Current Events > Why is it important for abortion and gay marriage to be illegal?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8
YUHH 10/16/18 7:17:20 PM #1:	@SageHarpuiaHX --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910645807] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>@SageHarpuiaHX</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Evolician 10/16/18 7:20:10 PM #2:	Me must outlaw homosecks marriage in order to appease god or else he will flood America like he did before O: --- http://steamcommunity.com/id/Lavidon/ https://www.twitch.tv/Lavidon <cite>Evolician posted [p:910645961] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>Me must outlaw homosecks marriage in order to appease god or else he will flood America like he did before O:</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Turbam 10/16/18 7:20:49 PM #3:	300 IQ topic --- ~snip (V)_(;,;)_(V) snip~ I'm just one man! Whoa! Well, I'm a one man band! https://imgur.com/p9Xvjvs <cite>Turbam posted [p:910645981] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>300 IQ topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 7:21:00 PM #4:	The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal. --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910645989] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 10/16/18 7:21:07 PM #5:	Because if we let the guys marry theyll obviously have gay kids because straight people only have straight kids --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:910645999] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>Because if we let the guys marry theyll obviously have gay kids because straight people only have straight kids</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 10/16/18 7:21:43 PM #6:	DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal. Abortion isn't murder --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910646029] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal.</quote> Abortion isn't murder</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Complete_Idi0t 10/16/18 7:22:22 PM #7:	Because if guys realize how much fun it is to have sex with each other than women won't have any power <cite>Complete_Idi0t posted [p:910646056] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>Because if guys realize how much fun it is to have sex with each other than women won't have any power</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Space_Man 10/16/18 7:23:25 PM #8:	I think abortion is iffy, but only because it's such a weird split and idk that all of the female supporters are necessarily in favor of it. Like, I can't count on my hands how many girls from hs/college were insanely vocal abortion activists and are now single moms. --- There sure are a lot of different mes just like you have a lot of different yous! I'm going outside to play now I hope all the different yous have fun too. Bye! <cite>Space_Man posted [p:910646121] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>I think abortion is iffy, but only because it's such a weird split and idk that all of the female supporters are necessarily in favor of it. Like, I can't count on my hands how many girls from hs/college were insanely vocal abortion activists and are now single moms.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 10/16/18 7:24:02 PM #9:	Space_Man posted... I think abortion is iffy, but only because it's such a weird split and idk that all of the female supporters are necessarily in favor of it. Like, I can't count on my hands how many girls from hs/college were insanely vocal abortion activists and are now single moms. Being pro choice doesn't mean you're going to have an abortion should you get pregnant --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910646154] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Space_Man posted...</cite> <quote>I think abortion is iffy, but only because it's such a weird split and idk that all of the female supporters are necessarily in favor of it. Like, I can't count on my hands how many girls from hs/college were insanely vocal abortion activists and are now single moms.</quote> Being pro choice doesn't mean you're going to have an abortion should you get pregnant</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 7:24:19 PM #10:	YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal. Abortion isn't murder Indeed, because "murder" is a legal term that's specifically defined in a way that excludes abortion. That's why I said "killing" instead. --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910646165] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal.</quote> Abortion isn't murder</quote> Indeed, because "murder" is a legal term that's specifically defined in a way that excludes abortion. That's why I said "killing" instead.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SageHarpuiaHX 10/16/18 7:25:18 PM #11:	Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide. <cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted [p:910646209] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 10/16/18 7:25:28 PM #12:	Space_Man posted... I think abortion is iffy, but only because it's such a weird split and idk that all of the female supporters are necessarily in favor of it. Like, I can't count on my hands how many girls from hs/college were insanely vocal abortion activists and are now single moms. That would be because theyre pro choice, not pro abortion My sister is pro choice, spent years saying she was never having kids but when she got pregnant she kept it. Because it was a choice, a choice that conservatives want to remove --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:910646220] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Space_Man posted...</cite> <quote>I think abortion is iffy, but only because it's such a weird split and idk that all of the female supporters are necessarily in favor of it. Like, I can't count on my hands how many girls from hs/college were insanely vocal abortion activists and are now single moms.</quote> That would be because theyre pro choice, not pro abortion My sister is pro choice, spent years saying she was never having kids but when she got pregnant she kept it. Because it was a choice, a choice that conservatives want to remove</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 10/16/18 7:26:28 PM #13:	SageHarpuiaHX posted... Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide. Which has nothing to do with abortion, so try again. And is also because you are forcefully making that choice that she has no control of, but you knew that and just wanted to shitpost. --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910646281] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote>Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide.