BUT leaving the childish, misogynistic ones in order to have a market to target their terrible film." Earned sub and ** you Sony.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Far-Queue 08/01/17 7:40:41 PM #23:	Juggernaut480 posted... Far-Queue posted... Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic Well one thing for sure is that this discussion board or the internet in general is clearly NOT a "Safe Space" for easily triggered SJW idiots who resorts to calling anyone who disagrees with them "insecure man-children", lol. lol "easily triggered"... this coming from someone who got their knickers in a twist over a couple women being cast in a movie. Zeus posted... Far-Queue posted... Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic Outed as an SJW! lol pathetic Speaking of "easily triggered"... --- https://i.imgur.com/ZwO4qO2.gifv this place is a fresh new hell every day - Lightning Bolt <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:884013378] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote>Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic</quote> Well one thing for sure is that this discussion board or the internet in general is clearly NOT a "Safe Space" for easily triggered SJW idiots who resorts to calling anyone who disagrees with them "insecure man-children", lol.</quote> lol "easily triggered"... this coming from someone who got their knickers in a twist over a couple women being cast in a movie. <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote>Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic</quote> Outed as an SJW! lol pathetic</quote> Speaking of "easily triggered"...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/01/17 7:51:09 PM #24:	Juggernaut480 posted... TheCyborgNinja posted... After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters... From what I've heard about Paul Feig, the guy is a cuck who suffers from self-hatred of being a male after being bullied a lot in high school by jocks or just by boys in general and then decided to take a jab back at "misogynist men" by trashing a classic movie franchise. It wouldn't surprise me. He has this passive, backhanded approach to it that poorly conceals some kind of chip on the shoulder... --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884013875] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters...</quote> From what I've heard about Paul Feig, the guy is a cuck who suffers from self-hatred of being a male after being bullied a lot in high school by jocks or just by boys in general and then decided to take a jab back at "misogynist men" by trashing a classic movie franchise.</quote> It wouldn't surprise me. He has this passive, backhanded approach to it that poorly conceals some kind of chip on the shoulder...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/01/17 7:53:30 PM #25:	Don't judge a book by its cover (I know the haircut may cause some of you concern) with her, it's the best video I have seen about the 2016 tragedy in question. She rails into the morons hard. She also swears a lot, so kinda NSFW in that regard... But yeah, I implore you all to watch this. It's honestly the fairest assessment of the situation and really is on point in many ways. Her comment about it being a "false flag" feminist issue was perfect. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn_vAcFGTJU --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884013974] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>Don't judge a book by its cover (I know the haircut may cause some of you concern) with her, it's the best video I have seen about the 2016 tragedy in question. She rails into the morons hard. She also swears a lot, so kinda NSFW in that regard... But yeah, I implore you all to watch this. It's honestly the fairest assessment of the situation and really is on point in many ways. Her comment about it being a "false flag" feminist issue was perfect. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn_vAcFGTJU</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/01/17 8:14:44 PM #26:	Far-Queue posted... Zeus posted... Far-Queue posted... Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic Outed as an SJW! lol pathetic Speaking of "easily triggered"... Speaking of "easily cuckolded"... =p --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash <cite>Zeus posted [p:884015053] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote>Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic</quote> Outed as an SJW! lol pathetic</quote> Speaking of "easily triggered"...</quote> Speaking of "easily cuckolded"... =p</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 8:21:13 PM #27:	Far-Queue posted... Juggernaut480 posted... Far-Queue posted... Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic Well one thing for sure is that this discussion board or the internet in general is clearly NOT a "Safe Space" for easily triggered SJW idiots who resorts to calling anyone who disagrees with them "insecure man-children", lol. lol "easily triggered"... this coming from someone who got their knickers in a twist over a couple women being cast in a movie. Zeus posted... Far-Queue posted... Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic Outed as an SJW! lol pathetic Speaking of "easily triggered"... LOL! You sure are one easily trigger-able special snowflake, are you? Did you completely ignore the part where I mentioned that I have nothing against female Ghostbusters members as long as it respects the original movie and didn't deliberately insult the GB fanbase with SJW BS? I suggest you should go crawl back to Tumblr from where you belong since clearly Gamefaqs boards are a not a "Safe Space" for cucks like you. <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884015333] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote>Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic</quote> Well one thing for sure is that this discussion board or the internet in general is clearly NOT a "Safe Space" for easily triggered SJW idiots who resorts to calling anyone who disagrees with them "insecure man-children", lol.</quote> lol "easily triggered"... this coming from someone who got their knickers in a twist over a couple women being cast in a movie. <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote>Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting. lol pathetic</quote> Outed as an SJW! lol pathetic</quote> Speaking of "easily triggered"...</quote> LOL! You sure are one easily trigger-able special snowflake, are you? Did you completely ignore the part where I mentioned that I have nothing against female Ghostbusters members as long as it respects the original movie and didn't deliberately insult the GB fanbase with SJW BS? I suggest you should go crawl back to Tumblr from where you belong since clearly Gamefaqs boards are a not a "Safe Space" for cucks like you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Far-Queue 08/01/17 8:42:31 PM #28:	lol @Zeus and @Juggernaut480 are so cute together. Funny how when these types get all riled up they throw around that "cuck" and "snowflake" nonsense, as if that means anything. Getting all bent out of shape over some perceived feminist agenda, but okay *I'm* the snowflake. Keep on coming back with that worn-out "Tumblr safe space cuck SJW" etc crap, since that's the only cards you two seem to have up your combined sleeves. --- https://i.imgur.com/ZwO4qO2.gifv this place is a fresh new hell every day - Lightning Bolt <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:884016509] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>lol @Zeus and @Juggernaut480 are so cute together. Funny how when these types get all riled up they throw around that "cuck" and "snowflake" nonsense, as if that means anything. Getting all bent out of shape over some perceived feminist agenda, but okay I'm the snowflake. Keep on coming back with that worn-out "Tumblr safe space cuck SJW" etc crap, since that's the only cards you two seem to have up your combined sleeves.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/01/17 8:53:43 PM #29:	^While I agree that their choice of words does diminish the impact of their messaging, you aren't better than they are. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884017096] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>^While I agree that their choice of words does diminish the impact of their messaging, you aren't better than they are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 8:54:07 PM #30:	Far-Queue posted... lol @Zeus and @Juggernaut480 are so cute together. Funny how when these types get all riled up they throw around that "cuck" and "snowflake" nonsense, as if that means anything. Getting all bent out of shape over some perceived feminist agenda, but okay *I'm* the snowflake. Keep on coming back with that worn-out "Tumblr safe space cuck SJW" etc crap, since that's the only cards you two seem to have up your combined sleeves. It's called having an opinion dipshit, lol. Deal with it. Do you have any better cards aside from the same old "insecure man-children" or "sexist pig" insults you have on your sleeves since you seem all bent up over people not sharing the same opinions as you? The "Sexist/Misogyny" and "Insecure Man-Children" card being pulled by extremist leftards are getting old, lol. <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884017122] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote>lol @Zeus and @Juggernaut480 are so cute together. Funny how when these types get all riled up they throw around that "cuck" and "snowflake" nonsense, as if that means anything. Getting all bent out of shape over some perceived feminist agenda, but okay I'm the snowflake. Keep on coming back with that worn-out "Tumblr safe space cuck SJW" etc crap, since that's the only cards you two seem to have up your combined sleeves.