Poll of the Day > Roseanne reboot quickly canceled after racist comments from 'Roseanne'...

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
DoubleDare 05/29/18 10:34:22 PM #52:	A few friends on FB that I know lean toward the right side is saying how the view should be cancelled then. Does the View use such hateful language? I know they said pence had to be mentally ill because he is religious, that comment is messed up, but I wouldn't say enough to cancel the show.] If Roseanne just said "VJ = Mentall Ill and an idiot" No one wouldv'e cared. but what she did was blantant racism and obviously horrible to say, There is nothing wrong with expressing your views or dislike for someone if you use proper wording. Roseanne stepped over the line. --- On Your Mark...Get Set........GO!!!!!! <cite>DoubleDare posted [p:902216292] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>A few friends on FB that I know lean toward the right side is saying how the view should be cancelled then. Does the View use such hateful language? I know they said pence had to be mentally ill because he is religious, that comment is messed up, but I wouldn't say enough to cancel the show.] If Roseanne just said "VJ = Mentall Ill and an idiot" No one wouldv'e cared. but what she did was blantant racism and obviously horrible to say, There is nothing wrong with expressing your views or dislike for someone if you use proper wording. Roseanne stepped over the line.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 05/29/18 10:49:02 PM #53:	Mead posted... A lot of people say political correctness but what they really mean is overt racism or other kinds of open bigotry DoubleDare posted... Does the View use such hateful language? Pretty sure nobody here would watch that, so no idea. DoubleDare posted... I wouldn't say enough to cancel the show.] So you believe that there's some magic threshold for offensiveness that once crossed means cancellation? >_> DoubleDare posted... If Roseanne just said "VJ = Mentall Ill and an idiot" No one wouldv'e cared. but what she did was blantant racism and obviously horrible to say, There is nothing wrong with expressing your views or dislike for someone if you use proper wording. So you think accusing people of mental illness isn't wrong? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:902217225] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>A lot of people say political correctness but what they really mean is overt racism or other kinds of open bigotry</quote> <cite>DoubleDare posted...</cite> <quote>Does the View use such hateful language?</quote> Pretty sure nobody here would watch that, so no idea. <cite>DoubleDare posted...</cite> <quote> I wouldn't say enough to cancel the show.]</quote> So you believe that there's some magic threshold for offensiveness that once crossed means cancellation? >_> <cite>DoubleDare posted...</cite> <quote>If Roseanne just said "VJ = Mentall Ill and an idiot" No one wouldv'e cared. but what she did was blantant racism and obviously horrible to say, There is nothing wrong with expressing your views or dislike for someone if you use proper wording.</quote> So you think accusing people of mental illness isn't wrong?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SkynyrdRocker 05/29/18 10:58:28 PM #54:	DoubleDare posted... A few friends on FB that I know lean toward the right side is saying how the view should be cancelled then. Does the View use such hateful language? I know they said pence had to be mentally ill because he is religious, that comment is messed up, but I wouldn't say enough to cancel the show.] If Roseanne just said "VJ = Mentall Ill and an idiot" No one wouldv'e cared. but what she did was blantant racism and obviously horrible to say, There is nothing wrong with expressing your views or dislike for someone if you use proper wording. Roseanne stepped over the line. The mentally ill thing is fucked up but it's socially acceptable to shit on mentally ill people so obviously there's no backlash. <cite>SkynyrdRocker posted [p:902217834] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>DoubleDare posted...</cite> <quote>A few friends on FB that I know lean toward the right side is saying how the view should be cancelled then. Does the View use such hateful language? I know they said pence had to be mentally ill because he is religious, that comment is messed up, but I wouldn't say enough to cancel the show.] If Roseanne just said "VJ = Mentall Ill and an idiot" No one wouldv'e cared. but what she did was blantant racism and obviously horrible to say, There is nothing wrong with expressing your views or dislike for someone if you use proper wording. Roseanne stepped over the line.</quote> The mentally ill thing is fucked up but it's socially acceptable to shit on mentally ill people so obviously there's no backlash.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DoubleDare 05/29/18 11:03:37 PM #55:	Zeus posted... Mead posted... A lot of people say political correctness but what they really mean is overt racism or other kinds of open bigotry DoubleDare posted... Does the View use such hateful language? Pretty sure nobody here would watch that, so no idea. DoubleDare posted... I wouldn't say enough to cancel the show.] So you believe that there's some magic threshold for offensiveness that once crossed means cancellation? >_> DoubleDare posted... If Roseanne just said "VJ = Mentall Ill and an idiot" No one wouldv'e cared. but what she did was blantant racism and obviously horrible to say, There is nothing wrong with expressing your views or dislike for someone if you use proper wording. So you think accusing people of mental illness isn't wrong? It's wrong, just saying the truth that nothing would've happened. BOTH is wrong. --- On Your Mark...Get Set........GO!!!!!! <cite>DoubleDare posted [p:902218162] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>A lot of people say political correctness but what they really mean is overt racism or other kinds of open bigotry</quote> <cite>DoubleDare posted...