</quote> Which has nothing to do with abortion, so try again. And is also because you are forcefully making that choice that she has no control of, but you knew that and just wanted to shitpost.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 10/16/18 7:27:00 PM #14:	To protect the moral fiber of our country of course. --- Sarcasm is my basic function. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:910646306] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>To protect the moral fiber of our country of course.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Space_Man 10/16/18 7:27:55 PM #15:	thronedfire2 posted... My sister is pro choice, spent years saying she was never having kids but when she got pregnant she kept it. Because it was a choice, a choice that conservatives want to remove These were all girls that said they'd get an abortion the second they found out they were pregnant I know of two who were pro choice and kept the babies. --- There sure are a lot of different mes just like you have a lot of different yous! I'm going outside to play now I hope all the different yous have fun too. Bye! <cite>Space_Man posted [p:910646354] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>thronedfire2 posted...</cite> <quote>My sister is pro choice, spent years saying she was never having kids but when she got pregnant she kept it. Because it was a choice, a choice that conservatives want to remove</quote> These were all girls that said they'd get an abortion the second they found out they were pregnant I know of two who were pro choice and kept the babies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WaterLink 10/16/18 7:28:34 PM #16:	YUHH posted... Space_Man posted... I think abortion is iffy, but only because it's such a weird split and idk that all of the female supporters are necessarily in favor of it. Like, I can't count on my hands how many girls from hs/college were insanely vocal abortion activists and are now single moms. Being pro choice doesn't mean you're going to have an abortion should you get pregnant This. Having the right to choose doesnt mean they're all going to make the same choice. --- No one sings like you anymore <cite>WaterLink posted [p:910646391] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Space_Man posted...</cite> <quote> I think abortion is iffy, but only because it's such a weird split and idk that all of the female supporters are necessarily in favor of it. Like, I can't count on my hands how many girls from hs/college were insanely vocal abortion activists and are now single moms.</quote> Being pro choice doesn't mean you're going to have an abortion should you get pregnant</quote> This. Having the right to choose doesnt mean they're all going to make the same choice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BruceWayneJr 10/16/18 7:29:00 PM #17:	Read your bible. --- He might be the president, but it's not his country. <cite>BruceWayneJr posted [p:910646405] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>Read your bible.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 10/16/18 7:29:27 PM #18:	SageHarpuiaHX posted... Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide. Because she has chosen to keep the potential child. --- Sarcasm is my basic function. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:910646433] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote>Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide.</quote> Because she has chosen to keep the potential child.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 10/16/18 7:30:24 PM #19:	Space_Man posted... thronedfire2 posted... My sister is pro choice, spent years saying she was never having kids but when she got pregnant she kept it. Because it was a choice, a choice that conservatives want to remove These were all girls that said they'd get an abortion the second they found out they were pregnant I know of two who were pro choice and kept the babies. You seem to be confused about what the word choice means --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:910646476] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Space_Man posted...</cite> <quote><cite>thronedfire2 posted...</cite> <quote>My sister is pro choice, spent years saying she was never having kids but when she got pregnant she kept it. Because it was a choice, a choice that conservatives want to remove</quote> These were all girls that said they'd get an abortion the second they found out they were pregnant I know of two who were pro choice and kept the babies.</quote> You seem to be confused about what the word choice means</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SageHarpuiaHX 10/16/18 7:30:36 PM #20:	YUHH posted... SageHarpuiaHX posted... Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide. Which has nothing to do with abortion, so try again. And is also because you are forcefully making that choice that she has no control of, but you knew that and just wanted to shitpost. Just because you call it something different to make it sound more tame doesn't make it more tame. <cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted [p:910646482] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote>Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide.</quote> Which has nothing to do with abortion, so try again. And is also because you are forcefully making that choice that she has no control of, but you knew that and just wanted to shitpost.</quote> Just because you call it something different to make it sound more tame doesn't make it more tame.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Calwings 10/16/18 7:30:40 PM #21:	DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal. Do situations where the mother could likely die from medical complications if she gives birth to the baby, or cases where the pregnancy was caused by rape, fall under "good justification" in this scenario? Those two are the only situations where I see abortion to be justifiable, but they're important situations to note. I agree 100% that gay marriage shouldn't be illegal. --- "Someday I too will fly... and find you again!" https://imgur.com/Hx7vr9Z <cite>Calwings posted [p:910646486] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal.</quote> Do situations where the mother could likely die from medical complications if she gives birth to the baby, or cases where the pregnancy was caused by rape, fall under "good justification" in this scenario? Those two are the only situations where I see abortion to be justifiable, but they're important situations to note. I agree 100% that gay marriage shouldn't be illegal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 10/16/18 7:31:05 PM #22:	SageHarpuiaHX posted... YUHH posted... SageHarpuiaHX posted... Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide. Which has nothing to do with abortion, so try again. And is also because you are forcefully making that choice that she has no control of, but you knew that and just wanted to shitpost. Just because you call it something different to make it sound more tame doesn't make it more tame. Keep dodging buddy, get them Jesus points. --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910646514] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote>Murdering a pregnant woman is legally considered double homicide.</quote> Which has nothing to do with abortion, so try again. And is also because you are forcefully making that choice that she has no control of, but you knew that and just wanted to shitpost.</quote> Just because you call it something different to make it sound more tame doesn't make it more tame.</quote> Keep dodging buddy, get them Jesus points.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 10/16/18 7:31:57 PM #23:	DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:910646565] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. </quote> Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 7:33:16 PM #24:	Calwings posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal. Do situations where the mother could likely die from medical complications if she gives birth to the baby, or cases where the pregnancy was caused by rape, fall under "good justification" in this scenario? Those two are the only situations where I see abortion to be justifiable, but they're important situations to note. I agree 100% that gay marriage shouldn't be illegal. Rape, no. While I can definitely have some sympathy, it still doesn't justify ending a third party's life (though I'd be 100% fine with "aborting" the rapist). A threat to the mother's life, absolutely, I see that as being in the same bucket as killing in self-defence. And if it's a "either one or the other, but not both, can be saved" situation, it's understandable to save the mother rather than the baby. And most of all - I certianly recognize that a ban alone won't solve the issue, and it must be combined with better support for those who do have babies, as well as better access to contraception to reduce the demand in the first place. --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910646635] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Calwings posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. The latter shouldn't be illegal.</quote> Do situations where the mother could likely die from medical complications if she gives birth to the baby, or cases where the pregnancy was caused by rape, fall under "good justification" in this scenario? Those two are the only situations where I see abortion to be justifiable, but they're important situations to note. I agree 100% that gay marriage shouldn't be illegal.</quote> Rape, no. While I can definitely have some sympathy, it still doesn't justify ending a third party's life (though I'd be 100% fine with "aborting" the rapist). A threat to the mother's life, absolutely, I see that as being in the same bucket as killing in self-defence. And if it's a "either one or the other, but not both, can be saved" situation, it's understandable to save the mother rather than the baby. And most of all - I certianly recognize that a ban alone won't solve the issue, and it must be combined with better support for those who do have babies, as well as better access to contraception to reduce the demand in the first place.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 10/16/18 7:34:21 PM #25:	DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910646693] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 7:35:07 PM #26:	YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910646737] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 10/16/18 7:35:26 PM #27:	DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." what --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910646759] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> what</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unbreakable 10/16/18 7:35:41 PM #28:	Now, do you people who want to force the mothers to bear children they don't want support aid for those mothers? --- But Wait... there's more <cite>Unbreakable posted [p:910646770] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>Now, do you people who want to force the mothers to bear children they don't want support aid for those mothers?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/16/18 7:36:28 PM #29:	DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:910646803] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 10/16/18 7:36:30 PM #30:	DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Sorry you got robbed, now you have to take care of his kid for the rest of your life --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:910646806] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Sorry you got robbed, now you have to take care of his kid for the rest of your life</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Space_Man 10/16/18 7:36:36 PM #31:	thronedfire2 posted... You seem to be confused about what the word choice means Not at all. In my first post I said they were insanely pro abortion and later elaborated that it was to the point of saying they would abort anything occupying their uterus. If they had said anything along the lines of "I want it legal for people to be able to choose" then I would've simply said pro choice in my post. --- There sure are a lot of different mes just like you have a lot of different yous! I'm going outside to play now I hope all the different yous have fun too. Bye! <cite>Space_Man posted [p:910646812] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>thronedfire2 posted...</cite> <quote>You seem to be confused about what the word choice means</quote> Not at all. In my first post I said they were insanely pro abortion and later elaborated that it was to the point of saying they would abort anything occupying their uterus. If they had said anything along the lines of "I want it legal for people to be able to choose" then I would've simply said pro choice in my post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy 10/16/18 7:36:47 PM #32:	It's not unless your religious. I'm a non religious conservative and I really couldn't care less about these two issues --- "How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot?" V-E-G-Y https://imgur.com/AqR3aeX https://imgur.com/vvuUXpp https://imgur.com/r9xK2NR <cite>glitteringfairy posted [p:910646821] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote>It's not unless your religious. I'm a non religious conservative and I really couldn't care less about these two issues</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 10/16/18 7:37:57 PM #33:	DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Yeah if the robber raped his victim and she needed to have an abortion I think that's fair. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:910646874] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Yeah if the robber raped his victim and she needed to have an abortion I think that's fair.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Geiki Ganger 10/16/18 7:38:54 PM #34:	Turbam posted... 300 IQ topic --- Nintendo 3DS Friend Code: 3368 - 1137 - 5460 http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q155/Gamecubesupreme/sf7y9s.jpg <cite>Geiki Ganger posted [p:910646934] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Turbam posted...</cite> <quote>300 IQ topic</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inferno Dive Dragoon 10/16/18 7:39:41 PM #35:	Unbreakable posted... Now, do you people who want to force the mothers to bear children they don't want support aid for those mothers? I want to say its ironic that the grand majority of pro-lifers are also anti-welfare, but then you realize it's not that surprising that pro-lifers do not in fact care about the woman or child, they just want to appear as though they care. So why do they pretend? Who are they trying to impress? --- Les aristocrates a la lanterne! Les aristocrates on les pendra! <cite>Inferno Dive Dragoon posted [p:910646973] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Unbreakable posted...</cite> <quote>Now, do you people who want to force the mothers to bear children they don't want support aid for those mothers?</quote> I want to say its ironic that the grand majority of pro-lifers are also anti-welfare, but then you realize it's not that surprising that pro-lifers do not in fact care about the woman or child, they just want to appear as though they care. So why do they pretend? Who are they trying to impress?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SageHarpuiaHX 10/16/18 7:40:06 PM #36:	Darklit_Minuet posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies. <cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted [p:910646996] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. </quote> Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal</quote> "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 7:40:11 PM #37:	Darmik posted... DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Yeah if the robber raped his victim and she needed to have an abortion I think that's fair. No matter how you frame it, you're punishing one person (with the death penalty, no less) for the actions of a different person here. Considering that support for abortion generally comes from the same people who cry about "what about those who are innocent?" when it comes to the death penalty, that's pretty fucking hilarious. --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910647003] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Yeah if the robber raped his victim and she needed to have an abortion I think that's fair.</quote> No matter how you frame it, you're punishing one person (with the death penalty, no less) for the actions of a different person here. Considering that support for abortion generally comes from the same people who cry about "what about those who are innocent?" when it comes to the death penalty, that's pretty fucking hilarious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Calwings 10/16/18 7:40:50 PM #38:	DarkTransient posted... Rape, no. While I can definitely have some sympathy, it still doesn't justify ending a third party's life (though I'd be 100% fine with "aborting" the rapist). The way I see it, a lot of women would rather not carry around a constant reminder of the time they were raped for nine months. While simply putting the baby up for adoption after birth is an option, the nine months leading up to that could still cause a lot of mental trauma for the woman. Though it's not as clear and dry as "the mother might die if the baby is born" like in the second case that I mentioned (and you agreed with), it's still a case of the mother suffering a lot of harm in the process, just mentally instead of physically. --- "Someday I too will fly... and find you again!" https://imgur.com/7IJcR3h <cite>Calwings posted [p:910647031] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no. While I can definitely have some sympathy, it still doesn't justify ending a third party's life (though I'd be 100% fine with "aborting" the rapist).</quote> The way I see it, a lot of women would rather not carry around a constant reminder of the time they were raped for nine months. While simply putting the baby up for adoption after birth is an option, the nine months leading up to that could still cause a lot of mental trauma for the woman. Though it's not as clear and dry as "the mother might die if the baby is born" like in the second case that I mentioned (and you agreed with), it's still a case of the mother suffering a lot of harm in the process, just mentally instead of physically.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 10/16/18 7:41:41 PM #39:	DarkTransient posted... Darmik posted... DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Yeah if the robber raped his victim and she needed to have an abortion I think that's fair. No matter how you frame it, you're punishing one person (with the death penalty, no less) for the actions of a different person here. Considering that support for abortion generally comes from the same people who cry about "what about those who are innocent?" when it comes to the death penalty, that's pretty fucking hilarious. They're not related at all. One is a clump of cells with no consciousness or sense of self inhabiting the body of another human being (akin to a parasite), the other is a human being that may or may not have made shitty choices to end up in the position to be legally executed. --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910647081] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Yeah if the robber raped his victim and she needed to have an abortion I think that's fair.