</quote> It's called having an opinion dipshit, lol. Deal with it. Do you have any better cards aside from the same old "insecure man-children" or "sexist pig" insults you have on your sleeves since you seem all bent up over people not sharing the same opinions as you? The "Sexist/Misogyny" and "Insecure Man-Children" card being pulled by extremist leftards are getting old, lol.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/01/17 8:55:50 PM #31:	The biggest problem with any argument involving "SJWs" (I can't think of a better description, sorry) is that they are fanatical in their views to the point they admit they're opinions but enforce them as facts due to some misguided moral high ground, whereas like anything in life, the truth exists somewhere in the middle most of the time. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884017206] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>The biggest problem with any argument involving "SJWs" (I can't think of a better description, sorry) is that they are fanatical in their views to the point they admit they're opinions but enforce them as facts due to some misguided moral high ground, whereas like anything in life, the truth exists somewhere in the middle most of the time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 8:57:13 PM #32:	TheCyborgNinja posted... ^While I agree that their choice of words does diminish the impact of their messaging, you aren't better than they are. Well, it's difficult not to insult such people since they sure love to start flame wars and insults with people who disagree with them. After all, some of these same people who I disagree with and insult are usually the ones that want to legally and socially silence people for "offensive" or "wrong" opinions(basically anyone who doesn't subscribe to their SJW philosophies). <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884017284] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>^While I agree that their choice of words does diminish the impact of their messaging, you aren't better than they are.</quote> Well, it's difficult not to insult such people since they sure love to start flame wars and insults with people who disagree with them. After all, some of these same people who I disagree with and insult are usually the ones that want to legally and socially silence people for "offensive" or "wrong" opinions(basically anyone who doesn't subscribe to their SJW philosophies).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/01/17 9:01:41 PM #33:	TheCyborgNinja posted... The biggest problem with any argument involving "SJWs" (I can't think of a better description, sorry) is that they are fanatical in their views to the point they admit they're opinions but enforce them as facts due to some misguided moral high ground, whereas like anything in life, the truth exists somewhere in the middle most of the time. The thing is, there's a painfully obvious truth to the SJW agenda theory of the Ghostbusters reboot since many of their advertisements flat out throw in "Girls Rule" or "Women are funny, get over it!" messages, even when the majority of the people harshly criticizing this movie aren't sexist and mostly criticized this reboot for disrespecting and disconnecting the original movie with cheap jokes, most of which are allegedly deleted by Sony Pictures so they can find the 1% of the comments that are genuinely misogynistic, to fit with their SJW narrative. On top of that, Sony Pictures threatened/blackmailed Bill Murray with litigation/legal action if he refused to make any cameo appearances in this movie. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/movies/ghostbusters-review-melissa-mccarthy-kristen-wiig.html http://www.thewrap.com/sony-hack-attack-studio-considered-legal-action-against-ghostbusters-star-bill-murray/ http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Sony-Might-Sue-Bill-Murray-Playing-Ball-Ghostbusters-68651.html <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884017534] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>The biggest problem with any argument involving "SJWs" (I can't think of a better description, sorry) is that they are fanatical in their views to the point they admit they're opinions but enforce them as facts due to some misguided moral high ground, whereas like anything in life, the truth exists somewhere in the middle most of the time.</quote> The thing is, there's a painfully obvious truth to the SJW agenda theory of the Ghostbusters reboot since many of their advertisements flat out throw in "Girls Rule" or "Women are funny, get over it!" messages, even when the majority of the people harshly criticizing this movie aren't sexist and mostly criticized this reboot for disrespecting and disconnecting the original movie with cheap jokes, most of which are allegedly deleted by Sony Pictures so they can find the 1% of the comments that are genuinely misogynistic, to fit with their SJW narrative. On top of that, Sony Pictures threatened/blackmailed Bill Murray with litigation/legal action if he refused to make any cameo appearances in this movie. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/movies/ghostbusters-review-melissa-mccarthy-kristen-wiig.html http://www.thewrap.com/sony-hack-attack-studio-considered-legal-action-against-ghostbusters-star-bill-murray/ http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Sony-Might-Sue-Bill-Murray-Playing-Ball-Ghostbusters-68651.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/01/17 9:04:04 PM #34:	Juggernaut480 posted... TheCyborgNinja posted... The biggest problem with any argument involving "SJWs" (I can't think of a better description, sorry) is that they are fanatical in their views to the point they admit they're opinions but enforce them as facts due to some misguided moral high ground, whereas like anything in life, the truth exists somewhere in the middle most of the time. The thing is, there's a painfully obvious truth to the SJW agenda theory of the Ghostbusters reboot since many of their advertisements flat out throw in "Girls Rule" or "Women are funny, get over it!" messages, even when the majority of the critics aren't sexist and mostly criticized this reboot for disrespecting and disconnecting the original movie with cheap jokes, most of which are allegedly deleted by Sony Pictures so they can find the 1% of the comments that are genuinely misogynistic, to fit with their SJW narrative. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/movies/ghostbusters-review-melissa-mccarthy-kristen-wiig.html Oh, I don't doubt that the movie did have something to prove on Paul Feig's end of things. For Sony it was a cash grab. As the girl in the video I shared pointed out, Sony just used the ignorance and drama in the hopes of salvaging their shitty attempt at a movie by playing up the angle of "like or you're sexist" - which is bullshit and anyone who fell into that trap is a person I could never respect as a human being. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884017643] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>The biggest problem with any argument involving "SJWs" (I can't think of a better description, sorry) is that they are fanatical in their views to the point they admit they're opinions but enforce them as facts due to some misguided moral high ground, whereas like anything in life, the truth exists somewhere in the middle most of the time.</quote> The thing is, there's a painfully obvious truth to the SJW agenda theory of the Ghostbusters reboot since many of their advertisements flat out throw in "Girls Rule" or "Women are funny, get over it!" messages, even when the majority of the critics aren't sexist and mostly criticized this reboot for disrespecting and disconnecting the original movie with cheap jokes, most of which are allegedly deleted by Sony Pictures so they can find the 1% of the comments that are genuinely misogynistic, to fit with their SJW narrative. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/movies/ghostbusters-review-melissa-mccarthy-kristen-wiig.html</quote> Oh, I don't doubt that the movie did have something to prove on Paul Feig's end of things. For Sony it was a cash grab. As the girl in the video I shared pointed out, Sony just used the ignorance and drama in the hopes of salvaging their shitty attempt at a movie by playing up the angle of "like or you're sexist" - which is bullshit and anyone who fell into that trap is a person I could never respect as a human being.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/01/17 9:06:44 PM #35:	On a similar note: Domino (Marvel Comics) is now black with a huge afro and bad makeup in Deadpool 2. People are already crying "racism!" with regards to any contrary opinions to "how progressive <3 <3 <3"... Skynet, WWIII, a meteor... Anything... Please... --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884017780] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>On a similar note: Domino (Marvel Comics) is now black with a huge afro and bad makeup in Deadpool 2. People are already crying "racism!" with regards to any contrary opinions to "how progressive <3 <3 <3"... Skynet, WWIII, a meteor... Anything... Please...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Duck-I-Says 08/01/17 10:07:09 PM #36:	TheCyborgNinja posted... On a similar note: Domino (Marvel Comics) is now black with a huge afro and bad makeup in Deadpool 2. Isn't she half-white and therefore mixed? I wonder if the US will ever be able to overcome the history of the 1-drop rule. <cite>Duck-I-Says posted [p:884021171] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>On a similar note: Domino (Marvel Comics) is now black with a huge afro and bad makeup in Deadpool 2.</quote> Isn't she half-white and therefore mixed? I wonder if the US will ever be able to overcome the history of the 1-drop rule.