</cite> <quote>Does the View use such hateful language?</quote> Pretty sure nobody here would watch that, so no idea. <cite>DoubleDare posted...</cite> <quote> I wouldn't say enough to cancel the show.]</quote> So you believe that there's some magic threshold for offensiveness that once crossed means cancellation? >_> <cite>DoubleDare posted...</cite> <quote>If Roseanne just said "VJ = Mentall Ill and an idiot" No one wouldv'e cared. but what she did was blantant racism and obviously horrible to say, There is nothing wrong with expressing your views or dislike for someone if you use proper wording.</quote> So you think accusing people of mental illness isn't wrong?</quote> It's wrong, just saying the truth that nothing would've happened. BOTH is wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/30/18 12:11:11 AM #56:	her statement suggesting that former Barack Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett is a product of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Planet of the Apes was a joke that was in bad taste. One is a voluntary affiliation, the other is a series of movies. I don't see how this is racist. I should have known better. Forgive me-my joke was in bad taste. Why do people keep making the mistake of apologizing? If you think that someone is ugly you should be able to say that you find that person to be ugly. Executive producer and co-star Sara Gilbert said that Barrs comments are abhorrent and do not reflect the beliefs of our cast and crew or anyone associated with our show. Except the star of the show. What's really abhorrent here is the censorship. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:902221832] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><quote>her statement suggesting that former Barack Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett is a product of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Planet of the Apes was a joke that was in bad taste.</quote> One is a voluntary affiliation, the other is a series of movies. I don't see how this is racist. <quote>I should have known better. Forgive me-my joke was in bad taste.</quote> Why do people keep making the mistake of apologizing? If you think that someone is ugly you should be able to say that you find that person to be ugly. <quote>Executive producer and co-star Sara Gilbert said that Barrs comments are abhorrent and do not reflect the beliefs of our cast and crew or anyone associated with our show.</quote> Except the star of the show. What's really abhorrent here is the censorship.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/30/18 12:12:45 AM #57:	Zeus posted... So you think accusing people of mental illness isn't wrong? In many cases it's even called for. Especially if someone takes twitter seriously. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:902221904] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>So you think accusing people of mental illness isn't wrong?</quote> In many cases it's even called for. Especially if someone takes twitter seriously.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Monopoman 05/30/18 12:32:14 AM #58:	Every season of Roseanne is great except the final season before the reboot season 9. Season 9 is a pile of shit and even Roseanne would admit that. --- BF ID: Birck #1559845599 Leads: Senbonzakura Miku, Xenon, Bjorn+Linlin <cite>Monopoman posted [p:902222887] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>Every season of Roseanne is great except the final season before the reboot season 9. Season 9 is a pile of shit and even Roseanne would admit that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DoubleDare 05/30/18 7:50:23 AM #59:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Zeus posted... So you think accusing people of mental illness isn't wrong? In many cases it's even called for. Especially if someone takes twitter seriously. Some people, yes. Also another thing about the view is, why would it be cancelled? (Thought I never watch it, blegh) Not one host is the face of it really, you can replace the whole panel and it still be the View. Roseanne needs Roseanne to be Roseanne. --- On Your Mark...Get Set........GO!!!!!! <cite>DoubleDare posted [p:902234867] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>So you think accusing people of mental illness isn't wrong?</quote> In many cases it's even called for. Especially if someone takes twitter seriously.</quote> Some people, yes. Also another thing about the view is, why would it be cancelled? (Thought I never watch it, blegh) Not one host is the face of it really, you can replace the whole panel and it still be the View. Roseanne needs Roseanne to be Roseanne.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/30/18 7:51:48 AM #60:	@Zeus Use your words if you wanna disagree, otherwise know that Im right and move along --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:902234915] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>@Zeus Use your words if you wanna disagree, otherwise know that Im right and move along</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Playsaver 05/30/18 12:46:40 PM #61:	I'm surprised Mr. Trump supported Roseanne at all considering what she did to the national anthem. <cite>Playsaver posted [p:902248808] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>I'm surprised Mr. Trump supported Roseanne at all considering what she did to the national anthem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 05/30/18 12:53:51 PM #62:	I got a bunch of moronic sjws and "tolerant" lefties mad. So it's a plus in my book. --- "Whatever! Everyone is woman!" -Bimbo from Super Seducer : How to talk to women <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:902249215] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>I got a bunch of moronic sjws and "tolerant" lefties mad. So it's a plus in my book.