</quote> No matter how you frame it, you're punishing one person (with the death penalty, no less) for the actions of a different person here. Considering that support for abortion generally comes from the same people who cry about "what about those who are innocent?" when it comes to the death penalty, that's pretty fucking hilarious.</quote> They're not related at all. One is a clump of cells with no consciousness or sense of self inhabiting the body of another human being (akin to a parasite), the other is a human being that may or may not have made shitty choices to end up in the position to be legally executed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 7:42:17 PM #40:	Tmaster148 posted... DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist. Yes, a rape apologist that's perfectly fine with punishing the rapist with the death penalty, and simply objects to a third party that wasn't even alive at the time of the rape being put to death over it. --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910647103] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist.</quote> Yes, a rape apologist that's perfectly fine with punishing the rapist with the death penalty, and simply objects to a third party that wasn't even alive at the time of the rape being put to death over it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Inferno Dive Dragoon 10/16/18 7:42:20 PM #41:	SageHarpuiaHX posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies. If you're going to shitpost, could you at least step up on your main? --- Les aristocrates a la lanterne! Les aristocrates on les pendra! <cite>Inferno Dive Dragoon posted [p:910647104] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. </quote> Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal</quote> "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies.</quote> If you're going to shitpost, could you at least step up on your main?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 10/16/18 7:42:42 PM #42:	SageHarpuiaHX posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies. If you don't want someone to be in your home, you have every right to kick them out <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:910647127] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. </quote> Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal</quote> "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies.</quote> If you don't want someone to be in your home, you have every right to kick them out</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SageHarpuiaHX 10/16/18 7:43:31 PM #43:	Darklit_Minuet posted... SageHarpuiaHX posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies. If you don't want someone to be in your home, you have every right to kick them out Dude, that scenario would get you put in prison for negligent homicide <cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted [p:910647168] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. </quote> Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal</quote> "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies.</quote> If you don't want someone to be in your home, you have every right to kick them out</quote> Dude, that scenario would get you put in prison for negligent homicide</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unbreakable 10/16/18 7:43:42 PM #44:	Darklit_Minuet posted... SageHarpuiaHX posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies. If you don't want someone to be in your home, you have every right to kick them out Or kill them if you're in a "stand your ground" state --- But Wait... there's more <cite>Unbreakable posted [p:910647182] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. </quote> Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal</quote> "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies.</quote> If you don't want someone to be in your home, you have every right to kick them out</quote> Or kill them if you're in a "stand your ground" state</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik 10/16/18 7:44:15 PM #45:	DarkTransient posted... Darmik posted... DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Yeah if the robber raped his victim and she needed to have an abortion I think that's fair. No matter how you frame it, you're punishing one person (with the death penalty, no less) for the actions of a different person here. Considering that support for abortion generally comes from the same people who cry about "what about those who are innocent?" when it comes to the death penalty, that's pretty fucking hilarious. It's not a person yet. You're just punishing a victim for something that she had absolutely no control over. It's a ridiculous burden to put on a victim of rape. To expect her to give birth and raise a life that only exist because of something terrible happening to her. --- Kind Regards, Darmik <cite>Darmik posted [p:910647209] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darmik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Yeah if the robber raped his victim and she needed to have an abortion I think that's fair.</quote> No matter how you frame it, you're punishing one person (with the death penalty, no less) for the actions of a different person here. Considering that support for abortion generally comes from the same people who cry about "what about those who are innocent?" when it comes to the death penalty, that's pretty fucking hilarious.</quote> It's not a person yet. You're just punishing a victim for something that she had absolutely no control over. It's a ridiculous burden to put on a victim of rape. To expect her to give birth and raise a life that only exist because of something terrible happening to her.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 10/16/18 7:44:31 PM #46:	SageHarpuiaHX posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... SageHarpuiaHX posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies. If you don't want someone to be in your home, you have every right to kick them out Dude, that scenario would get you put in prison for negligent homicide If you don't want someone in your house, they have to leave your house. Period. In the case of newborns you have to drop them off at an orphanage or fire station, but they have zero right to be in your house against your will <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:910647226] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. </quote> Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal</quote> "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies.</quote> If you don't want someone to be in your home, you have every right to kick them out</quote> Dude, that scenario would get you put in prison for negligent homicide</quote> If you don't want someone in your house, they have to leave your house. Period. In the case of newborns you have to drop them off at an orphanage or fire station, but they have zero right to be in your house against your will</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/16/18 7:44:41 PM #47:	DarkTransient posted... Tmaster148 posted... DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist. Yes, a rape apologist that's perfectly fine with punishing the rapist with the death penalty, and simply objects to a third party that wasn't even alive at the time of the rape being put to death over it. You want the rapist to have an offspring. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:910647234] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist.</quote> Yes, a rape apologist that's perfectly fine with punishing the rapist with the death penalty, and simply objects to a third party that wasn't even alive at the time of the rape being put to death over it.</quote> You want the rapist to have an offspring.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 7:44:42 PM #48:	Inferno Dive Dragoon posted... SageHarpuiaHX posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... DarkTransient posted... The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies. If you're going to shitpost, could you at least step up on your main? If you're having a hard time figuring out who exactly that account's main is, I feel really sorry for you. I barely bother to familiarize myself with the various CEmen and even I can tell exactly who it is. --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910647235] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Inferno Dive Dragoon posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuiaHX posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>The former, because all other forms of killing a person without very good justification (ie: either as a penalty after a fair trial, or in self-defence) are illegal, and just because someone is a bit younger shouldn't exempt them from that protection. </quote> Exactly. "I do not consent for you to be in my body" is a very good justification, therefore it should be legal</quote> "I do not consent to you being in my home" isn't a good justification for putting a newborn outside to starve, and there's not much difference between these analogies.</quote> If you're going to shitpost, could you at least step up on your main?</quote> If you're having a hard time figuring out who exactly that account's main is, I feel really sorry for you. I barely bother to familiarize myself with the various CEmen and even I can tell exactly who it is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 7:45:51 PM #49:	Tmaster148 posted... DarkTransient posted... Tmaster148 posted... DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist. Yes, a rape apologist that's perfectly fine with punishing the rapist with the death penalty, and simply objects to a third party that wasn't even alive at the time of the rape being put to death over it. You want the rapist to have an offspring. No, but if they already have one - which they do by the time abortion is considered - there is no reason to punish said offspring for their father's actions. I mean, if your dad went out and raped someone or murdered someone or whatever, should you receive the punishment? Or should he be the only one who receives any? --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910647300] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist.</quote> Yes, a rape apologist that's perfectly fine with punishing the rapist with the death penalty, and simply objects to a third party that wasn't even alive at the time of the rape being put to death over it.</quote> You want the rapist to have an offspring.</quote> No, but if they already have one - which they do by the time abortion is considered - there is no reason to punish said offspring for their father's actions. I mean, if your dad went out and raped someone or murdered someone or whatever, should you receive the punishment? Or should he be the only one who receives any?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 10/16/18 7:46:30 PM #50:	DarkTransient posted... Tmaster148 posted... DarkTransient posted... Tmaster148 posted... DarkTransient posted... YUHH posted... DarkTransient posted... Rape, no maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months" "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring." Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist. Yes, a rape apologist that's perfectly fine with punishing the rapist with the death penalty, and simply objects to a third party that wasn't even alive at the time of the rape being put to death over it. You want the rapist to have an offspring. No, but if they already have one - which they do by the time abortion is considered - there is no reason to punish said offspring for their father's actions. I mean, if your dad went out and raped someone or murdered someone or whatever, should you receive the punishment? Or should he be the only one who receives any? Why should the mother be punished for a terrible thing that happened to her against her will? --- https://i.imgtc.com/jUodQdE.jpg Barbecue confederate flags over spare time <cite>YUHH posted [p:910647334] in Why is it ... [t:77103891]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>YUHH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Rape, no</quote> maximum kek level reached "Sorry you got raped, now have this rape baby you never wanted and the literal hell your body is going to go through for the next 9 months"</quote> "You got robbed, we'll lock the robber up for a few years, and kill his offspring."</quote> Sounds like you might just be a rape apologist.</quote> Yes, a rape apologist that's perfectly fine with punishing the rapist with the death penalty, and simply objects to a third party that wasn't even alive at the time of the rape being put to death over it.</quote> You want the rapist to have an offspring.</quote> No, but if they already have one - which they do by the time abortion is considered - there is no reason to punish said offspring for their father's actions. I mean, if your dad went out and raped someone or murdered someone or whatever, should you receive the punishment? Or should he be the only one who receives any?</quote> Why should the mother be punished for a terrible thing that happened to her against her will?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8

Current Events > Why is it important for abortion and gay marriage to be illegal? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Why is it important for abortion and gay marriage to be illegal?