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Syntheticon 08/01/17 10:23:05 PM #37:	Juggernaut480 posted... Rotten Tomatoes gave it a good score while most of the casual audience disliked it while the core audience refused to watch this movie to begin with? It's not a terrible movie but like most franchises that hollywood feels they need to 'reclaim for women' or whatever, they would have been better served making a new franchise altogether. While I believe people should stop depending on "Professional Reviewers" to figure out if whether or not a movie or video game is good, I think it's quite dumb how Rotten Tomatoes gave this crap movie a 73% rating, which is even one percent higher than Forest Gump so let than sink in for a minute. The movie wasn't terrible, but the jokes weren't as good as the originals, the editing was woeful and they tried too hard to make references to the originals (eg. the entire plot) while showing us how new, fresh and crazy they all were. Trying way too hard to be cool isn't cool. Most of the reviews that Rotten Tomatoes gathered are from pretty biased SJW "Professional reviewers" who praised the movie based on it's political motives rather than it's actual story, acting and overall movie content. It was obvious that the director rebooted this film to deliberately piss off the original Ghostbusters fan base and male audience with this SJW feminist crap being shoved down our throats, when the GB fans could have gotten a movie sequel that they've been long asking for but instead were given an unnecessary SJW reboot that no one ever asked for. Aside from a little butthurt bias, this is pretty close to the mark. Lady execs and actors of hollywood, make your own thing-there's plenty of good writers/scripts out there if you get off the sequel/reboot train long enough to try, you can do whatever you want with it and won't have the majority of these issues. --- Mod me? You don't even know me! <cite>Syntheticon posted [p:884022109] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote>Rotten Tomatoes gave it a good score while most of the casual audience disliked it while the core audience refused to watch this movie to begin with?</quote> It's not a terrible movie but like most franchises that hollywood feels they need to 'reclaim for women' or whatever, they would have been better served making a new franchise altogether. <quote>While I believe people should stop depending on "Professional Reviewers" to figure out if whether or not a movie or video game is good, I think it's quite dumb how Rotten Tomatoes gave this crap movie a 73% rating, which is even one percent higher than Forest Gump so let than sink in for a minute.</quote> The movie wasn't terrible, but the jokes weren't as good as the originals, the editing was woeful and they tried too hard to make references to the originals (eg. the entire plot) while showing us how new, fresh and crazy they all were. Trying way too hard to be cool isn't cool. <quote>Most of the reviews that Rotten Tomatoes gathered are from pretty biased SJW "Professional reviewers" who praised the movie based on it's political motives rather than it's actual story, acting and overall movie content. It was obvious that the director rebooted this film to deliberately piss off the original Ghostbusters fan base and male audience with this SJW feminist crap being shoved down our throats, when the GB fans could have gotten a movie sequel that they've been long asking for but instead were given an unnecessary SJW reboot that no one ever asked for.</quote> Aside from a little butthurt bias, this is pretty close to the mark. Lady execs and actors of hollywood, make your own thing-there's plenty of good writers/scripts out there if you get off the sequel/reboot train long enough to try, you can do whatever you want with it and won't have the majority of these issues.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
keyblader1985 08/01/17 10:34:32 PM #38:	Fuck. Why do I think a rational, civil conversation can ever be had here about things like this? --- Official King of PotD You only need one T-Rex to make the point, though. ~ Samus Sedai <cite>keyblader1985 posted [p:884022667] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>Fuck. Why do I think a rational, civil conversation can ever be had here about things like this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 08/01/17 10:39:43 PM #39:	shit reboot, they arent funny --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:884022918] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>shit reboot, they arent funny</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AC_Dragonfire 08/01/17 11:25:43 PM #40:	Don't even need to watch the movie. The scenes from the cinema sins are more than enough to tell me how trash the entire film was. Cinema Sins: Everything Wrong With Ghostbusters (2016) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoaS3-3ks2g And weird emails about Bill Murray confirmed from wiki leaks on Sony. https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/104704 In order to more fully evaluate our position if Bill Murray again declines to engage on “Ghostbusters”, AG requested that we identify “aggressive” litigation counsel with whom we can consult to evaluate our alternatives and strategize. [Harkening back to his prior employer, of course, raised the name of David Boies.] <cite>AC_Dragonfire posted [p:884025203] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>Don't even need to watch the movie. The scenes from the cinema sins are more than enough to tell me how trash the entire film was. Cinema Sins: Everything Wrong With Ghostbusters (2016) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoaS3-3ks2g And weird emails about Bill Murray confirmed from wiki leaks on Sony. https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/104704 In order to more fully evaluate our position if Bill Murray again declines to engage on “Ghostbusters”, AG requested that we identify “aggressive” litigation counsel with whom we can consult to evaluate our alternatives and strategize. [Harkening back to his prior employer, of course, raised the name of David Boies.]