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 05/30/18 1:02:14 PM #63:	Possible side effects of Ambien: anxiety, muscle cramps, loss of appetite, making racist tweets <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:902249669] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>Possible side effects of Ambien: anxiety, muscle cramps, loss of appetite, making racist tweets</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/30/18 1:07:14 PM #64:	The_tall_midget posted... I got a bunch of moronic sjws and "tolerant" lefties mad. So it's a plus in my book. Ironic considering this post suggests that mad is your baseline --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:902249967] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote>I got a bunch of moronic sjws and "tolerant" lefties mad. So it's a plus in my book.</quote> Ironic considering this post suggests that mad is your baseline</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 05/30/18 4:14:29 PM #65:	Mead posted... The_tall_midget posted... I got a bunch of moronic sjws and "tolerant" lefties mad. So it's a plus in my book. Ironic considering this post suggests that mad is your baseline Not really. Between an overweight racist woman and a bunch of idiotic sjws, I simply prefer to cheer the less idiotic of the two. --- "Whatever! Everyone is woman!" -Bimbo from Super Seducer : How to talk to women <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:902261324] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote>I got a bunch of moronic sjws and "tolerant" lefties mad. So it's a plus in my book.</quote> Ironic considering this post suggests that mad is your baseline</quote> Not really. Between an overweight racist woman and a bunch of idiotic sjws, I simply prefer to cheer the less idiotic of the two.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_AdjI_ 05/30/18 4:53:01 PM #66:	Zeus posted... They literally knew that going into the project. It's kind of silly to go into a project with somebody who is controversial on social then dropping them because they're controversial on social. The primary difference being that nobody cared about her when she wasn't on TV. Her social media activity is naturally going to generate more controversy when people care about her than when they don't. They should probably have warned her about her conduct before starting the project, but at the same time, she's an adult and should have been able to figure that out for herself. <cite>_AdjI_ posted [p:902263558] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>They literally knew that going into the project. It's kind of silly to go into a project with somebody who is controversial on social then dropping them because they're controversial on social.</quote> The primary difference being that nobody cared about her when she wasn't on TV. Her social media activity is naturally going to generate more controversy when people care about her than when they don't. They should probably have warned her about her conduct before starting the project, but at the same time, she's an adult and should have been able to figure that out for herself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ForteEXE3850 05/30/18 5:03:20 PM #67:	_AdjI_ posted... Zeus posted... They literally knew that going into the project. It's kind of silly to go into a project with somebody who is controversial on social then dropping them because they're controversial on social. The primary difference being that nobody cared about her when she wasn't on TV. Her social media activity is naturally going to generate more controversy when people care about her than when they don't. They should probably have warned her about her conduct before starting the project, but at the same time, she's an adult and should have been able to figure that out for herself. Not necessarily, she may have assumed if they hired her regardless of what her open political ideologies are and didn't tell her to censor herself they must have been okay with it. Although ABC, aka, Disney, like a lot of Hollywood, pushes liberal ideology really hard (as a means of image, profit, and control). It's not unusual at all when you enter a contract with a company in which you are a public figure, they dictate what is and isn't acceptable for you to express. I have seen some cases where they required the person create a (controlled) social media presence where they didn't have one before. --- Mwahahahaha. <cite>ForteEXE3850 posted [p:902264167] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>They literally knew that going into the project. It's kind of silly to go into a project with somebody who is controversial on social then dropping them because they're controversial on social.</quote> The primary difference being that nobody cared about her when she wasn't on TV. Her social media activity is naturally going to generate more controversy when people care about her than when they don't. They should probably have warned her about her conduct before starting the project, but at the same time, she's an adult and should have been able to figure that out for herself.</quote> Not necessarily, she may have assumed if they hired her regardless of what her open political ideologies are and didn't tell her to censor herself they must have been okay with it. Although ABC, aka, Disney, like a lot of Hollywood, pushes liberal ideology really hard (as a means of image, profit, and control). It's not unusual at all when you enter a contract with a company in which you are a public figure, they dictate what is and isn't acceptable for you to express. I have seen some cases where they required the person create a (controlled) social media presence where they didn't have one before.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/30/18 5:03:41 PM #68:	The_tall_midget posted... Mead posted... The_tall_midget posted... I got a bunch of moronic sjws and "tolerant" lefties mad. So it's a plus in my book. Ironic considering this post suggests that mad is your baseline Not really. Between an overweight racist woman and a bunch of idiotic sjws, I simply prefer to cheer the less idiotic of the two. Cause you have to cheer one of those on apparently --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:902264183] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The_tall_midget posted...</cite> <quote>I got a bunch of moronic sjws and "tolerant" lefties mad. So it's a plus in my book.</quote> Ironic considering this post suggests that mad is your baseline</quote> Not really. Between an overweight racist woman and a bunch of idiotic sjws, I simply prefer to cheer the less idiotic of the two.</quote> Cause you have to cheer one of those on apparently </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LOLIAmAnAlt 05/30/18 5:16:20 PM #69:	They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes. --- lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll <cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted [p:902264926] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/30/18 5:30:18 PM #70:	LOLIAmAnAlt posted... They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes. Yeah networks love pulling the plug on shows with good ratings --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:902265790] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote>They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes.</quote> Yeah networks love pulling the plug on shows with good ratings</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
keyblader1985 05/30/18 5:30:30 PM #71:	I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds. --- Official King of PotD You only need one T-Rex to make the point, though. ~ Samus Sedai <cite>keyblader1985 posted [p:902265803] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
magemaximus 05/30/18 5:35:51 PM #72:	wasn't it renewed for a season 2 after the first episode? keyblader1985 posted... I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds lol. good idea. they probably thought she was tamed. --- You can't persuade fanboys. You'd be better off trying to convince a wall. ~CodeNamePlasmaSnake~ <cite>magemaximus posted [p:902266073] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>wasn't it renewed for a season 2 after the first episode? <cite>keyblader1985 posted...</cite> <quote>I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds</quote> lol. good idea. they probably thought she was tamed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_AdjI_ 05/30/18 5:38:00 PM #73:	keyblader1985 posted... I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds. That wouldn't surprise me. <cite>_AdjI_ posted [p:902266192] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>keyblader1985 posted...</cite> <quote>I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds.</quote> That wouldn't surprise me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doctor Foxx 05/30/18 6:08:55 PM #74:	_AdjI_ posted... keyblader1985 posted... I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds. That wouldn't surprise me. Those kids are smart and were doing well until they let her back on. I mean she did that photo shoot dressed as Hitler, eating fried chicken. Maybe that shoot was the Ambien too --- Never write off the Doctor! <cite>Doctor Foxx posted [p:902267981] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>keyblader1985 posted...</cite> <quote>I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds.</quote> That wouldn't surprise me.</quote> Those kids are smart and were doing well until they let her back on. I mean she did that photo shoot dressed as Hitler, eating fried chicken. Maybe that shoot was the Ambien too</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_AdjI_ 05/30/18 6:13:44 PM #75:	Doctor Foxx posted... _AdjI_ posted... keyblader1985 posted... I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds. That wouldn't surprise me. Those kids are smart and were doing well until they let her back on. I mean she did that photo shoot dressed as Hitler, eating fried chicken. Maybe that shoot was the Ambien too I wouldn't be surprised if they relented just to prove to her that she couldn't be trusted, since I'm sure she denied that it'd be a problem. <cite>_AdjI_ posted [p:902268264] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>keyblader1985 posted...</cite> <quote>I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds.</quote> That wouldn't surprise me.</quote> Those kids are smart and were doing well until they let her back on. I mean she did that photo shoot dressed as Hitler, eating fried chicken. Maybe that shoot was the Ambien too</quote> I wouldn't be surprised if they relented just to prove to her that she couldn't be trusted, since I'm sure she denied that it'd be a problem.