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Golden Road 08/01/17 11:38:32 PM #41:	AC_Dragonfire posted... Don't even need to watch the movie. The scenes from the cinema sins are more than enough to tell me how trash the entire film was. You're not really supposed to take Cinema Sins seriously =/ --- Who's your favorite character from "Bend It Like Beckham"? And you can't say Beckham. <cite>Golden Road posted [p:884025842] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>AC_Dragonfire posted...</cite> <quote>Don't even need to watch the movie. The scenes from the cinema sins are more than enough to tell me how trash the entire film was.</quote> You're not really supposed to take Cinema Sins seriously =/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/01/17 11:47:52 PM #42:	Duck-I-Says posted... TheCyborgNinja posted... On a similar note: Domino (Marvel Comics) is now black with a huge afro and bad makeup in Deadpool 2. Isn't she half-white and therefore mixed? I wonder if the US will ever be able to overcome the history of the 1-drop rule. Can't tell if serious..... her skin is literally as white as paper. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884026256] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Duck-I-Says posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheCyborgNinja posted...</cite> <quote>On a similar note: Domino (Marvel Comics) is now black with a huge afro and bad makeup in Deadpool 2.</quote> Isn't she half-white and therefore mixed? I wonder if the US will ever be able to overcome the history of the 1-drop rule.</quote> Can't tell if serious..... her skin is literally as white as paper.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MICHALECOLE 08/01/17 11:50:54 PM #43:	Didn't read topic Overrated is a stupid word for "I didn't like it but other people did" <cite>MICHALECOLE posted [p:884026402] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>Didn't read topic Overrated is a stupid word for "I didn't like it but other people did"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KevinceKostner 08/01/17 11:55:06 PM #44:	Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well? <cite>KevinceKostner posted [p:884026602] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MICHALECOLE 08/01/17 11:56:06 PM #45:	KevinceKostner posted... Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well? I never saw it because it doesn't interest me. I didn't blindly hate it because it has women in it though. <cite>MICHALECOLE posted [p:884026650] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>KevinceKostner posted...</cite> <quote>Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well?</quote> I never saw it because it doesn't interest me. I didn't blindly hate it because it has women in it though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 08/02/17 1:06:40 AM #46:	KevinceKostner posted... Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well? That seems like a fair compromise. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:884029713] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>KevinceKostner posted...</cite> <quote>Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well?</quote> That seems like a fair compromise.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
argonautweakend 08/02/17 1:10:03 AM #47:	rotten tomatoes doesnt give it a score, the reviewers do. average people might not like it because they compare it to the original films and dont think it holds up. Obviously they could just think its a bad film, too. that is fine. But, a reviewers is less likely to do this. So that could account for the skew. <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:884029855] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>rotten tomatoes doesnt give it a score, the reviewers do. average people might not like it because they compare it to the original films and dont think it holds up. Obviously they could just think its a bad film, too. that is fine. But, a reviewers is less likely to do this. So that could account for the skew.