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doctor Foxx 05/30/18 7:19:24 PM #76:	just for fun, anyone remember this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgSIFG_SceA" data-time=" --- Never write off the Doctor! <cite>Doctor Foxx posted [p:902271846] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>just for fun, anyone remember this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgSIFG_SceA" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 05/30/18 7:29:56 PM #77:	Doctor Foxx posted... _AdjI_ posted... keyblader1985 posted... I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds. That wouldn't surprise me. Those kids are smart and were doing well until they let her back on. I mean she did that photo shoot dressed as Hitler, eating fried chicken. Maybe that shoot was the Ambien too Fried chicken? I thought it was cookies to represent a group of people Hitler killed. Were those fake pictures I'm seeing? <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:902272396] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>keyblader1985 posted...</cite> <quote>I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds.</quote> That wouldn't surprise me.</quote> Those kids are smart and were doing well until they let her back on. I mean she did that photo shoot dressed as Hitler, eating fried chicken. Maybe that shoot was the Ambien too</quote> Fried chicken? I thought it was cookies to represent a group of people Hitler killed. Were those fake pictures I'm seeing?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Doctor Foxx 05/30/18 7:38:07 PM #78:	BlackScythe0 posted... Doctor Foxx posted... _AdjI_ posted... keyblader1985 posted... I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds. That wouldn't surprise me. Those kids are smart and were doing well until they let her back on. I mean she did that photo shoot dressed as Hitler, eating fried chicken. Maybe that shoot was the Ambien too Fried chicken? I thought it was cookies to represent a group of people Hitler killed. Were those fake pictures I'm seeing? you are correct. my fuzzy brain remembered golden brown bits. they were gingerbread people that she burned in the oven. certainly much better, and now roseanne hitler is in my search history --- Never write off the Doctor! <cite>Doctor Foxx posted [p:902272834] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>keyblader1985 posted...</cite> <quote>I read that when the deal was struck, Roseanne's kids locked her out of her social media accounts, specifically to avoid this exact situation. Then they later changed their minds.</quote> That wouldn't surprise me.</quote> Those kids are smart and were doing well until they let her back on. I mean she did that photo shoot dressed as Hitler, eating fried chicken. Maybe that shoot was the Ambien too</quote> Fried chicken? I thought it was cookies to represent a group of people Hitler killed. Were those fake pictures I'm seeing?</quote> you are correct. my fuzzy brain remembered golden brown bits. they were gingerbread people that she burned in the oven. certainly much better, and now roseanne hitler is in my search history</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PuddingBoy 05/30/18 7:44:05 PM #79:	ForteEXE3850 posted... _AdjI_ posted... Zeus posted... They literally knew that going into the project. It's kind of silly to go into a project with somebody who is controversial on social then dropping them because they're controversial on social. The primary difference being that nobody cared about her when she wasn't on TV. Her social media activity is naturally going to generate more controversy when people care about her than when they don't. They should probably have warned her about her conduct before starting the project, but at the same time, she's an adult and should have been able to figure that out for herself. Not necessarily, she may have assumed if they hired her regardless of what her open political ideologies are and didn't tell her to censor herself they must have been okay with it. Although ABC, aka, Disney, like a lot of Hollywood, pushes liberal ideology really hard (as a means of image, profit, and control). It's not unusual at all when you enter a contract with a company in which you are a public figure, they dictate what is and isn't acceptable for you to express. I have seen some cases where they required the person create a (controlled) social media presence where they didn't have one before. I guess liberal ideology just means don't be blatantly racist these days --- 3DS Friend Code: 3308-5843-0863 Town: Virginia <cite>PuddingBoy posted [p:902273141] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>ForteEXE3850 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>They literally knew that going into the project. It's kind of silly to go into a project with somebody who is controversial on social then dropping them because they're controversial on social.</quote> The primary difference being that nobody cared about her when she wasn't on TV. Her social media activity is naturally going to generate more controversy when people care about her than when they don't. They should probably have warned her about her conduct before starting the project, but at the same time, she's an adult and should have been able to figure that out for herself.</quote> Not necessarily, she may have assumed if they hired her regardless of what her open political ideologies are and didn't tell her to censor herself they must have been okay with it. Although ABC, aka, Disney, like a lot of Hollywood, pushes liberal ideology really hard (as a means of image, profit, and control). It's not unusual at all when you enter a contract with a company in which you are a public figure, they dictate what is and isn't acceptable for you to express. I have seen some cases where they required the person create a (controlled) social media presence where they didn't have one before.</quote> I guess liberal ideology just means don't be blatantly racist these days</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa 05/30/18 7:50:03 PM #80:	PuddingBoy posted... ForteEXE3850 posted... _AdjI_ posted... Zeus posted... They literally knew that going into the project. It's kind of silly to go into a project with somebody who is controversial on social then dropping them because they're controversial on social. The primary difference being that nobody cared about her when she wasn't on TV. Her social media activity is naturally going to generate more controversy when people care about her than when they don't. They should probably have warned her about her conduct before starting the project, but at the same time, she's an adult and should have been able to figure that out for herself. Not necessarily, she may have assumed if they hired her regardless of what her open political ideologies are and didn't tell her to censor herself they must have been okay with it. Although ABC, aka, Disney, like a lot of Hollywood, pushes liberal ideology really hard (as a means of image, profit, and control). It's not unusual at all when you enter a contract with a company in which you are a public figure, they dictate what is and isn't acceptable for you to express. I have seen some cases where they required the person create a (controlled) social media presence where they didn't have one before. I guess liberal ideology just means don't be blatantly racist these days Unless it's toward white people then it's okay and actually encouraged <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:902273487] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>PuddingBoy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ForteEXE3850 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>They literally knew that going into the project. It's kind of silly to go into a project with somebody who is controversial on social then dropping them because they're controversial on social.</quote> The primary difference being that nobody cared about her when she wasn't on TV. Her social media activity is naturally going to generate more controversy when people care about her than when they don't. They should probably have warned her about her conduct before starting the project, but at the same time, she's an adult and should have been able to figure that out for herself.</quote> Not necessarily, she may have assumed if they hired her regardless of what her open political ideologies are and didn't tell her to censor herself they must have been okay with it. Although ABC, aka, Disney, like a lot of Hollywood, pushes liberal ideology really hard (as a means of image, profit, and control). It's not unusual at all when you enter a contract with a company in which you are a public figure, they dictate what is and isn't acceptable for you to express. I have seen some cases where they required the person create a (controlled) social media presence where they didn't have one before.</quote> I guess liberal ideology just means don't be blatantly racist these days</quote> Unless it's toward white people then it's okay and actually encouraged</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LOLIAmAnAlt 05/31/18 6:37:02 PM #81:	Mead posted... LOLIAmAnAlt posted... They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes. Yeah networks love pulling the plug on shows with good ratings You don't think things up for failure on purpose sometimes? They got their money. --- lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll <cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted [p:902329682] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote>They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes.</quote> Yeah networks love pulling the plug on shows with good ratings</quote> You don't think things up for failure on purpose sometimes? They got their money.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/31/18 6:39:45 PM #82:	LOLIAmAnAlt posted... Mead posted... LOLIAmAnAlt posted... They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes. Yeah networks love pulling the plug on shows with good ratings You don't think things up for failure on purpose sometimes? They got their money. And they certainly didnt want any more of it --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:902329824] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote>They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes.</quote> Yeah networks love pulling the plug on shows with good ratings</quote> You don't think things up for failure on purpose sometimes? They got their money.</quote> And they certainly didnt want any more of it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muscles 05/31/18 10:19:31 PM #83:	I never really watched roseanne, and didn't seeher tweet but it had good ratings, so idk why it got cancelled. I think any artist of any kind should have free reign to say whatever without persecution Imagine if they forced Michelangelo to censor the statue of David? --- Muscles Chicago Bears \| Chicago Blackhawks \| Chicago Bulls \| Chicago Cubs \| NIU Huskies <cite>Muscles posted [p:902341572] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>I never really watched roseanne, and didn't seeher tweet but it had good ratings, so idk why it got cancelled. I think any artist of any kind should have free reign to say whatever without persecution Imagine if they forced Michelangelo to censor the statue of David?