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathMagnetic80 08/02/17 2:53:48 AM #48:	Juggernaut480 posted... Golden Road posted... I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated." I was pointing how how this movie was overrated by "professional reviewers" gathered by Rotten Tomatoes. It's not like butt hurt, "anti-SJW" types that were frothing at the mouth the second they announced an all women reboot of Ghostbusters could POSSIBLY have tanked the score on the other end. I still haven't seen it, but people I know, that were huge fans of the original said it was decent. Not nearly as good as the original, but not nearly as bad as people were acting like it'd be. <cite>DeathMagnetic80 posted [p:884033294] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>Juggernaut480 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Golden Road posted...</cite> <quote>I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated."</quote> I was pointing how how this movie was overrated by "professional reviewers" gathered by Rotten Tomatoes.</quote> It's not like butt hurt, "anti-SJW" types that were frothing at the mouth the second they announced an all women reboot of Ghostbusters could POSSIBLY have tanked the score on the other end. I still haven't seen it, but people I know, that were huge fans of the original said it was decent. Not nearly as good as the original, but not nearly as bad as people were acting like it'd be.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Juggernaut480 08/02/17 3:03:01 AM #49:	MICHALECOLE posted... KevinceKostner posted... Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well? I never saw it because it doesn't interest me. I didn't blindly hate it because it has women in it though. The vast majority people aren't hating it because it has women in it. Most people hate it because of the obvious intention(SJW motive) behind gender swapping the characters, disconnecting the movie from the original(disrespecting that) and flat out insulting the core audience. If messages on the Ghostbusters 2016 advertisements saying "Girls Rule, Women are funny, Get over it." aren't SJWish or Radical Feminist to you, then I don't know what is. If this was about "sexism/misogyny"(two words that get constantly thrown around a lot on the social media these days, the same way the word "racist" is thrown around a lot), then explain to me why multiple movies with female leads like the Alien franchise, Kill Bill, Wonder Woman(live-action) and Mad Max Fury Road were all beloved by movie audiences and a huge success while Ghostbusters 2016 flopped and was hated by many. <cite>Juggernaut480 posted [p:884033559] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote><cite>MICHALECOLE posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KevinceKostner posted...</cite> <quote>Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well?</quote> I never saw it because it doesn't interest me. I didn't blindly hate it because it has women in it though.</quote> The vast majority people aren't hating it because it has women in it. Most people hate it because of the obvious intention(SJW motive) behind gender swapping the characters, disconnecting the movie from the original(disrespecting that) and flat out insulting the core audience. If messages on the Ghostbusters 2016 advertisements saying "Girls Rule, Women are funny, Get over it." aren't SJWish or Radical Feminist to you, then I don't know what is. If this was about "sexism/misogyny"(two words that get constantly thrown around a lot on the social media these days, the same way the word "racist" is thrown around a lot), then explain to me why multiple movies with female leads like the Alien franchise, Kill Bill, Wonder Woman(live-action) and Mad Max Fury Road were all beloved by movie audiences and a huge success while Ghostbusters 2016 flopped and was hated by many.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Conner4REAL 08/02/17 3:10:30 AM #50:	Fat chick. =/= ghostbusters No props to the 80s this movie was beneath trash it was worse that Sahara. And THEN they had s pig as a character.... I gotta say: the fake ghostbusters cartoon of the 80s was a real slap in the face to all us ghostbusters fans. Who saw the movies that's why they then called the actual cartoon the REAL ghostbusters. That shit knob rip off cartoon was at a minimum 10x better than the remake. --- "there is a real human centipede situation happening in the men's room" - Hon Ruth bader Ginsberg. <cite>Conner4REAL posted [p:884033758] in Would you ... [t:75628169]...</cite> <quote>Fat chick. =/= ghostbusters No props to the 80s this movie was beneath trash it was worse that Sahara. And THEN they had s pig as a character.... I gotta say: the fake ghostbusters cartoon of the 80s was a real slap in the face to all us ghostbusters fans. Who saw the movies that's why they then called the actual cartoon the REAL ghostbusters. That shit knob rip off cartoon was at a minimum 10x better than the remake.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Would you say that the Ghostbusters 2016 reboot is grossly overrated since... (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Would you say that the Ghostbusters 2016 reboot is grossly overrated since...