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/31/18 10:26:06 PM #84:	Muscles posted... I never really watched roseanne, and didn't seeher tweet but it had good ratings, so idk why it got cancelled. I think any artist of any kind should have free reign to say whatever without persecution Imagine if they forced Michelangelo to censor the statue of David? Showing a dick isnt really the same as alluding that black people are apes She had free reign to say what she wanted, these were the consequences --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:902341932] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muscles posted...</cite> <quote>I never really watched roseanne, and didn't seeher tweet but it had good ratings, so idk why it got cancelled. I think any artist of any kind should have free reign to say whatever without persecution Imagine if they forced Michelangelo to censor the statue of David?</quote> Showing a dick isnt really the same as alluding that black people are apes She had free reign to say what she wanted, these were the consequences</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
keyblader1985 05/31/18 10:36:38 PM #85:	Muscles posted... I think any artist of any kind should have free reign to say whatever without persecution The "without persecution" is the problem. People are free to say whatever they want, but that doesn't mean there won't be consequences. People can give you a piece of their mind right back, and businesses can decide not to associate with you if they feel it will hurt the image they're trying to present for themselves. --- Official King of PotD You only need one T-Rex to make the point, though. ~ Samus Sedai <cite>keyblader1985 posted [p:902342500] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Muscles posted...</cite> <quote>I think any artist of any kind should have free reign to say whatever without persecution</quote> The "without persecution" is the problem. People are free to say whatever they want, but that doesn't mean there won't be consequences. People can give you a piece of their mind right back, and businesses can decide not to associate with you if they feel it will hurt the image they're trying to present for themselves.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lobomoon 06/01/18 1:01:11 AM #86:	Would it be fair to say that Roseanne was Barred from the show? --- You havent set a signature for the message boards yet <cite>Lobomoon posted [p:902350288] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote>Would it be fair to say that Roseanne was Barred from the show?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NightMareBunny 06/01/18 2:25:36 AM #87:	LOLIAmAnAlt posted... Mead posted... LOLIAmAnAlt posted... They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes. Yeah networks love pulling the plug on shows with good ratings You don't think things up for failure on purpose sometimes? They got their money. except now this fall they have nothing for that spot... --- Gamefaqs Nintendo Discord Server: https://discord.gg/v9ut5hv <cite>NightMareBunny posted [p:902352980] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote>They were looking for a reason to cancel the show and they found it. I wonder why they even signed her to do 9 episodes.</quote> Yeah networks love pulling the plug on shows with good ratings</quote> You don't think things up for failure on purpose sometimes? They got their money.</quote> except now this fall they have nothing for that spot...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#88	Post #88 was unavailable or deleted.
#89	Post #89 was unavailable or deleted.
LOLIAmAnAlt 06/01/18 3:48:05 AM #90:	Zangulus posted... Do you even know how TV income works? Yes --- lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll <cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted [p:902354674] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote>Do you even know how TV income works?</quote> Yes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/01/18 3:54:52 AM #91:	LOLIAmAnAlt posted... Zangulus posted... Do you even know how TV income works? Yes Settles that --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:902354825] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>LOLIAmAnAlt posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zangulus posted...</cite> <quote>Do you even know how TV income works?</quote> Yes</quote> Settles that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_tall_midget 06/02/18 8:57:15 AM #92:	PuddingBoy posted... I guess liberal ideology just means don't be blatantly racist these days Impossible. The instant you disagree with those idiots you become either: a) A Nazi b) A racist/bigot/homophobe c) A misogynist d) Insert other idiotic labels for morons who can't stand that people have different opinions than them. I love making fun of sjws and such idiots. It's like shooting a fish in a barrel. --- "Whatever! Everyone is woman!" -Bimbo from Super Seducer : How to talk to women <cite>The_tall_midget posted [p:902417936] in Roseanne r... [t:76654679]...</cite> <quote><cite>PuddingBoy posted...</cite> <quote> I guess liberal ideology just means don't be blatantly racist these days</quote> Impossible. The instant you disagree with those idiots you become either: a) A Nazi b) A racist/bigot/homophobe c) A misogynist d) Insert other idiotic labels for morons who can't stand that people have different opinions than them. I love making fun of sjws and such idiots. It's like shooting a fish in a barrel.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Roseanne reboot quickly canceled after racist comments from 'Roseanne'... (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Roseanne reboot quickly canceled after racist comments from 'Roseanne'...